Chief Justice BR Gavai to hear Waqf law, marital rape, right to religion cases
CONSTITUTION BENCH MATTERS: There are 20 pending matters before five-judge benches, five matters before seven-judge benches, and three matters before nine-judge benches in the Supreme Court.These include the right to religion matters arising out of the Sabarimala temple dispute, a labour law matter before a nine-judge bench pending since 2001, an issue of data privacy on Whatsapp and the Delhi Government's dispute with the Centre over control of services, among others.WAQF AMENDMENT ACT: More than 120 petitions were filed before the Supreme Court after Parliament passed the Waqf Amendment Act on April 4. On April 17, a bench headed by the then CJI Sanjiv Khanna agreed to hear the issue of challenge to the Waf act. The bench asked the government to not touch certain provisions of the previous act and deferred the matter to be heard by a bench led by the new Chief Justice on May 15.advertisementKANCHA GACHIBOWLI FOREST LAND CASE: The Telangana government had announced it plans to auction some 400 acres of forested land adjacent to the University of Hyderabad (UoH) to build IT parks in February. This sparked widespread outrage and protests by Hyderabad University students, conservationists and others. The Supreme Court bench headed by Justice BR Gavai had intervened in the matter on April 17, issuing an immediate stay on the project, after being informed that bulldozers had been sent in to remove the trees in the "urban forest" area.This matter is now scheduled to be heard before the bench headed by Justice Gavai on May 15.POWER OF GOVERNORS TO HOLD BILLS: On April 8, a Supreme Court bench verdict restricted the power of the Governor of a State to "hold" bills passed by the legislature and imposed a timeline on the Governor and the President to take a decision on giving assent to the bills. A dispute over similar action by the Kerala Governor remains pending before the Supreme Court.MARITAL RAPE ISSUE: The issue of the criminalisation of 'marital rape' is an important legal question before the Top Court. Organisations and individuals fighting for the equal rights of women have challenged Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 63 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, which criminalise rape.advertisementThe case came to the Supreme Court in April 2022. The bench began hearing the case on October 17, 2024, but the bench headed by then Justice of India DY Chandrachud adjourned the matter as he was due to retire. The matter was not listed for hearing during the tenure of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna.DIGNITY OF JUDICIARY: Several issues have come up in the last few months which raised concerns about the dignity and role of the Judiciary. From the corruption allegations after the Justice Yashwant Varma case to statements being made by Government Ministers and even the Vice President questioning "overreach" by the Judiciary, Chief Justice Gavai will have to put the debate to rest.Tune InTrending Reel
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
25 minutes ago
- India.com
Malegaon verdict: Owaisi questions BJP's 'hypocrisy' on terrorism, asks if Centre, Maha govt will...
(File) Malegaon verdict: AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi on Thursday questioned the 'hypocrisy' of the BJP government on terrorism over the acquittal of all the seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case, and hoped the Centre will challenge the verdict in the Supreme Court. The seven accused who were acquitted by a special court in Mumbai include former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit. The September 2008 blasts near a mosque in the Maharashtra town killed six persons and injured 101. Speaking to reporters in the Parliament complex, Owaisi said, 'Will the Modi government and the Maharashtra government challenge the verdict in Supreme Court? Or will they continue their hypocrisy on terrorism?' He said the acquittal, coming 17 years after the blasts, raises serious questions about the investigation. 'First, the Mumbai ATS under Hemant Karkare probed the case, and then it went to the NIA. The investigation was deeply flawed. Despite the NIA saying military-grade RDX was used, no accountability has been fixed as to where that RDX came from,' he said. Owaisi also referred to earlier blasts, including the 2006 Malegaon attack and the Samjhauta Express bombing, arguing that justice has been denied across multiple cases. 'Who carried out the Samjhauta blast? Who was behind Mecca Masjid, Ajmer, and Mumbai train blasts? Even in the 2006 Malegaon case, Muslims were arrested and brutally tortured. They were later discharged. So who really did it,' he asked. The AIMIM chief also criticised the 'double standards' in terrorism cases, saying, 'There cannot be two approaches to terrorism. There has been no closure for the families of the victims, whether it's Malegaon, Samjhauta, Mumbai, or Mecca Masjid.' He also recalled how in 2015, special prosecutor Rohini Salian alleged pressure to go soft on the accused in the Malegaon blasts case. 'In 2017, the NIA reintroduced Pragya Thakur's name in the chargesheet. So, who will be held accountable for this mess,' he asked. Targeting the BJP's stand against saffron terror claims, Owaisi said, 'Was the person who killed Mahatma Gandhi Chinese? Who assassinated Rajiv Gandhi? Who killed Indira Gandhi?' Demanding the government to explain if it intends to appeal the acquittal, Owaisi said, 'If the real culprits are roaming free, the country has the right to know who bombed Malegaon in 2008?' (Only the headline has been reworked by staff. Copy comes from an agency feed)
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Will first hear on maintainability issue on August 6 on pleas seeking review of PMLA verdict: SC
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday said it would first hear arguments on August 6 on the issue of maintainability of the petitions seeking a review of its July 2022 verdict that upheld the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) powers to arrest, attach properties allegedly involved in money laundering, and carry out search and seizure under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). A three-judge bench of Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh noted that the ED has proposed three preliminary issues that primarily deal with the question of the review petitions' maintainability. The bench said the review petitioners have proposed 13 questions for its consideration. It noted the submissions of the questions raised by both parties and fixed the matter for further hearing on August 6. 'Since the proposed issues are arising in the review proceedings, we propose to first hear the parties on the issue of maintainability of the review petitions, followed by a hearing on the questions proposed to be raised on behalf of the review petitioners. Eventually, the questions that would finally arise for consideration will also be determined by us if we hold that the review petitions are maintainable,' the bench observed. The Supreme Court had on 4 May 2025 reconstituted a new bench to hear a batch of review petitions filed against the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary (VMC) judgment, which upheld certain provisions of the PMLA. The VMC judgment was delivered on 27 July 2022 by a three-judge bench headed by Justice A M Khanwilkar, and Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and C T Ravikumar (all now retired). It upheld certain provisions of the PMLA. 'Sections 5, 8 (4), 15, 17 and 19 of PMLA, relating to the Directorate's power of attachment, search and seizure, and arrest is upheld,' the top court had said.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
PPS alleges land grab by Pusapati family, seeks Rythu Bazaar land records
Pattana Powra Samskshema Sangham (PPS) District Secretary Reddy Shankara Rao on Thursday demanded that the government reveal documents related to the Rythu Bazaar at old Maharaja hospital. He alleged that the Pusapati family made a false claim and used their influence to secure GOs in their favour to get back the over ₹100 crore worth land. The PPS organised a roundtable conference in Vizianagaram and vowed to intensify their struggle for the establishment of the farmers' market within the same premises. Mr. Reddy Shankar Rao said that the Pusapati family cannot claim ownership of public properties, as they were acquired long ago by the government under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act. Uttrandhra Abhivruddhi Vedika convener M. Srinivasa raised concerns over the demolition of the famous Simhachalam meda (building), one of the oldest heritage structures in Vizianagaram, which was used as the Rotary Club's hospital. Vizianagaram Colonies and Apartments Association leader U. S. Ravikumar, CITU district secretary Venkatesh and others asked the government to protect heritage structures and restore the farmers' market within the original premises.
