logo
Jersey's government rejects calls to force businesses to report gender pay gap data

Jersey's government rejects calls to force businesses to report gender pay gap data

ITV News08-05-2025
Jersey 's government has again rejected calls to introduce legislation forcing businesses to publish their gender pay gap statistics.
In a scrutiny meeting on Tuesday 6 May, the island's Assistant Chief Minister Carina Alves said legislation of this nature would "place too much burden on businesses and entail quite a significant cost to government".
The Government has since added that this decision aligns with the goals of their common strategic policy, which stated they would not be overly bureaucratic and interfere too much in the private sector.
What is the gender pay gap?
The gender pay gap is the difference in average hourly earnings between men and women.
However, it is not just about men being paid more for the same job.
Factors like taking career breaks to raise children, the over-representation of women in lower-paying sectors, and a hesitancy to hire women in high-earning managerial positions also contribute.
In the UK, the gender pay gap was 7% in April 2024.
What is gender pay gap reporting?
In the UK, it is a legal requirement for companies with more than 250 employees to report their gender pay gap data.
It is argued that this transparency makes it easier to compare salaries, expose inequality, and introduce measures that will help create change.
The European Parliament also introduced legislation in March 2023 which forced EU companies to disclose information that makes it easier to compare salaries and imposes regulations if they report a gender pay gap of more than 5%.
However, neither Jersey nor Guernsey has equivalent laws.
What is the gender pay gap in the Channel Islands?
Whilst Jersey's government say they have no plans to enforce pay gap reporting, they explain they are leading by example in publishing their own gender pay gap data annually.
Statistics Jersey also produces pay gap reports using data from income tax returns and social security contributions.
In 2024, the pay gap in Jersey was 7.8%.
The States of Guernsey say they do not currently collect data that allows them to reliably report on the gender pay gap.
Local campaigners say forcing businesses to report pay gaps would bring greater transparency and be a critical step towards achieving gender equality.
Countries in Europe have shown that the shift can bring about change - Luxembourg currently favours women with a pay gap of -0.9% after making unequal pay illegal in 2016.
Alex Ruddy, Chair of Jersey's Institute of Directors and co-founder of campaign group 'Mind the Gap', says transparency is a necessary step towards achieving equal pay, improving childcare and maternity policies, and enabling career progression.
"Reporting your gender pay gap is not going to solve everything - it's a small step towards gender equality and recognising that diversity on boards or in businesses is a good thing", she says.
"It is a demonstration by a business of the steps they are taking to address the gender pay gap."
She adds that all female professionals will have encountered issues relating to pay inequality, maternal leave, or career progression at some point.
"It's about ensuring that people realise that those 'career gaps' - when you've spent time away from work to have children - are valuable, and it doesn't belittle the professional qualifications you'd previously held or the work you'd undertaken to get there."
Mind the Gap is currently working alongside the Government to provide incentives and toolkits for local businesses with the hope this will allow them to publish their own statistics and take the steps towards pay equality.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Risk boost from US-EU trade deal of little help to rupee as outflows persist
Risk boost from US-EU trade deal of little help to rupee as outflows persist

Reuters

time27 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Risk boost from US-EU trade deal of little help to rupee as outflows persist

MUMBAI, July 28 (Reuters) - The Indian rupee is expected to open little changed on Monday, with any support from improved risk sentiment after a trade deal between the European Union (EU) and the U.S. likely to be capped by persistent foreign portfolio outflows. The 1-month non-deliverable forward indicated the rupee will open in the 86.48-86.51 range versus the U.S. dollar, compared with Friday's close of 86.5150. Global stocks rose and the euro firmed after the weekend deal between the EU and the U.S., which set the import tariff on most EU goods at 15% - half the rate initially threatened. Asian currencies traded mixed, while the dollar index was at 97.6. The U.S.-EU trade pact is expected to reduce trade-related uncertainty in a week dominated by central bank policy decisions and the U.S.'s August 1 deadline for trading partners to strike deals. Washington has already signed similar framework accords with Britain, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam. Meanwhile, India's trade minister told Reuters last week that the country is also hopeful of reaching a deal with the U.S. that includes "special and preferred treatment". Alongside these, monetary policy meetings in the U.S., Japan and other economies will be in focus this week. While the Federal Reserve is widely expected to keep rates unchanged, ANZ said it will watch for "tweaks to the language" in the Fed's statement and Chair Jerome Powell's comments for clues on possible rate cuts in September. Over the week, traders expect the rupee to hover between 86.20 and 86.80-86.90, with a slight depreciation bias given the persistent outflows from local stocks. Foreign investors have net sold Indian equities worth about $750 million so far in July, reversing three months of inflows. KEY INDICATORS: ** One-month non-deliverable rupee forward at 86.63; onshore one-month forward premium at 13.25 paise ** Dollar index at 97.67 ** Brent crude futures up 0.4% at $68.7 per barrel ** Ten-year U.S. note yield at 4.39% ** As per NSDL data, foreign investors sold a net $231.1mln worth of Indian shares on July 24 ** NSDL data shows foreign investors sold a net $55.2mln worth of Indian bonds on July 24

Imported dogs could carry disease or behaviour risk, RSPCA warns
Imported dogs could carry disease or behaviour risk, RSPCA warns

The Herald Scotland

time2 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Imported dogs could carry disease or behaviour risk, RSPCA warns

RSPCA spokesman David Bowles likened the process to 'Deliveroo for dogs' and called on the Government to tighten regulations on animal rescues. He told the BBC: 'The RSPCA's major concern is these dogs are essentially ticking time bombs – coming over, not being health tested. 'Diseases are now coming in through these dogs. They're affecting not just the dogs that are being imported, they could also affect the dogs already in this country and their owners. 'They've almost set up a Deliveroo for dogs and that is a real problem.' There is no requirement for rescue organisations to be licensed in England, Wales or Northern Ireland. It comes weeks after a bill that aims to stop animal smuggling and cruelty cleared the Commons with cross-party support. Legislation put forward by Liberal Democrat MP Dr Danny Chambers will reduce the number of animals for non-commercial entry into the UK, ban the import of puppies and kittens under six months old or heavily pregnant dogs and cats, and introduce a halt on the import of dogs and cats who have been 'mutilated', including having their ears docked. The MP for Winchester's Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill was supported by the Government, and will now proceed to the House of Lords on its passage to becoming law. Dr Chambers said: 'As a vet, I've seen the devastating consequences of puppy smuggling. It's unimaginably cruel to separate puppies and kittens from their mothers at a very young age, and then bring them across borders in substandard conditions where they're then sold for maximum profit by unscrupulous traders who prioritise profit over welfare.' He added: 'Careful consideration has been given to setting these limits, balancing the need to disrupt illegal trade with minimising impact on genuine pet owners. To underpin this, only an owner, not an authorised person, will be permitted to sign and declare that the movement of a dog or cat is non-commercial. He criticised the influence of social media on the increased demand for dogs with docked ears, and a party colleague hit out at the platforms' role in publishing animal abuse. He said: 'One reason that there is such an interest in dogs with cropped ears is that a lot of influencers on Instagram and other social media platforms pose with these dogs or show they have these new dogs with cropped ears. Many people aren't aware that this is a mutilation. 'They think it's how the dogs' ears normally look, and it drives a demand for dogs that look like this.'

Justice Secretary ‘determined to keep prison staff safe' as Tasers trial starts
Justice Secretary ‘determined to keep prison staff safe' as Tasers trial starts

South Wales Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Justice Secretary ‘determined to keep prison staff safe' as Tasers trial starts

Specialist officers from the Operational Response and Resilience Unit based in Kidlington, Oxfordshire, and Doncaster, South Yorkshire, will be the first to become equipped with Tasers from Monday, as part of Government plans to clamp down on record levels of violence against prison staff. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood attended the base in Kidlington last Thursday, when officers demonstrated how they would use Tasers on violent inmates in scenarios where there is a significant threat to safety – such as hostage situations or riots. The trial will run until enough data has been collected to determine if Tasers should be more widely used, according the Ministry of Justice – but Ms Mahmood said she hoped to have updates in the autumn. 'I inherited a situation with completely unacceptable levels of violence,' she told reporters at the Kidlington base last week. 'I'm not willing to tolerate that. 'I'm determined to do everything I can to keep prison staff safe. 'They have been asking for Tasers to be allowed to be used in our prison estate for years and years and years, and I'm very pleased to have been able to greenlight this trial.' She said the roll-out of Tasers for local prison staff teams across the UK will be examined as part of the trial, adding: 'I think it's right that we start looking at the trial through the prism of our national capabilities. 'Of course I will consider what the trial shows, but from my perspective this is very much the beginning.' It comes after rates of assaults on prison staff reached record levels last year, rising by 13% in the 12 months up to December 2024, according to Government data. There were also 10,496 assaults on staff in the 12 months to September 2024 – a 23% increase from the previous 12 months and a new peak. In April this year, Manchester Arena plotter Hashem Abedi targeted prison staff at HMP Frankland with boiling oil and homemade weapons in a planned ambush. Four prison officers were injured at the jail in Brasside, County Durham, with three taken to hospital. 'The incident of Frankland has really forced the pace on further roll-out of these measures,' Ms Mahmood said. Southport killer Axel Rudakubana also allegedly attacked a prison officer at HMP Belmarsh in May by pouring boiling water over them. Union bosses called for officers to be given stab vests and protective equipment, with Ms Mahmood announcing in June officers would be told to wear body armour at close supervision centres, separation centres and segregation units in the highest categories of prisons in England and Wales. Last week, officers based in Kidlington demonstrated their emergency response protocols through two scenarios: one in which inmates take a member of staff as hostage, and another in which three inmates assault a fourth prisoner in the yard. In the hostage situation, officers showed how the use of loud pyrotechnics can help startle and distract violent inmates before officers are able to immobilise them by tackling them to the ground and putting them in handcuffs. In the yard attack scenario, officers deployed Tasers and gave verbal warnings before firing. The targets – fellow officers who played the role of violent inmates – wore thick protective suits so as to not feel the effects of the Taser. The trial will use the Taser 7 model, which generates 50,000 volts when fired, with the voltage dropping to 1,500 volts on contact with the skin to incapacitate the target. The T7 model is also a two-shot weapon, enabling officers to shoot a second time in the event they miss their target the first time. The Tasers will be worn by officers on their tactical vest in a secure holster, making the weapon visible to inmates as a deterrent, officers told Ms Mahmood last week. The device also collects data – such as how long it was armed for, how long it was discharged for, who discharged it, and any malfunction that arises – which will contribute to the trial, officers told the Justice Secretary. 'Tasers have been used for many years by the police, but a custodial setting is different to usage in other scenarios,' Ms Mahmood said. 'These are exactly the lessons that the trial will be looking to use, and it is one of the reasons why you can't just look at the usage of Tasers by the police and assume that the read across the prisons will be exactly the same. 'We will have to make sure that we guard against all of those potential incidents as much as is humanly possible … so that we can make sure we've got the strongest possible protocols in place and that, when they're discharged, they do what they're meant to do, which is prevent a threat to life and keep my staff safe.' Officers already have access to batons and Pava spray, a synthetic form of pepper spray, in men's prisons in the public sector. The Ministry of Justice announced in April Pava spray is due to be made available 'in limited circumstances' to a select number of specialist staff at the three public sector young offender institutions – including YOI Werrington, Wetherby and Feltham A. The Taser trial is part of a £40 million package announced last month to boost security across the prison estate, including £10 million specifically for anti-drone measures such as new netting and reinforced windows, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) said on Monday. 'Officers will be subject to robust accountability measures, each deployment of a taser will be reviewed,' a spokesperson for the MoJ added. The Prison Officers' Association (POA) said it welcomed the move, but added the Government needed to address the roots of violence in jail. 'The POA will always support any initiative that will help protect our members,' a spokesperson for the trade union said. 'However, as welcome as this initiative is we need to address the reasons why prison officers need Tasers in the first place. 'Violence in our prisons is out of control and apathetic prison managers would rather put the prison regime before the safety of their staff. 'We urgently need action to address overcrowding, understaffing, drugs and the other root causes of prison violence.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store