logo
Can Tata and Mamata Banerjee ever be business friends?

Can Tata and Mamata Banerjee ever be business friends?

Time of India20 hours ago
Academy
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
A lot of activities connecting the past, present and (intended) future happened over the last fortnight. The much-awaited, almost-given up reunion of Oasis happened in Cardiff on July 4. The epochal final 'Back to the Beginning' concert of Black Sabbath and its legendary frontman Ozzy Osbourne in Birmingham took place the next day. But a decidedly quieter meeting of no less momentous proportion took place in Kolkata on July 9. Tata Sons chairman Natarajan Chandrasekaran and West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee met at the latter's office on Wednesday. This was the first time that a Tata Group chairman met a West Bengal CM in 14 years - the last two being Ratan Tata and Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee, just before the woman who drove Tata Motor Dixie out of Bengal took over Bhattacharjee's portfolio, and much else.The warring Oasis brothers Liam and Noel Gallagher had been fighting for 16 years. Ozzy had been put out to Sabbath for health reasons for 20. But somehow, Didi's darbar with Chandra, at least to people with a more ironic sense of history - especially where economic progress has been history for some time - felt more fateful than a re-Oasis or re-Ozzy.Now, I - like most others who believe puddings should be first eaten before one considers them to be pudding - have seen Banerjee, in her post-Che chief ministerial module, rack up MoUs with corporate houses like she was Le Chiffre piling up chips at the baccarat table in Casino Royale. But her annual BGBS (Bengal Global Business Summit) is not WYSIWYG.The likes of Ambani, Adani and other open- and closed-vowelled big names of industry fly down to Kolkata have photo-ops with Banerjee, make investment promises, and then take the first flight back to where they'll put their money where their MoUs are.With Chandra, Didi reportedly exchanged pleasantries, a core strength of Bengalis. TMC officially noted: 'The meeting reflected Bengal's commitment to fostering meaningful public-private partnerships that drive innovation, investment and inclusive development... the conversation centred on deepening the Tata Group's presence in the state'. If you say so. And never mind Singur and the Tata Motors factory turned to factionary by then-in-opposition Didi. US goods trade with Vietnam was some $149.6 bn in 2024, 'Ho Ho Ho Chi Minh!' notwithstanding.But it's not the present tete-a-tete offensive's genuineness I doubt. Or whether bygones can be made to be bye-byegones. It's the continued mismatch between how Bengal - not just its CM or political class, but also its people - sees business and the way rest of the world sees it.A perfect example of this is Kolkata's roads, arguably the worst among India's metropolitan cities. But here again, Bengalis will trot out examples of collapsed bridges in Gujarat and bombed-out highways in UP to make a point that they are being picked on for conspiratorial reasons. The definition of 'maintenance' is radically different from that in the rest of India.Tenders are floated, vendors are chosen, councillors get a slice of the MLA fund... the repair work (sic) is done in such a calibrated shoddy manner that the 'fixed' road will turn into a lunar landscape and public hazard by the next round of rains. Wash, rinse, repeat. And everyone is fine with this 'circular economy' here.Then there's 'wealth creation' itself. At some fundamental level, wanting to be rich - never mind being rich - is taboo, as if akin to wanting to sleep with one's own cousin. This is largely because most people in this everything-is-politically-connected economy make money by cutting corners, slipping slips, nailing turfs, promising cuts....'Mou' in Bengali is honey. 'MoU' is sweet nothing. For a state that takes pride in being constantly angry, 'When Chandra Met Mamata' remains a romcom scene famous for 'faking it' - at least until the pudding of actual investment is eaten.P.S. Rumour of the meeting originally scheduled for July 8, and then pushed a day later after someone pointed out that Tuesday was Jyoti Basu's 111th birth anniversary, I'm sure, was nothing but a rumour.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nitin Pai: A caste census is likely to perpetuate division and weaken our nationhood
Nitin Pai: A caste census is likely to perpetuate division and weaken our nationhood

Mint

time3 hours ago

  • Mint

Nitin Pai: A caste census is likely to perpetuate division and weaken our nationhood

I want to sound a warning: a caste census not only risks diverting India away from development but could also undermine our foundational constitutional values. Instead of reducing the salience of caste in Indian society, it will reinforce it. In so doing, it goes against B.R. Ambedkar's warning on day-zero of the Indian Republic: 'The castes are anti-national. In the first place because they bring about separation in social life. They are anti-national also because they generate jealousy and antipathy between caste and caste. But we must overcome all these difficulties if we wish to become a nation in reality. For fraternity can be a fact only when there is a nation. Without fraternity, equality and liberty will be no deeper than coats of paint." Also Read: Caste census? Okay, but we must handle it with care Our politicians and liberal intellectuals are not being honest about the real reasons for India's caste census. Questioned at a forum last year, a prominent young leader of the opposition party blithely asked: 'What's the harm in just counting?" There is abundant evidence from psychology and sociology that counting is always and everywhere political. We know from our own history that when the British started counting a century ago, caste groups mobilized to show strength in numbers. In the post-Mandal era, there are open displays of caste identities on car bumper stickers. Evidence from social science affirms Ambedkar's argument that jealousy and antipathy are inevitable. When students are arbitrarily assigned to different houses in school, the houses quickly become identities and spark competition. Now, if those identities are not arbitrary, but instead claim long traditions, notions of superiority and inferiority, and carry with them historical grievances and long memories, you can imagine how they will interact with each other. Fraternity and a national consciousness are the victims. It thus follows that an Indian nationalist cannot perpetuate caste consciousness. Also Read: Himanshu: India's caste census must serve its purpose More honest politicians and intellectuals will respond that the caste census is necessary to promote social justice. By this they mean the system of reservations and quotas. Yet, it is hard to see how a caste census improves the prospects of the historically most oppressed communities. On the contrary, the demand for reservations in most states is a tussle among socially powerful communities for more political power. If we are honest, we will accept that the real reason for the caste census is that it is expected to inform caste-based power sharing. This might have been acceptable were it not for the fact that identity-based power sharing hollows out any attempt to create a nation that transcends caste. Some might argue that a sense of national identity is not important or that it co-exists with caste, ethnic and linguistic identities. That it is okay if we discover our Indianness only when competing with or fighting against other countries. It sounds comforting until you realize that we have pending questions like delimitation, fiscal federalism and regional autonomy for which we cannot find amicable, mutually acceptable solutions unless there is a strong sense that all of us are in this together. For the people of India, nationalism is not merely a slogan. It is central to our unity, security and prosperity. Also Read: Sanjoy Chakravorty: A caste census is a Pandora's Box that India must open anyway Grand ideas apart, lack of fraternity manifests in our daily lives to such an extent that it's everywhere but we blind ourselves to it. What I have called a sense of 'us-lessness' underlies the poverty of our public lives. With little exaggeration, I could argue that there is no 'public' at all in our country. There is only 'me' and 'my extended caste community.' There is a very weak 'my civic community.' As I have explained in an earlier column, this is why our public toilets stink, roads are jammed, parks are encroached, officials are often corrupt and our public spaces are usually ugly, dirty and crumbling. Few care about the public because few feel part of the public. The forthcoming caste census will supercharge caste consciousness. This will weaken our sense of fraternity, destroy social capital and result in poor public services. It will reduce our potential economic growth rate, limit what Indian society is capable of and reduce free citizens to being mere members of their identity groups. The economy will still grow, but our quality of life will not be commensurate with our material prosperity. Those who can afford it might withdraw into private realms with private transport, security, water, electricity, schools, healthcare and so on. Those who cannot will have to make do with shabby public services, inefficiently provided by vote-bank governments and grudgingly financed by sullen taxpayers. The Constitution enjoins us to work towards social justice and rid society of the animosities and discrimination that have held India down for centuries. But the train of social justice should not come to a final halt at the station of reservations and quotas. To solve our age-old problems, we need better ideas and new thinking. The first step, however, is not to worsen matters. Discrimination based on caste cannot be eliminated by strengthening caste consciousness. The author is co-founder and director of The Takshashila Institution, an independent centre for research and education in public policy.

Jun 2025 US logistics managers' index up 1.3 points MoM to 60.7
Jun 2025 US logistics managers' index up 1.3 points MoM to 60.7

Fibre2Fashion

time5 hours ago

  • Fibre2Fashion

Jun 2025 US logistics managers' index up 1.3 points MoM to 60.7

The June US logistics manager's index (LMI) was 60.7—up by 1.3 points from May's reading of 59.4. The increase in the overall index was driven by an increase in the rate of expansion for inventory levels, which was up by 8.3 points to 59.8. The June US logistics manager's index was 60.7â€'up by 1.3 points from May's 59.4â€'driven by a rise in the rate of expansion for inventory levels. The movement back above 60 marks only the third time since July 2022. As all three of those readings have come in the last six months indicates the heightened, and somewhat unseasonal, level of activity that has been seen in the supply chain in H1 2025. This expansion mostly occurred in the first half of June, when the metric read in at a robust 67.4 as importers scrambled to take advantage of the pause in the most punitive tariffs, an official release said. The movement back above 60 marks only the third time since July 2022. All three of those readings above 60 have come in 2025, which is a marked shift from 2023 and 2024 when that threshold was never breached in the overall index. The fact that all three of those readings have come in the last six months is indicative of the heightened, and somewhat unseasonal, level of activity that has been witnessed in the supply chain through the first half of 2025. While this has been positive in the short-run, it does raise questions on whether the same level of demand will be present in the second half of the year when we would normally see it picking up, the release observed. The uncertainty exists due to both the high levels of inventory already in the U.S., as well as the continued ambiguity regarding future U.S. trade policy. Inventory levels expansion declined to 52.2 in the second half of the month. The influx of inventories led inventory costs to rise by 2.5 points to 80.9, the first time this metric has been above 80 since October 2022, when supply chains were still in the throes of the post-COVID inventory bullwhip, an official release said. The effects of the continued inventory buildup are also evident in warehousing capacity dropping by 2.2 points to 47.8, contracting for the first time since January 2023. Similar to last month, the LMI transportation metrics are relatively stable, although it is worth noting that transportation capacity dropped by 2.3 points to 52.4, which is close to contraction. Transportation capacity has not contracted since March 2022, and therefore, if this trend continues, it would mark a real shift. Transportation utilization (plus 0.3) and transportation prices (minus 1.1) were relatively steady. The swings seen with inventories have kept freight markets humming at a steady, if not spectacular pace, the release noted. The most direct evidence of the strain of the high levels of inventories being held in supply chains can be seen in warehousing capacity, which was down by 2.2 point to 47.8. This is the first time this metric has been in contraction since January 2023. The contraction in available capacity is driven by smaller respondents, who reported steep contraction at 43.3 to the mild expansion of 53.2 reported by their larger counterparts. Due to this, smaller firms also reported warehousing prices expanding faster than larger respondents at a rate of 71.7 to 64.9. Warehousing utilisation expansion was down very slightly (minus 0.3) to 62.2 in June. It was statistically significantly higher upstream, where respondents reported expansion of 65.7 in stark contrast with the 53.8 reported downstream. This is likely reflective of the fact that downstream firms were already utilising much of their available capacity and upstream firms are taking on most of the new inventory that is being imported into the country. Despite this difference, both groups of respondents predicted strong growth for warehousing prices at 69.9 upstream and 65.2 downstream. These figures are fairly consistent with current warehousing pricing, which is expanding at a rate of 68.3—still high but down (minus 3.8) from May's reading. Researchers at Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Florida Atlantic University, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, and in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) issue the LMI report. The LMI score is a combination of eight unique components that make up the logistics industry: inventory levels and costs, warehousing capacity, utilisation, and prices, and transportation capacity, utilisation, and prices. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DS)

Manohar Rao Vangoori launches memoir celebrating six decades of manufacturing
Manohar Rao Vangoori launches memoir celebrating six decades of manufacturing

Hans India

time9 hours ago

  • Hans India

Manohar Rao Vangoori launches memoir celebrating six decades of manufacturing

Marking a monumental journey of over 60 years in India's engineering and manufacturing landscape, veteran industrialist Manohar Rao Vangoori unveiled his memoir titled 'How I Built It — Six Decades of Manufacturing Wisdom and Innovations'. The book launch coincided with the 85th birthday celebrations of the pioneering entrepreneur. A stalwart of India's post-Independence industrial revolution, Vangoori's memoir chronicles his life from modest beginnings to establishing Jaisara Tooling Systems Pvt Ltd, a globally respected name in aerospace tooling. Drawing from early stints at HEC Ranchi and HAL in the 1960s, the book reflects his ethos of discipline, innovation, and relentless dedication to quality. Unlike typical business memoirs, How I Built It blends entrepreneurial milestones with deeply personal reflections. Vangoori recounts his childhood struggles, early exposure to values of education and integrity, and the evolving journey of building a manufacturing enterprise in a then-nascent Indian industrial ecosystem. 'This book is not just about machines, but about values, decisions, and dreams. It's for every young mind that dares to believe India can lead with precision and integrity,' Vangoori shared during the launch. Dr. BVR Mohan Reddy, Founder Chairman of Cyient, who unveiled the book, remarked, 'It's more than a memoir—it's a blueprint for nation-building through values and engineering. At 80+, Vangoori remains an inspiration.' The event saw the presence of distinguished personalities including Dr. Ramesh Datla, Shri GunneswaraPursarla, and DwarakanathPatnam, who applauded Vangoori's contributions to India's industrial growth and mentorship legacy. How I Built It is now available in bookstores and online, offering readers a rare glimpse into a life shaped by purpose, precision, and perseverance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store