
No Tax on Overtime, Tips Changed in Senate Bill: What To Know
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
President Donald Trump's no tax on tips and overtime pay policy was one of his most popular pledges during the 2024 election campaign, and lawmakers in Congress are working to make his plans a reality.
The promise is included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the sprawling budget bill that outlines Trump's economic agenda, which has been amended by Senate lawmakers this week.
While the total removal of these income tax requirements is not on the table, Republicans have proposed letting workers deduct their reported tip and overtime income from their federal income taxes—with the House and Senate considering slightly different ways of implementing the policies.
Why It Matters
Nixing federal income taxes on overtime and tipped income was one of Trump's top policy promises during his 2024 election campaign, an idea that has also been embraced by Democrats. It could affect millions of workers across the U.S.
What To Know
The Senate Finance Committee's proposal would limit tax breaks on tipped income and overtime pay. The House version allowed deductions on income up to $160,000 annually.
The Senate plan offers the same $25,000 deduction, but would begin to phase out for single filers earning, with a modified adjusted gross income, $150,000, and couples over $300,000.
The list of occupations that will be permitted to deduct tips from their federal income taxes would need to be published within 90 days of the rule becoming law: it is expected to include most service workers.
Stock image of money and a receipt on a restaurant table.
Stock image of money and a receipt on a restaurant table.
GETTY
For overtime pay, Senate Republicans also propose a $12,500 deduction for single filers, doubled to $25,000 for joint tax returns. This would also phase out at the same levels as the tips policy.
Both plans would still be subject to FICA taxes, which pay for Social Security and Medicare, and both would be in place from 2025 to 2028.
What People Are Saying
Javier Palomarez, founder and CEO of the United States Hispanic Business Council, told Newsweek the policy could "unintentionally amplify tipping fatigue."
"If consumers perceive that service workers are receiving an additional government benefit, they may become less inclined to tip, or tip less, especially amid growing backlash to the seemingly common tipping prompts, e.g., at counter-service or self-checkout. Consumers' mindsets could shift, viewing the policy as a substitute for their personal responsibility to tip generously."
Republican Mike Crapo, Idaho Senator and U.S. Senate Finance Committee chairman, said the bill "delivers additional tax relief to middle-class families still recovering from record inflation under the [Joe] Biden administration.
"It powers the economy by permanently extending critical pro-growth provisions and introduces new incentives for domestic investment, providing certainty for American job creators to spur domestic economic activity and invest in their workers."
The University of Colorado's Nicole Lazzeri, a teaching assistant professor of accounting at the Leeds School of Business, told CU Boulder Today: "When you look under the hood, it gets a little more complicated. The current version of this proposal—the one included in what's been dubbed the "Big, Beautiful Bill"—doesn't actually remove all taxes on tips.
"It lets workers deduct their reported tip income from their federal income taxes, but tips would still be subject to payroll taxes—that's Social Security and Medicare, the 7.65 percent that's taken out of every paycheck. So yes, it would help some workers. But not as much as it might seem.
What Happens Next
If enacted, the changes would take effect from 2026 through 2028. The modified bill will first be debated by the Senate and return to the House for a final vote before Trump can sign it into law.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact check: Trump calls to prosecute Beyoncé based on a nonexistent $11 million payment
President Donald Trump over the weekend called for the prosecution of music superstar Beyoncé – based on something that did not actually happen. Trump claimed in a social media post that Beyoncé broke the law by supposedly getting paid $11 million for her endorsement of Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris during an October 2024 event in Houston. But there is simply no basis for Trump's claim that Beyoncé received an $11 million payment related to the Harris campaign, let alone for the endorsement in particular. Federal campaign spending records show a $165,000 payment from the Harris campaign to Beyoncé's production company, which the campaign listed as a 'campaign event production' expense. A Harris campaign spokesperson told Deadline last year that they didn't pay celebrity endorsers, but were required by law to cover the costs connected to their appearances. Regardless of the merits of this particular $165,000 expenditure, it's far from an $11 million one. Nobody has ever produced any evidence for the claim of an eight-figure endorsement payment to Beyoncé since the claim that it was '$10 million' began spreading last year among Trump supporters on social media. Fact-check websites and PolitiFact looked into the '$10 million' claim during the campaign and did not find any basis for it. The White House did not immediately respond to a CNN request late Saturday for any evidence of Trump's $11 million figure. When Trump previously invoked the baseless figure, during an interview in February, he described his source in the vaguest of terms: 'Somebody just showed me something. They gave her $11 million.' A Harris spokesperson referred CNN on Saturday to a November social media post by Beyoncé's mother Tina Knowles, who called the claim of a $10 million payment a 'lie' and noted it was taken down by Instagram as 'False Information.' 'When In Fact: Beyonce did not receive a penny for speaking at a Presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harrris's (sic) Rally in Houston,' Knowles wrote. A spokesperson for Beyoncé told PolitiFact in November that the claim about a $10 million payment is 'beyond ridiculous.' What Trump wrote Sunday Trump revived the false claim in a social media post published after midnight early Sunday morning in Scotland, where he is visiting. He wrote that he is looking at 'the fact' that Democrats 'admit to paying, probably illegally, Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT.' Democratic officials actually reject the claim of an $11 million payment. The White House did not immediately respond to CNN's request for any evidence of a Democratic admission of such a payment. Trump went on to criticize other payments from the Harris campaign to organizations connected to prominent endorsers. He asserted without evidence that these payments were inaccurately described in spending records. And he wrongly asserted that it is 'TOTALLY ILLEGAL' to pay for political endorsements, though no federal law forbids endorsement payments. Trump concluded: 'Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted! Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Trump has repeatedly called for the prosecution of political opponents. His Saturday post about Harris and celebrity endorsements was an escalation from a post in May, when he said he would call for a 'major investigation' on the subject but did not explicitly mention prosecutions.

Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he would ‘like' to strike a trade deal with the EU
US President Donald Trump said on Sunday he would 'like' to strike a trade deal with the EU, adding there was a '50-50 chance'.Trump said Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China, US to extend tariff pause at Sweden talks by another 90 days, SCMP reports
(Reuters) -Beijing and Washington are expected to extend their tariff truce by another three months at trade talks in Stockholm beginning on Monday, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported on Sunday, citing people familiar with the matter. During the expected 90-day extension, the U.S. and China will agree not to introduce new tariffs or take other actions that could further escalate the trade war, the report said. While the earlier discussions in Geneva and London focused on "de-escalation", the latest meeting the Chinese delegation will also press Trump's trade team on fentanyl-related tariffs, the report further said, citing three sources familiar with the matter. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The third round of U.S.-China talks is set to be held in Stockholm on Monday to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the centre of the countries' trade war. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data