Iran's top Shia cleric issues fatwa against Trump, Netanyahu; calls them ‘enemies of God'
A powerful religious decree has been issued by
Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi
, one of
Iran
's most senior Shia clerics, targeting U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The fatwa — a formal ruling under
Islamic law
— brands both leaders as 'enemies of God' and calls for Muslim unity in confronting them.
The pronouncement follows a deadly 12-day conflict between Iran and Israel that escalated into a regional crisis involving the United States.
According to Iranian state-linked Mehr News Agency, Makarem's fatwa declares, 'Any person or regime that threatens the Leader or Marja (May God forbid) is considered a 'warlord' or a 'mohareb'.'
Under Iranian law, the designation of mohareb, or 'one who wages war against God,' carries some of the most severe punishments — including execution, crucifixion, amputation, or exile. This interpretation was cited by Fox News, which reported on the legal implications of such a designation under Iran's penal code.
Live Events
The decree further stated: 'Any cooperation or support for that enemy by Muslims or Islamic states is haram or forbidden. It is necessary for all Muslims around the world to make these enemies regret their words and mistakes.'
It also invoked divine reward for any Muslim who suffers loss or hardship in such a campaign, describing it as fighting in the path of God.
Context: War, nuclear fears, and American involvement
This sharp escalation in rhetoric comes on the heels of a devastating military conflict that erupted on June 13, when Israel launched airstrikes inside Iran, reportedly killing high-ranking military officers and nuclear scientists. Tehran retaliated with a series of missile strikes on Israeli cities, while continuing to deny allegations that it was pursuing nuclear weapons.
The violence expanded when U.S. and Israeli forces jointly targeted three nuclear-related facilities in Iran, prompting a fierce response from Tehran. Iran then bombarded an American military installation in Qatar, further deepening tensions across the Middle East.
The weight of a fatwa
A fatwa, particularly one issued by a Marja — a senior authority in
Twelver Shia Islam
— holds deep religious and political weight in Shia-majority Iran. While not necessarily legally binding outside Iran, such decrees are often taken seriously by followers, including Islamic governments and individuals across the Shia world.
Historically, fatwas have been used by Iranian clerics to call for global action. The most notorious example remains the 1989 fatwa issued by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini against author Salman Rushdie over his novel The Satanic Verses. That edict led to decades of assassination attempts, including a brutal stabbing attack in 2023 that left Rushdie permanently blinded in one eye.
As of now, neither the United States nor Israel has officially responded to the decree by the Iranian cleric.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
21 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump revives proposal for Israel-Hamas ceasefire in Gaza, release of hostages: Report
After a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, US President Donald Trump has revived talks for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip and the release of remaining hostages taken during the October 7 terrorist attack, according to a report. read more Israeli military patrols near the Al Shifa Hospital compound in Gaza City amid the ongoing ground operation against Hamas in the northern Gaza Strip on November 22, 2023. (Photo: Reuters) After brokering a ceasefire in the Israel-Iran war, US President Donald Trump has revived talks to end the war in the Gaza Strip, according to a report. The Israel-Hamas deal reached in January collapsed in March and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel ordered the resumption of attacks. Several thousands of Palestinian casualties have been reported since the resumption of attacks, many of them as they gathered to receive humanitarian aid. The Jerusalem Post has reported that Trump has revived talks for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza and the release of remaining hostages taken during the October 7 terrorist attack. A US source said that the administration was 'optimistic' about reaching the deal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump came to power with the promise of ending wars in Gaza and Ukraine. Instead, he entered a new war with Iran. Moreover, instead of ending the war in Gaza, he has become party to the conflict by announcing the takeover of Gaza and conversion of the strip into a resort town after the expulsion of all Palestinians. The declaration, which critics say amounts to ethnic cleansing, would effectively killed the two-state solution. 75% work done for Israel-Hamas deal: Source A source told The Post that 75 per cent of issues have been resolved in recent weeks. 'The remaining 25 per cent includes key matters such as the humanitarian situation, the conclusion of the war itself, and the guarantees Israel is demanding to prevent Hamas from rearming,' the source said. One option being discussed is the exile of Hamas leaders from Hamas once a ceasefire is reached, according to the newspaper. Hamas has previously rejected the idea. Around the same time that the report emerged, it was reported that Netanyahu held a meeting with senior ministers and defence officials on Sunday to discuss the war in Gaza. The Post reported that that one of the questions discussed in the meeting was whether Israel should send a delegation for indirect talks with Hamas either to Qatar or Egypt.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
21 minutes ago
- First Post
Iran's fatwa against Trump and Netanyahu: How serious is this threat?
Iran's top Shiite cleric has issued a fatwa labelling Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu as enemies of Islam, urging Muslims to resist them. Framed in religious language and referencing divine punishment, the fatwa follows renewed tensions in West Asia. But is this decree a serious threat or a symbolic act? read more US President Donald Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, US, April 7, 2025. File Image/Reuters A fatwa (powerful religious decree) has been issued by Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi, one of Iran's top Shiite clerics, naming United States President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as enemies of the Islamic community. This fatwa — delivered following recent escalations between Iran, Israel and the United States — directly identifies both leaders as mohareb, or individuals who wage war against God. The religious order explicitly calls on Muslims globally to confront those who 'threaten the leadership and integrity of the Islamic Ummah.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Under Iranian Islamic law, the designation of mohareb is a serious one, legally warranting harsh penalties that may include execution, crucifixion, amputation of limbs, or exile. 'Those who threaten the leadership and integrity of the Islamic Ummah are to be considered warlords,' Makarem declared. Further urging the faithful to act, the fatwa states that Muslims who endure hardships in their opposition to these leaders would be considered mujahid fi sabilillah — warriors in the path of God. 'May God protect the Islamic community from the evil of the enemies and hasten the reappearance of the Master of the Age and Time,' the ruling added, alluding to the Shiite messianic figure known as the Mahdi. The fatwa arrives shortly after a period of armed conflict now being referred to as the '12-Day War.' On June 13, Israeli airstrikes targeted Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure, resulting in the deaths of prominent scientists and military commanders. In retaliation, Iran launched ballistic missiles at Israeli cities. The United States soon entered the conflict by striking three nuclear sites in Iran. This conflict was the culmination of months of rising tensions, marked by repeated warnings from Trump himself that any move by Iran toward weapons-grade uranium enrichment would prompt US intervention. What we know about fatwas A fatwa, by definition, is a legal or theological ruling made by an Islamic scholar or authority. These decrees have historically spanned a wide spectrum — ranging from legal clarifications on ethical matters to highly politicised calls for violence. While many fatwas are benign or even humanitarian in their focus, others have been used to justify violent acts against individuals seen as blasphemous or adversarial to Islam. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The case of Salman Rushdie remains the most well-known example in modern history. In 1989, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa condemning Rushdie to death following the publication of The Satanic Verses. The decree, though non-binding in a legal sense, had life-altering consequences. Rushdie spent years in hiding and survived a near-fatal stabbing in 2022 — 33 years after the fatwa was first declared. Despite Iran's political shifts over the years, including the more moderate presidency of Mohammad Khatami in the late 1990s, that fatwa was never officially rescinded. Religious decrees of this nature are not bound by time. There is no expiry. In the eyes of many believers, a fatwa from a revered authority is eternal and sacred. In his post on X (formerly Twitter), British-Iranian commentator Niyak Ghorbani criticised the recent fatwa against Trump and Netanyahu, describing it as a calculated act of state-endorsed extremism. ⭕️Very Important: This is not just a threat to Iranians — it's a global danger. A top Iranian cleric has issued a fatwa openly calling for violent jihad against Western leaders, not just Iranian dissidents. This is a clear act of state-backed incitement to international… — Niyak Ghorbani (نیاک) (@GhorbaniiNiyak) June 29, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The West must realise: the Islamic Republic is not only targeting its own people — it is preparing for global violence in the name of religion,' he wrote. A history of fatwas inciting violence The global implications of such fatwas are not theoretical. In many cases, they have resulted in violence, assassinations, and lasting fear. In 1992, Egyptian intellectual Farag Fouda was shot dead by Islamist militants after being accused of apostasy. His assassination followed a fatwa from religious scholars labeling him an enemy of Islam. Two years later, Egyptian Nobel laureate Naguib Mahfouz was stabbed in the neck by an extremist influenced by another fatwa. Several Western figures have also been targeted. Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh, who co-created a short film critical of the treatment of women in Islam, was murdered in Amsterdam in 2004. He was shot and stabbed by a Dutch-Moroccan Islamist who reportedly acted in line with religious directives. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Dutch politician Geert Wilders received death threats after his statements on Muslim immigration led to a fatwa calling for his beheading, issued by Australian imam Feiz Muhammad in 2010. In the United States, television host David Letterman became a target when a Muslim militant called for his assassination after he joked about the killing of an Al Qaeda figure on his show. The creators of South Park, Matt Stone and Trey Parker, were similarly threatened after depicting the Prophet Mohammed — albeit in a bear suit — sparking outrage and warnings of violent retaliation. Even religious figures outside Islam have been fatwa targets. Jerry Falwell, the American evangelical pastor, once described Prophet Mohammed as a terrorist in a 2002 interview. A fatwa for his death followed, though Falwell later died of natural causes. Fatwas can also lead to mass political consequences. Al-Qaeda's 1998 fatwa calling for jihad against Americans and Israelis followed the US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD That fatwa, signed by Osama bin Laden, justified its stance as a response to perceived Western aggression against Muslims. Not just extremism: Fatwas can also be peaceful While many fatwas attract attention due to their violent implications, others highlight peace, ethics, and coexistence. In 2005, a group of North American Islamic scholars issued a fatwa declaring all acts of terrorism forbidden in Islam. They stated, 'It is haram, forbidden, to cooperate or associate with … any act of terrorism or violence.' The fatwa also encouraged Muslims to work with law enforcement in protecting civilians. Fatwas reflect the intentions and beliefs of the clerics issuing them, and their weight largely depends on the influence and credibility of those scholars among their followers. In places like India, institutions such as the Darul Uloom in Deoband (Uttar Pradesh) issue thousands of fatwas each year. These rulings often address questions of daily life, ethics or personal conduct within an Islamic framework. The Darul Uloom's 12-volume fatwa compilation has even been compared to US Supreme Court proceedings in terms of its complexity and reach. So how serious is the threat against Trump and Netanyahu? Although fatwas are non-binding religious opinions, their danger lies in how they are interpreted and acted upon. Clerics with a vast audience can mobilise not only devout followers but also extremists willing to act violently. In a world already polarised by ideology and religion, a fatwa from a prominent authority can be seen as a divine command. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As history has shown, even decades-old fatwas can incite violence long after their original context is forgotten. Rushdie's near-fatal stabbing in 2022 serves as a chilling reminder. It is not only sanctioned operatives that carry out such attacks — self-radicalised individuals, lone actors or religious vigilantes often act without state direction. The fatwa from Ayatollah Makarem thus poses a long-term risk. While it may not lead to immediate action, it could inspire attacks in the years to come, carried out by individuals who believe they are fulfilling a religious duty. With Makarem calling for Trump and Netanyahu to be made to 'regret their words and mistakes,' the fatwa stops short of a direct death order, but the implications are clear to those familiar with such rhetoric. Also Watch: With inputs from agencies
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Not offering Iran anything': Donald Trump refuses to talk with Tehran; attacks Obama-era policy
US President Donald Trump US President Donald Trump said that he is "not talking or giving anything" to Tehran after the deputy foreign minister has put a condition on any future diplomatic and nuclear talks with America. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said, "Tell phony Democrat Senator Chris Coons that I am not offering Iran ANYTHING, unlike Obama, who paid them $Billions under the stupid 'road to a Nuclear Weapon JCPOA (which would now be expired!), nor am I even talking to them since we totally OBLITERATED their Nuclear Facilities." This came after Tehran's deputy foreign minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi said the US must rule out any further strikes on Iran if it wants to resume diplomatic talks. He revealed to BBC that the Trump administration communicated via intermediaries about resuming negotiations this week. However, he noted that they failed to clarify their stance regarding potential attacks during the discussion period. Discussions between the US and Iran concerning Iran's nuclear programme were ongoing when Israel conducted strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and military installations earlier this month, prompting Iran to launch missile counterstrikes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like ¿Padece una enfermedad renal crónica (ERC)? Trialbee Más información Undo The US entered the conflict directly on June 21 when it conducted bombing operations against three Iranian nuclear facilities. Earlier, a CNN report came that the Trump administration in recent days has explored possible economic incentives in return for the Iranian regime halting uranium enrichment. Iran would also be allowed to receive assistance from regional countries to help it build the civilian nuclear programme, granting Tehran access to as much as the reported $30 billion. However, Trump refuted the claims and called it a fake and hoax news. He said, "Who in the FAKE NEWS MEDIA is the SleazeBag saying that 'President Trump wants to give Iran $30 billion to build non-military Nuclear facilities.' Never heard of this ridiculous idea." "It's just another HOAX put out by the Fake News in order to demean. These people are SICK!!!," the MAGA leader added.
