India is pillar of certainty for Europe in increasingly uncertain world: EU chief Ursula von der Leyen
She lauded Prime Minister Modi's address at the Paris AI Summit earlier this month, and said that today, Europe and India are working together to shape a future in which AI is a driver of positive change in our economies and societies. The EU chief also affirmed her belief that the next AI Summit hosted by India will turn out a huge success.
During the joint address with PM Modi on Friday, Ursula said, "At the Paris AI Summit, you (PM Modi) said that AI is writing the code of humanity; you are so right. I am convinced that Europe and India working together can shape a future in which AI is a driver of positive change in our economies and societies."
"I am glad to note that AI is a major focus of the Trade and Technology Council. The European AI Office and India AI Mission also agreed to deepen cooperation. And we will apply AI in the areas of natural hazards, climate change and bioinformatics. AI should be at the heart of our Strategic Agenda. The next AI Summit hosted by you, Prime Minister, will take us forward. You can count on the European Union that this Summit is going to be a big success," she added.
A large delegation of the European Commission held talks with Indian officials in the presence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen at the Hyderabad House in the national capital. Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and other ministers were present during the meeting.
Ursula further said that India and the EU are aiming at the interoperability of the two digital public infrastructures, which are the "world's largest and most advanced."
"India's Aadhaar and the EU digital wallet aim to offer public and private services to nearly 2 billion citizens. The interoperability of our digital identities will strengthen ties between the EU and India even more. Our digital cooperation also has an ambitious industrial agenda. We are committed to strengthening cooperation in semiconductor R&D and manufacturing. We are cooperating in the future of secure telecommunication networks. In particular, our industrial associations have agreed to cooperate closely on 6G," she said.
The European Commission President is on a two-day bilateral visit to India, accompanied by members of the European College of Commissioners. Union Minister of State for Health and Family Welfare Anupriya Patel received Ursula von der Leyen at the airport.
This is Ursula von der Leyen's third visit to India. She previously visited India for a bilateral official visit in April 2022 and to attend the G20 Leaders' Summit in September 2023.
The EU chief also stressed the need for digital skills, while adding that India can help in closing the gap in Europe's competitiveness.
"Of course, technology is only as good as the people who can use it. That is why digital skills are so important. This is a topic very close to my heart. People are essential for Europe's competitiveness. Yet, we face a gap. India can help to close it. Let us increase student and skilled worker exchanges. Let us share expertise, talent and experience," Ursula said.
She emphasised deeper cooperation in the areas of security and defence and pointed the need to step up cooperation on land, sea and space. Ursula also asserted that for Europe, India is a pillar of certainty in an increasingly uncertain world.
The EU Chief also highlighted the importance of the Indian Ocean as a "lifeline" for global trade and said that ensuring its security is vital, not just for India but for the whole world/
"The third avenue I see is deeper cooperation in security and defence. For Europe, India is a pillar of certainty in an increasingly uncertain world. We know that authoritarian states are getting bolder, ignoring borders and threatening peace at sea. Now is the time to step up our security and defence cooperation on land, at sea and in space. Cybersecurity has never been so crucial. Our Cyber dialogue offers a platform for effective cooperation and information exchanges. Because threats are evolving and becoming more sophisticated by the day. Maritime security is just as essential," she said.
"The Indian Ocean is a lifeline for global trade. Ensuring its security is vital, not just for India but for the whole world. We should also explore expanding our joint naval exercises, building on our very successful operations in the Gulf of Guinea and the Red Sea. Finally, we should deepen cooperation in protecting the cables that ensure data connectivity between India and the European Union. On defence, we see avenues for cooperation. India is looking into diversifying its military supply and access to new capabilities, and so is Europe. So, both India and the European Union can be partners on this topic," the EU chief added.
While concluding her remarks, Ursula said that they are returning to Europe with fresh ideas for the future of India- Europe cooperation, adding that together, they send a "powerful and positive signal" to the world.
"Prime Minister, Ministers, Commissioners, we are going back to Europe with fresh ideas for the future of our cooperation and the Summit later this year. India and the EU are together greater than the sum of our parts. Together, we send a powerful and positive signal to the world. The planets are aligned – and so are Europe and India," she concluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
14 hours ago
- Observer
Substantial cut in tariffs in UK-India trade dea
The leading feature in the recent free trade agreement signed by the United Kingdom and India, during the visit by India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the UK, is the reduction of tariffs on a variety of goods from textiles to cars and furthermore, the deal allows market access for businesses. Talks on the trade agreement had already taken place in early May after three years of stop-start negotiations and both sides have been keen to seal the deal amid a turmoil of tariffs created over the months, by US President Donald Trump. This agreement between the world's fifth and sixth largest economies aims to increase bilateral trade by a further £25.5bn ($34bn) by 2040. It is the UK's biggest trade deal since it left the European Union in 2020. It is also India's biggest strategic partnership with an advanced economy and it could provide a template for a long-desired deal with the EU as well as for talks with other regions. Both sides hailed as historic a deal which will take effect following a ratification process, likely within a year after which firms such as drinks-maker Diageo and car companies such as BMW, Nissan, Aston Martin and Indian (Tata)-owned Jaguar Land Rover could benefit from lower duties. Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India speak during a press conference after signing a free trade agreement at Chequers near Aylesbury, England. — Reuters UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said there would be huge benefits for both countries, making trade cheaper, quicker and easier. 'We've entered a new global era, and that is one that requires us to step up, not to stand aside, by building deeper partnerships and alliances,' Starmer said in a statement. Modi called the agreement 'a blueprint for shared prosperity', highlighting how Indian goods from textiles to jewellery and seafood would secure better market access. The countries also agreed on a partnership covering areas such as defence and climate, and aim to strengthen co-operation on tackling crime. After spending three hours in talks with Starmer, Modi went to meet King Charles at his Sandringham estate. Under the trade agreement, tariffs on Scotch beverage will drop to 75 per cent from 150 per cent immediately, and slide to 40 per cent over the next decade. Tariffs on drinks such as brandy and rum will be cut to 110 per cent initially and end up at 75 per cent. On cars, India will cut duties to 10 per cent within five years from current level of up to 110 per cent under a quota system that will be gradually liberalised. In return, Indian manufacturers will gain access to the UK market for electric and hybrid vehicles, also under a quota system. Under the deal, 99 per cent of Indian exports to the UK will benefit from zero duties, including textiles, and Britain will have reductions on 90 per cent of its tariff lines, with the average tariff UK firms face dropping to 3 per cent from 15 per cent. But the projected boost to the UK economic output, of 4.8bn a year by 2040, is small compared to Britain's gross domestic product of 2.6bn in 2024. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has forecast that UK exports and imports will be about 15 per cent lower in the long run if Britain had stayed in the EU. The UK's Labour government, having been in power now for a year, has launched a reset of ties with the EU to smooth trade friction and won some tariff relief from the United States. The Confederation of Indian Industry called it a 'strong foundation for deeper market access.'
Observer
a day ago
- Observer
Trump is winning his trade war. What will that mean for the economy?
WASHINGTON — Over the last six months, the United States has left behind the global trade order that persisted for decades in favor of something drastically different and largely untested. Formidable economies such as the European Union and Japan have abruptly made peace with higher tariffs on their exports, acquiescing to President Donald Trump's demands in order to avoid damaging trade wars and to coax even steeper U.S. duties down just a little bit. As major economies fall in line to sign agreements that include the highest tariffs in modern history, the president's vision for global trade is rapidly being realized. That new normal uses the U.S. economy as leverage, with other countries accepting tariffs of 15% to 20% to do business with the United States. Even higher rates will be imposed on exports of critical products, including steel, or on certain adversarial countries, such as China. The outcome has seemingly proved Trump right that his tariff threats are a powerful bargaining tool. And the muted market reaction to 15% tariffs on Japan and the EU suggests that the panic many expected from his earlier, more extreme levies may not materialize. Nigel Green, the CEO of deVere Group, a global financial advisory, called the EU deal 'a reset, not a resolution.' 'A year ago, markets would have recoiled,' he said. 'Today, they're simply grateful it wasn't worse.' While the president's plan for global trade now looks like a political victory, whether it will be an economic success remains much more debatable. The Trump administration has essentially embarked on a vast economic experiment, with tariff levels not seen in the United States since the early 20th century. The rates Trump is asking other countries to agree to are typically used by poor economies trying to protect nascent industries, not by industrial powerhouses like the United States. Trump and his supporters argue that higher tariffs will encourage many more companies to produce in the United States, creating U.S. factory jobs while having minimal impact on businesses and consumers. The president also insists that foreign governments, not U.S. businesses or consumers, will pay the tariffs, despite long-standing research that shows Americans ultimately bear the brunt. Clyde Prestowitz, a former U.S. government official and the founder of the Economic Strategy Institute, said Trump's America had 'a lot of similarities' with the United States before 1946 and other countries, such as China, that built their economies with so-called mercantilist policies, using protectionism to try to amass trade surpluses and wealth. 'It worked for England, the U.S., France, Benelux, Germany, Japan, Korea and all others who became rich,' Prestowitz said. But many economists continue to predict that Trump's tariffs will result in higher prices both for businesses that import products and for the consumers who buy them. They expect that to slow the economy and backfire, at least somewhat, on the president's efforts to rev up manufacturing. In recent weeks, automakers such as General Motors and Volkswagen have reported hits of more than $1 billion from tariffs. 'What's lost in translation is even as these deals are being cut, the eventual tariff rate is likely to peak around 20%, which is up a lot from below 3,' said Diane Swonk, the chief economist at KPMG. While people expected the economic effect of tariffs to be 'instantaneous,' Swonk said, their rollout has been uneven, with many stops and starts, and it is taking time for the impact to work through supply chains. Economic research suggests that it takes six to 18 months for the full effects of tariffs to show up, she said, and that Trump's first-term trade war with China, which began in 2018, did not lead to weakness in manufacturing until the next year. Brad Setser, an economist at the Council on Foreign Relations, said he believed the tariffs were 'big enough that they're going to slow the economy' and 'a meaningful change in policy, one that I think most Americans will feel.' But he cautioned that the tariffs were probably not significant enough to push the U.S. economy into a recession, and that price increases for consumers would be 'big enough to be noticeable but not a giant shock.' Buyers of small appliances, clothing and toys are likely to see an impact by this fall, given the tariffs of 20% to 30% on many Asian countries that make those goods, Setser said. 'It's a policy that in most models would slow the economy, not stop the economy from growing,' he said. Some analysts argued that recent deal announcements have been positive because they have averted, at least for now, the likelihood of trade wars with major trading partners, but some say the agreements have limited economic benefits beyond that. Stephen Olson, a former U.S. trade negotiator, called the U.S.-EU deal 'both highly protectionist and unapologetically mercantilist' and said the EU had 'played a bad hand about as well as it could have.' 'The EU sees value in healthy, robust, and open North Atlantic trade relations. President Trump does not,' said Olson, a senior visiting fellow at the ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute, a research institution in Singapore. He added, 'In assessing what we know about the agreement, it is fair to say that it could have been worse, but that is hardly a ringing endorsement.' Trump's efforts to redraw the global trade map are not yet done. His administration has yet to clarify what tariff rates will apply to dozens of countries as of Friday, its deadline for reaching deals. According to tracking by Goldman Sachs, trading partners accounting for 56% of U.S. imports — including Canada, Mexico, South Korea, Brazil, and India — have not yet signed preliminary agreements. Analysts said it was also possible that the deals Trump has struck could unravel quickly, given his penchant for making new tariff threats and renegotiating agreements that even he has signed. U.S. officials have signaled that they expect to issue new tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals in the next two to three weeks, which could further reroute trade and anger some trading partners. As a large and diverse economy, the United States is generally less dependent on trade than other countries. Trade generates about a quarter of U.S. economic activity, compared with more than two-thirds in Mexico and Canada. In Canada, analysts say, U.S. tariffs may trigger a recession that could last through 2025 unless a deal with the United States is reached. But the effects of tariffs still spill through the U.S. economy, raising costs for businesses and consumers. That gives businesses less money to spend on hiring, expansion, and innovation, and slows consumer spending, the economy's real driver. Economists also have doubts that these trade deals will accomplish one of Trump's most important goals: reducing the nation's trade deficit, which he sees as evidence that the United States is being ripped off. Setser said tariffs could shrink or increase trade deficits with individual countries, but that he expected tariffs to have little impact on the U.S. trade deficit overall, unless they hurt the economy and shrink consumer spending. Maurice Obstfeld, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics who has argued that trade deficits are determined more by factors like saving rates and government spending, also said he expected tariffs to have little impact on the overall U.S. trade deficit. 'I doubt these deals will materially reduce the U.S. trade deficit, especially with the Trump administration having passed a fiscal bill that sharply increases the federal budget deficit in the near term,' he said. This article originally appeared in
Times of Oman
a day ago
- Times of Oman
Renowned economist Meghnad Desai passes away at 85; PM Modi condoles his demise
New Delhi : Distinguished Indian-origin economist, author, and member of the UK House of Lords, Lord Meghnad Desai, passed away at the age of 85 on Tuesday, prompting an outpouring of condolences from across the world, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the British High Commissioner to India, Lindy Cameron. Born as Meghnad Jagdishchandra Desai in 1940 in Vadodara, the economist began his academic journey in economics at the University of Mumbai, where he earned both his Bachelor's and Master's degrees, following which he received a scholarship to the University of Pennsylvania, completing his PhD in economics in 1963, three years after enrolling. Following the news of his demise, PM Modi expressed grief and recalled his valuable contributions to economic thought and India-UK relations. "Anguished by the passing away of Shri Meghnad Desai Ji, a distinguished thinker, writer and economist. He always remained connected to India and Indian culture. He also played a role in deepening India-UK ties. Will fondly recall our discussions, where he shared his valuable insights. Condolences to his family and friends. Om Shanti," PM Modi stated in a post on X. The British High Commissioner to India also expressed her condolences over Desai's demise, stating, "RIP Lord Desai. Thoughts with Kishwar Desai and his wider family and friends. Such fond memories of watching the UK general election with him last year," in a post on X. "So sad to learn Lord Meghnad Desai passed away in Delhi this evening. First Indian Labour Party Peer, Professor Emeritus LSE, renowned economist and author. A passionate advocate for UK-India links. Thoughts of all UK in India with his wife Lady Kishwar and their children," the Deputy High Commissioner of the UK to India, Christina Scott, stated in a post on X. The High Commission of India in London also paid tribute to Desai, noting that he had championed the strong and lasting ties between India and the UK and that his contributions would continue to inspire diplomats, academics, and thought leaders in both nations. "The High Commission of India in London is deeply saddened by the passing of Lord Meghnad Desai. A teacher, scholar, thought leader and great advocate of the enduring friendship between India and the UK. Lord Desai's work will be cherished by generations of diplomats, scholars and thought leaders in both countries. His role in the installation of a statue of Mahatma Gandhi at Parliament Square in London ensures that his legacy will endure," the High Commission of India in London stated in a post on X. Desai was elevated to the UK House of Lords in 1991, where he served as the first Indian-origin peer from the Labour Party. He held the title of Professor Emeritus at the London School of Economics (LSE) and was widely respected for his academic contributions and public policy insights.
