Law & Order: Organized Crime Season Finale Recap: Did Grief Lure Stabler Into Making a Choice He Can't Undo? — Plus, Grade It!
After Joe Jr.'s death in last week's Law & Order: Organized Crime, Stabler is in a very bad way at the start of the Season 5 finale. Let's face it: El has never been a super by-the-books type of cop, and when crushing grief enters the picture, he's poised to make choices that will set him on a very bad path in the future.
But does he make them? Read on for the highlights of 'He Was a Stabler.'
More from TVLine
Casting News: black-ish Star Joins Boston Blue, Carrie TV Series Adds 14 and More
Law & Order: Organized Crime Finale Sneak Peek: Randall Begs Stabler to Come Home After Joe's Murder (Exclusive)
Casting News: Felicity Huffman Joins Doc, Jen Garner Drama Adds Chloë Sevigny and More
LIGHT IT UP UP UP | In an empty warehouse somewhere, McKenna leaves Stabler alone with Vincent Mathis, Emery's thug. 'You have no idea the lengths I'm going to go to go get what I want,' Stabler says, dousing the bald bad guy with lighter fluid and striking a match. He offers him a choice: Mathis can answer Stabler's questions about Emery's whereabouts now 'or after I put out the fire,' Elliot says menacingly. 'What's it gonna be?'
Bell and Reyes, who are both back at the office, theorize that Emery is hiding out in New York while everyone is looking for him. The sergeant tells Reyes that Stabler has taken bereavement leave; Reyes notes that's extremely unlike their workaholic colleague. Then Tanner shows up to let them know that the Captagon (Emery's designer drug) deal is still going through, and the new NYPD dictate is to bring Emery in alive. Tanner is worried that Stabler won't steer clear of the situation, but Bell assures her he will. Just then, Reyes gets a text… and it's Stabler, absolutely not steering clear of the situation.
Reyes reluctantly agrees to help Stabler, who hands over Mathis for processing and asks Reyes to do some digging to find Emery's whereabouts. Then Stabler and McKenna go to a diner where Elliot says he's dreading telling his mother about Joe's death. McKenna knows that Stabler wants to kill Emery, and he's on board, but he's apparently also become a well adjusted paragon of mental health in the few episodes since we last saw him. 'Revenge doesn't bring light,' he advises, ' just a different kind of darkness.'
A PACKAGE FROM JOE | Stabler and McKenna have just finished roughing up one of Emery's contacts when Randall texts, demanding a meeting. The brothers meet, and Randall hands over an envelope that arrived with a note for Elliot: It's a broken flash drive from Joe Jr. 'When he was in my arms, he said, 'I mailed it,'' Elliot says. Then he instructs Randall to take the rest of the family out to Bernie's house in Montauk for a few days to keep them safe. 'You got people to take care of here, Elliot,' Randall says, begging his brother not to continue on the path he's chosen. 'Go to Montauk,' Elliot says in parting. He then secretly meets with a very confused Vargas, who agrees to try to get the files off Joe's broken drive.
Stabler and McKenna figure out that Emery's ex-wife and son are in New York, so they swing by to do a little light intimidation. The ex, Allegra, quickly realizes what's going on and calls Emery, putting him on speaker so that he can directly talk to Stabler. But Elliot's threats don't work — Emery basically tells his son 'good luck, kid! See ya never.' However, Vargas tracks the call, which gives Stabler and McKenna the Brit's location. Once more, McKenna proves the cooler head (I know, weird, right?) by having Stabler pause for a second before he busts in and tries to take out Emery himself.
BACK WITH THE TEAM | Next thing we know, Stabler marches into the office and announces that he knows where Emery is going. Looks like he made the correct choice after all! Bell is livid that Stabler's been working the case the whole time and that her staffers have been lying to her about helping him. 'Sarge, I understand,' Stabler says. 'Now, we can sit here and discuss all the ways that I f—ked up, or we can get after Emery.'
So they do. Bell, Stabler, Tanner, Reyes and a bunch more cops storm Emery's transport; a gunfight erupts. Emery sneaks away, but Stabler eventually corners him. There's a moment where it's not clear that Stabler is going to abide by the 'bring him in alive' mandate, but then Bell appears and takes the choice away from him by grabbing Emery's gun and cuffing him.
Emery knows his future is bleak if he doesn't do something big, so he offers his inside knowledge of three top Hezbollah leaders in exchange for an unfreezing of his assets and house arrest on his estate in Devonshire. And… he gets it! 'HE KILLED MY BROTHER!' Stabler yells in protest, but it's a done deal: The Brit is getting off easy.
CHANGE OF PLANS | But! Just before Stabler stalks out of the office in disgust, Vargas makes a breakthrough with the flash drive: It's full of photos and other evidence against Emery, proving that Joe Jr. truly was working against his criminal boss for the past six months. And that evidence negates Emery's deal with the Department of Justice. 'Whatever my brother's problems were, he was a Stabler, and he just put your ass away for the rest of your life,' Stabler says.
Earlier in the episode, Randall found a half-filled-out application for the New York Police Department that Joe had abandoned years before. So that's on Elliot's mind after he finishes talking with Emery. 'Today, he was a cop, and a good one,' Stabler tells Reyes, Bell, Vargas and Tanner after he exits the interrogation room.
Elliot finds Bernie and tells her they're going to a ceremony for Joe Jr. — he doesn't say exactly what's going on, but she starts to cry. HAS NO ONE TOLD THIS WOMAN HER CHILD IS DEAD YET? Then the family gathers in a hallway at what I'm assuming is NYPD headquarters, where a plaque commemorates Joe among notable cops who've died in the line of duty. (Bell pulled some strings.) The hour ends with Stabler and McKenna getting a six pack and hang out at the waterfront, looking at the lights of the city and toasting Stabler's little brother.
Now it's your turn. What did you think of the finale? Grade it, and the season as a whole, via the polls below. Then hit the comments with all of your thoughts!
Best of TVLine
Mrs. Maisel Flash-Forward List: All of Season 5's Futuristic Easter Eggs
Yellowjackets Recap: The Morning After
Yellowjackets Recap: The First Supper
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Man described as 'pillar of his community' admits drink driving
A STONEMASON who crashed his car into a metal bridge near Langwathby was still more than twice the drink drive limit five hours later. At Carlisle's Rickergate court, 36-year-old Lee Forster, whose lawyer described him as a 'pillar of the community' in Hunsonby where he lives, admitted drink driving and failing to report an accident. Prosecutor Diane Jackson described what happened. Police were called to the scene of an accident near Langwathby shortly after midnight on March 31. The officers found the defendant's damaged Nissan car abandoned and blocking the A686 after it had crashed into the metal river bridge.. 'The car had sustained significant front offside damage,' said Mrs Jackson. The car was blocking the road. Its airbags had deployed, and the front offside wheel was bent. There was also damage to the road surface and scratches to bridge metalwork. Inside the car, police found several cans of lager, some of them open. Officers traced the car's registered keeper but also had a call from the defendant's wife, who told them her husband had crashed the car. Because there had been an accident, the police took Forster to The Cumberland Infirmary. 'On route, he made the comment to officers, saying: 'I'll tell you what – I'll never ever drink drive as I did tonight,' continued Mrs Jackson. It was five hours before an alcohol blood test could be conducted. It showed Forster was a little over twice the legal limit. There were no relevant convictions on the defendant's record, his last offence being a vehicle theft in 2010. The prosecutor added that the offence was aggravated by Forster being under the influence of alcohol. Lewis Hazeldine, defending, said the defendant accepted his actions were entirely unacceptable and he recognised the danger that drink driving causes. The lawyer said: 'He'd been drinking that day with a friend, which is itself out of character. In relation to the cans of lager in the car, Mr Forster had a passenger and he was the person drink the lager. The defendant accepted he made a 'stupid mistake.' Forster had never intended to evade responsibility, but his phone had a flat battery and thus it was his wife who had called the police when he arrived home. Mr Hazeldine added that Forster had been a successful stonemason for more than 20 years and the inevitable driving ban on him – living as he does in a village with few transport links – would have a big impact. The lawyer added: 'Clearly, he is a hardworking man who is a pillar of his community, who regularly helps at his church and local swimming pool. He has shown clear and genuine remorse.' Imposing a fine of £1,250 and an 18-month ban, the lead magistrate told the defendant: 'This was a very serious collision. You were very lucky that nobody was hurt. "The alcohol in your [system], even after five hours, was dangerously high. You had a passenger in the car.' The defendant must also pay a £500 victim surcharge and £85 costs. He was offered a drink driver rehabilitation course, which if completed by a deadline will reduce his ban by 18 weeks. The defendant's blood alcohol was recorded as 189mcg per 100mls of blood. The legal limit is 80mcg.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bodycam video shows woman identify Jon Jones as man threatening cops on phone after crash
Albuquerque Police bodycam video sheds light on the immediate aftermath of former UFC champion Jon Jones' latest run-in with the law. Jones is up against a criminal summons accusing him of fleeing the scene of an accident and leaving a half-naked intoxicated woman behind, then making "allusions to violence" over the phone toward responding officers. The woman, who said she drank alcohol at Jones' house and took mushrooms there, said Jones was the driver of the vehicle, a claim Jones' attorney, Christopher Dodd, vehemently denies. Jones is scheduled for a bond arraignment July 24. The incident occured Feb. 21. In the police video, which was released in portions to the Albuquerque Journal, the woman, sitting in the passneger seat, tells a police safety aide (PSA) that "Jon Jones the fighter" was driving and left the crash site. At one point, she hands the PSA her phone and says "pleae talk to him." The man's voice on the phone, which sounds similar to Jones but never confirms his identity, asks the PSA to identify himself. The PSA again asks the voice for his name. The woman then tells the PSA "that's Jon Jones." The voice sounds irritated by the conversation, brings up his brothers, and says "some of them are bored enough to kill you, to kill YOU." The PSA acknowledges those words as a threat, and the voice responds: "Guess what? You won't be the first guy this year that I threaten, swear to God. You'd be the second one." The voice continues, "My brothers, they kill people for way less. If something happens to me, dude, she's (the woman in the car) flat and dead." The man on the other end of the call never identifies himself as Jones after being asked directly if he is the former UFC champion, who has called Albuquerque home for many years. Jones, who turns 38 next month, retired from MMA and relinquished the heavyweight championship, which now belongs to Tom Aspinall, who had been interim champ since Nov. 11, 2023. For months, Jones didn't appear interested in a title-unification bout against Aspinall. Now the fight is officially off the table as Jones rides off into the sunset of his latest legal battle. This article originally appeared on MMA Junkie: Did Jon Jones threaten cops after crash? Watch police video
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
NYPD Commissioner Tisch doubles down against Pride March ban on gay cops in uniform: ‘PR stunt'
NEW YORK — Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch on Saturday doubled down in her criticism of the Pride March organizer's decision to ban the NYPD's Gay Officers Action League from participating in the annual event in New York City. In a strongly worded letter to the event's organizer, Heritage of Pride, calling the group hypocrites, Tisch demanded that it change its stance on the officers' exclusion from the celebratory procession. The top cop slammed the new reason given for not letting the gay officers march — namely, that it would violate the event's no-weapons policy — calling it a 'PR stunt' and 'Not a solution.' 'It is also the height of hypocrisy to request the security and protection of thousands of armed, uniformed police officers for The March on Sunday and then ban from that event the very officers that proudly represent your community,' Tisch said in the letter. 'In a year when LGBTQ+ rights are under siege in ways we had thought were behind us, this is the time to stand together, not to splinter,' Tisch added. 'In that light, I urge you to reconsider your decision here. Regardless of the ultimate outcome.' Heritage of Pride, about two weeks ago, informed the New York Police Department, including the Gay Officers Action League, or GOAL, that it was continuing its ban for the fourth straight year against allowing police officers to march. 'Though the NYPD remains a partner in monitoring and addressing security threats, the NYPD response is to be called upon only when absolutely necessary,' an internal memo from Heritage of Pride states. 'Additionally, the guidelines for our March were updated to clarify that no participating contingent could march with weapons.' Tisch on Friday said she was shocked by the decision, given earlier dialogue she and Detective Brian Downey, GOAL's president, had had with Heritage of Pride officials. HOP spokesman Chris Piedmont stressed that the organization has a no-weapons policy, to which GOAL would not agree. However, NYPD officers are required to have their service weapons on them while they are in uniform 'as a matter of public and personal safety,' according to Tisch's letter. 'To be clear,' Piedmont told The New York Daily News on Friday, 'GOAL is welcome to march without weapons like every other contingent and we welcome them to join us as we march to protect trans youth, advocate for full equality and stand in proud defiance of the attacks our community is facing.' The ban was first announced in 2021, when protests over the killing of Minnesota man George Floyd by police officers generated a wave of anti-cop sentiment across the country, including in New York City. But it's also rooted in the trauma many in the LGBTQ community have experienced in dealing with law enforcement for years — going back to the 1969 Stonewall riot, which was sparked by a police raid at the now-famous Greenwich Village gay bar. The ensuing Stonewall protests are considered the birth of the modern gay rights movement. Brian Downey, GOAL's president, announced that in response to the ongoing ban, the organization will be protesting on Sunday, starting at 11 a.m., at W. 20th St. and Fifth Ave., five blocks away from the starting point of the Pride March. 'This isn't a time for apathy or complacency,' Downey said. 'It's a time for visibility! It's a time for protest!'
