Wes Streeting accuses British Medical Association of showing 'complete disdain for patients' as union abandons peace talks and vows to plough on with five day doctors strike
The health secretary last night accused the British Medical Association of showing 'complete disdain for patients' and described their walkout as 'unjustified '.
Health leaders were also quick to round on the union, warning their 'crushing' and 'misjudged' action would cause widespread disruption and harm.
Rory Deighton, acute director at the NHS Confederation, which represents health organisations, said: 'The BMA will clearly bear the responsibility for the distress being caused to patients.
'While we recognise the concerns that resident doctors have, we believe the strikes are a misjudged course of action given the large pay rise that resident doctors have already received.'
Up to 50,000 resident doctors - formerly known as junior doctors - are set to strike from 7am on Friday in pursuit of a 29 per cent pay rise.
They have already received above inflation pay rises for the past three years, worth an extra 28.9 per cent in total, following previous strikes.
This includes an inflation-busting rise this year of 5.4 per cent, which is the most generous in the public sector.
The BMA and Department of Health and Social Care held talks over the weekend with the aim of negotiating a settlement and averting industrial action.
Mr Streeting had refused to budge on pay but offered a number of other financial concessions relating to the cost of exams, equipment and training.
The BMA's delegates took the offer to the union's resident doctors committee but members voted to reject it this afternoon and immediately announced they would proceed with the walkout.
It said Mr Streeting's offer 'did not go far enough to warrant calling off strikes' and lacked any 'substantive proposal on both pay and non-pay elements'.
Dr Melissa Ryan and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, co-chairs of the BMA's RDC, said: 'Disappointingly, what we saw would not have been significant enough to change the day-to-day financial situation for our members.
'The non-pay aspects of last year's pay deal have still not been delivered, which has shaken the confidence of our members that any further non-pay elements would be honoured.'
Mr Streeting said: 'After a 28.9 per cent pay hike in the last three years and the highest pay rise in the public sector two years in a row, strike action is completely unjustified, completely unprecedented in the history of British trade unionism and shows a complete disdain for patients and the wider recovery of the NHS.'
Rachel Power, chief executive of the Patients Association, said: 'This latest strike adds even more uncertainty for people who are waiting in pain, with anxiety, and without answers, and will leave more patients vulnerable and unsupported as their health and wellbeing deteriorates.
'It demonstrates a worrying disregard for the very real toll this further disruption will have on people's health and their confidence in the healthcare system.'
The announcement came after health bosses warned striking doctors will cause patients 'undoubted harm' and a new poll revealed the majority of the public now oppose walkouts.
The latest YouGov poll reveals more than half (52 per cent) of people in the UK either 'somewhat oppose' (20 per cent) or 'strongly oppose' (32 per cent) the idea of resident doctors going on strike over pay.
Meanwhile, only a third (34 per cent) of the 4,954 adults surveyed either 'somewhat support' (23 per cent) or 'strongly support' (11 per cent) doctor strikes.
YouGov said the proportion supporting the strike over pay has dropped five points since it last asked the question in May.
Then, 48 per cent opposed resident doctors striking, while 39 per cent supported them taking action.
Daniel Elkeles, chief executive of NHS Providers, said of the BMA's announcement: 'This decision is a crushing blow for patients and for the NHS.
'We urge resident doctors to help trusts minimise the harm by notifying them of their plans for strike days.
'For example we must ensure that there are enough staff for all the cancer, transplant and maternity care that cannot and must not be delayed.
'Another huge worry is the cost.
'It is vital that consultants providing cover take NHS rates of pay rather than insisting on inflated BMA rates that are simply unaffordable.
'We say to the BMA 'think again' and pull back from this hugely damaging decision.'
The BMA is demanding NHS hospitals pay consultants £6,000 to provide on-call cover for striking junior colleagues this weekend.
This would be even higher if they have to given advice over the phone or attend hospital in person.
NHS England said it is 'vital' people do not put off seeking care during the strikes and managers are working hard to maintain 'as much routine care as possible'.
Patients should continue to attend appointments as planned unless they are told otherwise by their local trust, it added.
The BMA says the pay of resident doctors has been cut in real terms since 2008 and it wants to achieve full pay restoration.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
29 minutes ago
- The Sun
NHS strike chaos threatens to spread as paramedics REJECT pay offer on first day of doctors' walkout
NHS strikes threatened to spread yesterday as paramedics in the GMB union voted to reject their annual pay offer. It came as a five-day walkout by hospital resident doctors began over pay, led by the British Medical Association union. NHS chiefs said the health service was still 'open for business'. But ambulance crews and other NHS staff in the GMB union yesterday voted 67 per cent in favour of rejecting their 3.6 per cent offer for this year's pay rise. Paramedics joined nursing strikes in the winter of 2022-23 and could vote to do so again if they cannot get a better offer from Health Secretary Wes Streeting. National Secretary Rachel Harrison said: 'We have written to Wes Streeting, asking him to meet with us to discuss pay and other issues.' The Royal College of Nursing is also angry at getting a lower wage rise than doctors — and hospital consultants with the BMA are also considering striking again. As resident doctors, formerly called junior doctors, kicked off their strike to demand for a 29 per cent pay rise over the 5.4 per cent offer, Mr Streeting warned he could not guarantee patient safety. He said: 'I'm really proud of the way that NHS leaders and frontline staff have mobilised to minimise the disruption and the risk of harm to patients. 'What I can't do is guarantee there will be none. That's why the BMA's action is so irresponsible.' The BMA has made one exception for its strike so far. It allowed resident doctors to be called in to cover neo-natal intensive care at Nottingham City Hospital to protect newborn babies' lives. Strike leader Dr Melissa Ryan, who works there, said: 'We don't have enough senior staff to cover the doctors that aren't there. "It is important to us that those very sick babies get a lot of care.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Map reveals where it will cost you $40,000 to give BIRTH... as natural-born population risks going 'extinct'
Americans living in 10 states may have to fork over nearly $30,000 to give birth, shocking new data reveals. In Alaska, mothers opting for a vaginal birth can expect to receive a bill for $29,000, including both insurance and out-of-pocket costs. Going with a C-section? That will be an extra $10,000 for moms living in America's 49th state, twice the national average. For vaginal births, which just over 66 percent of American women choose, New York and New Jersey followed closely behind, both costing about $21,800. Connecticut and California rounded out the top five priciest states to have a vaginal birth, totaling $20,600 and $20,400, respectively. And for the 1.2million women in the US who undergo a C-section every year, Maine and Vermont were the two most expensive states behind Alaska, each costing roughly $28,800. States rounding out the list of most expensive C-sections were Oregon and New Jersey, with price tags of $28,700 and $26,900. Meanwhile, women giving birth in Mississippi paid the least on average for both vaginal birth and C-sections. A typical vaginal birth in the Magnolia state runs roughly $9,900, while a C-section is about $11,100. The rankings, compiled by health insurance claims analyst FAIR Health, are based on records from 51billion commercial health insurance claims filed nationwide within the last several years. All services were considered in-network, meaning insurance covered some of all of the costs and a patient paid the remaining balance. The costs account for both the portions paid by the patients and by the insurance companies. Services included vaginal or C-section delivery, anesthesia, ultrasounds, lab work, breast pumps and fetal nonstress tests, which measure a fetus' heart rate and movement in the womb. The average vaginal birth in the US is $15,200, whereas a C-section costs $19,300. C-sections tend to cost more than vaginal births because they need more specialized surgical equipment and often require longer hospital stays and more involved post-operative care. Recent research suggests the cost of childbirth in the US increased 22 percent from 2017 to 2021, a factor potentially driving America's fertility crisis. The current fertility rate reached a new low of 1.6 births per woman, according to a new CDC report. This is well below the 2.1 needed to sustain population growth. It's also a sharp decline from 3.5 in 1960 and 2.1 in the 1990s, showing women are having far fewer children than their mothers and grandmothers. Young Americans have also cited a shifting focus on their careers and climate change as reasons for not having children. Experts previously told that while the US has not seen a 'downward trend economically' in the way countries like South Korea, Japan, or Germany have, the effects of depopulation in the US would be 'detrimental.' They fear depopulation would put a significant strain on the job market and drastically reduce the number of workers in the country. This would drive up the cost of goods. Dr Abigail Hall, an associate professor of economics at the University of Tampa, told 'Economically speaking, depopulation is detrimental for economic growth.' As the population dwindles, there will be fewer people to pay off the nation's debt. For example, the Heritage Foundation estimates a baby born in 2007 will assume $30,500 in debt. However, a baby born in 2020 will assume $59,000. Dr Hall said: 'One thing people would probably witness is that it's going to be harder to find people to fill jobs.' In FAIR Health's analysis, Alaska was the most expensive state for vaginal and C-section births. The former added up to $29,152 while the latter was $39,532. This could be due to one in five Alaskans living in remote locations, meaning medical supplies and personnel have to be transported by air, driving up costs. Rural areas also have fewer hospitals to choose from, leading to many increasing costs since there is little competition. New York, New Jersey and Connecticut all followed closest behind Alaska for the cost of vaginal births. Costs in these states range from $20,600 to $21,800. The Northeast has a generally higher cost of living and rent than the rest of the country, driving up overall hospital stay and material prices. The area also has a high concentration of academic, renowned medical centers like Columbia, Yale New-Haven and NYU Langone, which tend to charge more. California, which rounds out the top five most expensive states for a vaginal birth at $20,390, requires insurance companies to cover many maternity-related screenings that aren't mandatory in other states, which tends to drive up overall total cost. The list varied for C-section births. Following close behind Alaska was Maine with a cost of $28,794. Like Alaska, a significant portion of residents - 61 percent - live in rural areas, limiting their access to a variety of hospitals. Rural hospitals often have lower patient volumes but still have to pay to keep facilities open, so they typically charge more per patient to afford these costs. The same is true for Vermont, where it costs $28,747 on average to have a C-section. Oregon and New Jersey rounded out the top five C-section states, totaling $28,708 and $26,896. Meanwhile, Mississippi was the cheapest state to give birth either vaginally or via C-section. The former costs $9,847 while the latter is $11,110 on average. More than half of births in Mississippi are covered by Medicaid, according to the latest available data, which significantly lowers overall costs. Births in Mississippi are also more likely to occur in lower-cost community hospitals without advanced, costly facilities. Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana and Tennessee also ranked closely behind, with costs ranging from $10,000 to $11,500 for a vaginal birth and $11,500 to $15,000 for a C-section.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Shed pounds with up to 61% off the walking program that's tailor-made to help you reach your goals - no equipment needed!
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more Whether you have no time for the gym or are looking for an effective low-impact workout, you might want to consider walking your way to a fitter you. It sounds simple — and it is. The difference is that the WalkFit by Welltech program is designed to help you achieve your health and fitness goals without the arbitrary 'rules' that govern the usual walking plans for weight loss. WalkFit by Welltech Walk your way to improved health and fitness with this program that is tailor-made for you! You'll lose weight at a sensible and sustainable pace, enjoying all of the strengthening benefits of walking at the same time. Ready to get started? You can save up to 61 percent on your first subscription period! Click through to begin your walking journey today. That means you aren't bound to walk the standard recommended 10,000 steps if that's not right for you. WalkFit takes a personalized approach, creating a plan tailored to your specific parameters, including your existing weight, fitness level, and age. With such a carefully tailored program at up to 61 percent off your first subscription period, you can feel confident as you get started, knowing that it's made just for you. Everything is accessible, with options like indoor workouts, treadmill exercises, and step aerobics to mix things up and help you stay motivated. Equally motivating are the exciting challenges woven into the program. Some light, fun competition can go a long way in energizing you and keeping you focused — and you'll be rewarded for your efforts with streaks, awards, and badges. Of course, there is really nothing that can spur you to keep going more than seeing your hard work pay off. The program features built-in calorie tracking and step counting, so you'll always have clear insight into all you've achieved. The mindset that fueled the formation of WalkFit is simple: Walking really should be enough to stay fit and healthy. And it can be, but often people feel compelled to do the bigger things — the hardcore workouts and challenges that may burn you out before the scale even has a chance to budge. This program is designed to prevent that. It simplifies working out to its most basic, essentially serving as a powerful reminder that you actually can walk your way to a fitter body, better flexibility, and an overall healthier state. Because it's so easy to get started, you're much more likely to stick with WalkFit than you would a more intense program that leaves you feeling exhausted and frustrated. With this program, you can work your way up in a sensible way, which is the key to achieving results that actually last. As the pounds come off, you'll find yourself becoming stronger and more motivated to continue. It's so easy to get started, too. Just answer a few questions about your goals, body type, target zones, skill level, and sleep quality. The information is used to create a sustainable timeline and even a date by which you can expect to reach your target weight. Don't miss this opportunity to get fit — and stay fit! Get started with up to 61 percent off your first subscription period with WalkFit by Welltech. You are worth the effort!
