logo
'He was still a child': Grief and fear at Latakia hospital

'He was still a child': Grief and fear at Latakia hospital

Middle East Eye15-03-2025
At the National Hospital in Latakia, a coastal city in the heartland of the Alawite minority, the watchful presence of Syria's new authorities is constant.
Visibly shaken, Alawite Syrians arrive to identify the bodies of their loved ones, killed in the recent and deadliest wave of violence in the country since the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad.
What began as an attack on security forces by Assad loyalists - many from the former president's Alawite sect - quickly spiralled into revenge attacks on civilians, leaving hundreds dead and thousands displaced.
Civilians belonging to the Alawite community were particularly targeted.
Medical staff say security forces, some unidentified, have been posted at the hospital since 6 March, when the violence erupted, and have remained there since.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Fear on the faces
On the morning of 11 March, the day after the government concluded its military operation, terror-stricken families rushed to hospitals on Syria's western coast to find their loved ones.
At the National Hospital, a man arrived at the morgue to claim the body of his neighbour, one of two brothers who were killed on 7 March.
When asked about the perpetrators, he glanced at an armed man wearing a mask concealing half of his face, closely following the conversation.
Over 800 extrajudicial killings documented in coastal Syria violence Read More »
In a hushed voice, he responded: "Possibly thieves, I really don't know."
Meanwhile, a mother there to identify her murdered son is cut off by her husband: "Don't share any information; it could endanger us."
Another mother, Rim, stood nearby with her neighbour - both there to retrieve her son's body.
The urgency in the mother's eyes was palpable, but she stayed silent. Her neighbour, referring to the deceased as "our son", said that he was killed two days earlier by "armed men".
Another armed security member stood just a metre away. The fear on the faces of the few Alawites present was clear. Seizing a moment of distraction, Rim discreetly shared her phone number.
'He never held a weapon'
Over the phone, Rim, whose name was changed for her protection, spoke fervently, her voice filled with shock as she relayed the details of her story.
Before heading out to spend the evening with friends, her son - a 19-year-old engineering student - asked his mother not to call.
'When they led me there, bodies covered the floor. But I was lucky. My son was in a refrigerator'
- Rim, Alawite civilian
Concerned about the clashes that had erupted on the coast that morning, she called him the next day: "Ahmed?" she asked anxiously.
Instead of her son's voice, she heard a stranger identifying himself as general security.
"Your son was killed. He's here with a bullet in his head. He was a regime loyalist," the man said.
Hoping for a mistake, Rim pleaded: "He hasn't even served in the army. Can you describe his clothes?"
"He's dressed in black trousers and a black jacket," the man replied.
That morning at the morgue, Rim found her son.
"When they led me there, bodies covered the floor. But I was lucky. My son was in a refrigerator," she said.
"My son is tall, fat and bearded, looking older than his age," she added, thinking he might have been mistaken for a "military" for this reason.
"He never held a weapon. He was still a child."
Syrian authorities told Rim she had two days to ask for her son's body.
"I never imagined I'd have to do this," she said. Citing fears of retaliation, she has decided against holding a funeral.
Reassuring minorities
Pressure has been growing on Syria's government, led by interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa, to investigate the killing of at least 1,500 civilians, including women, children and entire families.
Syrian Alawis sheltering in Lebanon say it isn't safe to return home Read More »
The Syrian Network for Human Rights said at least 803 extrajudicial killings were committed by all sides involved in the clashes, including forces loyal to Assad, government forces, groups loosely affiliated with the Syrian government and individual gunmen.
The sectarian violence in villages with large Alawite communities has been the biggest challenge to Sharaa since coming to power after the overthrow of Assad in December.
Aron Lund, an analyst at Century International, said the violence has shown the fragility of the new power, supported in part by Islamists "hostile to the Alawis".
The interim president's rhetoric has been aimed at reassuring minorities and advocating appeasement, even if this approach is not "uniformly adopted by all the factions under his command", Lund told Middle East Eye.
At the National Hospital in Latakia, the authorities' discomfort was palpable.
An administrative official repeatedly stated in a mechanical tone: "I am not allowed to give interviews. No statistics will be released until we have official permission."
'The hospital has become their base'
Sitting in a car parked along the deserted coast on a sunny day, a young, terrified doctor spoke of her ordeal since the violence erupted.
Like about 50 other staff members, she did not leave the hospital during the clashes, sleeping in the hospital quarters out of fear for her safety.
A weekend from hell in coastal Syria Read More »
She recounted seeing a patient, who had come to the hospital for a scan, being beaten before her eyes on 7 March, accused of being loyal to Assad.
"They hit him in the chest and face, and I was just a metre away."
The doctor does not know what became of the man.
Since Assad's fall, the atmosphere of inter-community mistrust - fuelled by 14 years of civil war and perpetuated by the Assad family - has reached unprecedented levels.
The doctor criticised the interference of Syrian forces in hospital operations.
"They enter armed and interrogate patients: 'Where are you from? How did you sustain these wounds?'" she said.
Her claims were supported by several colleagues who spoke to MEE.
One doctor in his thirties said: "The hospital has become their base. They come and go armed, and we can't even determine their affiliations."
'How can we feel safe?'
The security forces of the new government now encompass several factions, including the militant group Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, which led the offensive that brought down Assad.
"It was worse during Assad's era. The 'shabiha' - regime enforcers - would enter the hospital and do whatever they pleased, showing no regard for the doctors," another doctor remarked.
'Every time I leave my home for the hospital, I see the fear in my mother's eyes that it might be the last time she sees me'
- Doctor, National Hospital
An audio message from a health administrative official in Latakia received on 11 March said: "The situation is back to normal. We are now tracking absences. It's a safe country, God willing." A follow-up message emphasised: "The roads are clear, no more excuses."
The hospital, predominantly staffed by Alawites, saw the appointment of a Sunni vice president by the new authorities, Dr Moataz Fadliye, a month earlier.
Sitting in his office, where the new three-star Syrian flag hung on the wall, he appeared hesitant to discuss recent events, mentioning only "the hundred wounded treated here in the first two days: soldiers, general security and Syrian army members" - without mentioning civilian casualties.
On 9 March, Sharaa announced the creation of an "independent" commission to investigate the recent turmoil in the coastal region, including what led to the outbreak, abuses against civilians and attacks on institutions.
However, this has done little to reassure the Alawite community.
The doctor, speaking from her car, admitted: "I don't trust him."
"Every time I leave my home for the hospital, I see the fear in my mother's eyes that it might be the last time she sees me. How can we feel safe in this country after what happened ?" another doctor said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iraqi parliament debates law restricting right to protest
Iraqi parliament debates law restricting right to protest

Middle East Eye

time2 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Iraqi parliament debates law restricting right to protest

Rights groups have expressed concern over new laws being debated in Iraq's parliament that will restrict the right to protest. Legislation has been introduced to the parliament that will introduce new restrictions including on insults to religious sects, a ban on nighttime protests and restrictions on gatherings on public roads, near hospitals, schools and government buildings. The new bill, being debated in parliament on Saturday, will also require prior approval from local authorities for protests at least five days in advance. Ten-year jail sentences could be handed down for those advocating war, terrorism or ethnic, racial or sectarian hatred, while those who desecrate or insult religious symbols or sites could face a minimum of one year in prison and a fine of one million dinars. Amnesty International and the INSM Foundation for Digital Rights criticised the legislation, noting that it comes in the wake of a wider crackdown on dissent, including the arrest of government critics. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'Lawmakers must vote against or propose amendments to any laws that would add to the arsenal of tools that the authorities are already using to restrict civic space or betray Iraq's constitutional and international commitments to protect freedoms of expression and peaceful assembly,' said Razaw Salihy, Amnesty International's Iraq researcher. "However, with no real transparency and no public debate on the current draft, civil society is left guessing what is being put before lawmakers to vote on. In light of Iraq's record on suppression of freedom of expression and assembly, the fear is that the new law will not bring much needed positive changes.' The parliament has claimed the new draft is in line with Iraq's constitutional and international obligations and 'does not restrict peaceful assembly'. At least 20 individuals were prosecuted between January and June this year over what Amnesty said was the peaceful exercise of their human right to free expression. Tensions heating up Iraq has seen regular demonstrations in recent years against entrenched corruption, regular power cuts and violence from state-linked armed groups. Tensions regularly run high in the summer as shortages of power and water make living unbearable in heats that often top 50 degrees. Hundreds of people protested last week near the cities of Hilla and Diwaniyah, south of Baghdad, blocking roads and burning tires, in protest at the shortages. Why Turkey abruptly cancelled an Iraqi oil pipeline agreement Read More » Iraq's water resources ministry has said that 2025 has been "one of the driest since 1933", and that water reserves are down to only eight percent of full capacity. The draft Law on Freedom of Expression and Peaceful Assembly's first readings took place on 3 December 2022 and on 9 May 2023. Following outcry from rights groups, the parliament announced on 31 July that passages referring to freedom of expression had been removed from the law, in the spirit of "not restricting protests". However, there has been little transparency with regards to the alterations made to the original draft and civil society representatives have protested their lack of involvement. William Warda, co-founder of the Hammurabi Human Rights Organization, told Middle East Eye he feared the new legislation did "not adhere to international human rights standards". "Without information, we cannot talk about freedom of expression," he said. He added that Iraq needed to instead strengthen mechanisms for accountability. "I believe that in democratic countries, the private sector should also be subject to the principle of transparency - such as political parties, companies and organisations - for the purpose of criticising anyone who will hold public office in the future or monitoring the work of companies or organisations in democratic countries," he explained.

Karim Khan investigation: Former ICC judges criticise handling of complaint against prosecutor
Karim Khan investigation: Former ICC judges criticise handling of complaint against prosecutor

Middle East Eye

time3 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Karim Khan investigation: Former ICC judges criticise handling of complaint against prosecutor

Former judges at the International Criminal Court have criticised the court's oversight body over its handling of an ongoing investigation into a complaint of alleged sexual misconduct brought against the court's chief prosecutor, Karim Khan. Speaking to Middle East Eye, two former judges at the court said they were gravely concerned by the way in which Khan had been publicly identified as the subject of a complaint, and questioned the need for an external investigation into his alleged misconduct. Cuno Tarfusser, an Italian judge who worked at the court from 2009 to 2019, told MEE: "I am deeply disturbed, even scandalised, by the way the proceedings against Karim Khan seem to be unfolding." Another former judge, speaking on condition of anonymity, told MEE he feared that a lack of due process had taken the investigation into 'bandit country' in which 'anything can happen'. The investigation by the United Nations' Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) was commissioned by Paivi Kaukoranta, the President of the Assembly of State Parties, the ICC's oversight body, after details of a sexual misconduct complaint against Khan were leaked to the media in October. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Khan was publicly identified by Kaukoranta as the subject of a complaint, even though the ICC's own investigative body, the Internal Oversight Mechanism (IOM), had closed two investigations of its own, without publicly naming the chief prosecutor, after the complainant, a female ICC staff member, declined to cooperate. Announcing the OIOS inquiry the next month, Kaukoranta said the IOM had investigated the complaint against Khan on the basis of requests by a third party and by Khan himself, and acknowledged the IOM was 'competent to investigate such allegations'. Exclusive: How Karim Khan's Israel war crimes probe was derailed by threats, leaks and sex claims Read More » But she said that 'the particular circumstances of the case, including the IOM's victim-centred approach, and perceptions of possible and future conflicts of interest' had led her to seek an external investigation. Both judges told MEE they believed Khan had been denied due process and the right to privacy in being named by Kaukoranta and by her decision to outsource the investigation to the OIOS. The former judge said it was his view that Khan should not have been publicly identified before the investigation was completed, commenting: "It's a genie that you can't put back in the bottle." Tarfusser told MEE the investigation appeared to have been 'tailored' for Khan. 'It is unprecedented and a shame within an institution based on the rule of law that a personalised proceeding is created just for Karim Khan,' he said. 'This, far from being decisive, threatens to permanently damage the credibility of the court itself. This way of doing things, these procedures, are known to autocratic states, not to states or institutions based on legality and law.' The other former judge said he was concerned that the handling of the complaint would erode trust in the court's procedures. He said it could discourage future complainants from coming forward because of a lack of confidence that their complaint would be dealt with correctly. Cuno Tarfusser told MEE he was "scandalised" by how the investigation into Khan had unfolded (ICC/Flickr) 'It damages the whole structure of the complaints procedure,' he said. The complaint against Khan is based on allegations of sexual misconduct made by a female ICC staff member, but was initially reported to the IOM by a member of Khan's office rather than the complainant herself. Khan, who has been chief prosecutor at the ICC since 2021, has strenuously denied all of the allegations against him. He is understood to have been interviewed by OIOS investigators in early May and to have cooperated with the investigation. Khan was forced to step away on leave later in May following the publication of new allegations against him, including claims that he had sexually assaulted the complainant on a number of occasions over a period of almost a year. Khan's lawyers said in a statement at the time: "Our client has decided to take a period of leave, not least as the wildly inaccurate and speculative media focus on the matter is detracting from his ability properly to focus on his job. 'Our client remains the Prosecutor, has not stepped down and has no intention of doing so.' But new questions about the investigation into Khan were raised this week after MEE revealed details of a pressure campaign exerted on the prosecutor which sought to derail his investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes in Gaza and the occupied Palestinian territories. MEE reported that an initial complaint of sexual harassment was made against Khan in May 2024 as he was in the final stages of preparing to apply to the court for arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his then-defence minister, Yoav Gallant. The allegations re-emerged in October 2024, as the ICC was preparing to issue the warrants, when details of the initial complaint were circulated to journalists and on social media. It was these allegations which prompted the ASP to commission the OIOS investigation. Then, in May this year, reports that Khan was accused of sexual assault, as first reported by the Wall Street Journal, broke just as Khan was reported to be seeking further arrest warrants for Israeli officials. The complainant told MEE that her complaint had 'nothing whatsoever to do with the Court's investigation into Palestine', and said she is not affiliated with, or acting on behalf of, any state or external actor. She said any suggestion that her complaint was politically motivated is 'highly inappropriate… offensive and unfounded'. She said she continued to support all investigations under the ICC's jurisdiction. French newspaper Le Monde on Friday also published details of a campaign against Khan and others working at the court. It quoted British lawyer Andrew Cayley, who oversaw the ICC's Palestine investigation, as saying that he had been told by Dutch intelligence that he was at risk. He said in December he had been directly threatened: "I was told I was an enemy of Israel and that I should watch my back." Cayley quit the court earlier this year after being warned by the British foreign office that he was at risk of being targeted by US sanctions. The judge who spoke on condition of anonymity told MEE the investigation into the complaint against Khan needed to look into allegations of suspected interference in the work of the prosecutor's office. He noted that a lot of people had an interest in damaging the prosecutor and the court, and said judges working at the court had always had to deal with "a political undercurrent from one source or another". Both judges told MEE their concerns were shared by a number of other former and current ICC judges. The court has faced punitive and hostile measures over its investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes. Khan was subjected to US sanctions in February, and the US sanctioned four current ICC judges in June. Speaking last month at a meeting of the ASP, the US State Department legal advisor, Reed Rubinstein, warned the court's oversight body that 'all options are on the table' if the arrest warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant are not withdrawn. It remains unclear when the investigation into Khan will be completed and what will happen next. In June, the ASP Presidency announced that the OIOS's final report would be sent for assessment to an external panel of judicial experts to help consideration of 'appropriate next steps'. It said the work of the panel would be conducted on a confidential basis. Asked for comment, the office of the ASP Presidency referred MEE to its public statements about the allegations against Khan and the OIOS investigation. It said the findings of the investigation would be 'handled in a transparent manner' once it was concluded.

UN video shows shots fired at Palestinians waiting for aid
UN video shows shots fired at Palestinians waiting for aid

The National

time3 hours ago

  • The National

UN video shows shots fired at Palestinians waiting for aid

The UN has released a video showing shots being fired towards people waiting for food in Gaza, many of them children, as an aid convoy approaches. The shots are fired into the ground in front of a crowd of people, who begin rushing towards the UN vehicles as they draw near. ' Israeli forces were firing warning shots just inches away from a crowd waiting for a UN convoy with food supplies,' the UN Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Ocha) said. It said the shooting took place on Wednesday near the Karam Abu Salem border crossing from Israel into southern Gaza. In the video, a male voice says: "No, no, don't do this, don't do this" as people swarm towards the vehicles, despite the shots fired seconds earlier. "Check your door's locked, check your door's locked, safety lock as well," another male voice says. Ocha spokesperson Olga Cherevko said the UN team faced "several constraints" when they went to pick up food supplies from the border crossing. "One of the constraints that we faced was waiting about 2.5 hours at an Israeli forces checkpoint, which by the time we were allowed to pass, we were met on the road by tens of thousands of hungry and desperate people who directly offloaded everything from the backs of our lorries." Israel also did not give the UN enough time to secure the aid on the lorries, Ms Cherevko said, making it easier for the packages to fall off. The UN footage was released amid growing international anger over Israel's restrictions on the delivery of aid as it presses a military campaign against Hamas in Gaza, despite extreme levels of hunger in the Palestinian enclave and the rising number of deaths among people trying to receive food. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said on Friday that at least 1,373 Palestinians have been killed while seeking food. It said 859 deaths occurred near aid sites run by the US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), and 514 along the routes of food convoys. "Most of these killings were committed by the Israeli military," it added. Twelve more people died while trying to collect aid on Saturday morning, the Palestinian news agency Wafa reported, as well as 10 others killed in Israeli attacks across the enclave. Gaza health authorities have also been reporting more and more people dying from hunger-related causes. The total stands at 147, among them 88 children, most of whom died in the past few weeks. Israel said it is taking steps to increase aid access and last Sunday announced humanitarian pauses in its war against Hamas to allow the delivery of relief supplies. However, aid agencies say they are not receiving enough permissions from the Israeli military for the entry of aid. US President Donald Trump 's special envoy Steve Witkoff and Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visited Gaza on Friday in what the White House said was a preparation to draw up a new plan to deliver aid to the territory. Mr Trump has repeatedly expressed concern over the levels of starvation in Gaza. "We want to help people. We want to help them live. We want to get people fed. It is something that should have happened long time ago," he told the Axios news website on Friday. Ms Cherevko said access to aid had to be expanded so that more food was entering on a regular basis and "communities have the confidence that supplies are coming and that they will be receiving them and that they will be distributed properly". Israel has denied pursuing a policy of starvation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store