
Fancy condos, BMWs, and Bulgari: Why international students are so valuable to Boston's economy
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Perhaps nowhere is foreign students' influence more striking than the high-rise buildings in Downtown Crossing and Fenway, where families frequently purchase condos for children studying oceans away, and students rent top-dollar apartments in the city's swankiest buildings.
Advertisement
Now, as the White House moves to revoke some student visas and
The Newbury Street outpost of designer jewelry brand Bulgari.
Pat Greenhouse/Globe Staff
To be sure, not
Related
:
Advertisement
It's not yet clear how many of those international students will return in the fall, as legal challenges against Trump's moves to restrict visas wind through the courts.
But even if his mandates are reversed, they're hitting during 'high season' for student visa applications, said Tom Dretler, chief executive of the international student advising service Shorelight Education.
'This is like deciding you're going to stop all retail sales right before Thanksgiving and saying maybe you'll open it on Dec. 26,' Dretler said. 'At colleges, you can do four years' worth of damage in a month and a half.'
The fallout is starting to emerge. Boutiques that retain Mandarin-speaking sales staff are waiting to gauge the drop-off in Chinese customers, and real estate brokers are watching to see how a plunge in foreign students could transform the housing market.
That population has long accounted for a big slice of the city's condo market, dating back to Kuwaitis who came to Boston in the 1990s. Families from abroad typically buy ahead of a student's freshman year and sell after graduation at a profit. Many of the priciest condos in Boston are occupied by young adults
from China and Saudi Arabia, said Brett Star, principal broker at Star Residential.
Advertisement
'The number of times I listed something in Boston for sale, had someone from outside the country tour it on FaceTime for a student, and then saw an all-cash offer almost immediately is exceptional,' he said. 'You basically expected that.'
In January, for example, an apartment at Millennium Place was vacated by a few international students abruptly.
They had just moved out of the Downtown Crossing luxury condo building, where nothing sells for under a million, and left behind a small fortune's worth of stuff: guitars, designer clothes, three MacBooks, $1,000 worth of liquor, and in the bathtub, a pile of copies of a drinking board game named 'Wasted' that the residents had apparently produced, and then abandoned, like everything else in the apartment.
That might be an extreme example, but
Millennium Place on Washington Street in Downtown Crossing.
Jonathan Wiggs/Globe Staff
'When you all of a sudden start to think about a force of individuals who fuel the housing market with no way to replace them, what happens?' DeRocker asked. 'Will there be a pullback in home values? Will there be a surplus in inventory?'
Those worries have given way to uncertainty in neighborhoods like Allston, where foreign residents have reshaped the streetscape. Over the past decade,
Advertisement
'They would both have a lot less customers and revenue if these mandates go into effect,' he said.
The same goes for luxury retail. Many foreign students purchase Dior saddle bags and Le Labo perfume in Boston because the products are more affordable
in the US compared to the same goods back home, said one Boston-based luxury retail executive, who was not authorized to share his name by his employer. Boutiques rely on that steady flow of sales year after year.
'A good portion of the stability in luxury retail in Boston is sustained with the consistency of the student population,' the executive said. 'It's like the tide. You know it's going to come in at this time, and go out at this time. If we were to start to see a cap on how many international students are coming from any university, that is going to have severe repercussions.'
Employee Cristian Petre detailed tires on a Porsche for sale at the Boston Foreign Motors lot in Allston.
David L. Ryan/ Boston Globe Staff
For Riccardo Dallai Jr., foreign-born students are a good chunk of the customer base at Riccardi, the fashion boutique he owns on Newbury Street
offering Comme des Garçons sneakers, Moncler bomber jackets, and Loewe hoodies. At least once a week, he said, a Turkish master's student browses his selection in search of new styles, one of many international students who frequent the shop.
Advertisement
'Hopefully, they come back to school next year,' Dallai said. 'That is the main wild card.'
At Boston Foreign Motors in Allston, business also follows the academic calendar, said owner Milad Farahani, thanks largely to
international students. For 20 years, he has watched students — especially from Malaysia — refer him from friend to friend, creating a never-ending line of clients looking for BMWs, Mercedes, and Land Rovers. They sell cars back to him in May, and he flips them to a new buyer come fall. Offers are typically all-cash, even
for the six-figure vehicles.
Related
:
'We do think it could affect things to not have those people come into the country or into Boston,' Farahani said.
The slowdown may already be here.
Leonardo Solís, owner of the International Student Guest House, a short-term rental service that caters to foreign students, once owned seven apartment buildings in Back Bay and a transportation company, mostly catering to foreign students. At his peak, he hosted 100 students a year. But those numbers began to dwindle during the COVID-19 pandemic, and have fallen again this year. Today, his client list from abroad is closer to five.
'Boston has always been a beacon for international students with money,' Solis said. 'But that wealthy population of international students just doesn't seem to be coming as they used to, and I don't know if they are ever going to come back.'
Leonardo Solís checked the mail at International Guest House on Beacon Street in the Back Bay.
David L. Ryan/ Boston Globe Staff
Take Big Night Live. Ed Kane, co-owner of Big Night Entertainment, thought it would be a slam dunk when he booked Alan Walker for a show. The Norwegian DJ had filled stadiums in China and India during a record-breaking 2024 world tour, and foreign students from those very countries are the lifeblood of nightclubs in Boston, snagging tables and bottle service.
Advertisement
But Walker's May 30 show at the 1,500-person venue didn't even sell out, Kane said. A fifth of the general admission tickets went unsold; a few tables stayed empty.
Kane said he saw it coming.
'I feel like the international market is exactly where I thought it was, which is not great right now,' said Kane, who also operates The Grand, Memoire, and Scorpion Bar. 'It's been coming for 12 to 18 months, and here it is.'
Andrew Brinker of the Globe staff contributed to this story.
Diti Kohli can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Magazine
36 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Cements GOP Dominance
The passage of the 'Big Beautiful Bill' on Thursday was a moment when President Donald Trump's hold on the Republican Party was tested — and he won. GOP holdouts objected to the trillions of dollars the bill is projected to add to the debt and the cuts to Medicaid and other safety net programs. But in the end, Trump was able to browbeat Republicans into supporting his costly plans to fund long-term tax cuts for the wealthy, more deportations of immigrants and boosting defense spending. Trump's victory further strengthens his power in Washington and clears the way for him to take even more aggressive actions on immigration, trade policy and depart from American tradition to hammer the chair of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell into lowering interest rates, a move that could give the U.S. economy a sugar high of cheap cash. Trump's control over the GOP 'is as close to total as any President has ever had over his own political party,' says Whit Ayres, a long-time Republican pollster. 'It gives him the support of his own legislative caucus for almost anything he wants to do.' Trump plans to sign the bill into law on Friday at 5 p.m. as B-2 bombers jet over the White House during a Fourth of July celebration for military families. 'We'll be signing with those beautiful planes flying right over our heads,' Trump told reporters traveling with him on Air Force One on Thursday evening. In order to get the bill passed, some Republicans broke their promises not to cut Medicaid, other Republicans reneged on pledges to keep down the national debt. In the House, only two Republicans—Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania—ended up voting against Trump's bill. The bill narrowly passed the House 218-214 with all Democrats voting against it. Massie wrote on X that he voted 'no' because 'it will significantly increase U.S. budget deficits in the near term, negatively impacting all Americans through sustained inflation and high interest rates.' The bill barely made it out of the Senate earlier in the week. Republican Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina voted against Trump's bill forcing Vice President J.D. Vance to cast a tie-breaking vote. Tillis said the Medicaid cuts would be devastating to his state, and, after bucking Trump, said he wouldn't run for reelection. Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri had argued against the cuts to Medicaid but ended up voting 'yes,' and Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, a Republican, had criticized the bill for not cutting enough to offset adding trillions to the debt, but ended up voting for the bill. Now Trump is faced with the daunting task of selling the unpopular bill to the public. Only 29% of voters said they support the bill, according to a Quinnipiac University poll published on June 26, while 55% percent of voters said that they oppose the bill and 16% were unsure. The cuts to social safety net programs and the increase in the deficit could lead to political blowback that helps Democrats take back control of the House in the 2026 mid-term elections. The bill could be a political risk for Trump, says Ayres, if 'a whole lot of Trump supporters lose their health care and get angry about it.'


Politico
36 minutes ago
- Politico
How Scold-and-Fold Became the GOP's Calling Card
At 6:50 PM on Wednesday, conservative hardliner Rep. Keith Self (R-Texas) tweeted that the Senate's version of the Republican megabill was 'morally and fiscally bankrupt.' At 3:20 AM Thursday morning, Self nevertheless voted to advance that very bill. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) likewise slammed the Senate amendments as a 'travesty' that undermined 'the good things' in the House bill. He, too, joined Self in finally supporting the legislation in the wee hours Thursday morning. Both held out longer than their moderate colleague Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.), who said in a post on X last week that he could not vote for any Senate changes to the Medicaid provisions in the House version of the bill. These reversals may be surprising, but they were not remarkable. It was par for the course for congressional Republicans who, in recent years, have shown a proclivity for taking bold, theatrical stands before meekly capitulating in the face of political pressure — particularly from President Donald Trump. In just the past six months, hardline conservatives have expressed concerns about backing a continuing resolution, two different budget resolutions and the initial House version of the Republican megabill before caving in to pressure from Trump. In May, conservatives originally threatened to withhold their vote for the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it provided a tax deduction targeted at residents of blue states. The head of the House Freedom Caucus, Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), even insisted it might take weeks to appease hard-right concerns on May 21. It passed early in the morning the next day after hard right conservatives yielded overnight. It was no different this week when they loudly and repeatedly expressed horror and dismay at the version of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' passed by the Senate. There was outrage that it increased the deficit. Complaints that it didn't do enough to roll back efforts to encourage clean energy were abundant. Conservatives wanted changes to the bill to address these concerns. The problem is that it would have required the bill to be sent back to the Senate, either through legislative 'ping pong' or through the traditional expedient of a conference committee. That would have been time consuming — and prevented Republicans from passing the legislation by Trump's self-imposed July 4 deadline. Republicans had until the end of the year to do the most urgent part of the legislation, the extension of the 2017 tax cuts, but the decision was made to treat Trump's deadline as a firm time limit in the same way Congress might handle the looming debt crisis or the expiration of government funding. On Wednesday morning, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), who railed against the imposition of 'arbitrary deadlines,' told POLITICO those kinds of deadlines led to 'panicking' and it wasn't going to work. Needless to say, Burchett eventually voted for the bill, too. The truth is that there really wasn't any other option but to stick to an arbitrary deadline, because it's what Trump wanted. Steve Scalise, the number two House Republican, bluntly explained that extending the deadline to make last-minute alterations wasn't going to happen because Trump didn't want it. 'It became clear from the president's meeting at the White House to further conversations later, that there's going to be no more amendments to the bill,' he said. Republican Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas) analogized the situation to a restive football team that occasionally forgets who is calling the plays and needs a reminder. 'You may be a good receiver, you may be an all star running back, but the quarterback is still Donald J. Trump.' When it was all over, the holdouts justified the Big Fold in predictable fashion, claiming to have won valuable concessions even if none of those would be enacted into law. Burchett, one of the holdouts who eventually capitulated, said that he had 'a very good conversation with President Trump and Vice President Vance.' That discussion gave him confidence that the administration would 'go after fraud and get rid of a lot of the nonsense in our energy policies.' Harris, another holdout, told reporters, 'we came to significant agreements with the administration overnight on executive actions that will make America great again.' Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.), who long expressed concern about the deficit implications of the legislation — which by a nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimate will add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade — the process represented a combination of policy negotiation and airing of grievances. 'It was a little bit of hearing people out,' said the ardent fiscal hawk. But there were also policy issues as 'everyone became convinced it just didn't make sense to send it back to the Senate.' A more jaundiced and skeptical view was taken by Rep. William Timmons (R-S.C.), who described the dramatic scold-and-fold as a venting exercise by the usual suspects who always 'cry wolf.' 'There's just a couple people that really want to talk a lot about things that are important to them, and they use these pressure points as opportunities to force people to listen to them,' said the four-term incumbent. 'I don't think you accomplish much, but we got it done.' In the final hours before the House narrowly passed the sweeping legislation, despite all the apocalyptic rhetoric about the bill's drawback, all was forgotten and forgiven. The group of conservative holdouts, including Self and Roy, gathered in the center aisle of the House at about 3:15 in the morning. The dozen hardliners, who did not want to support the Senate bill as written, joined together for a smiling group picture just before they all cast their votes to help make that text the law of land. The photographer, using a cell phone camera, was Speaker Mike Johnson himself. 'He just pulled out his camera and we took the picture,' said Rep. Bob Onder (R-Mo.), one of the hardliners who yielded. 'It was awesome.' The Republican holdouts had ended their fight by getting together to strike a pose. It wasn't difficult. After all, they had been posing all week.


The Hill
37 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's tariffs will increase July 4 barbecue costs: Democratic report
President Trump's tariffs have increased the price of beer, beef and grilling ahead of holiday celebrations for Independence Day, according to analysis from Democrats on the Joint Economic Committee. A Thursday report from the minority says the new price for a six-pack of bottles of Miller Lite American Lite Lager Beer has increased by 13.6 percent while grill tool costs went up by 17.7 percent since the start of April. Sunscreen prices also jumped by 8.1 percent as did aluminum foil, with a 6.9 percent markup. The Democrats said the 'so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs' were unpredictable policies causing a rise in economic uncertainty. Their findings show the cost of a grocery store trip for a cookout increased by a 12.7 percent annualized rate in the months following Trump's reciprocal tariff measure. The Joint Economic Committee minority said impacts are reflected in the price of ground beef and ice cream, which saw a 30-year high in May. Data from the Consumer Price Index was used by the Joint Economic Committee minority to calculate the price increase for popular food and beverage items for a 10-person summer cookout. The Hill has reached out to the majority of the Joint Economic Committee and the White House for comment.