
Donald Trump to attend FIFA Club World Cup Final at MetLife Stadium on July 13 ahead of 2026 World Cup
Donald Trump
will attend the FIFA Club World Cup Final on July 13 at
MetLife Stadium
in New Jersey. Trump said he'll be watching the soccer game in person this Sunday. The match is part of the FIFA Club World Cup 2025 tournament being held in the U.S, as per the reports.
FIFA President Gianni Infantino visited Trump Tower in NYC earlier this week. Infantino brought the FIFA Club World Cup trophy to show Trump during the visit. Infantino had previously given Trump a symbolic key to the trophy, showing appreciation, as mentioned in the report by northjersey.com.
ALSO READ:
Trump announces 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals, 50% tariff on copper in major trade shift
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
"혈액순환 싹~ 손발저림이 사라졌어요~ '' 하루1번 ''이것" 먹었을뿐 ,,,
피로개선 끝판왕
더 알아보기
Undo
Infantino also thanked Trump for hosting the tournament. The FIFA Club World Cup Final is on July 13, which also sets the stage for the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The 2026 FIFA World Cup final will also be in New Jersey, and this current event is a prep step, as per the reports.
Big FIFA matches before the final
In the Club World Cup semi-finals, Chelsea vs Fluminense will be played on July 8 at 3 p.m. at MetLife. The other semi-final, Real Madrid vs PSG, is on July 9 at 3 p.m. The winners of these two matches will play in the final on July 13, as mentioned in the report by northjersey.com.
Live Events
Trump's sports appearances and immigration concerns
Trump has attended several sports events recently like the Super Bowl, College Football National Championship, and UFC fights. Trump even announced the White House will host a UFC fight next year, according to the reports.
ALSO READ:
After face slap, now Brigitte Macron snubs Emmanuel's hand — awkward royal visit moment caught on camera
Some people have raised concerns about immigration and ICE presence around this FIFA tournament and next year's World Cup. There are fears that Trump's strict immigration policies could affect how global fans and players feel during these events, as stated in the report by northjersey.com.
FAQs
Q1. Is Donald Trump attending the
FIFA Club World Cup Final 2025
?
Yes, Donald Trump said he will attend the FIFA Club World Cup Final at MetLife Stadium on July 13.
Q2. Which teams are playing in the FIFA Club World Cup Final 2025?
The final will feature the winners of Chelsea vs Fluminense and Real Madrid vs PSG, played on July 8 and 9.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Economic Times
15 minutes ago
- Economic Times
S&P 500 ends down as tariffs sour sentiment
Wall Street ended lower on Friday, with Meta Platforms weighing on the S&P 500 after President Donald Trump intensified his tariff offensive against Canada, amplifying the uncertainty swirling around U.S. trade policy. Trump late on Thursday ramped up his tariff assault on Canada, saying the U.S. would impose a 35% tariff on imports next month and planned to impose blanket tariffs of 15% or 20% on most other trading partners. ADVERTISEMENT The S&P 500 eased from a record high the day before, with caution prevailing after Trump on Thursday imposed 50% tariffs on Brazil and as the European Union braced for a possible letter from Trump with details on fresh tariffs. "The increased rhetoric around tariffs, what we've seen this week regarding Brazil and Canada, is certainly elevating the anxiety level," said Michael James, an equity sales trader at Rosenblatt Securities. "People had become a little more accustomed to the lack of negative tariff headlines, and we've kind of been reminded that the tariff picture is still there." Shares of Nvidia rose 0.5% to a record high, lifting its stock market value to $4.02 trillion. Drone makers AeroVironment and Kratos Defense & Security Solutions jumped about 11% after U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered a surge in drone production and deployment. The S&P 500 declined 0.33% to end the session at 6,259.75 points. The Nasdaq declined 0.22% to 20,585.53 points, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.63% to 44,371.51 points. ADVERTISEMENT Volume on U.S. exchanges was relatively light, with 15.4 billion shares traded, compared with an average of 18.3 billion shares over the previous 20 sessions. For the week, the S&P 500 dipped 0.3%, the Dow lost about 1% and the Nasdaq slipped 0.1%. ADVERTISEMENT The S&P 500 is up about 6% so far in 2025. Investors will soon turn their attention to second-quarter reporting season, with a focus on how Trump's on-again off-again tariffs are affecting major U.S. companies. Among the big names reporting results next week are JPMorgan, Netflix and Johnson & Johnson. ADVERTISEMENT Analysts on average expect S&P 500 companies to increase their second-quarter earnings by 5.7%, year over year, with big gains from tech companies and declining profits in energy, consumer staples and consumer discretionary, according to LSEG I/B/E/S. "We believe expectations are a bit low for S&P 500 earnings. Much of the second quarter was marked with tariff and trade issues and that may have caused some dislocations in earnings," said Michael Landsberg, chief investment officer, Landsberg Bennett Private Wealth Management. Levi Strauss & Co jumped 11% after the apparel seller raised its annual revenue and profit forecasts and beat quarterly estimates. Meta Platforms shares closed 1.3% lower after Reuters reported that the company is very unlikely to offer more changes to its pay-or-consent model, increasing the risk of fresh EU antitrust charges and hefty daily fines. Kraft Heinz closed 2.5% higher after the Wall Street Journal reported the company is preparing to break itself up as the packaged food maker grapples with persistent weakness in demand for its higher-priced brands. ADVERTISEMENT Across the U.S. stock market, declining stocks outnumbered rising ones by a 2.8-to-one ratio. The S&P 500 posted 12 new highs and 4 new lows; the Nasdaq recorded 58 new highs and 43 new lows. (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)


Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Weapons going from US to Ukraine via NATO; ‘they are paying, 100%', says Trump
The United States is selling weapons to its NATO allies in Europe so they can provide them to Ukraine as it struggles to fend off a recent escalation in Russia's drone and missile attacks, President Donald Trump and his chief diplomat said. 'We're sending weapons to NATO, and NATO is paying for those weapons, 100%,' Trump said in an interview with NBC News late Thursday. 'So what we're doing is, the weapons that are going out are going to NATO, and then NATO is going to be giving those weapons (to Ukraine), and NATO is paying for those weapons.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Friday that some of the US-made weapons that Ukraine is seeking are deployed with NATO allies in Europe. Those weapons could be transferred to Ukraine, with European countries buying replacements from the US, he said. 'It's a lot faster to move something, for example, from Germany to Ukraine than it is to order it from a (US) factory and get it there,' Rubio told reporters during a visit to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Ukraine badly needs more US-made Patriot air defense systems to stop Russian ballistic and cruise missiles. The Trump administration has gone back and forth about providing more vital military aid to Ukraine more than three years into Russia's invasion. After a brief pause in some weapons shipments, Trump said he would keep sending defensive weapons to Ukraine. US officials said this week that some were on their way. NATO itself doesn't send weapons to Ukraine or otherwise own or handle arms — that is done by its 32 member nations — but it does coordinate the deliveries of weapons to a logistics hub in Poland, bordering Ukraine. The alliance itself ships items like medical supplies and fuel. 'Allies continue to work to ensure that Ukraine has the support they need to defend themselves against Russia's aggression,' NATO spokesperson Allison Hart said. 'This includes urgent efforts to procure key supplies from the United States, including air defense and ammunition.' Germany, Spain and other European countries possess Patriot missile systems, and some have placed orders for more, Rubio said. The US is encouraging its NATO allies to provide 'the defensive systems that Ukraine seeks … since they have them in their stocks, and then we can enter into financial agreements with them, with us, where they can purchase the replacements,' Rubio said. A senior NATO military official said Trump spoke to NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte about the plan but noted that the details were 'still being worked out.' US weapons already in Europe could be transferred to Ukraine under Trump's proposal, as could American-made weapons previously purchased by allies. 'NATO has effective mechanisms in place to make something like this possible,' the official said.A senior European defense official said it was their understanding that European nations would purchase U.S. weapons for Ukraine under the officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. Russia has recently sought to overwhelm Ukraine's air defenses by launching major aerial attacks. This week, Russia fired more than 700 attack and decoy drones at Ukraine, topping previous barrages for the third time in two weeks. Ukraine has asked other countries to supply it with an additional 10 Patriot systems and missiles, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Thursday. Germany is ready to provide two systems, and Norway has agreed to supply one, he Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Thursday that officials 'stand ready to acquire additional Patriot systems from the US and make them available to Ukraine.' Asked how many Patriot systems Germany is interested in buying, Merz didn't give a number. But he said he spoke to Trump a week ago 'and asked him to deliver these systems.' In addition to the Patriots, the weaponry that could be sold to NATO members includes advanced medium-range air-to-air missiles, shorter-range missiles and Howitzer rounds, according to a person familiar with the internal White House debate. The person spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private discussions. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment seeking more details. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who has been in touch with Trump in recent days, said it's in US national security interests to sell weapons to Ukraine, and 'Europe can pay for them.' 'We have the best weapons. They sure as hell know how to use them,' Graham said in an AP interview in Rome while attending a meeting on the sidelines of a Ukraine recovery conference. Allies purchasing US weapons for Ukraine would get around a possible stalemate in funding for Kyiv once an aid package approved last year runs out. Even with broad support in Congress for backing Ukraine, it's unclear if more funding would be approved. Trump's efforts to facilitate Ukraine's weapon supply come as he has signaled his displeasure with Russian President Vladimir Putin. At a Cabinet meeting this week, he said he was 'not happy' with Putin over a conflict that was 'killing a lot of people' on both bigger army is pressing hard on parts of the 620-mile (1,000-kilometer) front line, where thousands of soldiers on both sides have died since the Kremlin ordered the invasion in February 2022. Graham says Trump has given him the go-ahead to push forward with a bill he's co-sponsoring that calls, in part, for a 500% tariff on goods imported from countries that continue to buy Russian oil. Trump said Tuesday that he's 'looking at it very strongly.'In the NBC News interview, Trump teased that he will make a major announcement on Russia next week. The US president also has had a tumultuous relationship with Zelenskyy, which reached a low point during an Oval Office blowup in February when Trump berated him for being 'disrespectful.' The relationship has since shown signs of two leaders spoke by phone last week about Ukraine's air defenses. Zelenskyy said Thursday that talks with Trump have been 'very constructive.' In the latest attacks, a Russian drone barrage targeted the center of Kharkiv just before dawn Friday, injuring nine people and damaging a maternity hospital in Ukraine's second-largest city, officials said.'There is no silence in Ukraine,' Zelenskyy said. A daytime drone attack on the southern city of Odesa also injured nine. Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, has endured repeated and intensifying drone attacks in recent weeks, as have many other regions of the country, mostly at urged Ukraine's Western partners to quickly follow through on pledges they made at the international meeting in Rome on Thursday. Ukraine needs more interceptor drones to bring down Russian-made Shahed drones, he said. Authorities said Friday that they're establishing a comprehensive drone interception system under a project called Clear Sky. It includes a $6.2 million investment in interceptor drones, operator training and new mobile response units, the Kyiv Military Administration said.'We found a solution. … That's the key,' Zelenskyy said. 'We need financing. And then, we will intercept.


Indian Express
37 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Judge orders Trump administration to halt indiscriminate immigration stops, arrests in California
A federal judge on Friday ordered the Trump administration to halt indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests in seven California counties, including Los Angeles. Immigrant advocacy groups filed the lawsuit last week accusing President Donald Trump's administration of systematically targeting brown-skinned people in Southern California during its ongoing immigration crackdown. The claimants include three detained immigrants and two US citizens, one of whom was held despite showing agents his identification. The filing in US District Court asked a judge to block the administration from using what they call unconstitutional tactics in immigration raids. Immigrant advocates accuse immigration officials of detaining individuals based on their race, carrying out warrantless arrests, and denying detainees access to legal counsel at a holding facility in downtown LA. Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security, said in an email that 'any claims that individuals have been targeted by law enforcement because of their skin colour are disgusting and categorically FALSE.' McLaughlin said 'enforcement operations are highly targeted, and officers do their due diligence' before making arrests. Judge Maame E. Frimpong also issued a separate order barring the federal government from restricting solicitor access at a Los Angeles immigration detention facility. Frimpong issued the orders the day after a hearing during which advocacy groups argued that the government was violating the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the Constitution. Immigrants and Latino communities across Southern California have been on edge for weeks since the Trump administration stepped up arrests at car washes, Home Depot car parks, immigration courts and a range of businesses. Tens of thousands of people have participated in rallies in the region over the raids and the subsequent deployment of the National Guard and Marines. The order also applies to Ventura County, where busloads of workers were detained on Thursday while the court hearing was underway, after federal agents descended on a cannabis farm, leading to clashes with protesters and multiple injuries. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, the recent wave of immigration enforcement has been driven by an 'arbitrary arrest quota' and based on 'broad stereotypes based on race or ethnicity.' When detaining the three day labourers who are claimants in the lawsuit, all immigration agents knew about them was that they were Latino and were dressed in construction work clothes, the filing said. It goes on to describe raids at swap meets and Home Depots where witnesses say federal agents grabbed anyone who 'looked Hispanic.' ACLU solicitor Mohammad Tajsar said Brian Gavidia, one of the US citizens who was detained, was 'physically assaulted … for no other reason than he was Latino and working at a tow yard in a predominantly Latin American neighbourhood.' Tajsar asked why immigration agents detained everyone at a car wash except two white workers, according to a declaration by a car wash worker, if race wasn't involved. Representing the government, solicitor Sean Skedzielewski said there was no evidence that federal immigration agents considered race in their arrests, and that they only considered appearance as part of the 'totality of the circumstances', including prior surveillance and interactions with people in the field. In some cases, they also operated off 'targeted, individualised packages', he said. 'The Department of Homeland Security has policy and training to ensure compliance with the Fourth Amendment,' Skedzielewski said. Solicitors from Immigrant Defenders Law Centre and other groups say they also have been denied access to a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in downtown LA known as 'B-18' on several occasions since June, according to court documents. Solicitor Mark Rosenbaum said in one incident on 7 June, solicitors 'attempted to shout out basic rights' at a bus of people detained by immigration agents in downtown LA when the government drivers honked their horns to drown them out and chemical munitions akin to tear gas were deployed. Skedzielewski said access was only restricted to 'protect the employees and the detainees' during violent protests and it has since been restored. Rosenbaum said solicitors were denied access even on days without any demonstrations nearby, and that the people detained are also not given sufficient access to phones or informed that solicitors were available to them. He said the facility lacks adequate food and beds, which he called 'coercive' to getting people to sign papers agreeing to leave the country before consulting a solicitor. Attorneys general for 18 Democratic states also filed briefs in support of the orders. US Customs and Border Protection agents were already barred from making warrantless arrests in a large swathe of eastern California after a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction in April.