Satheesan slams speech of RSS ideologue at Raj Bhavan
Operation Sindoor
'.
Satheesan, speaking to the media at the KPCC headquarters on Thursday, called the act "unfortunate and inappropriate" and demanded that the state govt formally convey its protest to the governor.
He clarified that while there was no objection to the event itself, Raj Bhavan platform is not the place for political remarks against past govts or prime ministers. "If it's a seminar, bring in military experts or foreign policy professionals.
Calling an RSS leader to make political statements is unbecoming," he said. The opposition has demanded a clear stance from the chief minister on this issue and criticized the governor's conduct for allowing political narratives to be pushed through Raj Bhavan.
He said the govt must clarify whether media organizations were paid for promoting the 4th anniversary of the govt beyond advertisements. He accused the govt of paying media houses and online platforms for coverage aimed at promoting individual ministers rather than informing the public.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed!
IC Markets
Start Now
Undo
"Let the CM say such payments weren't made" he said.
He reiterated that he was questioning the govt, not the media. "It was the industries minister who twisted my question as an attack on journalists. I never criticized journalists." On the condition of national highways, the opposition leader slammed the state govt for taking credit for projects without ensuring quality. "Small rains have left the national highways cracked across Kerala.
We warned about unscientific construction.
Where are those who put up flex boards claiming credit now?" he asked.
He alleged that by bypassing soil tests and scientific procedures, the state was responsible for poor roadwork. "Flooding is inevitable during the monsoon because canals and water bodies were covered for construction. There was no coordination by the state in implementing centrally funded NH projects," he said, adding that he would write to Union minister Nitin Gadkari demanding a thorough probe into the construction of NHs in the state.
"There was no proper engineering supervision. The same govt that glorified the highways during its anniversary is now silent as the roads collapse," he said.
He also flagged the internal discord among ministers over Smart City road projects. "We learnt about ministerial disagreements from the media. There is more to come," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Primary responsibility of states: Govt on implementing passive euthanasia in healthcare system
Health being a state subject, it is the primary responsibility of the states and Union territories to implement passive euthanasia and living wills in the healthcare system by incorporating these into hospital protocols to ensure that medical professionals are trained to respect patients' end-of-life preferences , the government told Parliament on Tuesday. In a written response to a question in the Rajya Sabha, Union Health Minister J P Nadda said it is also the responsibility of the states to establish ethical safeguards , such as a mandatory review by a medical board in accordance with a Supreme Court judgment . Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category healthcare Finance Artificial Intelligence Product Management Cybersecurity MCA Design Thinking Digital Marketing Leadership Data Science Data Analytics Public Policy Technology others Data Science Management CXO MBA Project Management Degree Operations Management Others Healthcare PGDM Skills you'll gain: Duration: 11 Months IIM Lucknow CERT-IIML Healthcare Management India Starts on undefined Get Details Nadda's response came with respect to a question on the specific measures taken to implement and promote passive euthanasia and living wills in the healthcare system in light of the 2018 judgment of the apex court. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo He said in the judgment in Common Cause Vs Union of India , the Supreme Court laid down specific guidelines for executing advance directives and implementing passive euthanasia. The court, in Miscellaneous Application No. 1699 of 2019 in Common Cause Vs Union of India, relaxed these guidelines by simplifying the procedure for executing the same. Live Events These modifications aimed at making the process more accessible for terminally-ill patients to exercise their right to die with dignity by refusing life-prolonging treatment, the minister said. "Health" being a state subject, it is the primary responsibility of the states and Union territories to implement passive euthanasia and living wills in the healthcare system by incorporating these into hospital protocols to ensure that medical professionals are trained to respect patients' end-of-life preferences," Nadda said in his written response.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Temple politics in Bengal: How Mamata Banerjee is trying to counter BJP's 'Jai Ma Kali' push
NEW DELHI: Chief minister Mamata Banerjee, who is often accused of appeasement politics by her opponents, seems to be charting new waters to take on the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) as the political temperatures rise ahead of the 2026 West Bengal assembly election. In the recent bypoll in Nadia's Kaliganj assembly segment, BJP, which although lost the election, felt that the party had significant takeaway from the results - consolidation of Hindu votes. "We have been able to reap the benefits of assimilating Hindu votes in the region. The effort has paid off since we have received an overwhelming majority of votes from Hindu-dominated areas like Palassey," Suvendu Adhikari, leader of opposition, said. This perhaps explains Mamata's recent visible tilt towards soft Hindutva as she tries to do a course correction. With the grand inauguration of Rs 250 crore Jagannath Dham in April, and now the announcement of 'Durga Angan' project, Mamata is signaling a deliberate recalibration of her ideological narrative, long dominated by BJP. The 'Durga Angan' gambit With the 2026 West Bengal assembly elections looming, the chief minister has moved to the heart of the state's cultural and religious identity with her announcement to create 'Durga Angan', a grand year-round temple complex dedicated to Ma Durga. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Here's The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower Upgrade Homebuddy Learn More Undo "Just as we developed Jagannath Dham, we will create 'Durga Angan' so that people can visit and experience it throughout the year," the TMC chief said. Interestingly, the announcement comes at a time when BJP is swiftly invoking Bengal centric religious symbols like 'Jai Ma Kali' and 'Jai Ma Durga' in its campaign narrative. On July 18, Prime Minister Narendra Modi invoked the Goddesses at the beginning of his speech in Durgapur as he said that BJP is the only party that truly respects and protects Bengali 'ashmita' (pride). Later Banerjee, targeting PM directly during Martyrs' Day rally asked: "Why is it that you suddenly start remembering Ma Kali and Ma Durga only during the elections? Ma Durga is our revered goddess, and Durga Puja has even received international recognition as an Intangible Cultural Heritage. Now listen, just as we developed Jagannath Dham, we will create 'Durga Angan' so that people can visit and experience it throughout the year. " The CM, however, gave no timeline or details of the project. BJP slams TMC's Hindu symbolism Soon after Mamata's announcement, BJP slammed the decision as unconstitutional, alleging misuse of public funds to promote religion and branding it a political ploy to woo Hindu votes traditionally gravitating toward BJP. Suvendu Adhikari, leader of the opposition in the West Bengal assembly, asked, "No religious institution - temple, mosque, church or gurudwara - can be built using taxpayers' money." He accused Mamata of misusing public funds and ignoring constitutional benchmarks. He further added, "She hasn't read the Constitution, nor does she understand her own religion. She must educate herself before making such statements." TMC defends its faith credentials TMC spokesperson Riju Dutta, in rebuttal, pointed out Mamata Banerjee's long-standing spiritual affinity and said, "She performed Kali Puja at home even before entering politics. Building temples like Jagannath Dham or Durga Angan stems from genuine faith." He also cited prior state support for thousands of grassroots Durga Pujas and securing a Unesco heritage tag for the festival as evidence of the TMC's longstanding cultural engagement. "She has supported thousands of grassroots Durga Pujas with financial grants and helped secure UNESCO's heritage tag for the festival. She even organises the annual Durga Puja Carnival. Does that not count? BJP mocks Jagannath Dham as a 'theme park' and now questions her faith, people will judge them," he added. Why temple projects matter for TMC In West Bengal, the BJP election campaigns have focused on alleged Muslim appeasement by TMC, drawing support from Hindu voters. This has been especially effective in districts such as Murshidabad, Malda, Nadia, and North 24 Parganas. As Mamata government fights the aftermath of recent riots in Murshidabad, rapes in Kolkata medical college and B-school, the temple projects help TMC's double strategy of blending soft Hindutva symbolism with welfare-centric politics. These moves also come at a time when BJP has brought in Samik Bhattacharya, a staunch party loyalist with deep RSS roots to lead BJP state unit president marking a strategic move by the central leadership to stabilise the state unit amid internal rifts and prepare it for the 2026 Assembly elections. Since the BJP's 2021 assembly poll defeat, the organisation has suffered desertions, infighting, and setbacks in the 2023 Panchayat polls, 2024 Lok Sabha elections and recent bypoll in Kaliganj. In the 2021 assembly elections, TMC secured 48.02% vote share and 215 out of 292 seats, while BJP captured 37.97% but only 77 seats. In the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, TMC won 29 of 42 seats with approximately 45.76% vote share, up from around 43.3% in 2019; BJP fell to 12 seats with 38.73%, from 40.7% in 2019. While TMC retains advantage, Mamata's recent turn toward Hindu imagery appears bipartisan in purpose: a fence-mending strategy with Hindu voters while reinforcing her base among minority groups and welfare beneficiaries. As Banerjee positions herself at the cross-section of symbolism and state resources, her gamble may well be to preempt BJP's Hindutva allure. For now, the electoral arithmetic still favors TMC, but the game is tightening. In Bengal's increasingly polarised politics, religious symbolism is now a shared battlefield, and Mamata is choosing to play offense.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
No papers, no preschool: 21 states sue Trump over immigrant service ban
A political firestorm has erupted as 21 Democratic attorneys general have taken the Trump administration to court over what they call a brutal assault on community safety nets. The lawsuit, filed Monday, targets new federal restrictions that deny access to key services—such as Head Start, public health clinics, and adult education—to immigrants without legal status. Spearheaded by New York Attorney General Letitia James, the coalition argues the administration bypassed legal protocols and is imposing changes that will not only devastate immigrant families but jeopardize essential services for American citizens as well. 'These programs work because they are open, accessible, and grounded in compassion,' James said in a statement. 'This is a baseless attack on some of our country's most effective and inclusive public programs, and we will not let it stand.' From care to compliance The rule changes, announced jointly by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Education, Labor, and Justice, represent a stark reversal of Clinton-era policies that allowed community-based programs to serve families regardless of immigration status. Now, providers receiving federal funds must check documentation before offering support. This shift places enormous burdens on local organizations, many of which run on razor-thin budgets. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo The lawsuit warns, 'It is likely that for some programs, the costs of compliance will be so high as to lead to the programs' closure.' Programs like Head Start, which provide preschool education, child care, and developmental services to homeless or impoverished families, have historically never required proof of immigration status. The new demand for verification, they argue, could unravel decades of progress in early childhood intervention. Collateral damage: American families The coalition's legal brief doesn't just highlight harm to undocumented individuals, it paints a broader picture of widespread fallout. Schools, mental health centers, addiction treatment clinics, and domestic violence hotlines, all partially federally funded, could see services disrupted or defunded due to their inability to verify immigration status quickly or legally. Such mandates, the lawsuit argues, are not only unrealistic but dangerous. By forcing organizations to act as de facto immigration agents, the administration risks driving vulnerable populations underground, including American citizens in mixed-status families. Legality in question Central to the lawsuit is a pointed accusation: that the administration violated the Administrative Procedure Act by circumventing the required rulemaking process and failing to provide public notice or invite stakeholder input. Legal experts warn that if this move goes unchallenged, it could open the door to unchecked executive overreach, where vital federal funds come with ever-changing political strings attached. Ideology over infrastructure Supporters of the administration say the rules simply ensure taxpayer dollars are used lawfully. But critics argue this isn't about budgets, it's about political messaging. With the 2024 immigration debate still reverberating through Washington, this move appears aimed at energizing a base that equates enforcement with exclusion. In doing so, the administration risks dismantling local programs that serve as lifelines for the country's poorest and most marginalized communities. What comes next As the legal battle unfolds, the fate of countless community organizations hangs in the balance. If the rules are enforced, many may be forced to shut their doors, not because they failed in mission, but because they couldn't meet the paperwork. This isn't just a dispute about funding. It's a confrontation over values: Whether America's public services exist to uplift or to divide, to include or to exclude. For millions of families, citizen and non-citizen alike, the outcome of this case may decide more than policy. It may decide survival. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
