Over 33,000 phones, 232kg of drugs seized in SA prisons – Groenewald declares war on corruption
Image: File
In a determined move to reclaim South Africa's correctional facilities from criminal networks, Minister of Correctional Services Pieter Groenewald has vowed to intensify raids and root out corruption within prisons.
Delivering his Department's Budget Vote speech before the National Assembly on Tuesday, Groenewald revealed alarming figures from ongoing unannounced raids and outlined a zero-tolerance approach to illicit activities behind bars.
Minister Groenewald disclosed that in the past year alone, 466 raids were conducted in correctional centres across the country, resulting in massive confiscations.
'Since July 3, 2024, various smuggled items have been found and confiscated. These include 33,874 cell phones, 20,577 sharpened objects, and a total of 122,407 items related to alcohol and other substances, 232.16 kg of drugs and R394,450.40 worth of money,' he said.
Highlighting the threat posed by crime syndicates operating from inside prisons, Groenewald stressed that communities suffer when crimes are orchestrated behind bars.
'It is an evil that members of our communities, including the most vulnerable, suffer under horrendous crimes that are organised and committed from within our correctional facilities,' he said.
The Minister underscored the critical importance of removing illegal items such as cellphones from prisons to prevent further crimes from being coordinated externally.
'It is therefore important that we get illegal objects, such as cellphones, out of our facilities and prevent them from landing there,' he emphasised.
Raids, unannounced inspections, and disciplinary action against corrupt officials form part of Groenewald's strategy to restore order and integrity in the system. Over the past year, he reported, 515 officials received final written warnings, 181 were suspended without pay, and 146 were dismissed.
'When we fail to act against the few who betray their duty, we expose the many who serve with honour amidst grave danger,' Groenewald said.
The Minister also highlighted the courage of honest officials who refuse to cooperate with gangs, often becoming targets themselves. He assured them that the Department remains committed to protecting staff who uphold the law and to 'swiftly and decisively' remove corrupt elements.
Groenewald reminded Parliament and the nation of the collective mission.
'Together, we will continue to strengthen our department, affirm our constitutional commitments, and ensure that justice prevails in South Africa. Every day, we are newly afforded the opportunity to restore and build; to fix what is broken; and to render hope for a safe, peaceful and prosperous future.'
As prison raids intensify, Groenewald's uncompromising stance sends a clear message.
South Africa's correctional facilities will not remain safe havens for crime syndicates. Instead, they are to become true centres of rehabilitation and public safety, supporting the broader fight for a safer country.
IOL News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
18 minutes ago
- The South African
MK Party sets the record straight on Colleen Makhubele's 'removal'
UMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party leader in Parliament John Hlophe, says Colleen Makhubele remains the party's Chief Whip. Hlophe confirmed this during a media briefing on Thursday, 3 July, following reports that the party's caucus was divided over Makhubele's leadership skills and wanted her removed from her position. COLLEEN MAKHUBELE REMAINS MK PARTY CHIEF WHIP IN PARLIAMENT During the briefing, Hlophe said that if any complaint is made against any member of Parliament, it is brought to him as he is ultimately responsible. He also clarified that there is no petition in terms of which members of Parliament are calling for the head of the Chief Whip. 'This is a figment of someone's imagination. Quite frankly, I would've been the first person to receive that petition. Obviously, if the petition is against me, I wouldn't expect MPs to give it to me; they would probably give it to the Chief Whip, who would, in turn, forward it to the president,' he said. 'The suggestion that there is a petition here against the Chief Whip is quite frankly nonsense. It is nonsense! There is no such I have not received it, as a matter of fact, I asked ubaba [Jacob Zuma] as late as last night, and there is no such letter. Colleen Makhubele remains the Chief Whip; she is very good, she is very effective. I am not undermining the predecessors, but she is the kind of Chief Whip that we need now to take the party forward,' he emphasised. Earlier this week, two letters, addressed to MK Party president Jacob Zuma, were circulating on social media, with Hlophe's signature. One letter called for Zuma to deal with his daughter, Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla, and national spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela, who are both members of Parliament. In the first letter, Ndhlela was accused of undermining the organisation, engaging in factional activities, and using insulting language. The letter also claimed that he is disrespectful and obstructive. During the briefing on Thursday, Hlophe also confirmed that Ndhlela has been removed from the party's whippery team. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
NCC MP Fadiel Adams faces consequences for sexist and racist remarks
National Coloured Congress (NCC) leader Fadiel Adams. Image: Ayanda Ndamane / Independent Newspapers National Coloured Congress (NCC) MP Fadiel Adams has been found guilty of breaching Parliament's Code of Ethical Conduct and Disclosure of Members' Interests following a nine-minute Facebook video in which he used crude, sexist, and racially charged language. The Joint Committee on Ethics and Members' Interests tabled its report to Parliament, recommending Adams be reprimanded, suspended for 15 sitting days, and that his salary be docked for the same period. He is also ordered to issue a public apology and attend a consultation on ethical conduct. The complaint was lodged by Democratic Alliance Chief Whip George Michalakis and submitted to the Office of the Registrar of Members' Interests on March 5, 2025. The complaint relates to a nine-minute video Adams posted on February 18, 2025, where he made a series of offensive remarks directed at a female member of the Democratic Alliance, the mayor of Cape Town, and the DA as a party. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ According to the complaint, Adams used explicit and offensive terms referring to race, gender, sexual conduct, and political affiliation. In addition to personal attacks, he made inflammatory allegations and threats directed at a woman's employer, at the mayor's children, and the City of Cape Town leadership. In the report, the complainant stated that the content of the social media post is as follows: 'ek weet nie wat makeer sekere coloured mense nie (I don't know what is wrong with some coloured people)', and 'some of us are so desperate to fit white sexual reproduction organs into our mouths … the Mackenzie family has been practising it for years'. He then refers to an individual as a 'ding' (thing) and 'the Right-Wing love coloureds that are a fit to work in the kitchen but think they can make their way into the office by sucking white genitalia'. He then also calls her a 'coloured mother's p**s', 'naai', 'h***me!d', 'vuil ma se p**s (and if you do not excuse my language, f**k you sommer)', 'smetterige vark (pig)', 'coloured mother f**k', 'this mother n**i' and says that she is so desperate for a white man's recognition. He then continues: 'I don't care if you are a woman, because you're not a woman as far as I am concerned because a mother doesn't do this' and 'I don't give a p**s, I am not gender biased, jou vuil n**i (you dirty f**k)'. With regards to members of the DA as 'f**ng agents', he refers to the mayor of Cape Town as a 'piece of sh*t', 'wit god' and to 'his f**ng kids'. He then falsely accuses the mayor and the city of murder and fuelling violence. He furthermore threatens the female individual that he will approach her employer ('there will be consequences at your workplace') and tell them that 'you're employing a piece of sh*t' and then goes further to threaten the employer himself, stating that if she does not remove a Facebook post that 'your boss will not trade for a day or two', threatening to ignore a High Court order against him for closing business because 'some things are worth going to jail for'. The complainant also stated that Adams is in breach of items 5(1) and 9 of the Code. Also, if the complainant's conduct falls foul of the provisions of the Prevention and Combating of Hate Crime and Hate Speech Act, the member could be in breach of his oath of office. He also indicated that he was willing to ignore a High Court order in pursuit of what he termed justice. Adams did not dispute the content of the video or that he was the individual who made the remarks. The committee reviewed footage that was taken from his Facebook page before it was removed and confirmed that the statements were made as described. In his written response submitted on March 13, 2025, he offered an apology for the outburst and cited personal circumstances as a contributing factor. He said he had been under considerable stress linked to threats to his children's safety and family-related trauma. He argued that the post was a reaction to a Facebook post made by a DA member, which, in his view, had placed his children in danger by suggesting gang affiliations. The committee acknowledged Adams' account of personal stress, but maintained that it did not excuse the severity or public nature of the language used. It expressed concern about the particularly vulgar, sexist, and racist nature of the remarks, especially those directed at a woman, and stated that "the member brought Parliament into disrepute". The committee found that the Member had breached items 9(1) and 9(2) of the Code of Ethical Conduct, as outlined under item 16(1)(c). These provisions prohibit members from using racist, sexist, or derogatory language on social media and from bringing Parliament into disrepute through such conduct. It further noted that members are expected to uphold the integrity of Parliament and act in a manner that promotes public confidence in the institution. Although the member was informed of the breach and invited to submit written representations regarding a possible penalty, no such representation was received. The committee has recommended that Adams be formally reprimanded in the House. He should issue an apology in the National Assembly, to the public, and to the woman referred to in the Facebook video for the use of racist, sexist, and vulgar language. It further recommended that he be suspended from participating in debates and committees for 15 sitting days. His salary and allowances should be reduced by an amount equal to the same period. The member is also expected to attend a consultation with the Speaker of the National Assembly, the Co-Chairpersons of the Committee, and the Acting Registrar to discuss the ethical conduct required of MPs.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
IRR warns Parliament against expropriating SARB
The Institute of Race Relations has made written and oral submissions to Parliament in opposition to the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) Amendment Bill. The Bill, tabled by Economic Freedom Fighters leader Julius Malema in 2018, is moving forward to a committee vote on 'desirability'. The IRR warned that it is undesirable, uneconomical, unfunded, unconsidered, and unconstitutional. To start, the Bill expropriates the shareholders of the SARB without compensation, which is a direct violation of constitutionally protected property rights. The shares are worth an estimated R20 million, so no one can seriously claim that the Bill would expropriate these shares without compensation to save the fisc money. Rather, the real purpose of such an exercise is to try to set a precedent that any shares in the country can be expropriated without compensation, including trillions of rands worth of stock and bond securities that depend on SARB's prudent monetary management. So extreme is the Bill's threat of expropriation without compensation that even the government and members of the ANC have voiced public opposition to it. Treasury official Christopher Axelson, representing the government, spoke out at length in opposition to this danger and other dangerous aspects of the Bill before Parliament. Says IRR Fellow Gabriel Crouse: 'The effort to expropriate rural landowners in the hinterland is death to property rights by a thousand cuts. Expropriating SARB shareholders without compensation poses the same threat, only faster, like an atom bomb.' SARB's 802 shareholders make very little money from those shares, with dividends limited to R1,000 per annum, but do get to elect seven of the SARB's 15 directors. This decentralised, minority input provides a public-private engagement mechanism that has helped implement the 'primary object' of the SARB, which is 'to protect the value of the currency', according to the Constitution. SARB is arguably the most successful government institution at hitting its target. Over the last quarter of a century, it has largely succeeded in maintaining inflation within the 3% - 6% target range that was nominated for it by the then-minister of finance back in 2000. Most of South Africa's thousands of other organs of state have, by stark contrast, been riddled with ongoing state capture, often taking them well beyond the point of bankruptcy. Most organisations where the state is the 'sole shareholder' are so badly off that President Cyril Ramaphosa's first, second, and third presidential terms have included repeated calls for 'reform' through 'public-private partnerships' that increase the role of the private sector. So why, in this local environment, would anyone want to make the same overburdened state the 'sole shareholder' of one of the only bastions of excellence, namely SARB? Malema, the Bill's sponsor, leaves no room for mystery about it. Malema openly calls for total nationalisation of the land, banks, and mines, which would be significantly easier if the SARB were captured, and forced to abandon its mandate temporarily by stocking rampant inflation. That sudden loosening of monetary policy would produce what luminary SARB Governor Lesetja Kganyago has warned would be a 'deep depression'. It would also create enough chaos to facilitate a deeper round of state capture. Crouse concludes: 'This is a test for the GNU. The MK, EFF, and Action SA signalled support for the Bill in Parliament. If the ANC joins those parties in keeping the Bill alive to spite its investment-friendly GNU partners, this will damage government unity. More importantly, it dangles a threat over everyone's prospects, and the lifesavings of those who have any.' Institute of Race Relations I Joburg
