
Trump says US to hold nuclear talks with Iran next week
THE HAGUE : US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday he would likely seek a commitment from Iran to end its nuclear ambitions at talks next week and credited US strikes on Iran with bringing a swift end to the war between Israel and Tehran.
Trump said his decision to unleash huge bunker-busting bombs in Sunday's attack had devastated Iran's nuclear programme and called the outcome 'a victory for everybody'.
'It was very severe. It was obliteration,' he said, shrugging off an initial assessment by the US Defense Intelligence Agency that Iran's path to building a nuclear weapon may have been set back only by months.
Meanwhile, anxious Iranians and Israelis sought to resume normal life after 12 days of the most intense confrontation ever between the two foes and a ceasefire that took effect Tuesday.
Speaking in The Hague where he attended a Nato summit on Wednesday, Trump said he did not see Iran again engaging in nuclear weapons development. Tehran has for decades denied accusations by Western leaders that it is seeking nuclear arms.
'We're going to talk to them next week, with Iran. We may sign an agreement. I don't know. To me, I don't think it's that necessary,' Trump said.
'I'll tell you, the last thing they want to do is enrich anything right now. They want to recover,' he said, referring to Western accusations that Iran has been enriching uranium to near-weapons-grade purity.
Later on Wednesday, US Central Intelligence Agency director John Ratcliffe said in a statement that the US air strikes had 'severely damaged' Iran's nuclear programme, but he stopped short of declaring that the programme had been destroyed.
The agency confirmed a 'body of credible evidence' that several key Iranian facilities were destroyed and would take years to rebuild, he said.
Israel's nuclear agency assessed the strikes had 'set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years'. The White House also circulated the Israeli assessment, although Trump said he was not relying on Israeli intelligence.
Trump said he was confident Tehran would pursue a diplomatic path towards reconciliation. The president gave no details on the discussions next week such as the venue and participants.
If Iran tried to rebuild its nuclear programme, 'we won't let that happen. Number one, militarily we won't,' he said, adding that he thought 'we'll end up having something of a relationship with Iran' to resolve the issue.
The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, dismissed what he called the 'hourglass approach' of assessing damage to Iran's nuclear programme in terms of months needed to rebuild as besides the point for an issue that needed a long-term solution.
'In any case, the technological knowledge is there and the industrial capacity is there. That, no one can deny. So we need to work together with them,' he said. His priority was returning international inspectors to Iranian nuclear sites, which he said was the only way to find out precisely what state they were in.
Iran president hints at domestic reforms
Israel's bombing campaign, launched with a surprise attack on June 13, wiped out the top echelon of Iran's military leadership and killed leading nuclear scientists. Iran responded with missiles that pierced Israel's defences in large numbers for the first time.
Iranian authorities said 627 people were killed and nearly 5,000 injured in Iran, where the extent of the damage could not be independently confirmed because of tight restrictions on media. Twenty-eight people were killed in Israel.
Israel claimed to have achieved its goals of destroying Iran's nuclear sites and missiles; Iran claimed to have forced the end of the war by penetrating Israeli defences.
Israel's demonstration that it could target Iran's senior leadership seemingly at will posed perhaps the biggest challenge yet for Iran's clerical rulers, at a critical juncture when they must find a successor for Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, now 86 and in power for 36 years.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, a relative moderate elected last year in a challenge to years of dominance by hardliners, said it could result in reform.
'This war and the empathy that it fostered between the people and officials is an opportunity to change the outlook of management and the behaviour of officials so that they can create unity,' he said in a statement carried by state media.
Still, Iran's authorities moved swiftly to demonstrate their control. The judiciary announced the execution of three men on Wednesday convicted of collaborating with Israel's Mossad spy agency and smuggling equipment used in an assassination. Iran had arrested 700 people accused of ties with Israel during the conflict, the state-affiliated Nournews reported.
During the war, both Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Trump publicly suggested that it could end with the toppling of Iran's entire system of clerical rule, established in its 1979 revolution.
But after the ceasefire, Trump said he did not want to see 'regime change' in Iran, which he said would bring chaos at a time when he wanted the situation to settle down.
Relief, apprehension, exhaustion
In both Iran and Israel, residents expressed relief at the end of the fighting, but also apprehension.
'We came back after the ceasefire was announced. People are relieved that the war has stopped, but there's a lot of uncertainty about what comes next,' said Farah, 67, who returned to Tehran from nearby Lavasan, where she had fled to escape Israeli bombing.
In Tel Aviv, Rony Hoter-Ishay Meyer, 38, said the war's end brought mixed emotions: relief that children could return to school and normal life resume, but exhaustion from the stress.
'Those past two weeks were catastrophic in Israel, and we are very much exhausted and we need to get back to our normal energy.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
30 minutes ago
- The Star
Majority of Finns prefer to shift away from U.S. products, investment: survey
HELSINKI, July 1 (Xinhua) -- A recent survey conducted by Finnish financial services group LahiTapiola reveals that two out of three Finns now prefer to purchase products and services from Europe rather than the United States. The shift is largely attributed to U.S. President Donald Trump's unpredictable trade policies. According to the survey results released Tuesday, 66 percent of respondents said Trump's policies have made them more inclined to favor European goods and services. Only 16 percent disagreed, while 18 percent remained undecided. The findings also show that 56 percent of Finns believe that avoiding investments in U.S. companies is a responsible value-based choice. Among those who currently hold investments, that figure rises slightly to 59 percent. The accompanying press release cites growing concern over the negative impact of Trump's policies on Europe, particularly regarding economic stability and security, as the main driver behind this shift away from U.S. goods and investments. Beyond economic and political concerns, many Finns expressed frustration with Trump's communication style. The survey indicated that his rhetoric and behavior have fostered an emotional resistance toward American products. This sentiment appears to extend beyond Finland. The press release mentioned Tesla as a notable example, pointing out that its sales have been hit hard. According to the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association, registrations of new Tesla vehicles in EU countries dropped by more than 45 percent between January and May 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. Heikki Urpelainen, portfolio manager at LahiTapiola Asset Management, noted that escalating trade restrictions are making the United States a less attractive export market. In response, European companies are increasingly lowering prices and focusing on domestic sales. While this trend may provide short-term advantages for some European firms, Urpelainen warned that the broader impact of Trump's tariffs is detrimental to European exporters overall. The survey, conducted in April 2025, collected responses from 1,100 Finnish residents aged 18 and older.


New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Road to Middle East peace runs through Teheran and Tel Aviv
IRAN stands at the crossroads of history for resisting Israel and the United States that went all out to destroy the Islamic republic's uranium enrichment facilities. With or without nuclear weapons, Teheran can be a force for equilibrium and stability — not just in the Middle East, but across the Eurasian heartland. In hindsight, everything was going well with Iran's nuclear programme until US President Donald Trump decided to dump the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on May 8, 2018. Technically speaking, the US withdrawal from JPOA removed Iran from its obligations and expedited its "breakout time" — the time it would take for Iran to produce enough weapon-grade uranium for a nuclear bomb. By the morning of June 22, when all hell broke loose over the Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan uranium processing sites, Iran had the capacity to enrich uranium to 60 per cent purity, short of the 90 per cent that Israel feared. Incidentally, Israel has nuclear bombs at Dimona that could blow the entire region into pieces, and yet Tel Aviv is fearful of Teheran that has no nuclear bombs? After the US strikes, Trump triumphantly declared that the facilities "were totally and completely obliterated". His assessment was later downplayed by Central Intelligence Agency director John Ratcliffe. The killing of Iran's top nuclear scientists and generals may set back the process for a few years. However, it is unlikely to undermine its technical capacity to weaponise the knowledge, if it wishes to. The current Iran-Israel conflict is no longer based on ideological schisms or differences. Instead, the once-dominant Arab-Israeli conflict has given way to a more complex, dangerous and region-defining rivalry between Iran and Israel — one that reflects shifting alliances, strategic ambition and a new geopolitical architecture in the Middle East. This new fault line is less about identity or religion, and more about regional hegemony, deterrence, and resistance to unilateralism, territorial domination and land grabbing. Lastly, Israel's genocide policy in Gaza is a stark warning to other countries that they, too, could face the same fate if they dare challenge the nuclear state of Israel openly. Israel is a formidable military power and can respond to Iranian attacks — but without the US, it faces high strategic and operational risk. While US involvement provides the margin between military resilience and regional catastrophe, the response from Iran touched the very heart of Middle Eastern geopolitics in that states, however weak they are perceived to be, will stand up to regional bullies, a lesson that Tel Aviv should heed. The recent "12-day war" shows clearly that the Iran-Israel rivalry cannot be managed through bombs and diplomacy alone. What the Middle East needs to prevent further clashes involving the big powers is a new collective security dialogue and an acknowledgement that Iran, with a population of 90 million and sophisticated homegrown hypersonic missile technology, is a force to reckon with. Besides, it controls the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic choke point, through which some 20 million barrels of oil go through daily. Israel's true survival lies not in bombs, walls or foreign guarantees but in reconciliation, restraint and regional trust. Its security comes not from controlling land or stockpiling weapons — it comes from genuine coexistence with neighbours based on mutual respect, shared dignity and resilience. The road to Middle East peace no longer runs through Cairo, Riyadh or Amman — it now runs through Teheran and Tel Aviv. Thus, the Arab-Israeli conflict is no longer the story. The Iran-Israel confrontation is.


The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Children dying in S. Sudan after US aid cuts: NGO
NAIROBI: The impact of US aid cuts has already taken a toll in South Sudan and children are dying, Action Against Hunger told AFP on Tuesday. The east African nation has remained deeply poor and unstable since independence in 2011 and is massively dependent on international aid despite its oil wealth. It is among the countries facing shortfalls following US President Donald Trump's decision to slash funding for the US Agency for International Development (USAID), which had provided over 40 percent of global humanitarian aid. On Tuesday, the British Lancet journal projected that the cuts to USAID could lead to more than 14 million deaths by 2030, including over 4.5 million children under the age of five. 'I think it's not just a fear. It's already a reality. We're already having some mortality rates coming in,' said Denish Ogen Rwot, Action Against Hunger's communication and advocacy lead in South Sudan. 'Already we are having children die,' he added. The international NGO works across South Sudan, including in the increasingly violent Jonglei state, providing food and supplies. Rwot estimated they had lost 30 percent of their funding due to the USAID cuts. 'That means now we'll have facilities without food... and how do we work without these supplies?,' he asked. Rwot recently visited northern Warrap state, near the border with Sudan -- itself enduring a civil war -- describing how the warehouses there were 'very empty'. 'They're still registering people, but there is no food for them,' he said. It comes a day after the World Food Programme (WFP) warned that acute malnutrition rates among refugee children in South Sudan -- fleeing the war in Sudan -- had 'already breached emergency thresholds'. Action Against Hunger has been forced to reduce its staffing in the country from 300 to 86, further impacting its ability to respond during a crisis. 'We are running on sheer faith,' Rwot said.