Daily subject-wise quiz: Polity and Governance MCQs on Lok Sabha, Justice Hema Committee and more (Week 114)
🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for May 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at manas.srivastava@indianexpress.com🚨
Which of the following part/s of the Constitution of India offer scope for introducing affirmative action?
1. Part III (Article 15 and 16)
2. Part IV (Directive Principles of State Policy)
3. Part IV-A (Fundamental Duties)
Select the correct answer using the codes given below:
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 1 only
(c) 2 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3
Explanation
— Part III (Article 15 and 16) and Part IV (Directive Principles of State Policy) of the Constitution offer scope for introducing affirmative action.
— Affirmative action is a policy that seeks to increase employment and educational possibilities for people who are under-represented in numerous aspects of our society. It is a series of policies designed to build a justified society for individuals who have previously faced discrimination by giving them priority access to education, employment, healthcare, social welfare, and other services.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
Consider the following statements:
Statement 1: In 1953, the government set up the First Backward Classes Commission under the chairmanship of Kaka Kalelkar.
Statement 2: It was formed to identify the 'socially and educationally backward' communities.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
(a) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are correct and Statement 2 is the correct explanation for Statement 1.
(b) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are correct and Statement 2 is not the correct explanation for Statement 1.
(c) Statement 1 is correct but Statement 2 is incorrect.
(d) Statement 1 is incorrect but Statement 2 is correct.
Explanation
— While the Constitution ensured reservation for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST), the identification of backward classes was a post-Constituent Assembly phenomenon.
— Responding to requests for quota for Other Backward Classes (OBCs), the Congress administration established the First Backward Classes Commission in 1953, chaired by Kaka Kalelkar, to identify 'socially and educationally backward' communities. Hence, statements 1 and 2 are correct.
— The committee classified 2,399 castes as 'socially and educationally backward' based on their social status in the caste hierarchy, educational advancement, and representation in government services, trade, commerce, and industry. Because the panel believed caste to be the sole basis for determining backwardness, rather than economic position, the then-Congress government rejected the findings and allowed the states complete authority to determine the backward classes in their respective regions.
Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are correct and Statement 2 is the correct explanation for Statement 1.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
Initially, the Eighth Schedule listed 14 languages. Which of the following languages were not among the 14 languages?
1. English
2. Sindhi
3. Marathi
4. Punjabi
Select the correct answer using the codes given below:
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 2 and 3 only
(c) 3 and 4 only
(d) 2 and 4 only
Explanation
— Every year, February 21 is observed as International Mother Tongue Day, a day with special significance in India, where hundreds of mother tongues are spoken across the subcontinent.
— Initially, the Eighth Schedule listed 14 languages: Assamese, Bengali, Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Kashmiri, Malayalam, Marathi, Oriya (renamed Odiya in 2011), Punjabi, Sanskrit, Tamil, Telugu, and Urdu.
— English is not one of the 22 languages in the Eighth Schedule, however Sindhi was added to the Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution by the 21st Amendment Act of 1967.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
The Justice Hema Committee was formed:
(a) to draft a National Policy on Criminal Justice aimed at comprehensive reforms in the criminal justice system.
(b) to examine the structure and functioning of police forces in India and recommend reforms to make them more accountable and professional.
(c) to investigate sexual harassment and gender inequality in the industry.
(d) to suggest reforms in the criminal justice system to make it more efficient and people-friendly.
Explanation
— The Kerala police withdrew 35 sexual assault complaints filed after the Kerala government announced the Justice Hema Committee report on August 19, 2024.
— In July 2017, the Kerala government established the Justice Hema Committee to look into sexual harassment and gender discrimination in the industry. This was the first such committee established by any state in the country.
— The report discovered a culture of sexual harassment in the Malayalam cinema industry. The Committee reported the existence of a casting couch (in which powerful men demand sexual favours from women in exchange for film roles), frequent suggestive and vulgar comments made by men at work, and drunk male co-actors forcing themselves into women's rooms, among other things.
— The Committee also discovered that numerous women did not report cases of sexual assault for fear of retaliation.
Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.
With reference to the rights of minorities, consider the following statements:
1. Article 30 of the Constitution of India provides for the rights of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions.
2. Only religion-based minorities shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
3. The State can discriminate against any educational institution in awarding funding because it is managed by a minority, regardless of religion or language.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) All three
(d) None
Explanation
— Article 30 of the Constitution of India provides for the rights of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions. Hence, statement 1 is correct.
— All minorities, regardless of religion or language, have the right to create and run educational institutions of their choosing. Hence, statement 2 is not correct.
— When enacting any law providing for the compulsory acquisition of any property of an educational institution established and administered by a minority, the State must ensure that the amount fixed by or determined under such law for the acquisition of such property does not restrict or abrogate the right guaranteed.
— The State shall not discriminate against any educational institution in awarding funding because it is managed by a minority, regardless of religion or language. Hence, statement 3 is not correct.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
(Source: Constitution of India)
Why is the Lok Sabha called the popular chamber?
(a) A joint session of Parliament is chaired by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha.
(b) The strength of Lok Sabha is and will always be greater than that of Rajya Sabha
(c) It is composed of representatives of the people chosen by direct election on the basis of adult suffrage.
(d) The Lok Sabha has greater authority in financial matters than the Rajya Sabha.
Explanation
According to FAQs at sansad.in
— 'The Lok Sabha is composed of representatives of the people chosen by direct election on the basis of adult suffrage. That is why it is called the popular chamber.'
Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.
Consider the following key Acts:
1. The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA)
2. The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA)
3. The Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 (FEOA)
4. The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (COFEPOSA), 1974
Which of the above acts is the Enforcement Directorate empowered to enforce:
(a) 1, 2 and 3 only
(b) 1 and 4 only
(c) 2, 3and 4 only
(d) 1, 2, 3 and 4
Explanation
Mandate to enforce laws
— While the ED has a broad mandate to investigate offences related to money laundering and foreign exchange violations, it's empowered to enforce the following key laws:
— The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA): The ED traces assets from money laundering activities and is responsible for ensuring the prosecution of offenders and confiscation (permanent seizure of ownership, usually after conviction) of such assets.
— The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA): The law enforcement agency is also responsible for imposing penalties on offenders of FEMA and in the cases pertaining to violations committed prior to the repeal of the FERA of 1973, which FEMA replaced, thus being responsible for the handling of legacy FERA cases.
— The Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 (FEOA): The ED is mandated to attach (temporarily seizing of property without assuming ownership to prevent sale, usually during trial phase) and confiscate properties of economic offenders evading Indian law by fleeing abroad.
— The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (COFEPOSA), 1974: The Directorate is the sponsor of cases under the law and can initiate preventive detention proceedings on FEMA violations based on COFEPOSA.
(Refer to read more: As SC raps ED, a look at agency's powers, role and red lines)
Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.
With reference to the office of Deputy Speaker, consider the following statements:
1. Like the Speaker, the Constitution states that the Deputy Speaker must be appointed in the first sitting of the newly elected Member of Parliaments of the House of People.
2. The Deputy Speaker has the same general powers as the Speaker when presiding over the House.
3. There was no Deputy Speaker for the entire duration of the 16th, 17th and 18th Lok Sabha.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3
Explanation
— There was no Deputy Speaker for the entire duration of the 17th Lok Sabha (2019-24). M Thambi Durai of the AIADMK, a BJP ally at the time, was Deputy Speaker of the 16th Lok Sabha (2014-19). The Opposition had the post of Deputy Speaker continuously from 1990 through 2014. Hence, statement 3 is not correct.
— According to Article 95(1), the Deputy Speaker performs the duties of the Speaker if the post is vacant. The Deputy Speaker has the same general powers as the Speaker when presiding over the House. All references to the 'Speaker' in the Rules are deemed to be references to the Deputy Speaker as well for the times when he or she presides. Hence, statement 2 is correct.
— Both the Speaker and Deputy Speaker must be appointed 'as soon as may be'. Article 93 states that 'The House of the People shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the House to be respectively Speaker and Deputy Speaker'. Hence, statement 1 is not correct.
Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.
Daily Subject-wise quiz — History, Culture, and Social Issues (Week 114)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Polity and Governance (Week 113)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Science and Technology (Week 113)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Economy (Week 113)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Environment and Geography (Week 113)
Daily subject-wise quiz – International Relations (Week 113)
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week.
Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
Manas Srivastava is currently working as Senior Copy Editor with The Indian Express (digital) and leads a unique initiative of IE - UPSC Essentials. He majorly writes on UPSC, other competitive exams and education-related projects. In the past, Manas has represented India at the G-20 Youth Summit in Mexico. He is a former member of the Youth Council, GOI. A two-time topper/gold medallist in History (both in graduation and post-graduation) from Delhi University, he has mentored and taught UPSC aspirants for more than four years. His diverse role in The Indian Express consists of writing, editing, anchoring/ hosting, interviewing experts, and curating and simplifying news for the benefit of students. He hosts the YouTube talk show called 'Art and Culture with Devdutt Pattanaik' and a LIVE series on Instagram and YouTube called 'You Ask We Answer'.His talks on 'How to read a newspaper' focus on newspaper reading as an essential habit for students. His articles and videos aim at finding solutions to the general queries of students and hence he believes in being students' editor, preparing them not just for any exam but helping them to become informed citizens. This is where he makes his teaching profession meet journalism. He is also the editor of UPSC Essentials' monthly magazine for the aspirants. He is a recipient of the Dip Chand Memorial Award, the Lala Ram Mohan Prize and Prof. Papiya Ghosh Memorial Prize for academic excellence. He was also awarded the University's Post-Graduate Scholarship for pursuing M.A. in History where he chose to specialise in Ancient India due to his keen interest in Archaeology. He has also successfully completed a Certificate course on Women's Studies by the Women's Studies Development Centre, DU. As a part of N.S.S in the past, Manas has worked with national and international organisations and has shown keen interest and active participation in Social Service. He has led and been a part of projects involving areas such as gender sensitisation, persons with disability, helping slum dwellers, environment, adopting our heritage programme. He has also presented a case study on 'Psychological stress among students' at ICSQCC- Sri Lanka. As a compere for seminars and other events he likes to keep his orating hobby alive. His interests also lie in International Relations, Governance, Social issues, Essays and poetry. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
40 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Sexual harassment at workplace is antithetical to constitutional values: SC judge
Sexual harassment at workplace is antithetical to the core constitutional values of equality, liberty, justice and dignity of individual, Supreme Court judge N Kotiswar Singh said on Thursday, while mooting for creation of a conducive work environment for women. Sexual harassment at workplace is antithetical to constitutional values: SC judge The judge was speaking at the launch of a dedicated portal for workplace sexual harassment complaints by the Delhi high court. The portal was launched in the presence of chief justice DK Upadhyay and justice Prathiba M Singh, chairperson of Delhi high court's internal complaints committee (ICC). 'Any such act which negates the conducive atmosphere of the workplace has to be forbidden or prohibited. Sexual harassment demeans women, acts as a barrier to her creativity, slows down the efficacy causing immense mental and physical trauma, which is completely antithetical to the enabling principle of equality, liberty and justice– which forms the core values of the Constitution,' he said. He added, 'This menace, has to be taken head on and it is from this perspective that lies the significance and importance of this act and also assumes importance of the fact that today large number of women are joining and becoming partners in nation building exercise and are contributing meaningfully in all walks of life, which were exclusively reserved for men. There is a paradigm shift that is taking place, therefore it is incumbent on all of us to ensure that the workplace remains safe, secure, encouraging and not plagued by these insidious practices.' In his speech the judge also laid emphasis on some of the aspects that act as hurdle in ensuring a safe workplace for women including the cultural resistance in acknowledge certain acts of sexual harassment, mindset that women's role is confined to domestic sphere. 'One of the greatest challenge is the deep rooted cultural resistance in acknowledging certain acts of sexual harassment. In fact many organisations consider these complaints of sexual harassment as a threat of their reputation, rather than providing opportunities of growth. There is a need to sensitise the people that there are certain acts which are prohibited, which cannot be tolerated,' he said. Justice Singh said that it is important for men to understand what makes a female counterpart uncomfortable and to extend help or cooperation in case they face inappropriate behaviour. 'It is also equally important for men to extend help or cooperation whenever such a woman faces any such kind of inappropriate behaviour from the men. Not only cooperation but empathetic attitude. Certainly not sympathy. Because what women require is not an act of charity, but it is a solemn obligation on all of us to ensure the dignity of women,' he said.
Hindustan Times
41 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Sangh backs Hosable amid row over calls to review Preamble
The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) on Thursday doubled down on its general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale's statement about the need to review the inclusion of words 'secular' and 'socialist' in the Preamble to the Constitution of India, saying it was critical to take cognisance of the context in which these words were inserted during Emergency. Dattatreya Hosabale 'What he (Hosabale) said is that it is important to understand the context of how the words were inserted when Emergency was imposed in the country and atrocities and excesses were carried out. He spoke about the things that should be discussed and the need to debate these issues,' RSS chief spokesperson Sunil Ambekar said. Addressing an event in Delhi on June 26, Hosabale had called for reviewing the insertion of the words 'secular and socialist' in the Preamble. 'During the Emergency, two words, secular and socialist, were added to the Constitution, which were not part of the original Preamble. Later, these words were not removed. Should they remain or not… a debate must happen on this. These two words were not in Dr Ambedkar's Constitution. During the Emergency, the country had no functioning Parliament, no rights, no judiciary and yet these two words were added,' he had said. The changes were among those made in the contentious 42nd Amendment, passed in 1976. The RSS general secretary's remarks triggered a political slugfest; with the Opposition Congress accusing the RSS — the ideological mentor of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) — of wanting to 'destroy' the Constitution. 'The mask of RSS has come off again. The Constitution irks them because it speaks of equality, secularism and justice,' Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi said on X. 'The RSS, BJP do not want the Constitution, they want 'Manusmriti'. They aim to strip the marginalised and poor of their rights and enslave them again. Snatching a powerful weapon like the Constitution from them is their real agenda.' Ambekar was addressing a press conference in Delhi on the eve of the beginning of the three-day annual meeting of the All India Prant Pracharak, which will be attended by the top brass of RSS, including its chief Mohan Bhagwat. To a question on the Opposition's allegation that RSS does not give representation to the socially marginalised and backward communities within the organisation, Ambekar said the Sangh is a social organisation that works with the intent to promote social harmony and unity. 'The Sangh does not work like a political party. We work to unite people on the ground and take all sections along…that is the reason why the Sangh attracts support nationwide,' he said. The RSS functionary also lent support to the Union government's decision to conduct caste enumeration along with the decennial Census. He said while the thrust of the organisation's work is social harmony, whatever work needs to be done for the welfare of the people should be carried out. 'The government can take whatever information is needed for that,' he added. Giving details of the three-day meeting, which will be attended by 233 RSS functionaries taking stock of the work undertaken by various offshoots of the organisation, Ambekar said the centenary year of the Sangh is the main agenda of the meeting. 'All the programmes (to mark the centenary year) that had been announced, their working will be discussed. Hindu sammelans (conferences) to discuss important issues will be held across the country, beginning Vijayadashami on October 2,' he said. The RSS will complete 100 years of its foundation on Vijayadashmi this year, which falls on October 2. As part of the centenary outreach, volunteers will organise door-to-door interactions called 'Griha Sampark', giving details about the ideology and work of the Sangh and share literature about its functioning, the functionary said. 'Meetings of eminent persons at district levels will be held after the Vijayadashami programme. Special sessions with Bhagwat ji will be held in four cities — Delhi, Bengaluru, Mumbai and Kolkata,' Ambekar added. The three-day meeting is also expected to take stock of issues related to national security, as well as those pertaining to illegal immigration and atrocities against Hindus in Bangladesh.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Pune court rejects plea to compel Rahul Gandhi to submit book in Savarkar defamation case
The special member of Parliament – member of legislative assembly (MP-MLA) court on Thursday rejected an application seeking to compel Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to submit a copy of the book he was referring to during a speech in London on March 2, 2023, in which he allegedly made defamatory remarks about Hindutva icon, Veer Savarkar. The complaint alleged that Rahul Gandhi had made false and defamatory statements during his 2023 London speech, including a claim that Savarkar had written about enjoying assaulting a Muslim man in his book. (HT FILE) 'No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself. The burden of proof lies entirely on the complainant. Hence, the application filed by the complainant is liable to be rejected and is accordingly rejected,' judicial magistrate Amol Shinde said in the order pronounced in open court on July 3. Advocate Sangram Kolhatkar, appearing for Satyaki Savarkar – Veer Savarkar's grand-nephew who filed the defamation complaint under section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) last year – had argued that Gandhi's lawyer was deliberately delaying proceedings which are currently at the stage of recording the plea. Advocate Kolhatkar maintained that the book in question is essential to ensuring a fair trial. In response, Gandhi's lawyer, advocate Milind Pawar, strongly opposed the plea, stating that the trial had not yet commenced and therefore Gandhi could not be compelled to disclose any part of his defence or supporting documents. Advocate Pawar argued that the burden of proof lies solely on the complainant and compelling the accused to produce material at this stage would violate the accused's constitutional protection under Article 20(3) which safeguards against self-incrimination. Advocate Pawar submitted, 'The complainant is required to prove his case beyond reasonable doubt. The accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Forcing the defence to prematurely disclose material is not permitted under criminal law and violates constitutional guarantees.' Advocate Pawar further argued, 'There is no legal obligation on the defence to provide any document or material to the complainant. Such a direction would seriously prejudice the accused's right to a fair trial and his ability to defend himself effectively.' After hearing the arguments from both sides, the court noted that the case is still at the stage of recording the accused's plea, and that it arises from a private complaint. The court held that the burden of proving the allegations lies entirely on the complainant. The court observed: 'Gandhi cannot be compelled to disclose or submit any part of his defence before the trial formally begins. He is entitled to present relevant documents at the defence stage as per the law. Forcing the accused to produce material at this preliminary stage would infringe upon his constitutional protection under Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India, which protects against compelled self-incrimination.' The complaint alleged that Rahul Gandhi had made false and defamatory statements during his 2023 London speech, including a claim that Savarkar had written about enjoying assaulting a Muslim man in his book. Gandhi had earlier been exempted from appearing before the MP-MLA court presided over by magistrate Shinde and was granted bail on a bond of ₹25,000. He was also granted permanent exemption from personal court appearances, citing his public responsibilities and security considerations
