logo
Will resist if Kerala Governor tries to implement RSS agenda, says SFI

Will resist if Kerala Governor tries to implement RSS agenda, says SFI

The Hindu25-06-2025
Students Federation of India (SFI) national president V.P. Sanu and general secretary Mayukh Biswas have said that the organisation will hit the streets if Kerala Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar is planning to uphold Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh former chief M.S. Golwalkar's book Bunch of Thoughts in the place of Indian Constitution.
They told the media here on Wednesday that Governors should keep in mind the limitations of their powers. Mr. Sanu said that the Governors were not democratically elected to their office, but were nominated by incumbent Union governments. That way, they were subservient to the Centre. 'If the Kerala Governor is trying to implement the RSS agenda, we will resist the move. We are not willing to toe his line,' he said.
Against NEP
Mr. Sanu and Mr. Biswas said that the four-day 18 national conference of the SFI that would begin at Aspinwall Courtyard near the Kozhikode beach on June 27 would discuss issues such as the intervention of Governors in the higher education sector, the BJP's alleged attempts to divide the country on communal lines, and the Union government's alleged move to disrupt the federal set-up in the country. Replying to a question, Mr. Sanu said that the SFI was opposed to implementing the National Education Policy (NEP) across the country. Journalist Shashi Kumar and theatre activist M.K. Raina would open the delegate session of the conference.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

J&K Politics: New Alliances After Pahalgam Attack
J&K Politics: New Alliances After Pahalgam Attack

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

J&K Politics: New Alliances After Pahalgam Attack

Published : Jul 04, 2025 16:46 IST - 10 MINS READ Nearly six years after the Union government abrogated Article 370, which granted special Constitutional status to Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), the region's political landscape remains fluid: Old alliances are crumbling, traditional parties losing influence, and new coalitions are emerging in a pall of uncertainty and limited political power. In the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, which killed 26 tourists, the Kashmir Valley has been speculating on the restoration of statehood in the next Parliament session, the likelihood of a fresh Assembly election, and the rise of new political alliances. Together, these developments suggest a potential recalibration of the political structure in J&K. The terrorist attack in Pahalgam this April, which claimed the lives of tourists and triggered several days of tension between India and Pakistan, brought Kashmir back into international focus. In fact, Chief Minister Omar Abdullah also reacted to media reports suggesting that the Centre may consider restoring statehood to J&K in the coming months, possibly on the condition that a fresh Assembly election is held. 'I read in a newspaper that statehood will be restored, but Assembly elections would have to be held afresh. Let them do it, who has stopped them?' Abdullah remarked, this June. Now, the formation of a new alliance reflects the ongoing reconfiguration of political alignments in the Union Territory (UT), where traditional parties have been weakened and new actors are vying to fill the vacuum left in the wake of constitutional and administrative restructuring. Also Read | Kashmir is an open-air prison; a zoo for outsiders: Mehbooba Mufti In a new development to J&K's evolving political saga, a new coalition, the People's Alliance for Change (PAC), has been formed, bringing together Sajad Lone's J&K People's Conference, Hakeem Yaseen's People's Democratic Front, and the Justice and Development Front, an outfit formed this February, reportedly comprising former members of the proscribed religious party Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI). According to analysts the coalition is less about ideology and more about recalibrating influence in J&K. The alliance they say marks another realignment in the post-Article 370 era, raising questions about the fluidity of political loyalties, the weakening of traditional parties, and what lies ahead for governance and electoral politics in the region. On the formation of the PAC, political and social commentator on J&K, Zafar Choudhary told Frontline that the alliance cannot be seen in isolation from the recent wave of media reports about the possible restoration of Statehood and fresh elections. 'This could be about testing the political pulse', Choudhary said. 'Politics in J&K has long been shaped by the patterns of conflict. The Constitutional changes of 2019 were viewed as a turning point aimed at defining a clear political trajectory. However, there have been several disturbing developments since: Jammu has witnessed a rise in violence after 2019, with militants carrying out deadly ambushes on security forces and increasing attacks on civilians. Soldiers and policemen have been killed. Migrant workers and minority groups, including Kashmiri Pandits, have also been targeted in grenade attacks and firing incidents across Pulwama, Shopian, and Budgam. The recent terror attack in Pahalgam, has reinforced the reality that the political environment remains heavily influenced by security concerns'. Anuradha Bhasin, editor of Kashmir Times, says the timing of the PAC's formation cannot be separated from the political signals currently circulating in the region. 'The alliance has emerged amid renewed speculation around statehood and Assembly elections, but we must ask who is fuelling these rumours and to what end', she said. 'Such speculation has been around since 2019, with vague statements made by leaders, even in court. Ultimately, it is the Centre that controls the timeline. The courts have only said statehood should be restored at an 'appropriate time,' which also remains vague'. Bhasin, who is also the author of A Dismantled State: The Untold Story of KashmirAfter Article 370, said the formation of the PAC reflects a recurring pattern of political instability in J&K, marked by parties frequently rising, fragmenting, and regrouping—a process that has only deepened since 2019. While acknowledging that some of it may be electoral posturing, she questioned the practical impact of such alliances in today's highly centralised system. 'What do these alliances realistically hope to achieve,' she asked, 'when the political system is so centralised that even an elected government cannot take basic decisions such as job appointments or official transfers?' Since 2019, J&K has witnessed a series of shifting political alliances. The first major coalition, the People's Alliance for Gupkar Declaration (PAGD), brought together parties such as the National Conference (NC), Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), and the CPI(M) to demand the restoration of special status. While the alliance made early electoral gains, it soon began to unravel due to internal rifts, particularly over seat-sharing during the 2020 District Development Council (DDC) elections. Delhi's micromanaging Ahead of the 2024 Assembly election, the NC changed course by forming a pre-election alliance with the Congress and CPI(M) under the INDIA bloc, leaving the PDP on the sidelines. And just nine months after Abdullah assumed office as the first Chief Minister of the UT, a new the PAC coalition has emerged. According to Bhasin the timing of the PAC's formation raises questions. 'It is not unreasonable to think that some sections within the BJP or the Central government may want these smaller players to participate in order to split votes and dilute the influence of stronger regional parties such as the NC', said Bhasin. 'There is a long-standing belief that Delhi interferes in Kashmir's politics at a very micro level. The BJP, in particular, has refined this model across the country, and I would not be surprised if similar tactics are at play here. Historically, New Delhi has played a manipulative role in shaping political formations in J&K, and the PAC appears to follow that same trajectory'. Choudhary also noted that decades of conflict and the way it has been managed have made the perception of Kashmir politics inherently suspicious. 'Even genuine alliances are viewed with mistrust, and the sudden emergence of this coalition may suggest political manoeuvring behind the scenes, possibly involving New Delhi. There may not be a public admission of it, but there is a certain realisation in New Delhi that its policies have not delivered the desired results'. Choudhary pointed out that while there has been a significant and widely acknowledged improvement in day-to-day security, there is little evidence to suggest that the broader conflict is nearing resolution. 'Refusing to reinstate statehood and denying meaningful powers to an elected government for too long will be increasingly difficult for the Centre. Having recognised this, New Delhi is likely to chart a path that empowers the elected government while continuing to retain overarching control over security-related matters,' he said. In the Valley, where public sentiment is shaped by decades of political turmoil, traditional parties such as the NC and the PDP have contributed to a narrative that fosters deep mistrust of emerging political formations. The ruling NC has dismissed the PAC as a proxy for the BJP, accusing it of lacking both legitimacy and public support. Tanvir Sadiq, NC chief spokesperson and MLA from Zadibal, posted on X a criticising the alliance, referring to it as the BJP's 'loyal B-Team'. He wrote, 'Look who's back—the BJP's loyal 'B-Team,' freshly repackaged as an alternative… When ideology fails, desperation unites. Let's just call them Party B Pro Max. Now with Extra Obedience :)' The NC's scepticism is also rooted in the electoral track record of the PAC's constituents. Most of the leaders and parties now part of the new alliance failed to secure any significant victories in the 2024 election. Their limited electoral appeal, combined with sudden political realignment, has fuelled speculation that the coalition is less about representing public will and more about political engineering. Speaking to Frontline, J&K People's Conference chief spokesperson and former MLA from Kupwara, Bashir Ahmad Dar, said the formation of the PAC stems from the failure of the NC-led government under Abdullah to address the concerns of the people. 'We have seen how the current government has failed to meet public demands, whether it is the issue of student reservations, access to basic amenities, security verification delays, or the ongoing struggle for the restoration of Article 370 and statehood', Dar said. He added that prominent and committed young leaders have now come together to offer people an alternative rooted in 'real politics', with the aim of fulfilling their aspirations. When asked why the People's Conference withdrew from the Gupkar Alliance—a coalition that, like the newly formed PAC, had pledged to fight for the restoration of Article 370 and statehood—Dar pointed to an internal breach of trust. 'Both the NC and PDP weakened the alliance during the 2020 District Development Council (DDC) elections, as the NC fielded proxy candidates in several constituencies where the PAGD had already nominated candidates. This betrayal compelled us to leave the alliance,' he said. No ideological clarity Bhasin said the Gupkar alliance had initially united ideologically diverse parties around the shared goal of opposing the abrogation of Article 370 and the loss of J&K's statehood, but the coalition eventually collapsed. 'The PAC lacks such ideological clarity. For instance, Sajad Lone has a separatist background, while the Justice and Development Front (JDF) is linked to JeI. These are unlikely allies. It is difficult to see the strategic coherence unless the intent is simply to remain politically visible in a system where actual power is minimal,' she told Frontline. Besides Sajad Lone, most members of the PAC were unsuccessful contenders in the 2024 election, and their coming together appears to be an attempt to consolidate a vote bank in the long run to improve their prospects in future political contests. The entry of former JeL members into electoral politics, even before forming the JDF, was largely unsuccessful, with none managing to secure a win in any constituency. But for People's Conference leader Lone, the inclusion of former JeI members in the PAC signifies victims joining hands. 'This alliance is made up of those who have suffered. Unlike the NC, whose members inflicted pain on the people, the PAC represents those who bore that pain.' While the JeI's top leadership, including its chief Abdul Hameed Fayaz, remains behind bars along with several senior leaders and activists, a breakaway faction has joined hands with the People's Conference to form the new political alliance. However, this offshoot appears to have limited representation from the original outfit. Also Read | Are Kashmir's separatists ready to engage with Delhi? Only two relatively known figures with JeI backgrounds are part of the JDF—Ghulam Qadir Lone from north Kashmir, whose son Kalimullah Lone contested and lost from Langate in the 2024 Assembly election, and Ghulam Qadir Wani, a member from Pulwama. A tehsil president of JeI in Anantnag, speaking on condition of anonymity, questioned the legitimacy of the JDF claiming any association with the banned organisation. 'How can this new group be seen as JeI participating in politics when the outfit is still banned?' he told Frontline. 'We are not in favour of elections because our core leadership is in jail and our assets have been seized. Our Constitution does not permit the creation of a separate political party. Only the advisory council can make such decisions, and neither Wani nor Lone were members of that council when the ban was imposed.' In contrast, Kalimullah Lone, the former general secretary of JeI, defended the decision to enter electoral politics. The JDF views the ban on JeI as a political move, and believes it must be challenged through democratic means, he told Frontline. 'We stayed away from elections since the rigging in 1987, but now we feel JeI is under political pressure, and the response must also be political. That is why we joined PAC, to align with others who have suffered and to challenge our ideological rival, the NC. There is suspicion around us, but we believe our voices can only be heard through political engagement.' Kalimullah Lone questioned how a banned organisation could fight for its existence without a political platform. 'How can we challenge the ban or seek justice for our seized schools and institutions if we do not participate in the democratic process? We also want to address the basic issues people face, alongside the larger fight for the restoration of Article 370 and statehood'. Irfan Amin Malik is a journalist based in Jammu and Kashmir.

Chirag Paswan Declares He Will Contest All 243 Seats In Bihar Elections
Chirag Paswan Declares He Will Contest All 243 Seats In Bihar Elections

NDTV

time2 hours ago

  • NDTV

Chirag Paswan Declares He Will Contest All 243 Seats In Bihar Elections

Saran: Claiming that there was a "conspiracy" to thwart his foray into Bihar politics, Union minister Chirag Paswan on Sunday asserted that he would, nonetheless, contest the upcoming assembly polls in the state. The Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) president, who is a junior NDA partner in the state, made the statement at a rally in Saran district. "I want to take Bihar to new heights. I visualise a future in which our boys and girls will not need to go outside in search of greener pastures; rather, people from other states will come here in search of better education and employment opportunities," said Mr Paswan. He claimed that his passion made many people uneasy. "These people are content with having secured their own future, and they worry about my vision of 'Bihar First, Bihari First' catching the public imagination. So they are involved in a conspiracy to hinder my involvement in state politics. They are trying to create confusion in the minds of the people by asking whether Chirag Paswan will contest the assembly polls himself," Mr Paswan. "I want to put an end to such designs by proclaiming, from this glorious land of Saran, yes, I will contest the assembly polls. I will contest in all 243 seats. Every segment will see Chirag Paswan fighting with full intensity," said the 42-year-old, who has been denying that he had his eyes on the chief minister's chair. He, nonetheless, voiced "concern" over incidents like the murder of top industrialist Gopal Khemka a couple of days ago, and said it raised doubts over the ability of the Nitish Kumar government "which we support and which has so far enjoyed a reputation for good governance". "The upcoming elections are crucial. After winning these, we shall strive to create an atmosphere in which people can step out of their homes at any time without fear and security concerns," said Mr Paswan. He also appeared peeved at his estranged uncle Pashupati Kumar Paras getting a toehold with the offer of entry into the opposition INDIA bloc. Without mentioning the younger brother of his late father Ram Vilas Paswan by name, he recalled, "I was expelled from my own party and made to vacate my own house". Mr Paras had split late Paswan's Lok Janshakti Party in 2021, leaving Chirag, the then national president, isolated, and grabbed a berth in the Union cabinet. Before he was redeemed in the run-up to the Lok Sabha polls of 2024, Chirag had to suffer the ignominy of vacating the 12, Janpath bungalow, that his late father had occupied for several years and which also served as the LJP office. The BJP's decision to make peace with Chirag had caused Paras to resign from the Union cabinet ahead of the Lok Sabha polls and, in April this year, quit the NDA. Chirag Paswan also trained his guns at RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav by mocking the 'Chhatra Yuva Sansad' drive, where free pens are being distributed among the youth. "Those who had snatched away people's land with the promise of jobs are now distributing pens," said Mr Paswan, in an obvious reference to the railway scam involving Mr Yadav's father, Lalu Prasad, the RJD president. The Union minister also said, "I am fully in support of Bihari youth's demand for a domicile policy. The rights of our young men and women must be protected. But it must be pointed out that the domicile policy, brought in 2006, was scrapped in 2023, when the RJD was sharing power, its de facto leader was the Deputy Chief Minister, and another senior leader was the education minister." Mr Paswan also referred to the 'inheritance tax' proposed by the Congress, an RJD ally, in its manifesto for the Lok Sabha polls, and urged the people to be wary of the opposition coalition.

Trump To Send Tariff Letters Today, Warns BRICS Allies Of 10% Additional Levies
Trump To Send Tariff Letters Today, Warns BRICS Allies Of 10% Additional Levies

News18

time2 hours ago

  • News18

Trump To Send Tariff Letters Today, Warns BRICS Allies Of 10% Additional Levies

Last Updated: Trump previously announced plans to send trade letters to 12 countries outlining the new reciprocal tariff rates set to take effect on August 1. US President Donald Trump has said he will send the first set of tariff letters, including trade deals, to several countries, which are expected to include new reciprocal tariff rates that will take effect from August 1. Trump's first set of tariff letters would be sent to various trade partners at 12 pm ET (9:30 pm Indian time) on Monday, he said, amid high-stakes trade talks with several nations, including India. 'I am pleased to announce that the UNITED STATES TARIFF Letters, and/or Deals, with various Countries from around the World, will be delivered starting 12:00 P.M. (Eastern), Monday, July 7th. Thank you for your attention to this matter!," he said on his Truth Social platform. The US president had earlier said he would send formal letters to 12 countries, without naming them. The reciprocal tariffs, announced in April, were supposed to kick in on July 9 after a 90-day pause. However, Trump announced that the imposition would be pushed to August 1 to allow time for ongoing trade talks to wrap up. 'We'll be sending letters out on Monday having to do with the trade deals. Could be 12, maybe 15. And I guess, Howard (Lutnick), I would say, it could be maybe as many as 15 or so, and they'll be going out on Monday and some will go out on Tuesday and Wednesday. And it'll and we've, we've made deals also. So we're going to have a combination of letters and some deals have been made," he told reporters in the presence of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Trump Threatens More Sanctions On BRICS Allies Furthermore, the US president announced that any country aligning with the BRICS – which includes India, Brazil, China and Russia – will be charged with an additional 10% tariffs. 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff," he added. This came after leaders in the 11-member BRICS grouping criticised Trump's tariff policies, saying they were damaging the global economy and disrupting trade. The BRICS declaration also described the US tariffs as 'illegal and arbitrary", and said they could further reduce global trade. India-US Trade Talks India and the United States are likely to make a final decision on a mini-trade deal within the next 24 to 48 hours, CNBC-TV18 reported on Sunday, citing sources, after negotiators recently concluded a round of discussions in Washington. As per the report, the mini-trade deal is likely to have annual quotas for lower tariffs on certain labour-intensive products from India. Certain American agricultural products, such as pecan nuts and blueberries, may be provided with lower tax rates. India has shown reluctance to rush to a trade deal with the US under the pressure of deadlines, with Union Minister Piyush Goyal affirming that national interest comes first. On April 2, the US imposed an additional 26% reciprocal tariff on Indian goods but suspended it for 90 days. However, the 10% baseline tariff imposed by America remains in place. India had sought withdrawal of all reciprocal tariffs, but has reportedly accepted a partial relief for limited agricultural concessions. Sources also told news agency PTI on Sunday that India had 'drawn its red lines' and the ball was now in Washington's court to finalise the deal. tags : donald trump US tariffs Location : Washington D.C., United States of America (USA) First Published: July 07, 2025, 07:56 IST News world Trump To Send Tariff Letters Today, Warns BRICS Allies Of 10% Additional Levies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store