
Dark clouds emerge for Trump on economy
The report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) suggested the economy and labor market are much weaker than previously thought, and will raise questions about whether the president's tariff regime is keeping businesses from hiring.
The combination of the dismal jobs report and rising inflation also raises disturbing questions about whether the economy is in stagflation, where unemployment rises with prices.
Trump's response to the report was furious: He fired BLS commissioner Erika McEntarfer, accusing her, without evidence, of politicizing previous BLS reports in the run-up to last year's presidential election.
In doing so, Trump cast doubt on whether future jobs reports, which are analyzed carefully around the world for signals about the U.S. economy, will be politicized and inaccurate.
Markets reacted dismally to the news, marking their worst day drop since May. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 542 points to finish down 1.2 percent on the day. The S&P 500 lost 1.6 percent of its value, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite fell 2.3 percent.
The president fumed over the poor economic news this week, posting on Truth Social that 'today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad' and telling reporters 'we need someone honest' at BLS.
The economy added 73,000 jobs in July, well below economists' expectations of around 100,000.
More significant were the massive downward revisions over the past two months. The economy added just 14,000 jobs in June, after the number was initially reported as 147,000. Only 19,000 jobs were added in May after initially being reported as 144,000. The combined revisions showed 258,000 fewer jobs in the economy.
The Labor Department described the revisions as abnormally large in their monthly release. Asked why they were so big, a representative for the department told The Hill that new information had come in and pointed to employment levels in the state and local government education sectors.
Trump's response to fire the head of BLS raised major red flags from economists.
'This is awful. Reliable economic data is a key strength of the US economy,' Harvard economist Jason Furman, who chaired former President Obama's White House Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) wrote in a commentary. 'I don't think Trump will be able to fake the data given the procedures. But there is now a risk, plus an awful appearance.'
White House economists admitted the numbers were bad, while pointing to 'anomalous factors' related to seasonal adjustments.
'This jobs report isn't ideal. There's no way around that,' White House Council of Economic Advisers chief Stephen Miran told CNN Friday. 'The downward revisions reflect a couple of anomalous factors … about 60 percent of the downward revision is due to quirks of the seasonal adjustment process.
Harvard economist Jeffrey Frankel, a former member of the National Bureau of Economic Research's business cycle dating committee, told The Hill that the previously reported jobs numbers stood out to him more than the revised numbers, which he said make more sense in the context of tariffs and a broader slowdown.
'The consistently strong numbers that we thought we had previously were the anomaly,' he said.
Market participants expressed similar sentiments throughout the day.
Zacks Investment Research senior market analyst Mark Vicker said the labor market is looking 'much weaker… than we knew yesterday.'
The White House has been leaning on Trump's tariff plan as a policy that will turn around the U.S. economy and create revenue and jobs for the country.
Trump on Thursday signed an executive order that will modify tariff rates for dozens of trading partners starting Aug. 7 — pushed back from Aug. 1 and July 9 previously — and ranging from 41 percent to 10 percent imposed on imports.
The overall U.S. tariff level is now around 17 to 18 percent, according to various estimates.
Some nations had negotiated trade agreements to lock in tariff rates, like 19 percent for Indonesia and Thailand and 15 percent for South Korea, Japan and the European Union. Others face a higher rate, like Canada with 35 percent and Brazil with 50 percent.
Aside from the jobs numbers revealing a struggling economy, skeptics of the president's tariff plan already predicted this year will be one of 'pain' for the U.S. consumer, with companies passing off the cost of high tariffs to customers.
'That, in and of itself, is a recipe for slower economic growth and higher prices, and that's what he's got. So they did this, and we have been promised that it's going to be worth it. We should put up with this pain because we're going to get new steel mills and new aluminum factories,' said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the center-right American Action Forum. 'It takes years for any of that to happen, so all you're gonna get for this year is the pain.'
The messaging out of the White House to pitch the president's aggressive tariff policy has been that more goods can be made in the U.S., minimizing the dependency on foreign goods.
But, the jobs report on Friday showed the manufacturing sector lost 11,000 jobs in July after shedding 15,000 in June.
'We're certainly not seeing a manufacturing renaissance. At this point, the data is showing the opposite,' Monica Gorman, former special assistant to President Biden for manufacturing and industrial policy, told The Hill.
Trump also lashed out again Friday at Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, urging the central bank board to wrest control from him. Such a move could dramatically shake markets after just the idea of Trump moving to fire Powell earlier this month caused stocks to dip.
The Fed voted on Wednesday to keep short-term interest rates at a level of 4.25 percent to 4.5 percent, but that vote included the first double dissent from Fed board officials in more than 30 years.
Trump leaned on the dissents, calling Powell 'stubborn' and saying 'the board should assume control' after months of the president calling for Powell to resign and flirting with moving to remove him.
'What the president is essentially saying is, ignore the fact that I'm raising every price in the economy. Don't worry about that. Cut rates and save the jobs. But he wasn't elected to have higher prices so he can't say that. So he's just beating up on Powell,' Holtz-Eakin said.
Many forecasters predicted on Friday that the Fed will move to cut rates sooner given the newly apparent weakness in the job market.
'Today's figures should be a bombshell for Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who called the labor market 'solid' in the post-FOMC meeting press conference this week,' Preston Caldwell, U.S. economist at Morningstar, wrote Friday.
Futures markets show an 80 percent chance of a rate cut at the Fed's next meeting in September.
Aside from tariffs, the economy is in the middle of a gradual slowdown that's been going on since the soaring recovery from the coronavirus pandemic, which was bolstered by trillions in fiscal stimulus that's taken years to filter through the economy.
The Friday jobs report suggests that the moderation in conditions could be further along than previously known.
'We're seeing a slowdown in the economy,' Gorman said. 'Whether that turns into a recession I think is too early to predict.'
Gross domestic product grew by 2.9 percent in 2023, and by 2.5 percent in the first half of last year. In the first half of this year, it grew by just 1.2 percent.
On top of that, prices are also starting to rise from tariffs, creating potential stagflation. Prices from personal consumption rose to a 2.6-percent annual increase in June, while the Labor Department's consumer price index rose to a 2.7 percent annual increase.
Businesses are sounding increasingly worried about normalizing the new U.S. tariff levels.
'Institutionalizing the highest U.S. duties since the Great Depression, coupled with ongoing uncertainty, will ultimately make American businesses less competitive globally and consumers worse off,' the National Foreign Trade Council, a trade group, said in a Friday statement.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Smithsonian slated to restore Trump impeachment exhibit
The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History said it is slated to restore the placard with information about President Trump's two impeachments after removing it from the exhibit last month. The museum said in a Saturday statement that the section will be 'updated in the coming weeks to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history.' The Washington Post reported on Thursday, citing an unnamed source familiar with the exhibit plans, that the removal of the placard occurred as part of an internal content review the institution agreed to after pressure from President Trump's administration to get rid of the art museum director. The Smithsonian said on Saturday that the placard, part of the exhibit 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden,' did not meet the institution's standards and argued no one within the administration asked the museum to remove the information. 'The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a twenty-five-year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline and overall presentation. It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case,' the Smithsonian said in a statement. 'For these reasons, we removed the placard. We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit,' the museum added. The placard, before being removed last month, detailed Trump's two impeachments and was featured as part of the exhibit since September 2021, the Smithsonian previously told The Hill. 'It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025,' a Smithsonian spokesperson said. 'The section of this exhibition covers Congress, The Supreme Court, Impeachment, and Public Opinion,' the spokesperson added. 'Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the Impeachment case back to its 2008 appearance.' The president was impeached two times during his first White House term: once over a phone call where he allegedly asked Ukraine to investigate then-ex-President Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, and the other over his alleged role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. He was acquitted by the Senate in both instances. The removal of the placard drew backlash from Democratic Party lawmakers. Trump signed an executive order in March, ordering the removal of 'divisive narratives' from the Smithsonian museums that are not compatible with the administration's views and 'remind' Americans 'of our extraordinary heritage.' 'As the keeper of memory for the nation, it is our privilege and responsibility to tell accurate and complete histories. As has been recently reported, in July, a placard was removed from the National Museum of American History's exhibit 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden,'' the Smithsonian said on Saturday. 'The intent of the Impeachment section of the exhibit is to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history,' the institution added.


San Francisco Chronicle
28 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Smithsonian denies White House pressure to remove Trump impeachment references
WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House did not pressure the Smithsonian to remove references to President Donald Trump's two impeachments from an exhibit and will include him in an updated presentation 'in the coming weeks,' the museum said Saturday. The revelation that Trump was no longer listed among impeached presidents sparked concern that history was being whitewashed to appease the president. 'We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit," the Smithsonian statement said. A museum spokesperson, Phillip Zimmerman, had previously pledged that 'a future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments,' but it was not clear when the new exhibit would be installed. The museum on Saturday did not say when in the coming weeks the new exhibit will be ready. A label referring to Trump's impeachments had been added in 2021 to the National Museum for American History's exhibit on the American presidency, in a section called 'Limits of Presidential Power.' The section includes materials on the impeachment of Presidents Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson and the Watergate scandal that helped lead to President Richard Nixon's resignation. 'The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a twenty-five year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation,' the statement said. 'It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard.' Trump is the only president to have been impeached twice — in 2019, for pushing Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to investigate Joe Biden, who would later defeat Trump in the 2020 presidential election; and in 2021 for 'incitement of insurrection,' a reference to the Jan. 6 siege of the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters attempting to halt congressional certification of Biden's victory.


NBC News
29 minutes ago
- NBC News
Smithsonian will again include Trump in impeachment exhibit in 'coming weeks'
The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History will include President Donald Trump in an exhibit focused on presidential impeachments after the removal of a placard noting Trump's two impeachments sparked concerns this week over the White House's influence on the institution. In a statement on Saturday, the Smithsonian detailed its decision to remove the Trump placard from the "Impeachment" section of an exhibit titled "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden," saying the decision was not influenced by politics, but rather the conditions of the placard. "The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a 25-year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation," the Smithsonian's Saturday statement read. "It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard." The "Impeachment" section of the exhibit "will be updated in the coming weeks to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history," the Smithsonian said. The Washington Post was the first to report on the changes to the exhibit. According to the Post, the Trump references were removed from the exhibit after the Smithsonian undertook a content review following pressure from the White House and accusations of partisan bias. In its statement, the Smithsonian said "we were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit." 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibit was created in 2000 and hasn't been formally updated since 2008, a spokesperson for the Smithsonian told NBC News on Thursday. In lieu of an update, which the museum indicated would be costly, the Smithsonian in 2021 affixed a placard noting Trump's two impeachments to the exhibit. 'It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025," the spokesperson said Thursday. Because the exhibit, which also covers Congress and the Supreme Court, hadn't been updated since 2008, the museum decided to restore the 'Impeachment' section of the gallery 'back to its 2008 appearance," the spokesperson said at the time. The decision to remove the Trump label drew criticism from lawmakers, particularly as Trump has sought to exert his influence over the Smithsonian, which encompasses 21 museums, nine research centers and a zoo. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., on Friday accused Trump of attempting to "rewrite history." "He is censoring the American History Museum. It's Orwellian. It's downright Orwellian. It's something you'd see in an authoritarian regime," Schumer said. "Here's my message to the president: no matter what exhibits you try to distort, the American people will never forget that you were impeached not once, but twice." Trump has called for a reimagining of the Smithsonian, accusing the cultural institution in March of coming 'under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology' and signing an executive order to 'restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness.' In that order, Trump directed Vice President JD Vance to work with the Smithsonian's Board of Regents to "remove improper ideology" from the museums. Trump also barred spending on exhibits or programs "that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race or promote programs or ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy." Last week, artist Amy Sherald said she withdrew her exhibit from the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery after concerns were raised about a portrait she featured of a transgender woman dressed like the Statue of Liberty. "I was informed by the National Portrait Gallery that concerns had been raised internally about the museum's inclusion of a portrait of a trans woman titled Trans Forming Liberty. These concerns led to discussions about removing the work from the exhibition," Sherald said in a statement. "I cannot in good conscience comply with a culture of censorship, especially when it targets vulnerable communities." A spokesperson for the Smithsonian refuted Sherald's characterization of the incident, arguing that that the artist was not asked to remove the painting, but rather the museum wanted to contextualize the portrait through a video featuring differing opinions of it. "The Smithsonian strives to foster a greater and shared understanding. By presenting and contextualizing art, the Smithsonian aims to inspire, challenge and impact audiences in meaningful and thoughtful ways. Unfortunately, we could not come to an agreement with the artist," the spokesperson said.