Matter Aera launched at ₹1.93 lakh in Delhi. Check the geared EV motorbike out
Matter, an Indian electric mobility startup, has introduced its Aera electric motorcycle in Delhi, marking the regional launch of what the company claims is India's first geared electric two-wheeler. Priced at ₹ 1,93,826 (ex-showroom), the Aera is now available for booking via the company's official website.
This launch comes at a time when Delhi, one of the country's most polluted and densely populated cities, continues to witness rising interest in electric mobility. The Aera's entry is being positioned as a blend of performance, tech, and efficiency in a segment that typically relies on simplified automatic drivetrains. Matter Aera: Manual gearbox in an electric format
A key feature of the Aera is its 'HyperShift' transmission, a 4-speed manual gearbox developed in-house. This system is paired with three ride modes, allowing for a total of 12 gear-mode combinations. While most electric two-wheelers offer a twist-and-go experience, Matter is betting on the idea that manual control can add a layer of rider engagement that's largely missing in the EV space. Also watch: Matter Aera 5000+ review: Can India's first geared electric motorcycle be a gamechanger? Matter Aera: Powertrain and performance
The Aera is powered by a liquid-cooled electric powertrain, also developed by Matter, and is aimed at handling Indian climate and road conditions. It comes with a 5 kWh battery pack that is certified for a range of up to 172 km under IDC conditions. According to the company, the bike can accelerate from 0 to 40 kmph in under 2.8 seconds. Matter's Aera: Connectivity and tech features
Inside the cockpit, the Aera features a 7-inch touchscreen display with integrated navigation, ride stats, and music controls. It also supports over-the-air (OTA) software updates. Connectivity is a central part of the package, with the MatterVerse app offering features such as remote locking and unlocking, live location tracking, geo-fencing, and ride analytics.
Also Read : Matter Aera 5000+ real-world range tested in Sport mode: Here's how far it went Matter Aera: Safety and convenience
For braking and ride comfort, the Aera uses a dual-disc setup with ABS and a dual suspension system. A smart park assist feature is included to assist with low-speed manoeuvres, and the bike also offers a keyless start system for convenience. Matter Aera: Running costs and ownership
In terms of operating costs, Matter estimates that the Aera will consume energy at roughly 25 paise per kilometre, with potential savings of up to ₹ 1 lakh over three years when compared to petrol-powered commuter bikes.
Also Read : Matter Motor targets mid-segment riders with EV motorcycles and a tiered product strategy Matter Aera: Vision
Arun Pratap Singh, Founder and Group COO of Matter, said the Aera reflects a step toward redefining what electric motorcycles can offer. 'Delhi isn't just the capital, it's a city that sets the pace. The AERA is about power and precision, but also practicality," he stated.
The AERA is entirely developed in India and is aimed at urban riders looking for a distinctive electric alternative that doesn't compromise on control or connectivity. With this launch, Matter hopes to carve out a niche in an increasingly crowded but largely automatic-focused electric two-wheeler market.
Check out Upcoming EV Bikes in India.
First Published Date: 04 Jul 2025, 09:15 AM IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
26 minutes ago
- Hans India
FDCI Presents Hyundai India Couture Week 2025 with Grand Curtain-Raiser in Delhi
The Fashion Design Council of India (FDCI) and Hyundai Motor India Ltd. officially launched the 18th edition of Hyundai India Couture Week 2025 in collaboration with Reliance Brands. The announcement was made at an exclusive press conference held at the Taj Palace, New Delhi, marking Hyundai's third consecutive year as the title sponsor. This year's edition also celebrates the 10th anniversary of the Hyundai Creta, with the new Creta EV set to be showcased during the event. The event saw the presence of leading names from fashion and corporate circles, including Sunil Sethi, Chairman, FDCI; Tarun Garg, COO & Whole-Time Director, Hyundai Motor India Ltd.; J.T. Park, Executive Director (Sales, Marketing & Service), HMIL; and Virat Khullar, Group Head Marketing, HMIL. The afternoon began with a formal welcome and lunch reception, followed by Sunil Sethi's keynote address. He emphasized the synergy between fashion and automotive design, stating that Hyundai India Couture Week continues to be one of the most anticipated platforms for Indian couture and innovation. He extended his gratitude to participating designers and Reliance Brands for their continued support. Tarun Garg spoke about Hyundai's ongoing partnership with FDCI and the brand's commitment to creativity and culture. He highlighted the significance of showcasing the Hyundai Creta Electric at this year's event, symbolizing the blend of cutting-edge mobility with the glamour of haute couture. A standout moment at the press conference was the live runway presentation where models unveiled one signature ensemble from each designer, coinciding with the couturier announcements. This gave guests a vibrant preview of the couture excellence to come. The stellar couturier lineup for 2025 includes names like Rohit Bal, JJ Valaya, Manish Malhotra, Ritu Kumar, Tarun Tahiliani, Amit Aggarwal, Falguni Shane Peacock, Rahul Mishra, Shantnu & Nikhil, Suneet Varma, Rimzim Dadu, Jayanti Reddy, Rose Room by Isha Jajodia, and Aisha Rao. Several designers also participated in an on-stage interaction, sharing insights into their inspirations, collections, and views on the evolving couture landscape. The conference concluded with a photo opportunity capturing key stakeholders and couturiers, symbolizing the power of collaboration and creativity. Hyundai India Couture Week 2025 is also supported by luxury and lifestyle brands Grey Goose Altius and Kohler, who add to the immersive experience of this iconic fashion celebration.
Economic Times
32 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Should India adjust its trade balance to partially mitigate US tariff risks?
Agencies If India pursues trade diversification, it can strike a better balance in its overall trade. The prospect of a uniform 10% base tariff regime by the United States, along with an additional tariff to be calculated on the basis of a formula based on a partner country's trade balance relative to its total exports to the U.S. marks a fundamental shift in global trade calculus. India was trying to cut a deal with the US which would have prevented these additional tariffs from kicking in from the 9th of July but that seems unlikely now. Piyush Goyal's terse comment, accompanied by a smiling photograph, that India does notnegotiate under threat of deadlines, says it there anything that India could do to minimize tariff damage from the US? One possible line of thought that could be explored is to proactively reduce its trade surplus with the US, even if that involves marginally increasing import costs. The core hypothesis is simple yet provocative and stems from the US administration's proposed tariff-setting formula, namely thatTariff Rate (Country X) = Base Tariff (10%) + Adjustment Factor based on (Trade Surplus of X with U.S. ÷ Total U.S. Imports from X)This formula prescribes a higher adjustment factor in respect to the higher trade surplus. One way to reduce it would be to decrease the trade surplus by importing more from the US, even if the goods being imported are slightly more expensive than from those currently being imported. India's strategic advantage lies in being a net importing country globally—with a trade deficit of around $240 billion in FY 2023–24—giving it room to to the official reports, the merchandise trade between the two nations was an estimated $129.2 billion in 2024. Indian exports of goods summed up to $87.4 billion in 2024. This amount was an increase from previous year's exports by 4.5 percent. The goods imported from the US, totalled $41.8 billion in 2024. This implies that India witnessed a surplus of $45.7 billion in merchandise trade with the US. From the data, it can be observed that India had a trade surplus ratio of 0.5 (i.e. 50%) for 2024 which is a good sign for economic growth, job creation and the strength of the currency. So, what could India's strategy be? There are two possible strategies that could be considered. The first option to explore could be import diversification to the US. India could attempt to raise its imports from the US—particularly in sectors where it already has structural dependencies or scope for efficiency imports from the US in 2023, present appealing opportunities and scope for expansion across several sectors. For instance, imports of oil and gas, currently valued at $11.6 billion, could be increased in line with India's strategy of energy diversification. In the aviation sector, imports of aircraft and machinery, worth $5.2 billion are likely to grow further as the country's aviation industry continues to expand. Electronics and semiconductors records imports under $2 billion. This sector also offers scope for growth with the implementation of Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes focusing on boosting domestic electronics manufacturing. Similarly, medical equipment imports, currently at $1.3 billion, can be expanded to support the ongoing development of India's healthcare infrastructure. Given these trends, one viable strategy for India would be to diversify and increase its imports from the US, particularly in sectors where there are existing dependencies or clear opportunities for efficiency improvements.A targeted increase of $10–15 billion in imports from the U.S. in these areas would reduce India's trade surplus with the U.S. to ~$30 billion, bringing the trade surplus ratio down from 50% to ~33%, reducing effective additional tariff exposure to around 13.3%. A second strategic option for the Government would be trade diversification. India can see if it's possible to simultaneously diversify some of its exports from US to third countries (e.g., EU, ASEAN, Africa) and shift some import sourcing away from countries like China to the India pursues trade diversification, it can strike a better balance in its overall trade. It can also address critical geopolitical dependencies in global trade. By spreading its exports across a wider range of markets—not just the US, lowers its risk of reliance on a single market. At the same time, shifting some import sourcing away from countries such as China to the US would provide domestic input suppliers a smoother path under US compliance regimes, making it easier to navigate regulatory of these strategies would be that by reducing the trade surplus we would be able to lowers the additional tariff exposure, thereby helping Indian exporters retain their competitiveness in the US market. Increased US imports can strengthen India's access to clean energy tech, critical semiconductors, and advanced machinery. And finally, such a proactive adjustment could be sold as India's attempt to reduce the trade balance, thereby deepening the Indo-US strategic partnership. Further, potentially creating room for bilateral carve-outs or they would not come without certain disadvantages and consequent criticism. Shifting to US suppliers may raise costs—US goods are often priced higher than Asian alternatives. For instance, US LNG landed price is 15–25% higher than Qatari or Russian alternatives. Also, some US exports may not be easily substitutable for inputs sourced elsewhere due to compatibility or volume. There is also the danger of short-term deterioration of the overall trade deficit, since an increase in high-value imports from the US could exacerbate India's overall current account deficit, even if temporarily. And finally, if the US again makes changes to its tariff policy, India's restructuring may become redundant. Nonetheless, India's structural trade flexibility offers a strategic tool to minimize damage from an evolving US tariff regime. By adjusting its trade balance with the US—especially via higher-value, strategically aligned imports—India can moderate tariff exposure from an estimated 15% to 12–13%, generating long-term diplomatic and economic dividends. This is a calculated bet. While there are short-term costs, including possible higher import bills and shifting supply chains, the broader payoff—in reduced tariff penalties, deepened bilateral trust, and a more balanced trade portfolio—may well justify the strategy. India's policymakers must remain nimble, using data-driven calibration and sectoral targeting to make this trade-off work. The author is President, Chintan Research Foundation
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Should India adjust its trade balance to partially mitigate US tariff risks?
The prospect of a uniform 10% base tariff regime by the United States, along with an additional tariff to be calculated on the basis of a formula based on a partner country's trade balance relative to its total exports to the U.S. marks a fundamental shift in global trade calculus. India was trying to cut a deal with the US which would have prevented these additional tariffs from kicking in from the 9th of July but that seems unlikely now. Piyush Goyal's terse comment, accompanied by a smiling photograph, that India does notnegotiate under threat of deadlines, says it all. Is there anything that India could do to minimize tariff damage from the US? One possible line of thought that could be explored is to proactively reduce its trade surplus with the US, even if that involves marginally increasing import costs. The core hypothesis is simple yet provocative and stems from the US administration's proposed tariff-setting formula, namely that Tariff Rate (Country X) = Base Tariff (10%) + Adjustment Factor based on (Trade Surplus of X with U.S. ÷ Total U.S. Imports from X) by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Learn More Undo This formula prescribes a higher adjustment factor in respect to the higher trade surplus. One way to reduce it would be to decrease the trade surplus by importing more from the US, even if the goods being imported are slightly more expensive than from those currently being imported. India's strategic advantage lies in being a net importing country globally—with a trade deficit of around $240 billion in FY 2023–24—giving it room to maneuver. According to the official reports, the merchandise trade between the two nations was an estimated $129.2 billion in 2024. Indian exports of goods summed up to $87.4 billion in 2024. This amount was an increase from previous year's exports by 4.5 percent. The goods imported from the US, totalled $41.8 billion in 2024. This implies that India witnessed a surplus of $45.7 billion in merchandise trade with the US. From the data, it can be observed that India had a trade surplus ratio of 0.5 (i.e. 50%) for 2024 which is a good sign for economic growth, job creation and the strength of the currency. Live Events So, what could India's strategy be? There are two possible strategies that could be considered. The first option to explore could be import diversification to the US. India could attempt to raise its imports from the US—particularly in sectors where it already has structural dependencies or scope for efficiency improvements. India's imports from the US in 2023, present appealing opportunities and scope for expansion across several sectors. For instance, imports of oil and gas, currently valued at $11.6 billion, could be increased in line with India's strategy of energy diversification. In the aviation sector, imports of aircraft and machinery, worth $5.2 billion are likely to grow further as the country's aviation industry continues to expand. Electronics and semiconductors records imports under $2 billion. This sector also offers scope for growth with the implementation of Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes focusing on boosting domestic electronics manufacturing. Similarly, medical equipment imports, currently at $1.3 billion, can be expanded to support the ongoing development of India's healthcare infrastructure. Given these trends, one viable strategy for India would be to diversify and increase its imports from the US, particularly in sectors where there are existing dependencies or clear opportunities for efficiency improvements. A targeted increase of $10–15 billion in imports from the U.S. in these areas would reduce India's trade surplus with the U.S. to ~$30 billion, bringing the trade surplus ratio down from 50% to ~33%, reducing effective additional tariff exposure to around 13.3%. A second strategic option for the Government would be trade diversification. India can see if it's possible to simultaneously diversify some of its exports from US to third countries (e.g., EU, ASEAN, Africa) and shift some import sourcing away from countries like China to the U.S. If India pursues trade diversification, it can strike a better balance in its overall trade. It can also address critical geopolitical dependencies in global trade. By spreading its exports across a wider range of markets—not just the US, lowers its risk of reliance on a single market. At the same time, shifting some import sourcing away from countries such as China to the US would provide domestic input suppliers a smoother path under US compliance regimes, making it easier to navigate regulatory requirements. Advantages of these strategies would be that by reducing the trade surplus we would be able to lowers the additional tariff exposure, thereby helping Indian exporters retain their competitiveness in the US market. Increased US imports can strengthen India's access to clean energy tech, critical semiconductors, and advanced machinery. And finally, such a proactive adjustment could be sold as India's attempt to reduce the trade balance, thereby deepening the Indo-US strategic partnership. Further, potentially creating room for bilateral carve-outs or exemptions. However, they would not come without certain disadvantages and consequent criticism. Shifting to US suppliers may raise costs—US goods are often priced higher than Asian alternatives. For instance, US LNG landed price is 15–25% higher than Qatari or Russian alternatives. Also, some US exports may not be easily substitutable for inputs sourced elsewhere due to compatibility or volume. There is also the danger of short-term deterioration of the overall trade deficit, since an increase in high-value imports from the US could exacerbate India's overall current account deficit, even if temporarily. And finally, if the US again makes changes to its tariff policy, India's restructuring may become redundant. Nonetheless, India's structural trade flexibility offers a strategic tool to minimize damage from an evolving US tariff regime. By adjusting its trade balance with the US—especially via higher-value, strategically aligned imports—India can moderate tariff exposure from an estimated 15% to 12–13%, generating long-term diplomatic and economic dividends. This is a calculated bet. While there are short-term costs, including possible higher import bills and shifting supply chains, the broader payoff—in reduced tariff penalties, deepened bilateral trust, and a more balanced trade portfolio—may well justify the strategy. India's policymakers must remain nimble, using data-driven calibration and sectoral targeting to make this trade-off work. The author is President, Chintan Research Foundation
