EU Unveils Recommendations To Rein In Powerful AI Models
Brussels has come under fierce pressure to delay enforcing its landmark AI law as obligations for complex models known as general-purpose AI -- systems that have a vast range of functions -- kick in from August 2.
The law entered into force last year but its different obligations will apply gradually.
But as the EU pivots to bolstering its competitivity and catching up with the United States and China, European tech firms and some US Big Tech want Brussels to slow down.
The European Commission, the bloc's digital watchdog, has pushed back against a delay.
The EU's executive arm has now published a code of practice for such systems prepared by independent experts with input from others including model providers themselves.
In the code, the experts recommend practical measures such as excluding known piracy websites from the data models use.
The code applies to general-purpose AI models, such as Google's Gemini, Meta's Llama and X's Grok -- the tech billionaire Elon Musk's chatbot that has come under fire this week for antisemitic comments.
Under the law, developers of such models must give details about what content they used -- like text or images -- to train their systems and comply with EU copyright law.
The code was due to be published in May. EU officials reject claims that it had been watered down in the past few months due to industry pressure.
Corporate Europe Observatory and Lobby Control in April had accused Big Tech of "heavily" influencing the process "to successfully weaken the code".
The code will need endorsement by EU states before companies can voluntarily sign up to it.
Businesses that sign the code "will benefit from a reduced administrative burden and increased legal certainty compared to providers that prove compliance in other ways", the commission said in a statement.
Nearly 50 of Europe's biggest companies including France's Airbus, Dutch tech giant ASML and Germany's Lufthansa and Mercedes-Benz last week urged a two-year pause.
The companies' CEOs in a letter accused the EU's complex rules of putting at risk the 27-country bloc's AI ambitions and the development of European champions.
The EU will be able to enforce the rules for general-purpose AI models a year from August 2 for new models, while existing models will have until August 2027 to comply.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local Germany
an hour ago
- Local Germany
Majority of Germans would support the UK re-joining the EU
A new YouGov poll indicates that most citizens in Germany, France, Italy, and Spain would welcome the United Kingdom back into the European Union (EU). Among the four largest EU nations, Germany stands out as showing the highest levels of support for welcoming the UK back into the EU. According to the YouGov , 63 percent of Germans are in favour of the UK being allowed to re-join. The margin varies from country to country, but citizens in each of the Western European nations could ultimately support a 'Breturn'. Italy was the least enthusiastic at 51 percent of citizens approving, while Spain and France fall in the middle at 60 percent and 53 percent, respectively. Polling in Denmark and Sweden found even greater levels of support for the UK re-joining, at 71 percent and 70 percent respectively. READ ALSO: EU and UK reach deal to reset fraught post-Brexit relations The data indicates a broadly favourable climate across Western Europe for the proposition - a marked improvement on previous polls. On the fifth anniversary of the Brexit referendum in June 2021, support for the UK re-joining stood at 40 percent in Germany, 36 percent in France, and 43 and 46 percent in Italy and Spain, according to a poll for Euronews . The terms of return Support in Germany and across the EU is not unconditional, however. When respondents were asked if the UK should be allowed to return on the same terms it enjoyed before – such as keeping the British pound and remaining outside the Schengen passport-free zone – support for the idea plummeted. Advertisement In Germany, only 22 percent favoured the UK re-joining with its previous opt-outs intact. The pattern is similar elsewhere, with the number in favour falling to 19 percent in France and Italy, and 21 percent in Spain. A clear majority in each country (ranging from 58 percent to 62 percent) insist the UK must participate fully in all major EU policy areas if it wishes to re-join. How does this compare with attitudes in the UK? On the UK side, according to the YouGov survey, 55 percent of Britons now support re-joining the EU. In a mirror image of the response in Europe, however, support for the idea drops sharply to just 36 percent when respondents are told this will mean giving up previous opt-outs, such as keeping the pound and remaining outside the Schengen area. READ ALSO: More than 120,000 Brits naturalised in European countries since Brexit vote This creates what YouGov describes as a 'public opinion impasse': both sides want a deal, but only on terms the other is unlikely to accept. The authors of the YouGov report also note that, despite the shift in sentiment, there is 'precious little likelihood' of the UK attempting to re-join, especially as the Labour government is currently focused on resetting relations rather than on exploring the possibility of full reintegration.
DW
an hour ago
- DW
EU walks trade tightrope as US-China rivalry intensifies – DW – 07/15/2025
Can the EU still trust the US after President Donald Trump's latest tariff threat? And can it risk closer ties with China? Last week, China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi held talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on the sidelines of the ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur. The meeting between two top diplomats is especially noteworthy because Rubio has been officially sanctioned by Beijing. Before he was tapped by President Donald Trump to become US secretary of state, Rubio had served in the US Senate, where he was a member of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China. The commission is charged with monitoring human rights and the development of the rule of law in China, and submitting an annual report to the US president. As a member of this body, Rubio sharply criticized the Chinese government for suppressing the democracy movement in Hong Kong, and for drastically restricting civil rights in the western province of Xinjiang. Beijing lambasted what it saw as "interference in internal affairs" and placed Rubio on the sanctions list after the US government imposed punitive measures on Chinese politicians. The current US state secretary faced an entry ban and a freeze of any assets in China. Last Friday, the first face-to-face meeting between Rubio and Wang took place behind closed doors in Malaysia. Neither side revealed much about what was discussed but Chinese state media later reported that the talks were "positive, pragmatic and constructive." At the Saturday press conference, Wang gave a brief summary of the conclusions made: Maintain contacts, avoid misjudgment, manage differences and expand cooperation. However, he made no mention of whether Rubio would remain on Beijing's sanctions list. There is a "strong will" in both Washington and Beijing to organize a meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, Rubio said after the talks. No date has yet been agreed. While the US still remains the sole global superpower, the gap with China is narrowing. President Xi wants China to become a "strong, democratic, civilized, and harmonious socialist nation" by 2049, the centenary of the People's Republic. A study published by the consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) at the start of 2025 projected that China would overtake the US and become the world's top economy over the next three decades. The US-China competition is already shaping the global economy and politics today, including trade wars, a global arms race and rising geopolitical tension. The US is now using its economic might to force all economically weaker countries to compromise on trade. On Saturday, Trump announced a 30% tariff on all imports from the EU from August 1. According to the DPA news agency, the decree will not apply to steel and aluminum. However, they are already subject to high tariffs. The US, for instance, imposes a 25% tariff on cars and car parts imported from the European Union and a 50% duty on steel and aluminum. The president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen promptly responded, saying that she would take "all necessary steps" to protect EU interests. At the same time, she said she is prepared to continue efforts to reach a mutually acceptable agreement with Washington. EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic was scheduled to hold talks with the US side on Monday. German businesses have sounded the alarm amid the latest crisis. The tariffs could damage "economic recovery and innovative strength," said Wolfgang Niedermark, member of the executive board of the Federation of German Industries (BDI). Confidence in international cooperation would also be affected, he added, noting that Germany, as an export-oriented nation, is just as dependent on free trade as China. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Against this backdrop, the question arises as to whom the EU can rely upon — on the US, an old ally which is now throwing obstacles in the way of globalization, or on the communist party-led China, which is now seeking closer ties with Europe and Germany despite ideological differences. Is a Trump-led US, like China, now seen seen as a "partner, competitor and rival" for Brussels? This is the question asked by China experts Paula Oliver Llorente and Miguel Otero-Iglesias in a new paper issued by Spanish think tank Elcano Royal Institute. The phrasing is borrowed from EU documents defining its relations with China, with the words also being included in the German government's China strategy in 2023. "Uncertainty has become the defining factor looming over the strategic positioning of the EU in the context of US-China rivalry," the two scholars claim. "For Germany, Trump's policies and the US-China conflict present historic challenges," said Claudia Wessling and Bernhard Bartsch, China experts at the Berlin-based MERICS think tank. They point out that the US administration under Donald Trump upended trans-Atlantic relations, shaking some long-held and deeply entrenched beliefs in Germany. At the same time, Germany also cooled its ties with China despite intensive trade and business links. Just last week, Germany's Foreign Office summoned China's ambassador after Berlin accused a Chinese warship of aiming a laser at a German aircraft on patrol in the Red Sea. The German plane was deployed as part of an EU-led operation to protect commercial ships from the Houthi militia operating out of Yemen. But China has disputed Germany's allegations, saying it was "totally inconsistent with the facts known by the Chinese side." The Chinese Ministry of Defense said the Chinese frigate in question was not in the Red Sea but in the Gulf of Aden at the time. If Germany manages to set aside all the differences with China and moves closer to Beijing, it would certainly anger Washington, which still binds together the European security architecture. Notably, Russia's ongoing war against Ukraine has brought the importance of US military presence in Europe into sharp focus. "Germany's new government (...) now faces unprecedented pressure to navigate in a geopolitical world amid an ongoing polarization of society at home," underlined Wessling and Bartsch. That being said, the EU and the US have substantially different threat perceptions of China, said Llorente and Otero-Iglesias. "The US is trying to fight a hegemonic competitor and an existential threat, while the EU is aiming to establish a balanced relation with a global player," they argued. Against this backdrop, the experts underlined, "the EU prefers to develop differentiated de-risking strategies to reduce critical dependencies in its economic relations with China." The German government's China Strategy, unveiled in 2023, indeed emphasized "de-risking," to reduce reliance on China. Recent years have also seen many German firms investing not only in China, but also in the US. However, many actors are now recognizing that these business strategies — such as further relocation to China and, increasingly, to the US — may ultimately run counter to the interests of the German economy, potentially leading to a crisis marked by declining exports and job losses, stressed Wessling und Bartsch. "Thus, the slogan 'derisking, but doing it right' could prove to be a challenging mandate for the new German government." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The EU-China summit will take place in Beijing at the end of July. Could this be a new start for Beijing and Brussels? The answer likely depends on Trump. His administration has already specified tariffs on the EU and its most important Asian allies, saying Washington will demand a 25% levy on imports from Japan and South Korea from August 1. The latest US plan for goods from China, however, has yet to be announced. If the trade war between the two escalates once again, China might try to use the EU market to absorb Chinese production overcapacity. In turn, the US could also redefine goods manufactured in the EU through Chinese direct investment as Chinese products and demand higher levies from EU businesses. All EU states must act together to reduce their external dependencies, the Spanish experts said. "Different Member States have different types of relations and dependencies with both the US and China, as well as individual interpretations of economic security and strategic autonomy," they pointed out. This "inherent heterogenous nature" of their trade ties leads to divergent foreign policy priorities, Llorente und Otero-Iglesias argued. Nevertheless, "partnerships are indispensable for the EU," they added. "China will have to, among other things, open its market to European businesses, and this needs concrete actions and not just promises."
Int'l Business Times
5 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Divided EU Weighs Action Against Israel Over Gaza War
EU foreign ministers on Tuesday will discuss a raft of options for action against Israel over the war in Gaza -- but likely will not agree on any. The bloc's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has put forward 10 potential steps after Israel was found to have breached a cooperation deal between the two sides on human rights grounds. The measures range from suspending the entire accord or curbing trade ties to sanctioning Israeli ministers, imposing an arms embargo and halting visa-free travel. But despite growing anger over the devastation in Gaza, EU states remain divided over how to tackle Israel and diplomats say there appears to be no critical mass for any move. "I was asked to give the inventory of the options that could be taken and it's up to the member states to discuss what do we do with these options," Kallas said Monday. The tone of discussions will be shaped strongly by how Israel is implementing a promise to the EU to improve humanitarian access to Gaza. Kallas said Thursday she had struck a deal with her Israeli counterpart, Gideon Saar, to open more entry points and allow in more food. Gaza's two million residents are facing dire humanitarian conditions as Israel has severely limited aid during its devastating war with Palestinian militant group Hamas. "We see some good signs of more trucks getting in," Kallas said Monday. "But of course we know that this is not enough and we need to push more (so) that the implementation of what we have agreed also happens on the ground." At a meeting of EU and neighbouring countries in Brussels on Monday, Jordanian foreign minister Ayman Safadi said the situation in Gaza remained "catastrophic". Israel's Saar, speaking at the same meeting, sounded confident his country would avoid further EU action. "I'm sure not any of them will be adopted by the EU member states," said the foreign minister. "There's no justification whatsoever." While the EU appears unable for now to take any further moves against Israel, just getting to this stage has been a considerable step. The bloc only agreed to review the cooperation deal after Israel relaunched its devastating operation in Gaza following the collapse of a ceasefire in March. Until then deep divisions between countries backing Israel and those more favourable to the Palestinians had hamstrung any move. The war was sparked by Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, which led to 1,219 deaths, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Of the 251 people taken hostage by militants that day, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Hamas-run Gaza's health ministry says that at least 58,386 Palestinians, most of them civilians, have been killed in Israel's retaliatory campaign. The UN considers those figures reliable.
