
How Scold-and-Fold Became the GOP's Calling Card
Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) likewise slammed the Senate amendments as a 'travesty' that undermined 'the good things' in the House bill. He, too, joined Self in finally supporting the legislation in the wee hours Thursday morning. Both held out longer than their moderate colleague Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.), who said in a post on X last week that he could not vote for any Senate changes to the Medicaid provisions in the House version of the bill.
These reversals may be surprising, but they were not remarkable. It was par for the course for congressional Republicans who, in recent years, have shown a proclivity for taking bold, theatrical stands before meekly capitulating in the face of political pressure — particularly from President Donald Trump.
In just the past six months, hardline conservatives have expressed concerns about backing a continuing resolution, two different budget resolutions and the initial House version of the Republican megabill before caving in to pressure from Trump. In May, conservatives originally threatened to withhold their vote for the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it provided a tax deduction targeted at residents of blue states. The head of the House Freedom Caucus, Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), even insisted it might take weeks to appease hard-right concerns on May 21.
It passed early in the morning the next day after hard right conservatives yielded overnight.
It was no different this week when they loudly and repeatedly expressed horror and dismay at the version of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' passed by the Senate. There was outrage that it increased the deficit. Complaints that it didn't do enough to roll back efforts to encourage clean energy were abundant.
Conservatives wanted changes to the bill to address these concerns. The problem is that it would have required the bill to be sent back to the Senate, either through legislative 'ping pong' or through the traditional expedient of a conference committee. That would have been time consuming — and prevented Republicans from passing the legislation by Trump's self-imposed July 4 deadline. Republicans had until the end of the year to do the most urgent part of the legislation, the extension of the 2017 tax cuts, but the decision was made to treat Trump's deadline as a firm time limit in the same way Congress might handle the looming debt crisis or the expiration of government funding.
On Wednesday morning, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), who railed against the imposition of 'arbitrary deadlines,' told POLITICO those kinds of deadlines led to 'panicking' and it wasn't going to work.
Needless to say, Burchett eventually voted for the bill, too.
The truth is that there really wasn't any other option but to stick to an arbitrary deadline, because it's what Trump wanted. Steve Scalise, the number two House Republican, bluntly explained that extending the deadline to make last-minute alterations wasn't going to happen because Trump didn't want it. 'It became clear from the president's meeting at the White House to further conversations later, that there's going to be no more amendments to the bill,' he said.
Republican Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas) analogized the situation to a restive football team that occasionally forgets who is calling the plays and needs a reminder. 'You may be a good receiver, you may be an all star running back, but the quarterback is still Donald J. Trump.'
When it was all over, the holdouts justified the Big Fold in predictable fashion, claiming to have won valuable concessions even if none of those would be enacted into law.
Burchett, one of the holdouts who eventually capitulated, said that he had 'a very good conversation with President Trump and Vice President Vance.' That discussion gave him confidence that the administration would 'go after fraud and get rid of a lot of the nonsense in our energy policies.'
Harris, another holdout, told reporters, 'we came to significant agreements with the administration overnight on executive actions that will make America great again.'
Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.), who long expressed concern about the deficit implications of the legislation — which by a nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimate will add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade — the process represented a combination of policy negotiation and airing of grievances. 'It was a little bit of hearing people out,' said the ardent fiscal hawk. But there were also policy issues as 'everyone became convinced it just didn't make sense to send it back to the Senate.'
A more jaundiced and skeptical view was taken by Rep. William Timmons (R-S.C.), who described the dramatic scold-and-fold as a venting exercise by the usual suspects who always 'cry wolf.'
'There's just a couple people that really want to talk a lot about things that are important to them, and they use these pressure points as opportunities to force people to listen to them,' said the four-term incumbent. 'I don't think you accomplish much, but we got it done.'
In the final hours before the House narrowly passed the sweeping legislation, despite all the apocalyptic rhetoric about the bill's drawback, all was forgotten and forgiven. The group of conservative holdouts, including Self and Roy, gathered in the center aisle of the House at about 3:15 in the morning. The dozen hardliners, who did not want to support the Senate bill as written, joined together for a smiling group picture just before they all cast their votes to help make that text the law of land.
The photographer, using a cell phone camera, was Speaker Mike Johnson himself.
'He just pulled out his camera and we took the picture,' said Rep. Bob Onder (R-Mo.), one of the hardliners who yielded. 'It was awesome.'
The Republican holdouts had ended their fight by getting together to strike a pose. It wasn't difficult. After all, they had been posing all week.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump signals deference to farmers on undocumented workers
President Trump late Thursday signaled deference to farmers in the U.S. who employ undocumented migrants, aiming to shield some of them from his administration's deportation efforts. 'Farmers, look, they know better. They work with them for years. You had cases where, not year, but just even over the years where people have worked for a farm, on a farm for 14, 15 years and they get thrown out pretty viciously and we can't do it. We gotta work with the farmers, and people that have hotels and leisure properties too,' Trump told the crowd at the 'Salute to America' event in Des Moines, Iowa. The president indicated during his speech, which formally kicked off the year-long celebration of the 250th anniversary of the nation's founding, that his administration is working on legislation that would permit some migrants without authorization to stay in the country and keep working on farms. 'We're gonna work with them and we're gonna work very strong and smart, and we're gonna put you in charge. We're gonna make you responsible and I think that that's going to make a lot of people happy,' Trump said, acknowledging that 'serious radical right people, who I also happen to like a lot, they may not be quite as happy but they'll understand.' Trump then turned toward Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins, who was in attendance, and asked if 'they'll understand that.' 'You're the one that brought this whole situation up. Brooke Rollins brought it up and she said, 'So we have a little problem. The farmers are losing a lot of people,' and we figured it out and we have some great stuff being written,' the president said in Iowa, the state that has over 86,000 farms. 'Let the farmers be responsible.' The White House has gone back and forth on the issue of migrant labor on farms and in the hotel industry. The administration has directed immigration agents to mostly halt raids at hotels, plants and farms in early June, though it reversed course days later. Later in June, Trump said during an interview on Fox News that a temporary pass would be issued to migrants in the hospitality industry and on farms to allow their employers to have more control. 'I cherish our farmers. And when we go into a farm and we take away people that have been working there for 15 and 20 years, who were good, who possibly came in incorrectly. And what we're going to do is we're going to do something for farmers where we can let the farmer sort of be in charge,' Trump said on Fox News's 'Sunday Morning Futures' with Maria Bartiromo. 'The farmer knows he's not going to hire a murderer.' During his speech in Iowa, the president warned that if the farmers do not do a 'good job, we'll throw them out of the country.' 'We'll let the illegals stay and we'll throw the farmer the hell out, okay? Get ready, farmer,' he said.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Slate Auto ditches 'under $20,000' price tag for its pickup EV after Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' passes
Slate Auto has quietly removed the "under $20,000" expected price tag for its electric pickup truck. Trump's huge tax bill is set to scrap federal EV incentives, which Slate had hoped to qualify for. Slate's website now says it expects its modular pickup to be priced in the "mid-twenties." Slate's plan to sell its no-frills electric pickup for under $20,000 appears to have hit a speed bump. The Jeff Bezos-backed EV startup previously said its modular Slate truck was expected to start at under $20,000 after federal incentives, but has now changed its website to say the electric truck will be priced in the "mid-twenties." Slate's website featured the "under $20,000" expected price as recently as Wednesday, according to Internet Archive screenshots viewed by Business Insider. TechCrunch first reported the change. It comes as the US House of Representatives passed a final version of President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," which is expected to kill the $7,500 tax credit for new US-built electric cars from September. When it unveiled the utilitarian truck in April, Slate said it would cost $25,000. However, the company had been banking on federal incentives, such as the $7,500 discount, to push the price of its first EV under the $20,000 mark. The company did not respond to a request for comment from BI, sent outside normal working hours. A lack of affordable options has hampered EV adoption in the US, and Slate Auto's CEO previously told BI the company aimed to help fill that gap. The startup made a big splash with its first vehicle, with the back-to-basics pickup truck amassing 100,000 refundable reservations in its first three weeks on sale. Although the base version of the truck, which is set to be built in Indiana with deliveries beginning in 2026, will lack frills such as screens, radios, or power windows, Slate says it will be heavily customizable. Buyers will be able to buy over 100 accessories, ranging from personalized wraps to an "SUV kit" that transforms the Slate truck into a five-person people carrier. The average price of an EV in the US is already almost $10,000 more expensive than its combustion-engine equivalent, and experts have warned that the scrapping of the $7,500 tax credit will make electric cars even more unaffordable. A report by Harvard University's Salata Institute in March found that removing the tax credit would result in a 15% hit to expected EV sales by 2030, and 20 million metric tons extra of CO2 emissions over the same time period. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's FBI Deputy Director Is A Podcaster Who Thinks The Election Was Stolen
President Donald Trump tapped a conservative media personality and conspiracy theorist for a big job in his administration. Dan Bongino, a former U.S. Secret Service agent who later hosted a Fox News show and pilots a popular right-wing podcast, is deputy director of the FBI despite having no leadership experience at the department. His appointment did not require a Senate confirmation. Bongino, who unsuccessfully ran for Senate in 2012, is a major promoter of some of Trump's favorite conspiracy theories about the 2020 election and COVID-19. He's also a 'significant shareholder' in the right-wing video platform Rumble, the company said. Here are some of the biggest whoppers he's spread. Researchers haveidentified Bongino as one of the most effective spreaders of misinformation around the 2020 election, noting he spent hours of his podcast and posted widely shared videos on social media promoting debunked claims about ballot harvesting and suspicious votes. 'The FBI and the CIA, members of it, unquestionably tried to rig both the 2016 and 2020 election,' he once told his listeners. Bongino, who has nearly 6 million followers on Facebook, had over 7.7 million interactions on Facebook the week of the 2020 election, The New York Times found at the time. In May 2024, he warned his listeners that they should still be leery of Democrats 'stealing an election' from Trump. 'Do not let them fleece this thing again,' he said on an episode of his podcast. Bongino, who claimed the FBI was 'irredeemably corrupt' after its agents raided Mar-a-Lago, raised diversity, equity and inclusion policies as a possible culprit behind the Secret Service's failure to prevent an assassination attempt on Trump last summer. 'They put out a thousand tweets about all this DEI stuff,' he said of the Secret Service. 'Do I know that's related here? I don't, I'm just saying, like ― you have one job and only one job.' After another person was apprehended for plotting an assassination attempt on Trump in September, Bongino asked whether there could be a 'mole' among the agents assigned to protect Trump or that one of them could be mishandling information about his whereabouts. 'Is there a honeypot trap going on in the Secret Service?' he asked on an episode of his podcast. 'Is there a guy or a woman in the Secret Service having a relationship with someone who is not who they say they are?' In an August episode of his podcast, Bongino questioned the integrity of the FBI's investigation into the assassination attempts. 'Folks, the FBI is at it again. I don't trust these people at all,' he wrote on social media alongside a clip from his podcast. Bongino has also claimed that footage the FBI released of the Jan. 6, 2021, pipe bomb suspect may have been 'manipulated' and that something sinister is afoot. 'Something is going on here. Where is the video of him dropping the bomb? Why don't we have it? Why does it appear manipulated?' he said in a January 2024 episode. 'Ladies and gentlemen, somebody's hiding something, and it's not small. They are hiding something freaking huge,' he continued. He's also pushed the theory that President Barack Obama's administration had at least one FBI agent tasked with spying on the 2016 Trump campaign. While discussing the idea on Tucker Carlson's Fox News show at the time, Bongino simply cited 'reporting.' In 2022, YouTube temporarily suspended Bongino's account, which had around 900,000 subscribers, for spreading misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic. Notably, he claimed masks were 'useless' at preventing the virus' spread despite research to the contrary ― something YouTube said violated its misinformation policy. When Bongino tried to circumnavigate the ban by posting from another account, the video platform banned him permanently. Shortly after, Google pulled all ads from Bongino's website. He said one of the pieces of content Google cited was about Anthony Fauci, then the chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden, and said that his 'use of masks despite being vaccinated had nothing to do with science.' In 2022, Bongino suggested Biden's administration may have been responsible for the explosions that ruptured a set of natural gas pipelines — Nord Stream 1 and 2 — running between Russia and Germany. The act of sabotage, the Wall Street Journal reports, was carried out by Ukraine, though Russia blamed the U.S. Bongino backed up the Kremlin's claims in an episode of his podcast. 'Is the Biden administration crazy enough to do this to light a spark that might cause World War III?' he asked. 'The answer is, 'I wouldn't be surprised, and I bet neither would you.'' 'The motivations of the Biden administration and the green agenda, I think, are far greater than the motivations of Russia,' he continued. Ex-Secret Service Agent And Conservative Media Personality Dan Bongino Picked As FBI Deputy Director A Conspiracy Theorist Is Officially In Charge Of The FBI Under Trump New FBI Deputy Director Is 'Significant Shareholder' In Right-Wing Video Platform