
Top Andrew Cuomo Donor Didn't Even Rank Him First In NYC Primary
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A top donor to former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo's super PAC on Wednesday said he did not rank the candidate as his first choice in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary.
The donor, investor Mark Gorton, also told The New York Times he will likely throw his support behind Zohran Mamdani, the 33-year-old state assemblyman who on Tuesday toppled Cuomo in a stunning political upset, all but clinching the Democratic nomination.
Newsweek reached out to a spokesperson for Cuomo for comment via email on Wednesday.
Why It Matters
Mamdani's insurgent campaign sent shock waves through the political sphere, overcoming tens of millions of super PAC dollars poured into Cuomo's campaign and endorsements from Democratic heavy hitters including former President Bill Clinton and ex-New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg.
Mamdani's campaign, conversely, was fueled by grassroots support and endorsements from progressive giants like New York U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and independent Vermont U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, campaigned on rent freezes in the city, eliminating bus fares and increasing taxes on wealthy New Yorkers.
Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani speaks at his primary election party on June 25 in New York City.
Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani speaks at his primary election party on June 25 in New York City.
Heather Khalifa/AP
What To Know
Gorton gave $250,000 to Cuomo's "Fix the City" super PAC but told the Times he ranked New York City Comptroller Brad Lander as his first choice for mayor.
He added that he will likely support Mamdani because Lander and the state assemblyman cross-endorsed each other in the mayoral race.
"I feel like people misunderstood my $250,000 for Cuomo for real enthusiasm," Gorton told the Times. "It was basically, 'Oh, looks like Cuomo is coming back. We don't want to be shut out. Let's try and get on his good side.'"
Cuomo, who resigned from office in 2021 amid a cloud of sexual harassment allegations, largely represented the old guard of the Democratic Party.
After launching his mayoral campaign in March, Cuomo was sharply criticized by his primary opponents for skipping candidate forums, making few public appearances and coasting on name recognition (his father, Mario, served as New York governor from 1983 to 1994).
Cuomo conceded to Mamdani less than two hours after polls closed on Tuesday, when it became clear his campaign would not overcome the 7-point lead held by Mamdani.
As of 10:18 p.m. ET Wednesday, 93 percent of the votes had been counted and the Associated Press (AP) had not called the race. But Mamdani, who stood at 43.5 percent support, will almost certainly be the Democratic mayoral nominee, though it will be several days until a final outcome is announced, due to New York City's ranked choice voting system.
AP projected that no one candidate will get more than 50 percent of first-choice votes in the first round, meaning the candidate who's ranked first by the fewest number of voters will have their votes redistributed to voters' second-choice candidate. Voting will continue until there are two candidates left, at which point whoever has the most votes will be declared the victor.
What People Are Saying
Mamdani declared victory on Tuesday night, telling supporters at an election night party in Long Island City: "I will be the mayor for every New Yorker, whether you voted for me, for Governor Cuomo or felt too disillusioned by a long-broken political system to vote at all. I will fight for a city that works for you, that is affordable for you, that is safe for you, I will work to be a mayor you will be proud to call your own."
Cuomo called Mamdani to concede and later congratulated him at his own election night party, telling supporters: "Tonight was not our night. Tonight was Assemblyman Mamdani's night."
Cuomo went on to say his opponent "inspired [voters] and moved them and got them to come out and vote. He really ran a highly impactful campaign."
Lander said at his election night party: "This much is clear: Together, we are sending Andrew Cuomo back to the suburbs. With our help, Zohran Mamdani will be the Democratic nominee."
Ocasio-Cortez applauded Mamdani, writing on X: "Congratulations, @ZohranKMamdani! Your dedication to an affordable, welcoming, and safe New York City where working families can have a shot has inspired people across the city. Billionaires and lobbyists poured millions against you and our public finance system. And you won."
What Happens Next
Cuomo bowed out of the Democratic primary on Tuesday but has still secured an independent line on the mayoral ballot. He told CBS News that he's considering staying in the race: "The Democratic primary is always an interesting situation, right? There are about 5 million voters in New York City, there are about 8 million people in New York City, and about 1 million people vote in the Democratic primary. So it's not necessarily representative of the city at large."
He added: "That's why I qualified for an independent line in November, I did that several months ago, because in the general election, more people come out to vote. It's a broader pool, if you will, of New Yorkers, more representative pool of New Yorkers."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Paramount, President Trump Reach $16 Million Settlement Over 60 Minutes Lawsuit
Paramount will settle President Donald Trump's lawsuit over an October 60 Minutes interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris, CBS' parent company announced late Tuesday. The settlement, for $16 million, will be paid to Trump's future presidential library and also cover the plaintiffs' fees and costs. Neither Trump nor co-plaintiff Rep. Ronny Jackson will directly receive monies from the settlement. More from TVLine Matlock Duo Sing Us a Li'l Something, Rave That 'Everyone' Now Wants to Appear on the CBS Hit - WATCH In NCIS: Origins Season 2, Will Gibbs Go From 'Probie' to Assertive Agent? EP Previews 'Honest' Evolution Ahead FBI: International Co-Creator Reacts to Cancellation, Believes It 'Had Nothing to Do With the Quality' of Spinoff Paramount also agreed that 60 Minutes moving forward will release transcripts of interviews with any presidential candidates, minus any redactions dictated by national security concerns. Paramount will not issue an apology. The lawsuit, filed on Oct. 31 — just days before the presidential election — centered on CBS News' dissemination of two different clips of Democratic nominee Harris' thoughts on the conflict in the Middle East. A longer version aired on Face the Nation, while a shorter excerpt was used the next day on 60 Minutes. CBS News had always maintained that each excerpt reflected the substance of Harris' answer, and in February full transcripts were released to support that stance. Ten days prior to filing suit, Trump called for CBS to no less than 'lose its license,' which is not really a thing. ('The FCC does not and will not revoke licenses for broadcast stations simply because a political candidate disagrees with or dislikes content or coverage,' the commission made clear in October.) 'I've never seen anything like it,' Trump told Fox News' Media Buzz on Oct. 20. '[CBS decided to take] the whole ridiculous answer out, and it was a long answer, and replace it [on 60 Minutes] with a much shorter answer that she did having to do with a totally different subject.' 'Same question. Same answer. But a different portion of the response,' asserted an Oct. 21 statement from 60 Minutes. 'When we edit any interview… we strive to be clear, accurate and on point. The portion of her answer on 60 Minutes was more succinct, which allows time for other subjects in a wide-ranging, 21-minute-long segment.' Trump's lawsuit was filed in federal court in the Northern District of Texas Amarillo — where the lone judge is a 2019 Trump appointee — and made unusual use of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act, which is meant to keep advertisers from misleading the public about a product being sold. The plaintiffs originally sought $10 billion in damages, and bumped up the number to $20 billion in February, arguing that millions of Americans 'were confused and misled by the two doctored Interview versions.' After the suit was filed, longtime 60 Minutes executive producer Bill Owens announced his exit, saying it has 'become clear that I would not be allowed to run the show as I have always run it.' Wendy McMahon, CEO of CBS News and Stations, also stepped down, saying, 'It's become clear that the company and I do not agree on the path forward.' Paramount's settlement comes six months after ABC News agreed to apologize and pay $15 million to settle a suit brought by Trump for comments made on-air by George Stephanopoulos in March 2024. Of note, Paramount's $8.4 billion merger with Skydance Media is still awaiting approval from the FCC, which is now led by Trump appointee Brendan Carr, and recently let a soft May deadline come and go. Best of TVLine 'Missing' Shows, Found! Get the Latest on Ahsoka, Monarch, P-Valley, Sugar, Anansi Boys and 25+ Others Yellowjackets Mysteries: An Up-to-Date List of the Series' Biggest Questions (and Answers?) The Emmys' Most Memorable Moments: Laughter, Tears, Historical Wins, 'The Big One' and More

Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Siena poll pits Hochul against Stefanik, Blakeman, Lawler for governor
Jul. 1—Gov. Kathleen C. Hochul leads the pack of likely gubernatorial candidates for next year's election, and Rep. Elise M. Stefanik is slightly outmatched by Hudson Valley Rep. Mike R. Lawler in theoretical contests against the incumbent, according to the latest Siena College Research Institute poll. According to the poll released on Tuesday, Hochul has at least 20 points of advantage over any of the three Republicans who appear most likely to run for their party's nomination for governor; Stefanik, Lawler and Nassau County Executive Bruce A. Blakeman. In the three separate contests, SCRI found that Hochul would lead handily among Democrats and independents, and carry 44% of the vote against both Lawler and Blakeman, who would carry 24% and 19% of the vote respectively. Against Stefanik, more people said they'd vote for Hochul, 47%, to 24% who would go to Stefanik. Stefanik did the best of the three with GOP voters and independents, but more Democrats said they'd vote Hochul over her than in the other contests if the election scheduled for November 2026 were held today. "Recognizing that 16 months in politics is many lifetimes away, a first look at how New York voters feel about potential gubernatorial matchups shows that partisanship wins out. Hochul leads Lawler by 20 points, Stefanik by 23 points and Blakeman by 25 points," Siena College Research Institute Director Don Levy said in a statement alongside the poll results. Levy noted that Hochul isn't pulling great numbers for an incumbent in such a heavily Democratic state, and that between one-fourth and one-third of voters had no choice in each of the three match-ups. Hochul's job approval, favorability and basic reelection numbers aren't all positive either; while 50% approve of the job she's doing, more people dislike her, 47%, than like her, 42%, and only 37% said they'd reelect her versus a non-specific "other candidate." These numbers have stayed roughly the same for the last few months. For Stefanik, favorability numbers are likewise underwater, with 25% of voters reporting that they like her and 32% who dislike her. Lawler is more closely tied, with 22% who like him to 24% who do not and 54% who don't know him or have no opinion. In a Republican primary, Stefanik is most likely to win, but many minds are not made up. The numbers show that voters are favoring Stefanik 35%, to 18% for Lawler and 7% for Blakeman. In a Democratic primary, Hochul far outpaces her one declared opponent, Lt. Gov. Antonio Delgado. Delgado pulls 12% to Hochul's 49%, and Rep. Ritchie Torres, who has not declared a campaign for governor, gets 10%. "One year out from a potential primary, two in five Republicans don't know who they'll support among Stefanik, Lawler and Blakeman, but Stefanik maintains an early lead, 17 points ahead of Lawler, who is 11 points ahead of Blakeman," Levy said. "On the Democratic side, Hochul has huge leads of 37 points over Delgado and 39 points over Torres, each of whom remains largely unknown to more than half of Democrats." The poll also asked voters for their positions on a number of bills passed by the state legislature this year. Voters widely approved of the issues SCRI asked about, with at least 70% of Republicans, Democrats and independents each supporting a requirement that state agencies disclose when they use artificial intelligence and requiring state prisons to expand video and audio surveillance in prison common areas. At least 60% of Democrats, Republicans and independents also said they supported a move to create a state utility consumer advocate's office to advocate for consumers before the Public Service Commission when utility companies seek rate increases. A plurality of Republicans and a majority of Democrats and independents said they approved of a bill that allows the state attorney general to sue businesses on behalf of customers in cases of alleged unfair or abusive practices. Perhaps the most controversial single-issue bill considered this year was one to allow medically assisted suicide, termed "medical aid in dying," in New York. The SCRI poll found that 54% of all New Yorkers back the bill as passed. "While it doesn't have the same level of support as several other less controversial bills that passed the legislature at the end of session, voters support what some call medical aid in dying and others call physician assisted suicide, 54-28%. It has better than two-to-one support from Democrats and independents, and Republicans support it 48-39%," Levy said. "It has support from at least 53% of voters from every region of the state, and at least 54% support from young, middle-aged and older voters. Jewish voters, 53-30%, and Catholic voters, 52-30%, support it at virtually equal levels. All those major pieces of legislation await the governor's approval, veto or negotiation on amendments, which must come before the end of the year. This poll was conducted from June 23 to 26, reaching 800 New York voters via phone and an online polling platform. The margin of error is 4.4 percent in either direction.


The Hill
44 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats must embrace Mamdani as their party's future
In a stunning upset, Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, won New York City's Democratic mayoral primary. For a Democratic Party that has seemed sluggish and out of touch, with poll numbers near record lows, the Mamdani playbook of viral, energetic and proudly partisan politics is no longer an outsider strategy that can be ignored as electorally irrelevant. And with a majority of party infrastructure having clung tightly to a known sexual harasser, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, it is time to take a good hard look in the mirror. Washington has changed, even from the days of Senate Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) obstruction-as-a-rule uncooperative antagonism. The newer brand of partisanship calls to mind Al Smith, the 'happy warrior' of the early 1900s. Democrats wishing to hold their seats in Congress would do well to take notice. It is not about Mamdani being on the far left — just like it was never about Trump being on the far right. The American people are ready for a Democratic Party that will fight for its principles. They are ready for politicians that do more than regurgitate the same tired talking points — who don't equivocate or back down from positions just because the wind is blowing a different way. To put it plainly, voters want leaders with guts — and the new generation has got them. Mamdani and I both came to political consciousness during the Obama mania of 2008. We both watched that same president approve massive bailouts to the bankers and 'experts' who had caused the 2008 housing crash. Some of our earliest memories are of George W. Bush standing amid the wreckage of the World Trade Center, then lying through his teeth about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our generation has watched America get worse every year, as the Democratic Party has stood inert and ineffective at preventing the rollback of Roe v. Wade, the Trump presidency, the opioid epidemic and skyrocketing housing costs. How long can Democrats cling to outdated and unimaginative ideas that alienate their base? As Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) tour the nation drawing crowds in the thousands at every stop, Democratic elites embraced and endorsed a man who had resigned in disgrace four years earlier, then watched as his campaign crashed and burned. How long will it take party leaders to learn their lesson? We have a chance to inject energy and vitality into a party that sorely needs it. The Democrats can harness these young, happy warriors and let them lead from the front — a chance we pass up at our peril. Randall Schmollinger is an artificial intelligence and tech policy analyst working for Geopoly and the Saltzmann Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia University.