&w=3840&q=100)
Xiaomi succeeds where Apple failed as its new EV surpasses 289K orders
Lei Jun, founder and chairman of Xiaomi Corp., the only tech company to have successfully diversified into carmaking, couldn't resist.
Speaking at a triumphant launch event in Beijing late last month for Xiaomi's second electric vehicle, a long-anticipated SUV, Lei pointedly mentioned Apple Inc., which spent a decade and $10 billion trying to make a car before giving up last year.
'Since Apple stopped developing its car, we've given special care to Apple users,' he said, noting that owners of the American giant's iPhones would be able to seamlessly sync their devices to Xiaomi's vehicles.
Xiaomi succeeding where Apple failed has burnished Lei's reputation, made his company one of the most valuable in China and shaken up both the tech and automobile industries.
The collapse of Apple's moonshot car program has only underscored the effectiveness of Xiaomi's grounded approach, which took inspiration from proven designs from Tesla Inc. and Porsche Automobil Holding SE while staying true to the affordable ethos that's made it a cult brand for Gen Z consumers.
Crucially, it also launched into the most fertile EV ecosystem in the world — China. With state subsidies, existing charging infrastructure and a ready made supply chain, Xiaomi had a structural tailwind Apple lacked.
Xiaomi declined to comment for this story.
Lei and Xiaomi's 'charisma, brand recognition and ecosystem cannot be underestimated,' Yale Zhang, the managing director of Shanghai-based consultancy Automotive Foresight, said. 'It's a big influence on young consumers who have filled their homes with Xiaomi products. When it comes time to buy an EV, they naturally think of Xiaomi.'
But building cars is a far more complex, capital intensive challenge than making phones or rice cookers. It requires mastering safety regulations, global logistics and production at scale, all while competing against legacy automakers with long histories and large model lineups. Any international expansion will also require navigating complex geopolitical landscapes. As one of the first tech giants to actually manufacture a car, Xiaomi is in uncharted territory.
Apple's Failings
Apple's car project, internally dubbed Project Titan, failed in large part because it wasn't just an EV — it was at one point an attempt to leapfrog the auto industry with a fully autonomous, Level 5 self-driving machine. Its goals were lofty and the direction constantly shifting, the result being over a decade of effort with nothing to show.
Lei, 55, was comparatively stingy with time and resources and staked his personal reputation on the endeavor, claiming that making cars would be his 'last entrepreneurial project.'
Xiaomi's public narrative is that Lei and his team learned by visiting multiple Chinese automakers, including Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co. and Great Wall Motor Co., and talked to more than 200 industry experts in some 80 meetings.
The reality is also that he used Xiaomi's reputation as an innovative consumer behemoth to get close to China's large carmakers and pick off their top talent. Geely and its billionaire founder Li Shufu welcomed Lei to the automaker's research institute in Ningbo in the months leading up to Xiaomi's announcement that it would enter the car business to discuss topics, including potential collaboration.
It's Geely lore that Lei added the WeChat contacts of many staff at the institute, including then-director Hu Zhengnan. Hu later joined Shunwei Capital Partners, the investment firm co-founded by Lei.
Recruitment Tactics
Xiaomi headhunters also courted Geely staff intensely, according to people familiar with the matter. While it's common for talent to move between companies in the same industry, it was unusual to see this level of aggressiveness around recruitment, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing information that's private. Geely didn't respond to a request for comment.
Hu, known for his love of the German luxury marque Porsche, was one of the team members credited as being instrumental to developing Xiaomi's EV business, Lei said at the SU7 launch in 2024. Lei added that Hu left his previous employer after his contract ended.
Other executives who joined Xiaomi came from companies including BAIC Motor Corp., BMW AG, SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile Co. — the General Motors Co. joint venture with SAIC Motor Corp. and Wuling Motors Holdings Ltd. — and auto supplier Magna Steyr LLC.
Besides assembling top Chinese automaking talent, Lei made a prescient bet on investing in a self-controlled supply chain — insulating Xiaomi's operation from manufacturing vagaries. This came from painful lessons learned in Xiaomi's early smartphone-producing days, when external suppliers would cut off components unpredictably.
In 2016, some members of Xiaomi's supply chain team displeased Samsung Electronics Co. representatives and the South Korean firm threatened to halt supply of its industry-leading AMOLED screens.
To mend the fractured relationship, Lei flew to Shenzhen to meet with Samsung's China head at the time. The pair drank five bottles of red wine during their dinner meeting, according to a Xiaomi company biography, and Lei also made multiple trips to Samsung's headquarters in South Korea to apologize and negotiate the resumption of supply. Representatives from Samsung declined to comment.
After Xiaomi went into the carmaking business, it invested into almost all parts of the EV supply chain, from batteries and chips to air suspension and sensors. It pumped more than $1.6 billion via Shunwei or other Xiaomi-led funds into over 100 supply chain companies between 2021 and 2024, according to data compiled by Chinese analytics firm Zhangtongshe and Bloomberg.
The components from some of the companies that Xiaomi invested in have ended up in its cars, such as lidars from Hesai Technology Co. and onboard chargers and voltage converters from Zhejiang EV-Tech Co.
With the 10 billion yuan ($1.4 billion) it committed to the first phase of its EV venture, Xiaomi also built its own factory, rather than going down the contract manufacturing route that some Chinese makers, including Nio Inc. and Xpeng Inc., did when they started out.
'Among tech companies that now build electric vehicles, those who previously had hardware products seem to be more successful than those who only had software products or information services,' said Paul Gong, UBS Group AG's head of China autos research.
Copycat Allegations
Despite its early success, there are many who argue Xiaomi's one hit car is copied from elsewhere — and that a sole successful vehicle does not a successful auto producer make. Lei's aggressive approach has also raised hackles in China's car industry.
Yu Jingmin, vice president of SAIC's passenger car division, reportedly described Xiaomi's approach as 'shameless' in a critique of the SU7 resembling Porsche. The SU7 has been colloquially dubbed 'Porsche Mi' by netizens. SAIC didn't respond to questions about Yu's remarks.
Xiaomi's design team, led by former BMW designer Li Tianyuan, has defended the SU7's aesthetics, emphasizing that the choices were driven by aerodynamic efficiency and performance benchmarks.
In late March, there was another setback after a fatal accident involving the SU7. The car had its advanced driver assistance technology turned on before the crash, which afterward led to authorities reining in the promotion and deployment of the technology.
The usually vocal Lei kept a low profile on social media for more than a month post the March accident. He returned to more active engagement in May with a missive that said this period of time was the most difficult in his career.
Fortunately for Xiaomi, its consumer base is sticky. Known as 'Mi Fans,' the loyal customers have played a pivotal role in the company's rise. Xiaomi cultivated this fandom early on by prioritizing user feedback and the grassroots allegiance has helped it build strong brand equity, especially in China. The SU7 has remained a top selling model even after the accident in March.
Indeed, dealers have reported that nearly 50 per cent of customers plump for the SU7 without comparing it to other brands. 'A significant number of older consumers are buying the SU7 for their children, indicating that the model has built trust among more conservative buyers thanks to its safety and quality,' said Rosalie Chen, a senior analyst from investment research firm Third Bridge.
Small Scale
Xiaomi has set a delivery target of 350,000 units in 2025, up from its previous goal of 300,000, buoyed by demand for the newly launched YU7 and a ramp up in production. The starting prices for the SU7 sedan, at 215,900 yuan ($30,100), and its SUV, at 253,500 yuan, make them competitive alternatives to models like Tesla's Model 3 and Model Y.
The EVs are also showing financial promise. Xiaomi posted record revenue for the first quarter this year, driven by car and smartphone sales. Its EV division is expected to turn profitable in the second half of 2025, Lei said in an investor meeting in June.
But even if the popularity of Xiaomi's EVs can spring beyond the company's devoted base, production is still on a much more boutique scale. China's top car brand, BYD Co., sold around 4.3 million EVs and hybrids last year, many overseas, while Tesla moved about 1.78 million vehicles globally. Toyota Motor Corp., the world's No. 1 automaker, sold some 10.8 million vehicles and boasts a lineup of approximately 70 different models.
Lei doesn't seem to be prioritizing the mass market of below $20,000 yet, which drives significant volume and is where BYD dominates, Automotive Foresight's Zhang said.
Without a lineup in that segment, Xiaomi cars will remain niche purchases for middle to higher-income consumers and Xiaomi may face the same risks as Tesla, which is seeing its sales slump exacerbated by a narrow consumer base and limited models.
Nonetheless, Lei seems buoyed by Xiaomi's early wins and is now looking at global expansion. Xiaomi will consider selling cars outside China from 2027, he said last week.
Success or otherwise, the European Union, the US and Turkey have all slapped tariffs on Chinese EVs, but Xiaomi wants to set up a R&D center in Munich and may test sales starting in European markets such as Germany, Spain and France when the time is right, Chinese media 36Kr reported in April.
'Xiaomi is a latecomer to the auto industry,' Lei admitted on Weibo in June. But, he said, in a market driven by technology and innovation and the rising global influence of China's EV culture, 'there are always opportunities for latecomers.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Sebi Plans to Heighten Derivatives Surveillance
Live Events The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) is planning to enhance its surveillance system to check manipulation in the derivatives market, chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey said on Monday. This follows the regulator barring US-based proprietary trader Jane Street from the securities market for allegedly generating illegal profits by manipulating indices through large derivatives positions.'This (Jane Street case) is essentially a surveillance issue,' Pandey said on the sidelines of an event. 'Surveillance mechanisms will be upgraded further to strengthen oversight.' He added that monitoring will continue at Sebi's as well as stock exchange levels.'Manipulative practices can be worked out by different players in different ways,' Pandey said. 'There is no one particular way in which you have to assess. Our regulations clearly mention that manipulative and fraudulent practices are not allowed in the market, and within the regulations, Sebi has all powers to investigate and act.'The chairman appeared to be of the view that such practices aren't widespread. 'There may not be many more such cases,' he said in response to a question on whether other funds may have manipulated the markets in a similar week, Sebi ordered the seizure of what it said were 'illegal gains' made by Jane Street to the tune of Rs 4,844 crore ($570 million) in one of the toughest punitive actions against an international trader. It's likely the largest amount thus impounded by the entities tied to Jane Street Group — JSI Investments, JSI2 Investments, Jane Street Singapore and Jane Street Asia Trading — have been prohibited from dealing in securities, directly or Street, which started its India operations in 2020, made a profit of about $4.3 billion between January 2023 and March 2025, the period under review, on its India regulator's finding is that the NSE's Bank Nifty Index — comprising stocks of India's top dozen lenders — was manipulated in a complex and illegal manner aided by JS Group's immense trading, financial and algorithmic Street would drive up prices with heavy buying in the morning and send them down through a selling spree later in the day, according to Sebi. It also sought to push index levels down with heavy sell orders close to the option expiry, the regulator found that Bank Nifty options alone contributed Rs 17,319 crore, amounting to 40% of the total index option's profits.


News18
25 minutes ago
- News18
‘Line Being Drawn': Trump To Impose BRICS Tariffs Only If Policies Are ‘Anti-US', Says Report
Last Updated: Trump had threatened to impose 10% additional tariffs on countries aligning with "anti-American policies" of BRICS nations. The Donald Trump administration will not immediately impose an additional 10% tariff on the BRICS nations, as against what he threatened to do, but will only proceed if the countries take 'anti-American" policy actions, news agency Reuters reported, citing a source on Tuesday. President Trump on Sunday said that the US will slap an extra 10% tariff on any country aligning itself with 'anti-American policies" of the BRICS group of developing nations. This triggered sharp denials from its member nations that they are acting against the United States. China said that BRICS does not seek confrontation. 'A line is being drawn. If policy decisions are made that are anti-American, then the tariff will be charged," Reuters quoted a source as saying, who requested anonymity. The White House has not yet released any executive order in this regard against the BRICS nations, which include India, China, and Russia. Trump's threat to the BRICS nations came after their leaders issued a 31-page statement during the Summit in Brazil, criticising the US tariffs on several nations, warning that the unilateral tariffs threatened global trade. They also condemned attacks on Gaza and Iran by Israel, a close US ally. 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy. Thank you for your attention to this matter," Trump posted on Truth Social on Monday. His announcement came as several countries in the BRICS group, including India, Indonesia, and other nations, were already in negotiations for trade deals with the US ahead of the deadline on Wednesday. The earlier three-month pause on Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day" tariffs would have gone live on July 9; however, the effective date has been postponed until August 1. It was not immediately clear if Trump's new threat would derail trade negotiations that are underway with India, Indonesia, and other BRICS nations. However, Trump sent out tariff letters to leaders of 14 countries on Monday, which included Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, South Africa, Bangladesh, among others. However, no letter has been sent to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. South Africa insisted that it was not 'anti-American" and said that its talks with the US government remained constructive. (With Reuters inputs) First Published: July 08, 2025, 05:42 IST

Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Zee promoters' road to higher stake goes through LIC, mutual funds
Mumbai: Domestic institutions, including mutual funds and Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), hold the key to allowing Subhash Chandra-led promoter entities to increase their stake in Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. That's when Norges Bank, the company's largest overseas investor, has given its assent. LIC (4.49%), HDFC Mutual Fund (3.66%) and ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund (3.04%) together own over a tenth of the outstanding shares of Zee as of 31 March, making their decision crucial. HDFC Life Insurance (1.57%) is another significant shareholder. Zee has intensified its outreach to canvass for support and convey the company's view on the warrants issue that will allow promoter entities to raise stake, said an industry executive in the know. The company seeks to issue warrants to two promoter entities: Sunbright Mauritius Investments Ltd and Altilis Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Upon conversion of the warrants to equity, the aggregate promoter stake in Zee will increase to 18.39% from the existing 3.99%. Improving odds A change in stance from proxy governance firm Stakeholder Empowerment Services (SES), which had earlier asked shareholders to reject the resolution, has improved the odds for the Zee promoters. SES said on Friday that it has reversed its stance based on clarifications given by the company. The firm said the resolution was legally sound and its objection was only on governance grounds. California-based proxy advisor Glass Lewis has also given its affirmation to the transaction. However, two other domestic proxy advisors—Institutional Investor Advisory Services (IiAS) and InGovern—remain opposed to the transaction. LIC, which subscribes to SES and IiAS, remains undecided on its voting decision, the executive cited above said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. LIC's voting will be crucial as many domestic institutions, including insurers and mutual funds, take a cue from the country's largest institutional investor. Foreign investors divided Some larger foreign investors have already cast their votes. Norges Bank, which manages the sovereign pension fund of Norway, gave its assent to the transaction, along with California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS). The aye vote of Norges, which has nearly ₹2 trillion of assets under management, is the most significant endorsement from an overseas investor as it holds a 3.86% stake in Zee. Calvert Research and Management, part of Morgan Stanley Research, and the City of New York Group Trust, which has over ₹200 billion in assets under management, have rejected the resolution to increase the promoters' stake. 'The proposed allottees are companies belonging to the promoter group that are under Sebi's investigation on financial dealings and governance practices," Calvert wrote justifying its voting decision. 'There are concerns on the transparency and accountability of the promoters." On 18 June, the media company's board approved raising ₹2,237 crore from two promoter entities through the issuance of convertible warrants at ₹132 each. Each warrant, when exercised over the coming 18 months, will be converted to one equity share. A quarter of the sum is to be paid upfront in cash, while the remainder is to be paid at the time of conversion. The deadline for investors to cast their vote is 10 July, and the resolution needs at least 75% of the votes cast to be in its favour to pass. 'The issuance of preferential warrants to the promoter group entities has been approved by the Board, post a thorough assessment of the Company's growth plans by the reputed investment bank—JP Morgan," a spokesperson for Zee said over an email. The investment bank had assessed the company's growth plans and also studied the capital market's feedback before submitting its assessment to the board, the spokesperson said. The board, after a careful evaluation of the alternatives and JPMorgan's assessment, decided to approve the issue of fully convertible warrants to promoter group entities, purely to enhance the company's financial foundation, the spokesperson said. Last year, when the company had sought shareholder approval for raising ₹2,000 crore, HDFC Mutual Fund and Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund, which own 1.12% of the company, had rejected it. Still, the resolution was approved, with nearly 79% of shareholders giving their approval. However, in November last year, investors had rejected an extension for Punit Goenka, son of founder Chandra, as the managing director, but the resolution later became infructuous as Goenka stepped down as the managing direstor. He continues as the chief executive officer of Zee. Zee shares closed 1.49% lower at ₹145 apiece on the BSE on Monday even as the benchmark Sensex ended flat.