This transforming, dual-screened Android console is the most interesting handheld I've ever tested
It isn't often that something entirely new crops up in the gaming space. Nintendo is the only player still innovating when it comes to handhelds, but even then the evolution from the Wii U in 2012 to the Nintendo Switch 2 released just a few months ago feels far more iterative than say, the leap from the Game Boy to the Nintendo DS.
Then there's the ONEXSUGAR SUGAR 1. With two screens, folding controllers, and more power than nearly any other Android gaming handheld on the market, this thing is unlike anything I've ever seen or tested.
I've spent the past few days tinkering with an early prototype, and while I can't say this is the perfect handheld for everybody, the experience is so unique that I think it's worth the early adopters' risk.
Sugar never tasted so sweet
Nick Fernandez / Android Authority
Before I get too far, I need to reiterate that this was a prototype. The internals are the same as the retail model, but the chassis and hinges are not. The final version will use an aluminium frame with stainless steel hinges, which should make it significantly more resistant. Because of that I'm not going to give this device a review score or anything like that.
Still, I have to say I was very impressed. I was expecting the ostentatious design to feel far flimsier than it did, especially when swapping between modes (more on this in a moment).
The SUGAR 1 has a surprisingly sturdy build, especially for a prototype.
Instead, it felt rock solid. There are powerful magnets opposite the hinge to hold the controllers firmly in place, with virtually no flexing when attached. The Nintendo Switch 2 Joy-Cons also use magnets to stay in place, so it's not too surprising that the approach works. I wouldn't hold the controller and swing the device around like a nunchuck, but for normal use it should be absolutely fine.
Nick Fernandez / Android Authority
That said, I only tested the device for a few days. It's more than possible that the hinges degrade after months of use. Again, the final build will have improved hinges compared to the prototype, so I'll reserve my final judgement for now.
As for the controls themselves, they're a bit hit and miss. The Hall effect sticks are a joy to use, and the buttons are nice and clicky. The shoulder buttons rotate with the controller in a clever way, but they feel a little cheap to me. I hope these are improved on the retail model.
Nick Fernandez / Android Authority
The D-pad is also a big disappointment. Since they rotate, they have separated, Joy-Con style buttons. This works fine for cardinal directions, but the diagonals are not great.
There's a magnetic D-pad cover to convert it into a more traditional experience, but it's even worse than the bare buttons. I was also very afraid that I would lose it since it doesn't house anywhere on the machine. Instead, it sticks to the sides with those same magnets.
Nick Fernandez / Android Authority
Of course, those flippy controllers are only interesting because of the other unique part of this device, and that's the second screen. When using the main 6.01-inch OLED, it tucks away into the body of the device. When opened, the almost-square 3.92-inch OLED sits between the two controllers. I believe this is the same panel used in the AYANEO Pocket DMG and Retroid Pocket Classic.
Both screens are excellent, and I was surprised by just how compact the whole thing is. It's definitely top-heavy when playing with both screens, but there's an open space behind the smaller screen that allows you to get a little extra grip. I actually found it more comfortable to flip the whole thing upside down, with the smaller screen on top, as shown above. This only works for games that don't require frequent touch inputs on the second screen, but it's not something you can do on a standard Nintendo 3DS console.
Sweet and smart
Nick Fernandez / Android Authority
A big reason why the ONEXSUGAR SUGAR 1 is so great for Nintendo DS and 3DS emulation is because of the software. Android is notoriously finicky with two-screen devices, but the company seems to have come up with a very unique solution.
The software menu gives you several options for the screen layout. You can turn either screen off (the smaller display turns off automatically when stowed), switch the two screens, or use the unique Fusion mode. This appears to combine the two displays into one long display, at least as far as the emulation software is concerned.
Nick Fernandez / Android Authority
That's really the secret sauce here. Fusion mode completely sidesteps wonky support for second screens on Android, instead relying on custom layouts within the emulator itself. The result is a much better experience for 3DS and DS emulation, although it does require a little extra setup.
For everything else, you can use one or both screens normally. You can, for example, be playing one game on the large screen with a guide open on the smaller screen, or play a classic Game Boy game on the smaller screen while watching YouTube on the larger screen.
There are a lot of ways to use the second screen, and the software makes it easy.
To be honest, I don't find this as comfortable as propping my phone up next to me, but maybe it's just a matter of getting used to it. I did, however, like that I could use the second screen as a kind of kickstand when playing on the main screen with a Bluetooth controller. I doubt this was the intended use, but it's very sturdy.
The software supports a few other features, like adding overlays to perfectly match 16:9, 3:2, and 4:3 content. You can also change fan settings and swap the power profile from Saving to Balanced. There isn't a higher power profile at the moment, but based on my testing, it's still an incredibly powerful handheld.
Sweetening the deal
Nick Fernandez / Android Authority
Before I get into actual emulation performance, let's have a look at the benchmarks. This is one of the first handhelds with a Snapdragon G3 Gen 3 chipset, which was designed specifically for gaming handhelds. It's essentially a modified Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, and it's an absolute beast.
The graphs below compare the results of the AYANEO Pocket ACE (Snapdragon G3 Gen 2), AYN Odin 2 Portal (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2), and the ONEXSUGAR SUGAR 1. The new chipset sports a solid 20% boost in multi-core scores, with more modest gains in single-core performance.
GPU performance also sees a significant boost, again showing a roughly 20% boost over the G3 Gen 2-sporting Pocket ACE. That means that this device, as well as the upcoming AYANEO Pocket S2 with the same chipset, are now the top dogs in terms of Android gaming handheld performance.
Nick Fernandez / Android Authority
Despite this, temperatures never spiraled out of control like I've seen on gaming phones with a Snapdragon 8 Elite. The peak temperature I recorded was 45°C (113°F), which is cooler than the Pocket ACE but much hotter than the Odin 2 Portal. The SUGAR 1 has two fans on each side of the chassis, but I suspect this also makes it fairly difficult to cool.
Benchmarks are one thing, but the ONEXSUGAR SUGAR 1 also delivers in emulation performance. Obviously, Nintendo DS games run flawlessly, as do all retro systems up to and including PS2. Nintendo 3DS games also run well and look spectacular when upscaled on the larger OLED screen. I still think 3DS games are best played on a 3DS, but this comes close.
Nick Fernandez / Android Authority
Thankfully, the chipset is capable of far more than that. Not only can it play the most demanding games like Genshin Impact with ease, it can also readily handle Nintendo Switch emulation.
The SUGAR 1 handled everything I threw at it with ease.
Eden with the latest Turnip driver ran most games cleanly, and although I wouldn't recommend buying an Android-based handheld to play Switch games, it shows that this chipset is built to tackle whatever you throw at it.
My only complaint here is the battery. I suspect the second screen doesn't leave a lot of space for a large cell, which is why it will ship with a 5600mAh battery. Battery life wasn't as bad as my original ROG Ally, but the two screens and powerful chipset need a lot of juice.
A league of its own?
Nick Fernandez / Android Authority
I didn't know how much the ONEXSUGAR SUGAR 1 would cost while testing it, but yesterday the company finally announced early bird pricing at $599 during the Indigogo campaign, which launched just now. That's several hundred dollars less than I was expecting for a device this unique. I'm reserving my final judgement for the finished product, but based on what I've seen so far it's a fairly compelling offer.
Up until now, your options for 3DS emulation have been pretty limited on Android handhelds, so the fact that the SUGAR 1 works this well out of the box is a breath of fresh air. The powerful chipset means it can play literally everything that's possible to emulate on Android, although you will make some sacrifices in terms of ergonomics and battery life.
The ONEXSUGAR SUGAR 1 is one of the most fascinating devices I've ever used.
Normally I'd recommend a few more devices to consider instead, but this time there simply aren't any. The AYANEO Flip 1S DS has two screens in a similar layout, but it's a traditional clamshell handheld, and it runs Windows. You can slap one of Retroid's second screen attachments onto a standard handheld, but it's not going to be anywhere near as seamless as this without the software.
And those flippy controls? They're a novelty for sure, but a novelty that actually adds to the experience, rather than taking away from it. It makes other handhelds look boring by comparison, which is something only Nintendo has managed to do until now.
Granted, I still think it's best for early adopters and collectors. I really hope ONEXSUGAR continues to iterate on this design, but it's one of the most fascinating devices I have used in my 35+ years of gaming. That alone might be worth the price of entry.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
AI Alone Won't Save You: Solve A Real Problem First
Digital generated image of abstract AI data chat icons flying over digital surface with codes We're living in the age of copy-paste intelligence. You can spin up an AI-powered landing page in 15 minutes, plug in a few GPT calls, and it'll even write its own press release. The tools are impressive. But most of what gets built doesn't stick. The real issue isn't a lack of AI, it's a lack of purpose. Many products skip the part where they answer: Why does this need to exist? Too many products today are beautifully packaged but hollow. A glossy AI wrapper with no meaningful problem underneath. Founders get caught up in the novelty and forget to ask the most important question: What are we really solving? Great products start at the breaking points. Where something is frustrating, slow, tedious, or emotionally draining. That's where the value is. AI should quietly support that, not be the entire pitch. Start With Problem, Not the Solution A lot of AI products today start with the technology. The model comes first. Then comes the scramble for a use case. That's backwards. The best ideas start with a real-world problem. Something that's annoying, inefficient, or consistently painful. That's where AI can make a real difference. Take something as specific (and surprisingly frustrating) as naming a company. It sounds simple, until you try. Founders spend hours searching for something that feels right - a name that fits the story, the tone, the ambition. But they often settle for whatever's available. Keyword-based search tools don't help much in finding great domain names. You enter a word, get back a bunch of literal matches. Some might be close. Most aren't. But that's not how people think. They search in feelings. In phrases. 'Something calming but confident.' 'A name that sounds smart but not cold.' That's not a search problem. It's a language problem. We built semantic search at not to showcase AI, but to bridge the gap between how people describe what they want and how results are typically delivered. One founder, for example, was building a modern parenting brand. She didn't search for 'baby' or 'mom.' She searched for something that felt timeless and trustworthy, something that could evolve with the brand. The name she picked wasn't obvious. But it clicked. Because it captured the feeling, not just the words. That's what AI should do. Not call attention to itself, but quietly help people get to a better answer. The Real Difference Is in the Decisions Everyone has access to the same tools. The same models, APIs, tutorials. That's not where the edge is. What really separates strong products from forgettable ones is the thinking behind them. The decisions about what to build, and what to leave out. It takes restraint to focus on solving one specific thing well. It takes clarity to ignore the hype and focus on something that's actually useful. The best builders aren't showing off the technology. They're paying attention to the person on the other side. The Best AI Products Don't Talk About AI Think about the tools you rely on every day. Notion. Figma. Superhuman. They all use AI but none of them lead with it. They just work better. Quietly. That's what progress looks like. You don't remember the tech. You remember how much smoother things felt. One of the clearest examples of this approach is Dharmesh Shah, co-founder of HubSpot. He's quietly building a suite of AI-powered tools that actually help you get work done. Agents that research companies, summarize complex inputs, and yes, even help find domain names. Not as a gimmick. But because those are tasks people genuinely want to spend less time on. It's not about being flashy. It's about being helpful. Better Questions to Ask If AI can make that feel lighter, faster, or simpler, you're onto something. If you're starting with 'what can we build with GPT-4,' you're probably building a demo, not a product. Final Thought: Solve Like a Human, Then Scale Like a Machine The companies that will stand out in this next wave won't be the ones shouting about AI. They'll be the ones quietly removing friction. Making things easier. Helping people move faster with less frustration. That's the work that lasts. Start with pain. Then let the AI fade into the background.
CNET
2 hours ago
- CNET
Ready, Set, Game: Fix Your Lag With These Tips
According to a report from Liquid Web, over 95% of users who were surveyed in a pool of 1,000 complained about experiencing latency issues while gaming. That same report showed that these gamers were known to play games on PC, Xbox, PlayStation and Nintendo. Anyone who's spent time gaming online knows the frustration -- you pull the trigger or dive for a tackle, but thanks to lag, your action lands way too late. That's high ping in action, and it's a serious problem. It doesn't just slow you down, it gives everyone else an edge while you're stuck playing catch-up. A strong, stable connection with low ping isn't a luxury for online gaming -- it's a necessity. With the tech available today, there's no reason to settle for a laggy experience. There are ways to optimize your internet connection. If you're dealing with high ping, the first move is figuring out how bad it is. Once you've measured it, you can take steps. Whether that's tweaking your setup or upgrading your equipment to lower your ping and keep your games fast and responsive. First off, what is ping? Put simply, ping is a test of latency, or how long it takes your computer or console to send data back and forth from a specific server somewhere on the internet. Think of it as a courier. Whenever you use the internet for anything, you're sending a courier out to fetch whatever data you need to stream a show, use an app or play a game online. In this sense, your internet speed represents how much data can be carried at once, typically in megabits per second, or Mbps. Meanwhile, the ping tells you how long -- the latency -- the trip takes in milliseconds. Locating local internet providers You'll want to shoot for a ping of around 50 milliseconds or lower for online gaming. Over 50ms isn't terrible, but you definitely want to land under 100ms. After that, lag can become an issue. A good speed test will indicate where your ping is. There are plenty of free speed tests that can provide a detailed assessment of your home network's performance. Screenshot by Ry Crist/CNET Take a quick internet speed test Better yet, do a series of them -- and at different times of day, if you can. Your goal is simply to get a baseline sense of what your average speeds and ping look like before you start making changes. Oftentimes, the right set of tests can point you in the right direction as you start trying to speed things up. For instance, running speed tests on a computer that's wired to your modem and then comparing those results with what you see when you're wired to the router can help you figure out if it might be time to get a new one. Enlarge Image Looking to measure the ping to a specific site or server? Windows users can open the Command Prompt and typing "ping" followed by a space and then a URL or IP address. Screenshot by Ry Crist/CNET There are lots of free speed testing tools on the web these days. Claiming over 55 billion speed tests since 2006, the most popular is probably the Ookla Speedtest -- it's fast, simple and easy to use, and I like that it gives you control over which nearby server you're using. (Disclosure: Ookla is owned by the same parent company as CNET, Ziff Davis.) The speed test is another good option that includes a latency measurement, and if you'd like, SpeedSmart's speed test lets you measure the ping to servers all over the globe. For example, I was able to measure a latency of 30ms to a server about 750 miles away from me in New York, then 290ms to a server located in Sydney, roughly 10,000 miles away. The distance makes a huge difference. Whichever speed test you're using, start fresh by rebooting all of your hardware first -- then grab an Ethernet cable and connect your laptop or console directly to your router. From there, a speed test will tell you what your ping looks like before your router starts transmitting the signal throughout your home. After that, you can unplug and do several Wi-Fi speed tests at different spots around the house to see how much the numbers change. Enlarge Image If you switch from a wireless to a wired connection, you'll see faster speeds and reductions in ping in your speed tests. How big of a difference depends on your router and the speed of your connection. Ry Crist/CNET Play plugged in, if possible In my home, the ping went up by about 20% after unplugging and doing a wireless speed test at close range. It likely would have gone up even more if I had tested the wireless connection at a greater distance. A good set of powerline adapters can deliver speeds and latency close to what you'd expect from a direct, wired connection with your router. Josh Miller/CNET That's why most online gamers will tell you to use a wired connection whenever possible. That's all well and good if your computer or gaming console is in the same room as your router. Experts recommend placing your router is at a central location. However, if you're using a bedroom or a back room for gaming, then the wired approach probably sounds less feasible. One potential solution is mesh router systems. A mesh router isn't quite as good as plugging directly into the router, but a wired Ethernet connection from a mesh node to your gaming system will be better than a completely wireless connection. Check your cables While we're talking about the importance of a wired connection -- it's worthwhile to make sure that you're using up-to-date cables that can support today's top internet speeds. Just don't expect them to do much of anything as far as ping is concerned. In fact, during a recent run of speed tests, I tested both a 300Mbps fiber connection and a 50Mbps cable connection using multiple speed-check services at different times of day. I ran each round of tests four times -- once with the laptop connected to the modem via Wi-Fi, and then once again using a wired connection to the modem with each of the three most common types of Ethernet cables: Cat 5, Cat 5e and Cat 6. On both networks, the Cat 6 cable connection returned the highest average download speeds, but the type of cable didn't have a noticeable effect on ping, with all three averaging out to within 2ms of one another. Still, Ethernet cables with the Cat 5e or Cat 6 designation are your clear best bet, as they're made to handle top speeds of up to 1,000 or even 10,000Mbps. Outdated Cat 5 cables aren't designed for speeds higher than 100Mbps, and they don't do as much to prevent interference as signals pass through the copper wiring inside. If you're using cables like that, then it's worth picking up some new ones. Optimize your wireless setup Proper cabling is nice, but maybe you're playing a game on your phone, tablet or another device that can't easily benefit from a wired connection. In that case, upgrading to a better router might be the right play -- but you'll want to make sure that you're getting the most out of your current setup first. To bring our metaphorical data courier back into it, stronger signal strength in your home makes the first and last leg of his journey easier and faster, which can help bring your ping down. To do so, follow the basic best practices for optimizing your network's signal strength. Start by making sure you've got the router in a good, open spot that's free from immediate obstructions. Wi-Fi signals tend to angle downward, so the higher you can get it up off of the floor, the better. The angle of the antennas can make a difference, too. If you can, try staggering them at 45-degree intervals: one straight up, the next diagonal, the next straight back. It might take some experimentation, but you might be able to find a much steadier connection with just a few quick tweaks. Once you've done everything you can to optimize your router's performance, you'll want to run some final speed tests to see how much of a difference your efforts made. If you aren't able to get your ping below 50ms or so for a routine speed check to a server that's within a few hundred miles of you, then it's probably time to upgrade your equipment or internet provider. Is might be time for an equipment upgrade Upgrading to a good gaming router can definitely help, too. Along with fast speeds and powerful processors, most high-end options can prioritize gaming traffic above everything else to help keep your roommate's Netflix binge from slowing you down. Others promise to route your signal on the fastest possible path to whatever server your game is hosted on. That said, you'll want to be sure to understand the other factors in your home that might be affecting things before you spend hundreds on new networking hardware. Final option: Splurge on a new router Like I said, a fancy gaming router can help guarantee that your home's connection is optimized for gaming. If you're thinking about upgrading, start by looking for a feature called Quality of Service. It'll let you tell the router to prioritize gaming traffic above everything else, which comes in handy if you're sharing bandwidth with roommates or family members. CNET recommends the Linksys Velop Pro 6E. It performed the best in terms of overall jitter scores out of all the routers we've tested. Spending hundreds on a high-end gaming router is probably overkill for most people. However, some features could be worth it. Gianmarco Chumbe/James Martin/CNET Most gaming routers are aimed at die-hard gamers willing to spend big on their setups, so they aren't casual investments. Prices for current-gen models typically range from around $150 to as high as $500 or even more. That's a lot to pay for a bit less ping. That's why I'd rather try to improve my home's network conditions with a powerline adapter or, if I'm struggling with something that's at least 5 years old, with a more modest router upgrade.
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
I tested the Supernote Nomad and Rocketbook Core. Which digital notebook is best?
When I talk about digital notebooks with friends and family, two very different products have come up in conversation: the Supernote Nomad and the Rocketbook. The former is an E Ink notebook that gives you a ton of options, and the latter is a physical notebook that's designed for easy scanning with your phone. I wasn't as familiar with either as I wanted to be, though, as I've had more experience with the Kindle Scribe and the ReMarkable Paper Pro: pricier options that might be out of the question for some folks. The more I heard about these devices, the more I knew I had to call them in. While they're quite different, I'll explain below how each has its own merits, and how I could easily see one being the entry-point to wanting the other. This digital notebook is designed to be scanned with its app so you can keep your notes wherever you go. Rocketbook Core Notebook This digital notebook is designed to be scanned with its app so you can keep your notes wherever you go. Supernote Nomad This E Ink tablet is a great solution for those looking for a natural digital handwriting experience that syncs in the cloud. From $35 From $329 Includes Pilot FriXion Pen and cleaning cloth Pen and folio cost extra Letter (8.5 x 11-in.) or Executive (6 x 8.8-in.) 7.6 x 5.5 in. Paper E Ink 8 oz. 9.6 oz. I tested the $35 Rocketbook Core pack, which includes a physical notebook with pages that are easily scanned into an app and designed to be reused. Once you scan your pages in, you can do whatever you want with those files, including sending them to a variety of apps. This spiral-bound notebook is protected by a rigid plastic cover, which makes it more durable than the cardboard paper bound composition notebooks of the past. Plus, it's available in six colors, ranging from the simple black to bolder pink and teal designs. The Rocketbook also includes its pen and cleaning cloth (more on that below), and all you need after that is an iPhone or Android phone. You'll spend a lot more getting a Supernote Nomad, which starts at $329 without accessories and goes up to $500 when you add on the pen and vegan leather folio I've tested it with. But while the Supernote Nomad is pricier, I believe it's still worth it. If all of this sounds too expensive, we have some journaling supplies you should consider for a more analog take on writing. TL;DR: The Rocketbook's low price makes it an easy purchase, while the Supernote's hefty price requires much more consideration. I love writing with pens and pencils because it feels great. That's not exactly the case with the Rocketbook notebook and its Pilot FriXion pen, which feels slippery on the page. Also, the pen doesn't draw lines as consistently thick as I'd like to see, but it still gets the job done. The Supernote Nomad, on the other hand, has more options for your digitized ink than you might need, with multiple virtual pens and thicknesses. Most importantly, its pen and screen offer the appropriate amount of friction when I write on the screen, for that natural handwriting experience. This stands in stark contrast with using an Apple Pencil on an iPad, which can feel too slippery, even though you're writing on some of the best tablets. I still like the feeling of writing with the ReMarkable Paper Pro slightly better, but if that didn't exist, I would be switching to the Supernote Nomad in a heartbeat. Also, its screen's crisp resolution offers a 300 pixels-per-inch density that makes it easy to see what you're writing. TL;DR: The Rocketbook notebook isn't just a lot less expensive, it feels like it too. The big downside of the Rocketbook system is its slightly cumbersome process. After you make your notes in your notebook, you take out your phone, open the Rocketbook app and scan each page in. Fortunately, you won't run out of pages, as you can erase the ink from the included pen by rubbing it with a slightly-wet towel (such as the included microfiber cloth). This is a far cry from the Supernote Nomad, which has undo gestures built into its sides. There's just one other caveat to know about the Rocketbook way: the company advises you wait 10 to 15 seconds for your writing to 'bond' to the page before you move or close the page. And Rocketbook is right: you need to do that, because the included pen's ink easily smudges when I push it with my finger before that small, allotted window of time. TL;DR: The Rocketbook requires a little elbow grease once it's time to clean its erasable pages or when you run out of paper. After I figured out how to actually set up the Nomad's automatic syncing (swipe down from the top, tap Settings, tap Drive, tap Supernote Cloud and turn on Auto Sync), I got to experience how the Supernote system matches my beloved ReMarkable Paper Pro in terms of being the perfect notebook. Anything you do in the Supernote Nomad syncs over Wi-Fi via its cloud storage service, so you can check it on a phone, laptop or tablet later on. This ends the ordeal of searching for your notes when you left your notebook somewhere else, as you're not reliant on the barriers of space and time to have your hand-written ideas within reach. TL;DR: Supernote really feels like a super-powered notebook that does it all for you. Rocketbook may not have its own cloud storage, but it will work with the one you already pay for. Seasoned iPhone veterans may look at the Rocketbook system and wonder why they need it when the Notes app already allows for document scanning and sharing. Well, that's where the built-in optical character recognition comes into play, as you can turn on OCR so that you include a TXT file of the text of your PDF when you send it with the scan. I've tried it myself, and it works fine, and I could see it as a huge time-saver that lets you easily copy and paste all of your writing into a big text file, email or other project. On top of that, you can use the bubbles at the bottom of each Rocketbook page to automatically export your scans once you've made them. In the Rocketbook app, you simply assign services and apps such as Google Drive, Dropbox and Todoist to one of the 7 icons, which are also found on the bottom of every page. Unsurprisingly, especially at its price, the Supernote Nomad also connects to other services, including Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive. TL;DR: The Rocketbook integrates with your existing apps and cloud storage providers, and so does the Supernote. While the Nomad has more features than you might have time to dive in and figure out — the menus go very deep for those who want a very particular way to write — its coolest trick isn't software; it's the hardware. Not only does the Crystal model I tested embrace the retro clear tech aesthetic I love (remember those translucent Nintendo 64 controllers?), but it reveals the user-replaceable battery and SD memory card reader that you can access with a small screwdriver, so you never need to worry about the lifetime or storage capacity of your device once that built-in 32GB drive fills up. You can also do this to the non-clear Supernote Nomad. Anyone looking for sustainable tech might see this as a great reason to go with the Supernote Nomad over any E Ink tablet. Otherwise, the specs seem pretty standard for this kind of device, with 4GB of RAM, a USB-C port for charging and a no-name 1.8 GHz processor that's been fast enough in my testing. TL;DR: The Supernote Nomad looks cool and it's made to last. A lot of the time when we do a Battle of the Brands story, the products are so similar that it's a close fight. But this time is different. The Rocketbook Core is definitely the pick for those on a budget and looking to figure out if they really want to go all-in on hand-written digital notes without plunking down a lot of money for a nice iPad and Apple Pencil or digital E Ink tablet with pen. Those who want a finer experience that does all of the work for you should get the Supernote Nomad, as it's a great starter E Ink notebook. Both products, I believe, are worth their price of entry, though I can see how some might think the Apple Notes app's note-scanning trick is a solid alternative to the Supernote. The only problem is that you'd be using actual sheets of paper, while the Rocketbook lets you reuse that same notebook, cleaning its pages again and again. Before you know it, you might want a bigger, backlit screen and start looking at the ReMarkable Paper Pro, though its larger size does make it less portable. But since that starts at $629, the slightly-more-affordable Nomad is probably a better entry point for many aspiring digital handwriting enthusiasts. Either way, congratulations on jumping into the hand-written notetaking world. I swear we're a fun crowd. Some might think it's a stretch to call these products similar, but they do both provide a digital system for writing your own notes. The Supernote Nomad, though, collects all of your notes for you in its system, while the Rocketbook Core is less of an electronics device and more of a notebook with a scanning app that puts the organizational onus on the user. Just don't expect the Nomad to compete with a Kindle, as it doesn't have an ebook store like the best e-readers do. Which digital notebook costs more, the Supernote Nomad or Rocketbook Core? Which digital notebook costs more, the Supernote Nomad or Rocketbook Core? This one's super-simple. The $329 and up Supernote Nomad costs a lot more than the $35 Rocketbook Core. Which digital notebook is bigger, the Rocketbook Core or Supernote Nomad? Which digital notebook is bigger, the Rocketbook Core or Supernote Nomad? Both the Letter and Executive sizes of the Rocketbook Core are bigger than the Supernote Nomad. Are either the Supernote Nomad or the Rocketbook Core compatible with landscape notetaking? Are either the Supernote Nomad or the Rocketbook Core compatible with landscape notetaking? The Supernote Nomad allows for landscape orientation notetaking, but things with the Rocketbook Core are slightly more complicated. You can write in landscape all you want, but the PDFs you scan will be vertical. You'd need to edit them later to make them horizontal. CNN Underscored comprises a team of writers and editors who have many years of experience testing, researching and recommending products, and they ensure each article is carefully edited and products are properly vetted. Electronics writer Henry T. Casey has been testing gadgets for in-depth product reviews for more than a decade, and he's increasingly become a fan of the E Ink digital notebooks, carrying the ReMarkable Paper Pro to every work event he attends. He only wishes it had Find My support, because he somehow keeps leaving it behind.
