India must use its influence to support de-escalation and a return to negotiations
The strikes came shortly after a diplomatic window had seemingly opened. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy had met Rubio and Middle East Special Envoy Steve Witkoff in Washington, after which Trump's press secretary announced a two-week window for diplomacy. This followed Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's outreach, suggesting that Iran was open to indirect talks. Trump walked out of the G7 summit to prioritise these developments. However, Vice President J D Vance and Witkoff's visit to Turkey fell through as Iran decided not to go ahead with talks without Israel halting its attacks. The last straw, reportedly, was the E3-Iran foreign ministerial meeting in Geneva, which failed to shift Tehran's position on enrichment. The US strikes were launched within 48 hours.
Iran's initial reaction was somewhat fiery. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi condemned the US action as 'extremely dangerous, lawless, and criminal behavior,' warning of 'everlasting consequences' and declaring that 'all options are open'. Iran also accused the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) of indirectly enabling the strikes.
Despite fears of radiological fallout, both Iran's Regulatory Authority and the IAEA confirmed that no off-site radiation spike has been detected so far. Still, Isfahan remains a concern as it is a uranium conversion facility, with gaseous uranium compounds that are both chemically toxic and radiologically active. The IAEA also convened an emergency meeting of the Board of Governors in Vienna on Monday for further assessments.
Iran has retaliated by firing a number of missiles at Tel Aviv, Haifa, and other locations in Israel. The decision of the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei on further retaliation is awaited. Will Iran escalate further or respond in a calibrated manner, as it did after the assassination of Qassem Soleimani in 2020? Over 4,00,000 US troops are stationed in the region, and the risk of broader conflict is immense. There is also uncertainty about the domestic political implications inside Iran: Will the public rally around the flag, or will frustration turn inwards? Will Iran activate its regional proxies to strike US bases or will it attempt to close the Strait of Hormuz? And can it do so effectively, given that its own missile capabilities have been reduced because of the strikes by Israel and the US?
A non-binding Iranian parliamentary resolution adopted on Sunday calls for the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, but most analysts view this as rhetoric aimed at placating hardliners. However, two empty supertankers after entering the waterway did a U-turn yesterday, indicating first signs of diversion.
Russia and China have condemned the strikes. Beijing called them a 'serious violation of international law' and pushed for a UNSC reaffirmation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. Yet, neither power appears willing to get involved and have limited themselves to statements supporting Iran. Foreign Minister Araghchi travelled to Moscow for political and diplomatic support and to explore the role of Russia as a mediator, potentially involving China or multilateral mechanisms.
India has remained cautious and balanced. Operation Sindhu was launched on June 18 to evacuate Indian nationals. Iran made a special gesture of opening its airspace for the evacuation of Indian nationals. Over 1,100 have already been brought home via special charter flights from Mashhad, Yerevan, and Ashgabat. Prime Minister Modi spoke to the Iranian President and emphasised de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy, reiterated by External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar.
For India, these developments cannot be viewed from a distance. The wider regional and global implications are grave. A broader conflict may ignite multi-front warfare involving the Houthis and Iran-backed militias in Iraq. US troops in the region face increased risk. Oil prices have increased amid disruption fears.The Strait of Hormuz, a narrow channel through which nearly 20 per cent of the world's oil and significant quantities of gas flow, is a critical lifeline. Its disruption would have immediate consequences for India's economy and its diaspora in the Gulf. Although India has built strategic reserves and diversified supply lines, a sudden spike in energy prices could accelerate inflation and deepen global market instability.
Beyond energy, India must also recalibrate its strategic posture. We have close ties with Iran (particularly under the Chabahar framework), deep strategic relations with Israel, and increasing defence interoperability with the United States. In this moment of potential rupture, we must continue to avoid taking sides while using our influence to support de-escalation and a return to the negotiating table.
What lies ahead is uncertain. Much depends on whether Ayatollah Khamenei, like in 1988, chooses to 'drink the chalice of poison' and accept a deal to avoid existential collapse. At that time, Ayatollah Khamenei ended the war with Iraq, recognising the cost of indefinite conflict. Today, the circumstances are different but the logic of strategic retreat may still apply. Khamenei's silence — over 24 hours now — has led many to believe Iran may opt for a face-saving de-escalation.
India, which has always emphasised dialogue, multilateralism, and restraint, must be prepared to play a constructive role. It must also prepare economically and diplomatically for the turbulence that may follow. What remains unknown is the fate of Iran's residual nuclear expertise. Enrichment facilities can be rebuilt, and knowledge cannot be bombed. As the IAEA and others have observed, Iran's technical capacity — rooted in decades of experience — still matters. Which is why negotiations remain essential.
The writer is former governor of India to IAEA, Vienna
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tariff Turmoil Ahead? Arvind Sanger flags growing risk for global economies
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads "So, the markets have so far largely ignored Liberation Day and everything that happened then and now maybe we are coming to at least start to worry about the reality that tariffs may be higher than we expected and in the background you have all this talk about him maybe will he fire Powell and on the interest rate policy," says Arvind Sanger , Geosphere Capital market is starting to realise that maybe the tariffs are going to sustain at a level higher than what the market was comfortable with. 10% tariffs was fine, but if you are talking about 15%, 20% 25%, 30% and the interesting thing is that none of the major trading partners neither Japan nor the EU nor India all of or Korea every time there is a talk, oh, now we are about to sign a deal with India, today it is oh, we are about to sign a deal with Japan, a few weeks ago it was oh, we are about to sign a deal with EU. I think nobody wants to be first because nobody is confident about whether any deal done with the US under this president is ever final or will he find some reason to recut the deal sometime in the near this tariff uncertainty has been receded by this acronym taco of Trump always chickening out, but the concern the market is now starting to face is that maybe Trump is trying to prove he is not taco and there could be some tariff related turmoil. So, the markets have so far largely ignored Liberation Day and everything that happened then and now maybe we are coming to at least start to worry about the reality that tariffs may be higher than we expected and in the background you have all this talk about him maybe will he fire Powell and on the interest rate policy. So, there is enough uncertainty out there that I do not think the markets can keep rallying like they have for the last couple of is bad for all global economies. Let us be clear, this is not US wins or US loses, and the rest of the world is not affected. It is US loses and it is all the major economies that are beneficiaries of global trade and all major economies are, India is maybe less affected because India's merchandise trade is not as big a percentage of GDP than other countries but nobody is going to be unimpacted by that. So, I think that it is it is a negative for India along with everybody it is something we have to start worrying about. We have so far put that on the back burner assuming something favourable would come around, but it is looking things are looking uncertain and that is never good for global economies and certainly not good for India although, again as I said, India is probably one of the less impacted but again it will have an impact.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
UK to implement new visa and settlement rules for immigrants starting July 22
Reduced skilled worker occupation list: Employers will no longer be allowed to sponsor overseas workers for roles classified as medium-skilled (RQF levels 3–5), unless those jobs are granted exceptions by the Migration Advisory Committee. The revised list will apply until the end of 2026. End of international recruitment for care workers: Employers will be barred from recruiting care workers from overseas under the Skilled Worker route. Those already sponsored by that date will not be affected. You Might Also Like: UK to raise English language standards for migrants seeking residency Tighter student visa compliance: Universities will face stricter compliance rules to maintain their licence to sponsor international students. Levy on international student fees: The government is exploring a charge on university income from foreign tuition, which would require parliamentary approval. Graduate visa shortened: The post-study Graduate visa is set to be reduced from two years to 18 months. Stricter English language requirement: The Home Office has announced plans to introduce higher English language standards by year-end, including for dependents of work visa holders. You Might Also Like: QS Rankings 2026: London is no longer the world's best city for international students. This Asian capital is Partners of British citizens Victims of domestic abuse EU nationals under the Settlement Scheme, who are covered by the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement The UK government will begin enforcing the first phase of immigration reforms from July 22, 2025, as part of its wider policy agenda outlined in the immigration white paper titled 'Restoring control over the immigration system'. The measures, aimed at reducing net migration, include a narrower list of sponsor-eligible jobs and a ban on overseas hiring in the care white paper, published on May 12, signals the government's intent to make it more difficult to move to and settle in the UK. Though a white paper does not itself change immigration law, several of its proposals are already being actioned through changes to immigration tomorrow, the Home Office will implement two key reforms:These changes form part of a wider policy drive to prioritise domestic labour and reshape immigration proposals in the white paper include:A key feature of the white paper is the proposal to extend the qualifying period for permanent residence—known as Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR), from five years to ten. This policy is still under consultation and will not come into force white paper also proposes an 'earned settlement' route, which would allow some migrants to qualify earlier if they demonstrate sufficient contribution to the UK economy and society under the points-based system. However, the criteria for this route have yet to be defined.'We will set out further details of the earned settlement and citizenship reforms later this year, and we will consult on them. There will be plenty of opportunity for people to comment on and consider the detail,' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told groups are expected to be exempt from the longer settlement timeline:The government has not clarified whether other routes currently offering a five-year path to ILR—such as the Hong Kong BN(O) visa, will be included. When questioned in Parliament, the Minister for Migration and Citizenship said, 'We will be consulting on the earned settlement scheme later this year and will provide details of how the scheme will work after that, including which immigration routes it will apply to.'Whether the ten-year settlement rule will apply to migrants already on existing routes remains undecided. A technical annex to the white paper suggests it might, 'A number of those currently in the UK are likely to leave due [to] it taking longer to gain settled status.'Parliamentary responses have so far deferred specifics, saying the issue will be addressed during the consultation phase. Nonetheless, media reports indicate that transitional measures may be considered for those nearing eligibility under current of the changes, including adjustments to the visa sponsorship list and English requirements, can be made through statements of changes to immigration rules. These do not require a parliamentary vote and come into effect automatically unless disapproved by motion within 40 days, a rare a few proposals, such as the levy on student fees or changes to naturalisation law, will require an Act of the first round of changes beginning July 22, the UK's immigration framework is entering a new phase. While many of the most impactful changes, such as the settlement timeline are still pending consultation, the direction of policy is clear: tighter eligibility, increased compliance, and a greater focus on economic contribution.
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
US trade policy: Aug 1 ‘hard deadline' for reciprocal tariffs, says Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick
As India awaits an announcement on an interim trade deal with the US, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Sunday said that August 1 is a hard deadline for countries to begin paying tariffs, although the US will continue to engage with them afterwards. This comes after India and the US concluded a week-long round of trade negotiations aimed at finalising an interim trade deal, seen as crucial for India to avoid reciprocal tariffs and gain an edge over its Asian peers. 'That's a hard deadline, so on August 1, the new tariff rates will come in… Nothing stops countries from talking to us after August 1, but they're going to start paying the tariffs on August 1,' Lutnick said in a television interview on Sunday. Notably, President Donald Trump's deadline for reciprocal tariffs has shifted from April 2 to July 9, and now to August 1. While Trump has reiterated that a deal with India is close, India could face tariffs of up to 26 per cent if both countries fail to reach an agreement. Government officials have maintained that India is aiming to sign a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) by the end of the year, which would provide market access in labour-intensive sectors and ensure a significant tariff differential compared to its Asian peers. Lutnick further stated that smaller countries — including those in Latin America, the Caribbean, and many in Africa — would face a baseline tariff of 10 per cent. 'The bigger economies will either open themselves up or they'll pay a fair tariff to America,' he said. Meanwhile, trade experts have pointed out that, despite being presented as trade 'agreements,' Trump's deals do not meet WTO standards for Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). Under WTO rules, FTAs require mutual tariff reductions on a substantial share of trade. 'Under the Trump model, only the partner country lowers its Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) tariffs, while the US makes no reciprocal cuts. Trump lacks Fast Track Trade Authority from Congress to reduce MFN tariffs. Instead, he's offering to roll back only the 'Liberation Day' tariffs imposed in April under emergency powers — tariffs that a US federal court has already ruled unlawful. The case is under appeal, but the legal basis remains fragile,' the think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said. For India, those April tariffs added a 26 per cent surcharge on top of normal US tariffs. Even if a deal is struck, Indian exports may still face a minimum 10 per cent additional levy, making it a pressured compromise, not a true partnership, GTRI said in a report.
