Russ Vought: Appropriations process ‘has to be less bipartisan'
'The appropriations process has to be less bipartisan,' Vought told reporters at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast Thursday.
With Republicans in full control of government, he said now is the time for reining in spending, even without input from Democrats on Capitol Hill. He did not lay out a legislative path for partisan spending bills to clear the Senate, where 60 votes are required to pass legislation.
Vought said he's looking to 'change the paradigm' of the way appropriations has worked, pointing to the continued use of stopgap spending bills.
When specifically asked if he would reassure Democratic appropriators that the White House would abide by bipartisan spending agreements or commit to not using rescissions on future appropriations bills, he simply said he would not.
'There is no voter in the country that went to the polls and said, 'I'm voting for a bipartisan appropriations process,'' Vought said. 'That may be the view of something that appropriators want to maintain.'
He did, however, acknowledge that federal spending power lies with Congress.
'It is one of the most constitutional foundational principles, but that power of the purse does not mean — It's a ceiling. It is not a floor,' he said.
Vought reiterated his view and that of President Donald Trump that the 51-year-old Impoundment Control Act, which bars the president from withholding congressionally approved funds without asking Congress, is unconstitutional.
Vought's comments on the appropriations process come as the White House is on the precipice of a major win with the first partisan rescission package expected to pass the House this week.
'We are willing to send up additional rescissions. I think if this continues to pass, we're likely to send up another rescissions package that would come soon, and we'll be working on that to try to get that across the finish line,' Vought said. 'We're not there yet.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
9 minutes ago
- USA Today
GOP senators call for special counsel to probe Obama over 2016 Trump-Russia investigation
GOP Sens. Lindsey Graham and John Cornyn are calling for a special counsel to investigate whether Obama was involved in undermining Trump's 2016 bid. WASHINGTON - Two Republican senators are calling for the Justice Department to appoint a special counsel to investigate whether former President Barack Obama and his staff were involved in an effort to undermine Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign. The push by Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and John Cornyn of Texas comes after National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard in a July 23 press briefing alleged she had evidence the Obama administration promoted a 'contrived narrative' that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump, arguing that it wasn't true. Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 presidential election in favor of Trump, according to former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's 2019 final report and a 2020 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee assessment. Trump had long said the investigations into his first White House campaign and its connections with Moscow are a hoax. 'For the good of the country, we urge Attorney General Bondi to appoint a special counsel to investigate the extent to which former President Obama, his staff, and administration officials manipulated the U.S. national security apparatus for a political outcome,' Graham and Cornyn wrote in a joint statement. "With every piece of information that gets released, it becomes more evident that the entire Russia collusion hoax was created by the Obama Administration to subvert the will of the American people," they added. Gabbard had released previously classified documents that she claimed 'directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment.' One was a report from the House Intelligence Committee drafted by Republicans in 2017 and revised in 2020. But The New York Times reported the documents don't indicate any evidence of criminal behavior, despite Gabbard's claims, and merely show Obama administration officials pressuring intelligence agencies to complete their review quickly. In 2023, then Justice Department special counsel John Durham released a report that detailed flaws in the department and FBI's investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election led by Mueller. But Durham also concluded there was no need for wholesale changes at the Justice Department and FBI, which had already overhauled its policies. Trump accuses Obama of treason On July 22, Trump accused Obama of treason without any evidence, as Reuters reported. 'They tried to steal the election, they tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever imagined, even in other countries,' Trump said during remarks in the Oval Office. Patrick Rodenbush, a spokesperson for Obama, dismissed Trump and Gabbard's allegations, calling them 'ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.' Trump has been facing backlash from his MAGA base over the release of late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's criminal files. Asked for comment on the calls for a special counsel probe into Obama, the Department of Justice referred USA TODAY to a July 23 press statement announcing the formation of a 'Strike Force' that would 'investigate potential next legal steps' stemming from Gabbard's disclosures. 'The Department of Justice is proud to work with my friend Director Gabbard and we are grateful for her partnership in delivering accountability for the American people. We will investigate these troubling disclosures fully and leave no stone unturned to deliver justice,' Bondi said in a statement. The FBI is also investigating former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey, who both served under the Obama administration, for possible criminal conduct related to their efforts in the Trump-Russia investigation, according to CNN. Contributing: Kinsey Crowley and Bart Jansen, USA TODAY; Reuters
New York Post
9 minutes ago
- New York Post
Speaker Johnson: Epstein drama ‘not a hoax,' Congress wants ‘full transparency'
House Speaker Mike Johnson has insisted that the drama surrounding the case of late child sex predator Jeffrey Epstein 'is not a hoax' and that lawmakers want to see justice for the victims as he grapples with a growing firestorm over the issue. 'We want full transparency,' Johnson (R-La.) told CBS News' 'The Takeout with Major Garrett' Wednesday. 'We want everybody who is involved in any way with the Epstein evils — let's call it what it was — to be brought to justice as quickly as possible.' 'We want the full weight of the law on their heads.' Advertisement A weeks-long controversy has roiled Trump's MAGA movement after the Justice Department and FBI concluded in a July 6 memo that Epstein most likely killed himself in his Manhattan jail cell and didn't have an 'incriminating client list' of rich and powerful people who took part in sex with girls as young as 14. The conclusion has caused headaches for Johnson after House Democrats won over several Republicans in a push to publicly release the full case file. 3 House Speaker Mike Johnson said he hasn't seen the Jeffrey Epstein evidence in question. REUTERS Advertisement 3 Interest in Jeffrey Epstein was revived after a DOJ and FBI memo this week kicked up a firestorm and demands within MAGA world for more transparency. AP On Monday, the House Rules Committee — the lower chamber's gatekeeper for most legislation that gets a floor vote — was forced to adjourn by Republicans who wanted to short-circuit a Democratic effort to force the disclosure of the Epstein files. Johnson then opted to send lawmakers home to their districts Wednesday for the August recess — one day ahead of schedule — due to the House floor effectively being frozen over the Epstein revolt. President Trump has seethed at the controversy, calling out 'past' supporters as 'weaklings' for buying into the 'hoax.' Advertisement 'It's not a hoax. Of course not,' Johnson told Garrett. 3 House Speaker Mike Johnson has been careful not to break with President Trump on the Jeffrey Epstein ordeal. Getty Images 'I've never seen the Epstein evidence; it wasn't in my lane, but I had the same concerning questions that a lot of people do,' he later added. Rank-and-file lawmakers are pushing Johnson to hold a vote to compel the release of outstanding documents once the House returns from its recess Sept. 2. Advertisement Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) are pursuing a discharge petition — a legislative technique to force a vote on a bill without the speaker's blessing — to that effect. Meanwhile, Trump has announced his support for the release of grand jury testimony in the cases against Epstein and his co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell. On Thursday, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Maxwell and her legal team in Tallahassee, Fla. to discuss the case. Additionally, the GOP-led House Oversight Committee has subpoenaed Maxwell for testimony, with an interview tentatively set for Aug. 11.
The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
Epstein controversy sets capitol dome spinning
I have previously observed in this space that there's something about Washington that just loves a juicy scandal. Is D.C. different from anywhere else in the U.S.? Probably only in degree. Scandals divert attention from the otherwise hum-drummery of political infighting and bureaucratic skirmishes that consume so much of our government's business. They provide an entertaining diversion from things that really matter. This scandal fixation doubled-down in the current brouhaha over whether the evidence held by the Justice Department on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein should be released. It now is a scandal about a scandal. The original scandal related to the sex-trafficking by Epstein of women, including minors. The new scandal is about just who the paying clients were, why they were not tried as accessories, and why their identities remain concealed. The current scandal has kicked into overdrive with the reversals of President Trump and his top Justice and FBI appointees over the wisdom of releasing all the relevant materials. Epstein's was one of the juicier conspiracy theories fueled for years by Trump and these same allies, who charged past Democratic presidents with covering-up the details. Now the shoe is on the other foot and it's pinching. Trump and his team are now claiming there's no there there. The problem is the hardcore base of the MAGA movement both nationally and in Congress fail to buy into this spin reversal. It is causing panic among some in the White House and on Capitol Hill, with midterm elections looming just over the horizon next year. All this fuss from both parties is setting the capitol dome spinning. Democrats are thumping the drums of a coverup and clamoring for full disclosure. Majority party Republicans are ducking for cover, but some are taking issue with the president's protestations that it's all a hoax, fake news and hyperventilating. The president is especially upset that a segment of his MAGA supporters is not closing ranks behind him, calling them a bunch of idiots and lunatics. This came to a head last week as the president's party leaders in Congress were trying to pass his $9 billion rescission package and the defense appropriations bill, with Democrats throwing brickbats and smoke bombs over Epstein. Last Tuesday, when House Republicans were trying to pass a special rule on the floor providing for consideration of the defense appropriations bill and three other measures, the wheels came flying off. The routine special rule for consideration of the bill, which is usually adopted on a party-line vote, was rejected, 196-223, with 13 Republicans voting against it. Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) voted 'nay' to preserve his right to call for a reconsideration of the vote, which he promptly moved. The chair postponed action on that critical vote until the next day when it passed, 217-212, with only three members not voting. But that was not the end of it. Democrats smelled blood and moved in for another attack the following day when the Rules Committee met to consider a final procedural rule for the recission bill (H.R. 4). The proposed rule provided for automatic adoption of the Senate-passed amendment to the bill, thus clearing the recissions for the president's signature. Rules Committee Ranking Member James McGovern (D-Mass.), offered an amendment to also make in order a bill introduced by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) to mandate that the Justice Department release all the evidence in the Epstein files. McGovern's motion was ruled non-germane by the chair, and he lost an appeal of the ruling on a party-line vote. When the special rule was brought to the floor late Wednesday evening, McGovern made a run at trying to defeat the previous question to allow for consideration of the Khanna bill. This time, the majority was better armed. In the Rules Committee, it had also allowed for consideration on the floor of a non-binding, sense of the House concurrent resolution by Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), one of two Freedom Caucus members on the committee. The resolution also called for the full disclosure of the Epstein files. Although the Norman resolution rule was not brought up for consideration last Wednesday, the leadership's agreement to allow for its later consideration was sufficient to placate most of the previous Republican naysayers to support the rescission rule, and it was adopted, 216-213, with only two Republicans voting 'nay' and two not voting. It was still obvious that the Epstein files concealment scandal had legs and was not going away. A small chunk of hardcore MAGA voters nationwide were still squawking, keeping pressure on for full disclosure of the Epstein files. House Republican leaders were sufficiently drained from the previous week's perilous peregrinations that they adjourned the House Wednesday for an early August recess rather than risk any more Epstein votes. The lesson learned from this whole episode is that conspiracy theories have a way of circling back and biting their original perpetrators in their posteriors. Don Wolfensberger is a 28-year congressional staff veteran who served as chief of staff to the House Rules Committee in 1995. He is author of, ' Congress and the People: Deliberative Democracy on Trial ' (2000); and, 'Changing Cultures in Congress: From Fair Play to Power Plays' (2018).
