Govt drafts bill to replace UGC, AICTE, and NCTE with unified Higher Education Commission of India
Union Minister of State for Education Sukanta Majumdar shared the information in a written reply to a question.
"The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 envisions a 'light but tight' regulatory framework to ensure integrity, transparency and resource efficiency of the educational system through audit and public disclosure while encouraging innovation and out-of-the-box ideas through autonomy, good governance and empowerment," Majumdar said.
"The NEP 2020 further envisions setting up of a Higher Education Commission of India (HECI) as an umbrella body with independent verticals to perform distinct functions of regulation, accreditation, funding and academic standard setting.
Considering the above vision of NEP 2020, the ministry is in the process of drafting a HECI bill," he added.
The HECI, which was proposed in the new NEP, looks to replace the
University Grants Commission
(UGC), the
All India Council for Technical Education
(AICTE) and the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE).
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Redefine Your Future with a Top Online MBA
SRM Online
Enquire Now
Undo
While the UGC oversees non-technical higher education, the AICTE oversees technical education and the NCTE is the regulatory body for teachers' education.
The concept of the HECI has been discussed before in the form of a draft bill.
A draft Higher Education Commission of India (Repeal of University Grants Commission Act) Bill, 2018, which seeks to repeal the UGC Act and provides for setting up of the Higher Education Commission of India, was put in the public domain that year for feedback and consultation with stakeholders.
Renewed efforts to make the HECI a reality were then initiated under Dharmendra Pradhan, who took over as Union education minister in July 2021.
Underlining the relevance of a single higher education regulator, the NEP 2020 document says, "the regulatory system is in need of a complete overhaul in order to re-energise the higher education sector and enable it to thrive".
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Odisha yet to set timeline for notifying PESA Rules: Min
1 2 Bhubaneswar: Odisha govt has not yet set a timeline for notifying the PESA Rules to implement the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, across all scheduled areas (tribal-dominated) in the state, Union minister of state for panchayati raj, S P Singh Baghel, informed the Rajya Sabha on Wednesday. The Act gives powers to gram sabhas in scheduled areas for managing natural resources. In response to a query from BJD member Sasmit Patra, the minister said the Odisha govt has not specified a timeline for the notification of PESA Rules. However, the state has indicated that the rules will be implemented after thoroughly examining objections, suggestions and feedback from relevant stakeholder departments. To implement the PESA provisions in Odisha's Fifth Schedule areas, state govt has incorporated them into the Orissa Grama Panchayats Act, 1964. Baghel further informed that a draft notification for the Odisha Grama Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Rules, 2023, was published in the Odisha Gazette on Nov 10, 2023. The state invited objections and suggestions from all affected parties. Following this, state govt conducted personal hearings with individuals and organisations that submitted objections or suggestions regarding the draft notification. These hearings were held in phases to finalise the draft. Additionally, the panchayati raj and drinking water department has held numerous consultative meetings with various stakeholder departments. After considering the objections and suggestions, state govt has modified the draft PESA Rules and shared them with all stakeholder departments for review and constructive feedback. The process remains ongoing as the state seeks to finalise the rules for effective implementation. In Sept 2024, state panchayati raj minister Rabi Naik announced in the assembly that the govt is planning to notify PESA rules and implement the PESA Act soon. Naik said draft rules were translated into Odia and Santhali languages and sent to collectors of districts having scheduled areas to ensure wider consultation among the stakeholders. The rules are needed to implement the central Act. Malkangiri, Koraput, Rayagada, Nabarangpur, Sundargarh and Mayurbhanj districts fully come under Fifth Schedule areas, besides, parts of Kalahandi, Kandhamal, Ganjam, Gajapati, Sambalpur, Keonjhar and Balasore.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
State: Justice Ganguly's order on teachers' appt had ‘mismatch'
Kolkata: Former Calcutta HC judge Abhijit Ganguly's order annulling the appointment of 32,000 primary teachers in state-run primary schools due to corruption allegations, had a "mismatch" between the judge's observations and his subsequent directions, alleged state counsel Abhratosh Majumdar, while pleading against the order on Wednesday. Making his arguments before the bench of justices Tapabrata Chakraborty and Reetobroto Mitra in HC, Majumdar asked why Justice Ganguly hadn't stopped the successful TET 2014 candidates from appearing in the subsequent TET 2016 or TET 2020 if there was a whiff of corruption in the 2014 exam process. "Why didn't the judge distinguish between tainted and untainted candidates if he had reasons to believe that there might have been corruption in the TET 2014 examination?" Majumdar asked. The senior counsel asserted there was no finding in the single bench order establishing corruption until March 2017, a month after most appointments were made in Feb 2017. He also questioned Justice Ganguly's decision to "cherry-pick" candidates. "Only five districts — Howrah, Hooghly, Cooch Behar, North Dinajpur, and Murshidabad — were chosen for scrutiny without citing grounds for selecting these districts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Emergency Generators in Montalvo: (Prices May Surprise You) Emergency Generator | Search Ads Search Now Undo The judge didn't call all the candidates from these districts, either. He chose candidates from the list and called them for questioning. The in-camera proceedings were held on Feb 21, 2023, following which the judge concluded that no aptitude test was held," Majumdar said. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
An unsurprising judgment
As the Central government prepares for the next delimitation exercise, which will redraw constituency boundaries based on the first Census after 2026, Telangana and Andhra Pradesh were waiting for their Assembly constituencies to be increased, as promised in the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014. However, a recent Supreme Court judgment has dampened their hopes. According to the 2014 Act, the number of seats in the Legislative Assemblies was to be increased from 175 to 225 in Andhra Pradesh and from 119 to 153 in Telangana. However, the delimitation process was stalled as the Census could not be conducted in 2020-21 — first because of the COVID-19 pandemic and later for various other reasons. Telangana has represented the matter to the Central government on many occasions. The State government brought it up during meetings convened by the Union Home Ministry to resolve bilateral issues between Telangana and Andhra Pradesh post-bifurcation and also during Southern Zonal Council meetings held under the chairmanship of Union Home Minister Amit Shah from time to time. In a letter addressed to Union Home Secretary Rajiv Mehrishi in June 2016, the then Telangana Chief Secretary, Rajiv Sharma, recalled the provision made under Section 26 of the Act for delimitation of constituencies in the two States. As the new State of Telangana came into existence with effect from June 2, 2014, Mr. Sharma requested the Home Ministry to place the matter before the Election Commission of India (ECI) for increasing seats in the Telangana Legislative Assembly from 119 to 153 as envisaged in the Act as soon as possible. Telangana's former Chief Electoral Officer, Rajat Kumar, also spoke of the impact of transferring a few mandals of Khammam district in Telangana to neighbouring Andhra Pradesh post-bifurcation. He said that the three constituencies were reserved for Scheduled Tribes. Professor K. Purushottam Reddy filed a plea in the Supreme Court seeking readjustment of seats in the Assemblies of the two States, pointing to the exercise in Jammu and Kashmir as a precedent. In its judgment last week, the Supreme Court ruled out delimitation of constituencies till the completion and publication of the Census, which is expected to start in 2026. The Court dismissed his petition saying granting relief would be 'contrary to the letter and spirit of constitutional design'. It said that 'Article 170 [which deals with composition of Legislative Assemblies in States] has no application to Union Territories...' It said that the Centre therefore did not discriminate against the electorates of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, nor dampen their legitimate expectations by conducting delimitation of constituencies in the Union Territory of J&K, which was being governed by a distinct constitutional and statutory regime. Justice Surya Kant also explained that there was a specific constitutional embargo in Article 170 stating that delimitation in States was barred until after the completion of the first Census post 2026. Article 170(3) lays down that 'upon the completion of each Census, the total number of seats in the Legislative Assembly of each State and the division of each State into territorial constituencies shall be readjusted by such authority in such a manner as Parliament by law determine'. The next Census, scheduled to begin in 2026, is likely to be conducted in two phases. The official headcount and house-listing process that will precede it are expected to be completed by March 1, 2027. The numbers will take a few years to be finalised and released. The Delimitation Commission can base its work only on the published Census figures and this could further delay the delimitation exercise in the two States. This means that the exercise will start only after the publication of the next Census data. While the verdict has dashed the hopes of the States, it is also unsurprising. No political party, including the Bharat Rashtra Samithi which claims to have played a crucial role in drafting the Act, seems to have paid notice to the wording of the Act. As former MP B. Vinod Kumar rightly said at a press conference, simply adding the words 'notwithstanding Section 170 sub clause 3' in the 2014 Act would have resolved the problem. If that had been done, delimitation in these two States would possibly not have been clubbed with delimitation across the country.
