2025 Smart #1 Premium & #3 Premium Review
The names might be odd (there's no #2), but the goal is clear: take on the booming compact EV segment with style and substance. After a first taste of the #1 Premium and #3 Premium, I'm happy to report that these siblings bring a refreshing mix of playful design, genuine tech cred and real driving chops to our roads. But how do they stack up against each other, and against rivals like the MG4 XPower, Cupra Born, or even Mercedes' own GLA/EQA?
From a distance, the Smart #1 and #3 could almost be twins, until you notice the profiles. The Smart #1 is the 'urban SUV' of the pair, chunky and cute, with a rounded front and upright stance. It wears a friendly face with oval LED headlights and a clamshell bonnet, while the rear features a full-width lightbar that cheekily resembles a baby Mercedes EQA.
By contrast, the Smart #3 is the swoopier SUV coupé. It's longer and lower, trading some of the #1's bubbly charm for a sleeker silhouette. It's as if someone took the #1 and stretched it into a hot hatch shape. Both sport hidden pop-out door handles (not usually my favourite, but these work okay in practice, as I found) and frameless doors.
Both Smarts are compact. The #1 measures 4270mm long, whereas the #3 is slightly longer at 4400mm. That extra length (and a 35mm longer wheelbase) benefits the #3 mainly in the cargo area – the boot space expands from the #1's compact 203 litres to a still-small 260L in the #3. Neither will swallow a family's holiday luggage. To put it in perspective, a Cupra Born hatch holds around 385L. But the #3's boot is at least useful for groceries or a couple of weekend bags. In both cars, the rear seats can slide forward to trade legroom for more cargo room, or fold mostly flat when you need extra space.
Climb inside, and you'll be surprised at how airy these little EVs feel. The cabin design is near identical between #1 and #3, but headroom differs slightly due to those opposing roof profiles. The #1 Premium gets a large panoramic sunroof (with a power sunshade) that lets in plenty of light, whereas the #3's 'halo' glass roof stretches even wider across the cabin. As a result, the #3 feels just a tad airier in the back.
During my 'giant human test' I found both cars surprisingly accommodating but the #3 offered a smidge more clearance above my head due to the wider glass panel, despite the lower roofline. Legroom is decent for this class; I could sit behind my own driving position in both, though in the #1 my knees brushed against the front seat back. Width is the limiting factor; don't expect to fit three adults across the rear bench comfortably.
Smart's Mercedes influence is evident in the cabin design. The dashboard has a flowing, modern style with metallic-look trim and turbine-inspired circular air vents. The Smart #1 Premium we tested featured a slightly more solid-feeling interior in some areas, whereas the #3 Premium had a different trim finish that looked cool but creaked a bit under pressure. Both cars have a mix of soft-touch surfaces up high and harder plastics down lower.
Smart does dress up the Premium trim with some genuine upgrades. There's leather seat upholstery (versus cloth/leatherette in the base model) and snazzy LED ambient lighting strips that add a premium vibe at night. Both cars have power-adjustable front seats that are nicely shaped. The #3's front buckets are a touch sportier with integrated headrests and I found them even more comfortable on longer drives.
Both cars come with a 12.8-inch central touchscreen and a 9.2-inch digital instrument cluster. The screens are crisp and packed with features. The centre display runs Smart's own UI, though we noted similarities to those found in Lotus and Zeekr cars. It has cutesy graphics and menus that, once learned, are easy enough to navigate. One thing I appreciated is the physical bezel around the touchscreen. It sounds trivial but having a frame to rest your hand on helps stabilise your finger when tapping on the move.
Both Premium models are loaded with tech. Highlights include integrated Apple CarPlay and Android Auto (wireless connectivity) and an impressive Beats audio system with 13 speakers and a subwoofer.
Smart #1 and #3 both come with the expected ADAS (advanced driver assistance systems) as standard, and they work remarkably well. Adaptive cruise with Lane Centering and Traffic Jam Assist are smooth and reliable. The lane-keeping in particular is among the best I've tried – it centres confidently without the ping-pong wobble some systems exhibit and, crucially, it isn't overly intrusive. The Smarts also read speed signs and can even automatically adjust your cruise speed. I rarely use such systems as they can be rather abrupt but this one isn't.
There's a wireless phone charger in the console, and multiple USB-C ports for device charging. Practical storage up front is decent – the centre console has an open bin beneath and a sliding cover over the cupholders. Both models have a powered tailgate (with a kick sensor on Premium) for easy access to that small boot.
The #1 and #3 Premium share the same powertrain: a 66kWh (usable) lithium NMC battery hooked up to a rear-mounted electric motor. Peak output is a healthy 200kW with 343Nm of torque, which is more than enough oomph for cars of this size. In fact, that's hot-hatch territory: by comparison, a VW Golf GTI makes about 180kW. On the road, the acceleration feels brisk; the #1 launches from 0-100 km/h in roughly 6.7 seconds. The slipperier #3 is quicker still: Smart quotes about 5.8 seconds 0-100km/h.
In real-world terms, both RWD Smarts feel punchy. There's instant electric torque to scoot out of intersections, and plenty of midrange power for highway passes. Unless you simply must have a sub-four second 0–100 time, the single-motor versions are more than quick enough. Smart also offers Brabus dual-motor AWD variants with a whopping 315kW – those will rip 0-100 in about 3.7s, but that's another story and another $10k+ on the sticker.
Both the #1 and #3 use that 66kWh NMC battery to good effect. Despite their small size, they're not ultralight (the #1 Premium weighs 1800kg, #3 Premium 1810kg), but the efficiency is respectable. The official WLTP range is up to 440km for the #1 Premium and 455km for the #3 Premium. That slight difference likely comes down to aerodynamics and possibly tyre choices – the #3 cuts through air a bit better and recorded a marginally lower energy consumption in testing (around 16.3kWh/100 km versus ~16.8 for the #1). In practice, you're looking at real-world 350–400 km on a charge for either car, depending on driving style.
Charging is another strong suit. There's a CCS2 port supporting up to 150kW DC fast charging, so a 10–80 per cent top-up can take as little as 30 minutes under ideal conditions. All NZ-spec Premiums also include 22kW AC charging, which is rare in this class and very handy if you've got access to three-phase charging at home or work. The base Pro+ models stick with a more common 7.4 kW onboard charger.
On the road, both cars are surprisingly engaging to drive. With 200kW to the rear wheels, these Smarts can even be a bit tail-happy if you provoke them. The ESC isn't overly intrusive; in Sport mode, you can actually get a hint of rear-wheel rotation on damp pavement before the electronics step in. Both cars are rear-drive, which contributes to their balanced feel in corners. Steering is a strong point: light at parking speeds but firming up nicely as you go. It's quick and responsive, making the #1 feel nippy around town, true to the Smart brand's city-car roots.
The #3, with its wider track and longer wheelbase, actually feels even more composed and confident when cornering at speed. Push it on a winding road and it hunkers down more like a hot hatch than an SUV, with great grip. In fact, the chassis tuning is genuinely impressive – there's a dash of that driver's car vibe, unexpected in a small electric crossover.
Credit likely goes to the Geely SEA platform they're built on (shared with the likes of the Volvo EX30 and Zeekr X), which has its batteries down low and a well-sorted suspension set-up. For a high-riding EV, the Smart #3 might be one of the best handlers in its class.
Now for the big question: do these Smarts make sense in the NZ market, and which one should you pick? On price alone, Smart has come in higher than the mainstream, but lower than traditional luxury brands, effectively carving out a premium niche of its own. The Smart #1 Premium is priced at $69,990, and the Smart #3 Premium at $74,990 (before on-road costs). For the Pro+ models, subtract $5000.
That positions the #1 just above some mainstream options at list, and the #3 well below premium options. It's also well below something like a Mercedes EQA (which starts around $92k). For your money, the Smarts come relatively fully loaded.
The biggest strengths of the Smart #1 and #3 are their blend of attributes. They give you zippy EV performance, usable range, and genuine style in a compact package that's perfect for city dwellers. They also offer tech and features that outshine many competitors – the 22kW AC charging capability, for example, is rare and super-useful. The driving experience is another highlight; these cars are actually fun to drive, with tight handling that can put a grin on your face on a winding road.
No car is perfect. The Smarts' main weaknesses boil down to space and perhaps brand perception. The limited boot capacity is the most obvious practical drawback.
When stacked against the MG4 XPower and Cupra Born, the Smarts hold their own. The MG undercuts on price and overwhelms with power but it can't match the Smart's interior finesse or tech. The Cupra Born is a closer fight: similar price, more range, very stylish, and backed by the Volkswagen Group. But the Cupra isn't quite as quick, and its interior isn't as feature-packed.
Mercedes GLA/EQA comparisons highlight the value of the Smart – a GLA 250 petrol or an EQA 250+ electric will cost you at least $15k–$20k more and yet come with similar or even fewer features.
Smart's #1 and #3 Premium models are impressive debut acts for the brand's return to NZ. They deliver an appealing mix of style, performance, and technology that feels well-suited to our market.
Personally, I find myself drawn to the Smart #3, its sleeker looks and marginally greater practicality win me over. If it were my money, I'd spend the few grand extra. That said, if you prioritise a smaller footprint and $5k saved, the #1 Premium won't disappoint. Both prove that EVs can be chic yet sensible, fun yet efficient. A smart choice, then.
Smart #1 Premium$69,990 / 16.8kWh/100km / 0g/km0-100 km/h 6.7s (claimed)Motor output 200kWMax torque 343NmBattery 66.0kWhRange 440kmDrivetrain Single-speed auto / RWDFront suspension Mac strut / swaybarRear suspension Multilink / swaybarTurning circle 11.0m (2.2 turns)Front brakes Ventilated discsRear brakes DiscsStability systems ABS, ESP, TVSafety AEB, ACC, BSM, LDW, RCTA, ALK, AHBTyre size f/r-235/45R19Wheelbase 2750mmL/W/H 4270 / 1822 / 1636mmLuggage capacity r-203L Tow rating Not rated to towService intervals 12 months / 20,000kmWarranty 5yrs / 150,000 kmANCAP rating ★★★★★ (2022)
Weight (claimed) 1788kg
Smart #3 Premium$74,990 / 16.3kWh/100km / 0g/km0-100 km/h 5.8s (claimed)Motor output 200kWMax torque 343NmBattery 66.0kWhRange 455kmDrivetrain Single-speed auto / RWDFront suspension Mac strut / swaybarRear suspension Multilink / swaybarTurning circle 11.0m (2.2 turns)Front brakes Ventilated discsRear brakes DiscsStability systems ABS, ESP, TVSafety AEB, ACC, BSM, LDW, RCTA, ALK, AHBTyre size f/r-235/45R19Wheelbase 2785mmL/W/H 4400 / 1844 / 1556mmLuggage capacity r-260L Tow rating Not rated to towService intervals 12 months / 20,000kmWarranty 5yrs / 150,000 kmANCAP rating ★★★★★ (2023)
Weight (claimed) 1810kg
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Techday NZ
4 days ago
- Techday NZ
NetSuite adds AI translation to workflows for seamless teamwork
NetSuite has released a new feature called Text Enhance Translate, providing in-field translation capabilities integrated within NetSuite workflows. The feature allows users to instantly translate text fields into more than 20 supported languages, including Chinese (Simplified & Traditional), Czech, Danish, Dutch, various English variants, Finnish, French (France/Canada), German, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Portuguese (Brazil), Spanish, Swedish, Thai, Turkish, and Vietnamese. Enhanced collaboration The company states that this new functionality is aimed at boosting collaboration between teams operating across different language regions, simplifying daily activities such as reviewing invoices, responding to customer support queries, or setting up HR job descriptions. The upgrade allows organisations to avoid delays that can arise when texts have to be translated externally or by human translators, especially for routine operational usage. "With Text Enhance Translate, users can instantly translate a field or a portion of text within the NetSuite product, whether that's a vendor invoice, a customer support response, or a job description in an HR record." According to NetSuite, about one in three of its customers currently uses the Text Enhance tools to improve productivity, minimise errors, and craft contextually relevant content across different company departments. The new translation functionality is described as a significant extension of these capabilities. Business context awareness The company asserts that Text Enhance Translate differs from generic translation tools by deploying generative AI designed to understand both business and operational context. This includes interpreting intent, tone, industry jargon, and workflow-specific terminology. This approach, the company claims, is especially beneficial in handling business documents and specialised records across multiple industries and regions. "Unlike basic translation tools, Text Enhance Translate can understand your business context, your data, and your workflow, helping your teams collaborate more effectively across borders and languages." For example, a sales manager based in Tokyo is able to translate deal records from English to Japanese prior to discussing pricing with local leadership. Finance teams can interpret vendor contracts in French that are stored in NetSuite without waiting for a human translator. Likewise, customer support agents can respond to tickets in the original language submitted by the customer using the context-aware capabilities of the tool. Technology and usage Text Enhance Translate can be accessed from any text field in the NetSuite product, where users can select the translate option via the Text Enhance icon. The translation process will prioritise enabled languages based on each user's settings in NetSuite's multi-language configuration. For more complex requirements, NetSuite Admins and power users can utilise Prompt Studio to construct tailored workflows that combine translation operations with other AI-powered instructions. Additionally, developers are able to incorporate translation into custom processes via the SuiteScript GenAI API, such as automatically translating customer comments when synchronising with a customer relationship management system. Language support and deployment Text Enhance Translate is available in all markets where NetSuite Text Enhance is currently supported, with direct translation capabilities across over 20 languages. "With translation embedded directly into NetSuite workflows, customers can now onboard international employees faster, localise customer communications with confidence, and help reduce operational friction as they expand abroad." NetSuite indicates that the feature is now available to all customers using NetSuite Text Enhance, supporting global operational requirements as businesses continue to grow and engage in international activities.
Techday NZ
4 days ago
- Techday NZ
Microsoft SharePoint zero-day flaw prompts urgent global response
Organisations around the world are racing to mitigate the impact of a critical zero-day vulnerability in Microsoft's SharePoint server software, which has already been implicated in a series of significant security breaches and is being actively exploited by threat actors, including alleged Chinese nation-state groups. The flaw, catalogued as CVE-2025-53770, was revealed last week after several cyber security researchers, including Microsoft and Google's Threat Intelligence Group, published emergency advisories. Microsoft has clarified that the vulnerability affects only on-premises versions of SharePoint. SharePoint Online, the cloud-based variant included in Microsoft 365, is not impacted by this zero-day flaw. The urgency of the threat became clear after Eye Security researchers published findings that highlighted "active, large-scale exploitation" of the flaw, which they related to a set of vulnerabilities coined "ToolShell." Attackers who successfully exploit CVE-2025-53770 can access sensitive MachineKey configuration details on vulnerable servers, including the validationKey and decryptionKey. These critical parameters can then be used to craft specially designed requests that enable unauthenticated remote code execution, effectively giving attackers full control over the targeted servers. Late breaking fixes for SharePoint Server 2019 and SharePoint Subscription Edition have been made available, with a patch for SharePoint Server 2016 expected to follow. Organisations are being urged to conduct incident response investigations, apply available patches, and closely review Microsoft's temporary mitigation instructions to limit exposure. In recent reports, the scope and impact of the exploit have become clearer. More than 100 servers across at least 60 global organisations, including critical infrastructure such as the US National Nuclear Security Administration, have reportedly been breached via the vulnerability. Cyber security analysts have attributed the campaign to Chinese state-linked groups, among them Linen Typhoon, Violet Typhoon, and Storm-2603. These groups are said to have used stolen credentials to establish persistent access, potentially enabling ongoing espionage even after patches are applied. According to Charles Carmakal, CTO of Mandiant Consulting at Google Cloud, attackers are using the vulnerability to install webshells - malicious scripts that provide ongoing unauthorised access - and to exfiltrate cryptographic secrets from compromised servers. This presents a substantial risk to organisations, as it allows persistent, unauthenticated access by malicious actors. "If your organisation has on-premises Microsoft SharePoint exposed to the internet, you have an immediate action to take," Carmakal said. He stressed that mitigation steps must be implemented without delay, as well as the application of patches as they become available. "This isn't an 'apply the patch and you're done' situation. Organisations need to assume compromise, investigate for any evidence of prior intrusion, and take appropriate remediation actions." Satnam Narang, Senior Staff Research Engineer at Tenable, warned of the widespread consequences, stating: "The active exploitation of the SharePoint zero-day vulnerability over the weekend will have far-reaching consequences for those organisations that were affected. Attackers were able to exploit the flaw to steal MachineKey configuration details, which could be used to gain unauthenticated remote code execution." Narang added that early signs of compromise could include the presence of a file named although it might carry a different extension in some cases. Bob Huber, Chief Security Officer and President of Public Sector at Tenable, commented: "The recent breach of multiple governments' systems […] is yet another urgent reminder of the stakes we're facing. This isn't just about a single flaw, but how sophisticated actors exploit these openings for long-term gain." Huber noted that because Microsoft's identity stack is so deeply embedded in government and corporate environments, a breach in SharePoint can create "a massive single point of failure." He argued for a more proactive, preventative approach to cyber security, emphasising the need for exposure management platforms that provide unified oversight across complex infrastructures. For now, the coordinated response by vendors, security firms, and government agencies continues, as organisations track for signs of compromise and await further guidance on long-term remediation. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the intricate cyber threats faced by modern institutions, and the pressing need for rigorous, ongoing defence strategies against ever-evolving adversaries.
RNZ News
4 days ago
- RNZ News
F1's Spa weekend kicks off a new era for Red Bull
Mercedes driver Lewis Hamilton at the Belgium Grand Prix. 2024. Photo: Thomas Maheux/ / PHOTOSPORT Formula 1's Spa weekend marks a new start for Red Bull and reigning world champion Max Verstappen as the team go racing for the first time without Christian Horner at the helm. The Briton's sudden sacking after a 20-year reign of rare success, including the most dominant of seasons in 2023, has had the sport buzzing for weeks with plenty of questions to be asked in Belgium. A Saturday sprint will be the first race of new boss Laurent Mekies' tenure and the change, and how it affects four-times world champion Verstappen's future, remains the big talking point of the moment. Horner has made no public comment and Red Bull's preview for the 13th round of the 24-race season made no mention of him. Mekies, promoted from Racing Bulls who have handed over the reins to Alan Permane, arrives with Red Bull fourth overall and Verstappen a distant third in the drivers' standings behind McLaren's Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris. That intra-team title battle is likely to have some extra sizzle at Spa-Francorchamps as Norris seeks a third win in a row - new territory for the Briton - and the chance to take over at the top. The sprint format offers more points than usual and Norris, whose mother is Belgian, is only eight behind the Australian going to a high-speed track that is a favourite for most drivers. Piastri, despite his generally unruffled exterior, may also be still simmering at the 10 second penalty that cost him a win in Britain and handed victory to Norris. He will want to hit back as Formula 1 kicks off a Belgium/Hungary double-header - the first fast and often wet while the second is twisty and hot - before the long August break. George Russell, his contract expiring at the end of the season and in danger of losing his Mercedes seat to Verstappen or having him as an uncomfortable teammate, is also not short of motivation. The Briton was stripped of victory last year at Spa when post-race checks found his car to be underweight, handing victory to then-teammate Lewis Hamilton in what remains the seven-times champion's most recent win in F1. Ferrari have yet to triumph, other than a Shanghai sprint, since Hamilton moved from Mercedes to Maranello in January but they are gathering momentum. The Italian team are second overall and Charles Leclerc has secured three podiums in the last five races while Hamilton was fourth at Silverstone. New Zealand's Liam Lawson wil be planning to get back into the points after lasting just one lap at Silverstone when he was hit by Esteban Ocon. New Zealand driver Liam Lawson of Racing Bulls. Photo: ANTONIN VINCENT / PHOTOSPORT Lap distance: 7.004km. Total distance: 308.052km (44 laps) 2024 pole position: Max Verstappen (Netherlands) Red Bull one minute 53.159 seconds* 2024 race winner: Lewis Hamilton (Britain) Mercedes** Race lap record: 1:44.701, Sergio Perez (Mexico) Red Bull 2024. Start time: 1300GMT (1am Monday NZ time) *Verstappen was demoted to 11th on the grid for the use of an additional power unit element. Ferrari's Charles Leclerc started on pole. **Mercedes' George Russell finished first but was disqualified for having an underweight car. Teammate Hamilton was promoted from second. The grand prix is the third sprint weekend of the year, with qualifying for the sprint on Friday and the 100km race on Saturday before qualifying for Sunday's main event. There is no Belgian driver on the starting grid but Verstappen and McLaren's Lando Norris have Belgian mothers. Verstappen was also born in Belgium. This will be the 70th Belgian Grand Prix and 58th at Spa. Spa is the longest lap in F1, with the fewest laps, and one of the fastest with an average speed of around 230km/h. Cars can hit 315km/h at Blanchimont. Three current drivers have won at Spa: Hamilton (2010, 2015, 2017, 2020, 2024), Leclerc (2019) and Verstappen (2021, 2022, 2023). Michael Schumacher won a record six times at Spa, including from 16th on the grid in a wet 1995 race. Hamilton can equal that tally this year. McLaren's Oscar Piastri leads teammate Lando Norris by eight points. Verstappen is third and 69 points off the lead. In the constructors' standings, McLaren (460 points) are now 238 points clear of second-placed Ferrari (222), with Mercedes third (210) and Red Bull fourth (172). Spa last year was Hamilton's most recent win and the record-extending 105th of his career. He has made 368 starts. Piastri has won five of 12 races this season, Norris four, Verstappen two and Russell one. Norris is going for three wins in a row for the first time in his career. Verstappen has won 65 grands prix and is third on the all-time list after Michael Schumacher on 91. Norris has eight career wins, Piastri seven. McLaren have had five one-two finishes this season, including the last two races. Piastri and Verstappen have been on pole four times this season and Norris three, Russell once. The McLaren drivers have each finished on the podium 10 times in 2025. Charles Leclerc's second place in Monaco remains Ferrari's best of the season so far. Hamilton has yet to stand on the podium for Ferrari. Piastri is the only driver to have scored in every race this season. The Australian has scored for 38 race weekends in a row, if sprints are included. Only one driver on the grid has yet to score - Alpine rookie Franco Colapinto. This weekend will be the first grand prix since 2004 without Christian Horner in charge at Red Bull. Mercedes' Toto Wolff (since 2013) is now the longest-serving principal. Nico Hulkenberg's third place for Sauber at Silverstone, the last race before Spa, removed his unwanted record of being the most experienced driver never to stand on the podium. He did so in his 239th race. The record reverts to fellow-German Adrian Sutil, who made 128 starts with a best result of fourth. Mercedes are marking their 600th grand prix weekend as an engine supplier. Red Bull's Yuki Tsunoda is making his 100th start. - Reuters
