&w=3840&q=100)
Iran's Khamenei picks potential successors to ensure smooth transition in case he dies: Report
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has reportedly named three potential successors to avoid an immediate leadership vacuum if Israeli or American forces take him out.
The New York Times has reported that Khamenei aims to ensure a swift transition upon his death, especially in the wake of ongoing Israeli attacks.
The report said, citing sources, that the supreme leader has taken a host of measures to preserve the Islamic Republic since the conflict began earlier this month.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Contrary to earlier speculations, the report said Khamenei's son, Mojtaba Khamenei, a cleric closely aligned with the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and long rumoured to be a front-runner, is not among the three people nominated for the top position.
What does Iran's Constitution say?
According to Iranian Constitution, the death of the supreme leader prompts a selection process by the Assembly of Experts. This committee consists of 88 members, mostly clerics.
The process has only been used once since the establishment of the theocratic regime in Iran following the 1979 Islamic Revolution, when Khamenei himself was appointed for the role in 1989.
Khamenei remains largely secluded
Khamenei is believed to have taken extraordinary security measures, largely isolating himself in his fortified compound in central Tehran, known as the 'Beit Rahbari' or Leader's House.
He has issued only two pre-recorded public messages, condemning what he termed a 'forced war' and pledging Iran's resolve against surrender.
Khamenei has mostly stopped using electronic communications to speak with his commanders, relying instead on a trusted aide.
Assassination threat looms
Last week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that Israel's primary military goal is to dismantle Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programmes, but the campaign could also 'create conditions' for regime change in Iran.
When asked if this includes targeting Iran's Supreme Leader, Netanyahu responded, 'No one is immune.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
Will Hezbollah surrender its weapons? Lebanese armed group balks as pressure mounts
Once hailed as the country's most powerful armed force, Hezbollah now finds itself under intense scrutiny from both domestic and international actors read more (File} Hezbollah flags flutter as protesters, rally to show support to Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and Lebanon's Hezbollah, in Sanaa, Yemen, on September 27, 2024. Reuters Hezbollah is facing mounting pressure to disarm following a devastating war with Israel that shattered its leadership, weakened its military, and raised serious questions about its future in Lebanon's political landscape. Once hailed as the country's most powerful armed force, Hezbollah now finds itself under intense scrutiny from both domestic and international actors. The group's leader for over 30 years, Hassan Nasrallah, was killed during the conflict, and his mausoleum in southern Beirut has become a sombre rallying point for loyalists, New York Times reported. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The war, triggered by Hezbollah's support for Hamas during the Gaza conflict, drew a heavy Israeli response. Senior Hezbollah commanders were killed, large swathes of southern Lebanon were bombed, and many fighters have since withdrawn. The Lebanese army, backed by UN forces, claims to have removed 90 per cent of Hezbollah's weapons from the south. The ceasefire agreement requires Hezbollah to vacate an 18-mile zone along the border and prohibits rearmament by nonstate groups. Israel, however, continues to occupy parts of southern Lebanon and launches regular airstrikes, further complicating enforcement. Despite its weakened position, Hezbollah's new leader Naim Qassem has vowed not to disarm while Israeli forces remain in Lebanon. But its ability to maintain this stance is increasingly uncertain, especially as the United States pushes for a swift disarmament timeline. Internally, Lebanon is battling economic collapse and urgently needs billions in reconstruction aid. Western donors have made Hezbollah's disarmament a condition for releasing funds, putting pressure on the government to act. President Joseph Aoun has said the Lebanese state must be the sole guarantor of national defence. Iran, Hezbollah's long-time patron, has stepped back. It remained on the sidelines during the conflict and has seen its influence in Syria, a key logistical route, decline. This has limited Hezbollah's ability to replenish its arsenal. Public support is also waning. In war-hit communities, many are disillusioned. While the group tries to project the war as a victory, residents speak of loss and destruction, not triumph. Anger is simmering in Hezbollah strongholds, where reconstruction has been slow and aid scarce. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Lebanon now faces a delicate balancing act: dismantle Hezbollah's arsenal without triggering internal unrest. But as Hezbollah's hold weakens and its allies retreat, the group may find itself with fewer options, and even fewer sympathisers.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
Standing tall: Bharat's strategic calm amid Trumpian turbulence
Bharat must stand its ground on tariffs and be prepared for short-term pain in pursuit of long-term strategic gain read more Modi's Bharat has to be both mild and fierce while dealing with the Trumpian turbulence. Image: The White House A bully is an intriguing phenomenon. Powerful, but insecure. Loud, yet hollow. Assertive, but deeply vulnerable. He doesn't merely seek obedience — he craves submission, preferably extracted through intimidation, manipulation, or humiliation. This classic bully syndrome is evident in how Donald Trump has approached his second term as US President, especially in foreign policy. This American trait is becoming more pronounced as 'we are moving into a post-American world, one defined and directed from many places and by many people,' as author Fareed Zakaria writes in his book, The Post-American World. This new world, Zakaria adds, may not be as much about the decline of America as it is about 'the rise of the rest.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's unpredictability, ego-driven decisions, and transactional diplomacy are the result of this changing world order where America is strong, but not strong enough. Trump tries to make up for this by becoming a bully — by holding the world to ransom, as he has done with his ongoing tariff moves. The Bully Syndrome Psychiatrists note that a bully thrives when others submit or appease. The same logic applies in the case of tariffs. Yielding to Trump — or any such figure — is counterproductive. Submission only feeds the bully, inviting more demands and further concessions. That doesn't mean Bharat should react to every Trump tweet or provocation. The goal is not to be reactive but strategic — or even better, strategically proactive. Understand the adversary: When does he lash out? What motivates him? What triggers retreat? Trump's behaviour is largely driven by domestic political compulsions, election cycles, and a simplistic view of trade and tariffs. He may have become the President, but the businessman in him refuses to leave his personality. His worldview remains binary — you're either a winner or a loser, an ally or a foe, a master or a servant. Bharat, with its growing economic heft and independent foreign policy, doesn't fit into his 'ally' column. It doesn't need to. Draw Red Lines, With Poise Bharat's first move should be to clearly set boundaries with poise, not posturing. It must articulate these red lines in an unemotional, matter-of-fact manner. And the Modi government has done precisely that, as the External Affairs Ministry in an official statement on Monday (August 4) called the ongoing Trump tirade 'unjustified and unreasonable.' It also highlighted how the US itself continues to import uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EVs, and fertilisers and chemicals from Russia. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bharat needs cheap oil for its people and growth. It cannot avoid looking at cheaper options just because it suits American interests. Bharat currently consumes about 5 million barrels per day, 85 per cent of which is met through imports. And given the unprecedented growth expected to take place in the country, with GDP growth constantly hovering above 6 per cent, reports say Bharat's demand for oil will be more than that of any other country in the world. Similarly, the US needs to understand that Bharat's Russian defence ties are born out of necessity, not ideology. America's restrictive terms — high costs, limited tech transfer, source code constraints, and end-use monitoring — have pushed New Delhi towards Moscow. What works for Pakistan, an artificial construct, cannot be imposed on Bharat, a civilisational state with strategic autonomy in its DNA. Ancient Wisdom, Modern Challenges Amid Trumpian turbulence, Ved Vyasa's Mahabharata can offer timeless wisdom, urging restraint and patience, and not being overwhelmed by anger and rage. Bhishma, for instance, advises Yudhisthira in 'Raja Dharma Parva' — as translated by Bibek Debroy in The Mahabharata (Volume 8): 'One must fight for the sake of victory, not because of anger or a desire to kill.' He qualifies his statement by saying that 'if the one who is fighting uses deceit, [one] must fight back using deceit. If he fights with adharma, one must counter with adharma.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bharat need not match Trump tweet-for-tweet. Instead, it should outmanoeuvre him with strategic steadiness. Timing matters. As Bhishma says, 'Time always brings success… However, a man who is waiting for the right time should not let that moment pass.' Meanwhile, without resorting to verbal volleys or showcasing confrontational postures, Bharat can continue doing what it has been doing thus far — buying Russian arms and importing oil. Let Bharat's actions speak for themselves. Build Strategic Alliances Bhishma also advises Yudhisthira to seek new allies when oppressed by a stronger king. He says, 'If a king is oppressed by a stronger king, he must resort to three kinds of allies and friends.' Bhishma then elaborates allies and friends as 'direct allies, allies of allies, and enemies of enemies'. Time is ripe for Bharat to expand its strategic alliances. It must build strategic coalitions — both traditional and innovative. It must reorient its ties with Europe along the lines of the UK Free Trade Agreement. It must look afresh at Asian, African, and South American markets. Some of the American trade losses can be covered there: Bharat's pharma industry, for instance, could find greater footholds in these markets. Similarly, it should deepen its outreach to Asean, and continue nurturing its neighbourhood through cooperative diplomacy. Even within the American political landscape, Bharat should engage with institutions, think tanks, businesses, and lawmakers — beyond the presidency. America is more than its president. Bharat must remember that. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The goal is not to overtly challenge the Trump administration but to signal that Bharat cannot be bullied and has options. It values the US relationship but will not be boxed in. Learn from the Dragon More importantly, while dealing with Trumpian threats, Bharat should realise — and also make the Americans realise — that it has weathered greater storms in the past. It navigated alone during the Cold War, defied American fury at the time of the 1971 Bangladesh crisis, endured global isolation after the 1998 nuclear tests, and emerged stronger every time. Today's Bharat is economically sounder, militarily stronger, and diplomatically assertive. It must preserve its strategic autonomy — not for defiance, but for national interest. If Trump is unreasonable, Bharat must stand its ground — calmly, firmly. China offers an instructive example. Trump began his second term with moves to tame the Middle Kingdom. But Beijing responded with resilience, recalibration, and countermeasures. It didn't react emotionally, and eventually, the US President softened. Not out of admiration, but because confrontation wasn't delivering. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Likewise, Bharat must insist on mutual solutions. If Washington wants Delhi to move away from Russian arms, it must offer better terms. If it wants to be an energy partner, it must offer affordable, stable alternatives — without coercion. Be Mild and Fierce Bharat's strength lies not just in GDP or missiles, but in civilisational confidence. Bullies lose power when met with quiet defiance. Bharat's message should be simple: 'We value the relationship, but we are equals. We act in our interest and expect respect.' Americans, as a people, are pragmatic. Once the noise settles, they will see that Bharat's rise is a stabilising phenomenon, not a threatening one. It seeks balance, not dominance. It avoids conflict but is unafraid of it when required. The Trumpian storm must be faced with civilisational calmness and confidence — not by shouting, but by outthinking. Not by trembling, but by standing tall. Bharat must be prepared for short-term pain in pursuit of long-term strategic gain. Because in the end, the one who doesn't bend under pressure shapes the course of history. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bhishma again has a word of advice: 'People disrespect one who is mild and hate one who is fierce. Do not be mild. Do not be fierce. Be both mild and fierce.' Modi's Bharat has to be both mild and fierce while dealing with the Trumpian turbulence. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Mint
7 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's U-turn: After accusing Zelensky of ‘starting war', how US is using Ukraine to justify tariff on ‘friend' India
The day was February 28, 2025 and the White House prepared to welcome Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for a meeting with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office. When the two leaders met, they shook hands and politely discussed diplomatic matters among other things. Minutes later, the meeting turned into a shouting match between Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance and Volodymyr Zelensky after the Ukrainian president emphasised the need for 'security guarantees for Ukraine' for any deal to happen. That started the clash, with the United States accusing Ukraine of being ungrateful for American support and of 'stalling' peace talks with Russia – warning, 'You're either going to make a deal, or we're out.' 'You see the hatred he's got for [Russian President Vladimir] Putin. That's tough to make a deal with that kind of hate,' Trump said as the whole world watched on LIVE television. Accused of 'starting the war', Zelensky left and the deal, that would have given the US rights to rare earth minerals in Ukraine, was not signed that day. Cut to July 2025 – Ukraine has now become the flashpoint in Donald Trump's trade war with India. In a stunning shift, Donald Trump, who once pointed the finger at Zelensky for starting the Russia-Ukraine war, has now trained his guns on India – imposing 25 per cent tariffs and additional penalties for New Delhi's business ties with Moscow, accusing New Delhi of bankrolling Vladimir Putin's war machine by buying Russian oil. Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump have spoken over the phone, but not met since Trump returned to the White House in January, despite both leaders expressing their desire for face-to-face talks. After one of the calls that happened in May, the US president said his call with Vladimir Putin went very well and that Moscow and Kyiv 'will immediately start negotiations' toward a ceasefire and end to the war. As Trump sounded hopeful, the Russian president said more 'compromises' were needed. By the end of the month, Trump – sensing no end to the Ukraine war – had started threatening sanctions on Russian products, warning Vladimir Putin that he was 'playing with fire'. Trump even admitted that Putin was not looking to stop Russia's war against Ukraine. 'I'm very disappointed with the conversation I had today with President Putin, because I don't think he's there, and I'm very disappointed. I'm just saying I don't think he's looking to stop, and that's too bad,' he said. Donald Trump has often portrayed himself as a dealmaker and global peacemaker, but as Russia refused to fall in line with his expectations, the US president began to show signs of frustration. Buoyed by his own expectations and frustrated over not being able to bring the Ukraine conflict to an end, Trump shifted blame outward. He slapped 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods and announced additional penalties for India's business ties with Russia. But Trump didn't stop there. He threatened even more tariffs for India's purchase of Russian oil, accusing the country of 'fueling' the Ukraine war. What could be called a striking twist, Ukraine, a country Trump had once accused of 'starting the war,' is now at the centre of his trade war with India, which he has used as a geopolitical weapon to justify the tariffs on 'friend' India.
