2 arrested at DUI checkpoint in North County
According to the San Diego County Sheriff's Office, deputies conducted the roadblock in the 12700 block of Poway Road into the night.
A total of 484 vehicles traveled into the checkpoint and authorities said 31 motorists were sent for a secondary evaluation.
DUI patrol, seat belt enforcement ramped up ahead of Memorial Day
Seven drivers conducted field sobriety tests, though only two were arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol, the sheriff's office confirmed.
Additionally, six drivers were cited for driving without a license or with a suspended license, another seven were cited for not having their driver license in their possession, and one driver was cited for a traffic signal violation.
'DUI checkpoint locations are determined based on reported incidents of impaired driving-related crashes,' authorities noted in a press release. 'The primary purpose of DUI checkpoints is to promote public safety by taking suspected impaired drivers off roads.'
Funding for this checkpoint is provided to the San Diego County Sheriff's Office by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Police incident causes delays on M1 and M25
A police incident on the M1 in Hertfordshire that led to the M25 also being closed has caused widespread disruption for morning commuters. Hertfordshire Police said it shut the M1 northbound, between junctions 6 and 6A, at about 05:15 BST, with a subsequent closure also being put in place on the M25 around junction 21A. Traffic was temporarily diverted on to the A405 North Orbital Road and other surrounding routes. Police said on X at 06:45 that the roads had been reopened but delays remained in the area. Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. National Highways Hertfordshire Constabulary
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sean 'Diddy' Combs juror hits back at 'insulting' public reaction to verdict
A juror in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs case has hit back at the "insulting" public response to the verdict. The 55-year-old rapper was found guilty of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution relating to ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura and a woman who testified under the name 'Jane' but was acquitted on the more serious charges of sex trafficking and racketeering and a jury member has denied claims that Diddy's celebrity status influenced their decision. The unnamed juror told ABC News: "We spent over two days deliberating. Our decision was based solely on the evidence presented and how the law is stated. We would have treated any defendant in the same manner regardless of who they are. I have nothing else to say." Diddy's attorney Anna Estevao described Wednesday's (02.07.25) verdict as a "huge win" for the I'll Be Missing You hitmaker as he avoided the possibility of life in prison, although he was denied bail by US District Judge Arun Subramanian. She said outside the courtroom in Manhattan: "This is a reminder to everyone I hope of the flaws in the criminal justice system and for everybody to take a second look when the government charges people with crimes. "This is a huge win. He was acquitted of sex trafficking, acquitted of RICO conspiracy and he will sleep well at night knowing that." Diddy - who has been in custody in Brooklyn since his arrest last September - was convinced of flying people around the US to engage in sexual encounters and Judge Subramanian denied bail as he noted the prosecution's argument that a Mann Act violation means the detention is "mandatory". The original 1919 law prohibited interstate or foreign commerce transport of a woman or girl "or prostitution, debauchery or for any other immoral purpose". In 1986, the law was made gender-neutral, and the wording altered to change "debauchery" and "immoral purpose" to "any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offence". Judge Subramanian said that "for present purposes, the defendant is unable to meet his burden" to show "lack of danger to any person or the community" with clear and convincing evidence. He added: "Prior to the trial, the court denied bail, and sees no reason to reverse that now." Diddy could now face a combined sentence of up to 20 years in federal prison, with Judge Subramanian scheduling a sentencing hearing for October 3.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Star Lawyer Who Defended Trump's Family Issues Stark Warning About Presidency
The super-lawyer who kept Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump out of legal jeopardy during Robert Mueller's Russian investigation now fears Donald Trump will demolish the very institutions that protected them. 'I have never been as concerned as to whether our system can withstand the pressure it is being put to,' Abbe Lowell told the Financial Times, warning that the White House is 'pushing the tree to the point that it could break,' noting that during Trump's first term, critics of the president said democracy was 'tested but didn't break.' The legal eagle has defended several high-profile Democrat figures—including Bill Clinton and Joe Biden's son, Hunter. But he is perhaps best known for his high-stakes work for Trump's daughter and son-in-law. In June 2017, the Daily Beast reported that Kushner, 44, who is married to Ivanka, 43, had hired Lowell to join his defense team as Robert Mueller's Russia probe heated up. The following month, Ivanka followed suit, tasking the prominent lawyer to provide 'legal and ethical advice' as investigators examined possible campaign ties to Moscow, bringing both Trump family members under the same high-powered counsel. Now, Lowell says, Ivanka father's behavior in his second term threatens to smash the constitutional 'wall' separating courts from executive muscle. 'The crack you put in the wall today becomes the gash tomorrow,' Lowell had told Congress in 1998. That was 'not a bad prophecy', Lowell told the FT, saying that the structure is 'more than cracked, not yet crumbled.' In an attempt to fight back, Lowell, 73, has launched Lowell & Associates to combat what he calls government 'over-reach.' Nine law firms, he says, have already 'buckled' under Trump-era intimidation—agreeing to nearly $1 billion in work that advances the president's agenda while muzzling internal critics. Several defectors from those firms have signed up to Lowell's boutique organization, Lowell said, with many more showing interest. Clients include New York Attorney General Letitia James—now under federal investigation after winning a massive civil-fraud judgment against Trump—and former DHS official Miles Taylor, whose security clearance vanished after he blasted the president. Both hope Lowell's aggressive strategy can blunt a barrage of executive orders targeting universities, NGOs and even courthouses. 'I don't know the administration has the ability, breadth, depth and expertise to handle all' the resulting lawsuits, Lowell said. Yet the veteran litigator is under no illusion every legal action will stick. With a Supreme Court that 'believes in an executive branch with broad power,' reports the FT, Lowell says challengers must craft cases on First Amendment grounds rather than on presidential authority. Because if Trump diminishes the authority of the country's courts, Lowell warns, 'there will just be rubble from that wall.' The Daily Beast has approached the White House for comment.
