Conor McGregor loses nearly 1 million followers since civil rape case
McGregor is back in the news with the appeal process taking place at the High Court earlier this, although the former MMA fighter was not present at proceedings.
Since the case took place in front of a jury, McGregor's social media following has gradually dropped. In November, McGregor's Instagram follower count was 47.5 million, and in the nine months since, that number has dropped to 46,520,653, per Social Blade.
In the last 30 days alone, McGregor has seen a net loss of 58,005 followers but has seen an update in the last week where he has eight days of positive growth in follower count.
Since the court case took place, there have been steady losses for McGregor on social media.
The losses are as follows
McGregor and a couple he put forward and subsequently withdrew as witnesses in his appeal are now facing potential criminal prosecution.
Three Judges of the Court of Appeal made the bombshell decision to refer documentation put forward by Counsel for Nikita Hand to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) today, following claims of 'perjury.'
The Judges made the decision off the back of claims by John Gordon SC for Ms Hand, that 'perjury' may have occurred in this case after sworn affidavits were opened in court by the now withdrawn witnesses Samantha O'Reilly and Steven Cummins.
The couple had sworn affidavits claiming they heard a row between Ms Hand and her then partner on the night of 9 December 2018, after the alleged rape, with Ms O'Reilly claiming she saw the row from her bedrooom in a house across the road.
She claimed Ms Hand's then boyfriend pushed her and she saw him moving his arms and hips as though he was punching and kicking her. Mr Cummins had claimed he was woken by screams and shouts coming from Ms Hand's house but said he did not see what had happened.
Their claims have now been totally withdrawn by McGregor - with Ms Hand's Counsel seeking an apology from him over the ordeal. It comes after Mr Gordon had asked the Judges yesterday that the court 'ought to allow me to cross-examine Ms. O'Reilly and her partner and Mr. Staines and then refer the matter for perjury proceedings to the Director of Public Prosecutions and subornation of perjury against Mr. McGregor.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Conor McGregor loses nearly 1 million followers since civil rape case
Conor McGregor has lost nearly one million social media followers since being found liable for assault in a civil rape case brought forward by Nikita Hand. McGregor is back in the news with the appeal process taking place at the High Court earlier this, although the former MMA fighter was not present at proceedings. Since the case took place in front of a jury, McGregor's social media following has gradually dropped. In November, McGregor's Instagram follower count was 47.5 million, and in the nine months since, that number has dropped to 46,520,653, per Social Blade. In the last 30 days alone, McGregor has seen a net loss of 58,005 followers but has seen an update in the last week where he has eight days of positive growth in follower count. Since the court case took place, there have been steady losses for McGregor on social media. The losses are as follows McGregor and a couple he put forward and subsequently withdrew as witnesses in his appeal are now facing potential criminal prosecution. Three Judges of the Court of Appeal made the bombshell decision to refer documentation put forward by Counsel for Nikita Hand to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) today, following claims of 'perjury.' The Judges made the decision off the back of claims by John Gordon SC for Ms Hand, that 'perjury' may have occurred in this case after sworn affidavits were opened in court by the now withdrawn witnesses Samantha O'Reilly and Steven Cummins. The couple had sworn affidavits claiming they heard a row between Ms Hand and her then partner on the night of 9 December 2018, after the alleged rape, with Ms O'Reilly claiming she saw the row from her bedrooom in a house across the road. She claimed Ms Hand's then boyfriend pushed her and she saw him moving his arms and hips as though he was punching and kicking her. Mr Cummins had claimed he was woken by screams and shouts coming from Ms Hand's house but said he did not see what had happened. Their claims have now been totally withdrawn by McGregor - with Ms Hand's Counsel seeking an apology from him over the ordeal. It comes after Mr Gordon had asked the Judges yesterday that the court 'ought to allow me to cross-examine Ms. O'Reilly and her partner and Mr. Staines and then refer the matter for perjury proceedings to the Director of Public Prosecutions and subornation of perjury against Mr. McGregor.'
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Sally Rooney will remain 'committed supporter of Palestine Action', court told
Sally Rooney has told the High Court she is 'and will continue to be a committed supporter' of Palestine Action, which failed to secure a temporary block on it being banned as a terrorist group on Friday. The Irish author said in court documents that the ban would prevent her from speaking at future public events as she 'could not in good conscience disguise or lie about my principles' if it comes into effect at 12.01am on Saturday as planned. If the ban does come into effect, it would make membership of, or support for, Palestine Action a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. I am and will continue to be a committed supporter of Palestine Action Rooney has provided support for a legal claim by Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, against the Home Office, over the decision to proscribe the group under the Terrorism Act 2000. Ms Ammori asked a High Court judge on Friday to temporarily block the move from becoming law over the weekend, ahead of a bid to be given the green light to challenge the Government's decision later this month. But in a ruling, Mr Justice Chamberlain refused to block the ban, stating that any harm caused is 'insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force'. Barristers for Ms Ammori are seeking to appeal against the ruling on Friday evening. In her witness statement, cited in Mr Justice Chamberlain's judgment, Rooney said the 'cultural effects' of Palestine Action becoming proscribed 'could not be easily mended'. She said: 'Though I am based in Ireland, my work is published in the UK. My novels regularly appear in bestseller lists, and I often travel to Britain to speak in public about my work. 'I am and will continue to be a committed supporter of Palestine Action. 'If… that support is criminalised, I will effectively be prevented from speaking at any future public events in the UK, since I could not in good conscience disguise or lie about my principles in public. For any public figure to be labelled a 'supporter of terrorism' by the state would have serious consequences. It would likely end or severely restrict the careers of many emerging artists 'If I continue to voice support for Palestine Action from my home in Ireland, what are the likely consequences? Will I be denounced publicly by the Prime Minister? 'Will bookshops go on stocking the work of an author the home secretary has branded a 'terrorist' simply for supporting a protest group? 'The BBC has adapted two of my books for television; both series are presently promoted on the iPlayer service. Normal People, which I co-wrote and produced, was the BBC's most-streamed series in 2020, with over 62 million views. 'My beliefs have not changed since the making of that series, and I have done nothing but continue to express them. 'If the expression of those beliefs becomes a terror offence under UK law, would the BBC continue to screen and promote my work? 'Is it likely that I could ever again collaborate with British public institutions like the BBC as I have done in the past? 'The cultural effects of proscription could not be easily mended, even if the home secretary later changed her mind. 'For any public figure to be labelled a 'supporter of terrorism' by the state would have serious consequences. If Palestine Action loses its bid to temporarily block the move, it is due to become a terrorist organisation on Saturday after the order was signed by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper (PA) 'It would likely end or severely restrict the careers of many emerging artists. ''Terrorism' is not a trivial word.' In written submissions for Friday's hearing, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, said that Rooney 'will continue to voice her support from Ireland' for the group. He said: 'Given her public support for Palestine Action… she is concerned that being labelled a 'supporter of terrorism' would have serious impacts on her ability to collaborate and publicise her work.' He continued: 'Ms Rooney notes that 'countless artists, writers and members of the public support direct action against complicity in what Israel is doing in Palestine', including Juliet Stevenson, Paul Weller, Tilda Swinton, Brian Eno, and other signatories to an open letter dated 30 June 2025.' If Palestine Action loses its bid to temporarily block the move, it is due to become a terrorist organisation on Saturday, after the order was signed by the home secretary, Yvette Cooper. Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe the direct action group last month, after two Voyager planes were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an action claimed by Palestine Action. Read More Eight men jailed for 129 years after record €157m cocaine seizure off Cork coast
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Refuse worker died after he fell from back of moving bin lorry and hit his head on road, High Court told
The family of a refuse collector who died after falling from the back of a bin truck has had a statutory payment of €35,000 for loss and mental distress approved by the High Court. Mr Justice Tony O'Connor heard how the vehicle had gone over a speed bump and the man, who was in his 50s, fell from the rear and hit his head on the road, causing severe injury. In 2020, the man's daughter, who was then a minor, brought High Court proceedings through her mother against the waste company and the driver of the refuse truck. It was alleged that the respondents were negligent and in breach of their statutory duties. READ MORE The daughter and the mother were dependents of the worker and all three lived together, the court heard. In the case it was alleged that the truck was driving at an inappropriate speed when approaching the speed bump, that the company allowed or permitted the worker to travel by holding on to the rear of the vehicle without a helmet and that there was a failure to have in place an adequate step upon which he could safely stand. The plaintiff said that the claimed breaches came under the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act, 2005. Damages were also sought under the Civil Liability Act for the benefit of the dependents in the form of the statutory payment. Padraig D Lyons, for the plaintiff, told the court on Friday the case had been settled and the only matter to be attended to was the statutory payment for loss and mental distress. Mr Lyons said the mother was waiving her entitlement to the payment in favour of her daughter. Four others were also entitled to a part of the payment, but had not originally been in the case as statutory dependents, he said. Mr Justice O'Connor made an order directing the payment of €35,000 to the plaintiff. He expressed his sympathy to the family for what they had gone through and he wished them well.
