
Europe's vow to Trump to push defence budget to 5% rings hollow
Advertisement
Above all, the
agreement , which would lift Nato defence spending from an estimated US$1.5 trillion to around US$4.2 trillion over the next 10 years, was an attempt to prevent US President Donald Trump from pulling the United States out of the transatlantic security alliance.
This placatory gesture seems to have succeeded: Trump left the
Nato summit reportedly purring, swearing unwavering commitment to Nato. But it must leave most practical observers incredulous as to how such a massive resource transfer might be achieved – and the implications if it did. For sure, defence spending needs to rise sharply across Europe – but 5 per cent?
For perspective, note that in 2023, just nine countries worldwide spent 5 per cent of their GDP or more on defence: Algeria, Armenia, Lebanon, Oman, Saudi Arabia, South Sudan and, of course, Israel, Russia and Ukraine. For any normal democratically accountable government, the key should be how money is spent, not how much. China, which the US labels as its
'pacing threat' , is estimated to spend just 1.7 per cent of its GDP on defence.
The imperative for Europe to reduce its
reliance on US defence has been firmly driven home, and is probably long overdue. But anyone who believes Europe's governments will find an extra US$2.7 trillion for defence over the coming decade is living in dreamland.
Advertisement
It has taken a decade of hectoring, foot-dragging and Russia's invasion of Ukraine to get
most Nato members to meet the 2 per cent defence commitment. Last year, 23 met the target, according to the Atlantic Council's tracker. Of the four members other than the US who surpassed 3 per cent in spending, three have long land borders with Russia: Poland at 4.12 per cent, Estonia at 3.43 per cent and Latvia at 3.15 per cent. Fingers are crossed that with a little creative accounting, the remainder will this year cross the 2 per cent line.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
UK welcomes French police puncturing boat to prevent migrants crossing Channel
The British government said on Friday it welcomed footage showing French police stopping a small boat carrying migrants from setting off across the Channel. Advertisement The UK and France have been rowing for years about who should be responsible for dealing with many thousands of migrants who make their way from Africa and the Middle East to the northern coast of France in a bid to get to Britain by boat. The BBC on Friday broadcast footage of French police puncturing a boat with a knife as it was about to set off for the UK, with dozens of migrants then making their way back to shore. 'What we saw this morning was a significant moment,' said a spokesman from Prime Minister Keir Starmer's office. 'We welcome action from French law enforcement to take action in shallow waters, and what you have seen in recent weeks is a toughening of their approach.' Advertisement French police are prevented by law from intervening once a boat is in the water.


South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump uses antisemitism slur ‘Shylock' in rally, denies knowing it's offensive
US President Donald Trump used an antisemitism slur during a rally in Iowa as he celebrated the passage of his tax cuts and spending bill but insisted he did not know the word was offensive to Jewish people. 'No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing from, in some cases a fine banker, and in some cases Shylocks and bad people,' Trump told the crowd on Thursday at the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines. The term 'Shylock' is borrowed from William Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice. The tale features a Jewish character, who is portrayed as a ruthless moneylender demanding 'a pound of flesh' from a merchant unable to repay a loan. The word refers to loan sharks and has long been considered offensive, playing on stereotypes of Jews and greed. The Trump controversy echoes a similar incident in 2014 when then-Vice-President Joe Biden used the term while describing exploitative lenders. Biden later apologised, calling it 'a poor choice of words'. 03:02 US House passes Trump's bill, sending it to White House for president to sign US House passes Trump's bill, sending it to White House for president to sign 'We see once again how deeply embedded this stereotype about Jews is in society,' Abraham Foxman, then-director of a Jewish activist group, the Anti-Defamation League, said at the time.


South China Morning Post
7 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
How to undermine the US dollar and destroy its monetary system
As a professional journalist dedicated to objectivity and detachment, I am totally uncalm about the US president. But you would be too if he had burned a big hole in your wallet. Since Donald Trump returned to power, the US dollar has dropped more than 10 per cent against the dollar index consisting of six major currencies, reportedly the worst fall since the oil shock of 1973. As you may have guessed, I am paid by my employer in Hong Kong dollars. So thanks to the US dollar peg, I had just had to exchange HK$5.8-plus for one Canadian dollar, instead of the roughly average HK$5.4 until recently. On a monthly basis, the difference is roughly equivalent to, for my wife and me, 6 to 7 visits to our favourite grocery store where the real inflation rate for some items, I suspect, is 10 times the headline Canadian rate of under 2 per cent. Every time Trump attacks or insults US Fed chair Jerome Powell, I weep. Posting on his own Truth Social platform, he has just openly called on Powell to resign: ''Too Late' should resign immediately!!!' The president has called him 'Mr Too Late', 'a numbskull', 'an average mentally person…Low IQ for what he does'. It's been a long list of insults. Poor Jerome. Financial historians may correct me but probably no previous Fed chair had to endure such prolonged public humiliation. Since Trump's avowed goal for his almost universal tariff war is to promote Made-in-America exports, he obviously wants a weak dollar. So there is a method in the madness in attacking Powell; and Trump seems personally to enjoy it. But there is no reason to doubt that he wants Powell out and replace him with what he calls 'a low rates guy', a complete sycophant just like he has with those put in charge of public health, education, defence, national security and intelligence, and much else. Powell's term ends next May.