Lab-Grown Meat Goes Upscale With Faux Foie Gras
Makers of lab-grown aka cell-cultured meat have pitched the product as a fix for our food chain's environmental and humanitarian issues. But it comes with its own baggage—it is expensive to produce, it can't nail the protein's texture and it starts 'life' as sludge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TechCrunch
20 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
OpenAI and Google outdo the mathletes, but not each other
AI models from OpenAI and Google DeepMind achieved gold medal scores in the 2025 International Math Olympiad (IMO), one of the world's oldest and most challenging high school level math competitions, the companies independently announced in recent days. The result underscores just how fast AI systems are advancing, and yet, how evenly matched Google and OpenAI seem to be in the AI race. AI companies are competing fiercely for the public perception of behind ahead in the AI race: an intangible battle of 'vibes' that can have big implications for securing top AI talent. A lot of AI researchers come from backgrounds in competitive math, so benchmarks like IMO mean more than others. Last year, Google scored a silver medal at IMO using a 'formal' system, meaning it required humans to translate problems into a machine‑readable format. This year, both OpenAI and Google entered 'informal' systems into the competition, which were able to ingest questions and generate proof‑based answers in natural language. Both companies claim their AI models scored higher than most high school students and Google's AI model from last year, without requiring any human-machine translation. In interviews with TechCrunch, researchers behind OpenAI and Google's IMO efforts claimed that these gold medal performances represent breakthroughs around AI reasoning models in non-verifiable domains. While AI reasoning models tend to do well on questions with straightforward answers, such as math or coding tasks, these systems struggle on tasks with more ambiguous solutions, such as buying a great chair or helping with complex research. However, Google is raising questions around how OpenAI conducted and announced its gold medal IMO performance. After all, if you're going to enter AI models into a math contest for high schoolers, you might as well argue like teenagers. Shortly after OpenAI announced its feat on Saturday morning, Google DeepMind's CEO and researchers took to social media to slam OpenAI for announcing its gold‑medal prematurely — shortly after IMO announced which high schoolers had won the competition on Friday night — and for not having their model's test officially evaluated by IMO. Btw as an aside, we didn't announce on Friday because we respected the IMO Board's original request that all AI labs share their results only after the official results had been verified by independent experts & the students had rightly received the acclamation they deserved — Demis Hassabis (@demishassabis) July 21, 2025 Thang Luong, a Google DeepMind senior researcher and lead for the IMO project, told TechCrunch that Google waited to announce its IMO results to respect the students participating in the competition. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW Luong said that Google has been working with IMO's organizers since last year in preparation for the test and wanted to have the IMO president's blessing and official grading before announcing its official results, which it did on Monday morning. 'The IMO organizers have their grading guideline,' Luong said. 'So any evaluation that's not based on that guideline could not make any claim about gold-medal level [performance].' Noam Brown, a senior OpenAI researcher who worked on the IMO model, told TechCrunch that IMO reached out to OpenAI a few months ago about participating in a formal math competition, but the ChatGPT-maker declined because it was working on natural language systems that it thought were more worth pursuing. Brown says OpenAI didn't know IMO was conducting an informal test with Google. OpenAI says it hired third-party evaluators — three former IMO medalists who understood the grading system — to grade its AI model's performance. After OpenAI learned of its gold medal score, Brown said the company reached out to IMO, which then told the company to wait to announce until after IMO's Friday night award ceremony. IMO did not respond to TechCrunch's request for comment. Google isn't necessarily wrong here — it did go through a more official, rigorous process to achieve its gold medal score — but the debate may miss the bigger picture: AI models from several leading AI labs are improving quickly. Countries from around the world sent their brightest students to compete at IMO this year, and just a few percent of them scored as well as OpenAI and Google's AI models did. While OpenAI used to have a significant lead over the industry, it certainly feels as though the race is more closely matched than any company would like to admit. OpenAI is expected to release GPT-5 in the coming months, and the company certainly hopes to give off the impression that it still leads the AI industry.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BofA Trims McDonald's (MCD) Price Target, Maintains Neutral Rating
McDonald's Corporation (NYSE:MCD) is one of the most profitable consumer stocks to buy now. Bank of America slightly lowered its price target on McDonald's Corporation (NYSE:MCD) to $322 from $327 while keeping a Neutral rating, as it fine-tunes estimates across its restaurant coverage ahead of the sector's upcoming earnings season. The revised target implies an upside of roughly 8.4% from the current market price of $297. saknakorn / The move reflects a broader recalibration by BofA analysts, who are adjusting their models to account for changes in market multiples and company-specific revisions. While McDonald's remains a stable performer, the firm signaled that valuation has grown less compelling in the short term, especially amid a backdrop of slowing same-store sales growth and cautious consumer trends in key international markets. BofA highlighted that while McDonald's continues to benefit from scale, operational efficiency, and strong brand equity, macro pressures, including FX headwinds and uneven traffic in Europe, could limit near-term upside. Still, the modest price cut is not a sign of deteriorating fundamentals but rather part of a broader sector-level housekeeping. Investors will be closely monitoring McDonald's quarterly update for guidance on pricing strategies, traffic trends, and progress in digital engagement, all of which will shape sentiment heading into the second half of the year. While we acknowledge the potential of MCD as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: Top 10 Healthcare AI Stocks to Buy According to Hedge Funds and 10 Best Industrial Automation Stocks to Buy for the Next Decade Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Over 99% of XRP holders are in profit
Over 99% of XRP holders are in profit originally appeared on TheStreet. Fresh on-chain data from on-chain analytical platform Glassnode shows that 99.6% of XRP's circulating supply is sitting in profit, meaning that hardly anyone wants to sell at a loss. This figure highlights the substantial price hikes XRP has undergone over the past weeks, rising to $3.64 at one point. XRP investor sentiment has also reached the verge of euphoria; the percentage of supply in profit is currently near an 18-month spike is occurring as both futures open interest and 24-hour trading volumes have rapidly increased simultaneously, suggesting that it is not just retail investors who are getting long, with the percentage of supply in profit at one of its highest levels since 2018 when the asset hit its all-time high at $3.84. Bitcoin trails behind XRP Bitcoin (BTC) is up nearly 70% at over $117,000, and its percentage of supply in profit is at almost 97%, just under that of XRP. Historically, Bitcoin has very high returns for holders, but the recent vertical move of XRP has now temporarily surpassed it in terms of raw holder gains. As Bitcoin adoption increases and holding cycles grow longer, profits are more distributed across price levels. The sharp XRP rally has led to the majority of its holders being in profit in an extremely short this means for the market Such outsized levels of profitability often indicate turning points. Though it evinces very bullish sentiment, it could also be suggestive of profit-taking pressure in the short term. However, with increasing interest in futures and a steady volume, the momentum could move forward—especially if regulatory clarity emerges from the yet-to-be-enacted CLARITY Act. Over 99% of XRP holders are in profit first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 21, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 21, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio
