
Dutch government collapses after far-right leader Wilders quits coalition
But Prime Minister Dick Schoof, an independent, accused the political maverick of irresponsibility, and the other coalition parties denied failing to support Mr Wilders, saying they had been awaiting proposals from his PVV party's own migration minister.
PVV ministers will quit the cabinet, leaving the others to continue as a caretaker administration until an election unlikely to be held before October.
Frustration with migration and the high cost of living is boosting the far right and widening divisions in Europe, just as it needs unity to deal effectively with a hostile Russia and an unpredictable and combative US president in the form of Donald Trump.
"I have told party leaders repeatedly in recent days that the collapse of the cabinet would be unnecessary and irresponsible," Mr Schoof said after an emergency cabinet meeting triggered by Mr Wilders' decision.
"We are facing major challenges both nationally and internationally that require decisiveness from us," he added, before handing his resignation to King Willem-Alexander.
The prospect of a new election is likely to delay a decision on boosting defence spending and means the Netherlands will have only a caretaker government when it hosts a summit of the transatlantic NATO alliance this month.
Election may be months away
Mr Wilders said he had no option but to quit the coalition.
"I proposed a plan to close the borders for asylum seekers, to send them away, to shut asylum shelters. I demanded coalition partners sign up to that, which they didn't. That left me no choice but to withdraw my support for this government," he told reporters. "I signed up for the strictest asylum policies, not for the demise of the Netherlands."
He said he would lead the PVV into a new election and hoped to be the next prime minister.
An election is now likely at the end of October or in November, said political scientist Joep van Lit at Radboud University in Nijmegen.
Even then, the fractured political landscape means formation of a new government may take months.
It remains to be seen whether right-wing voters will see the turn of events as Mr Wilders' failure to turn his proposals into reality, or rather decide that he needs a bigger mandate to get his way, Mr van Lit said.
Simon Otjes, assistant professor in Dutch politics at Leiden University, said the PVV must have calculated that the next election would be seen as a referendum on immigration policy, "because they know they would win that".
Amsterdam resident Michelle ten Berge hoped that "with the new election we will choose ... a government that's more moderate".
But florist Ron van den Hoogenband, in The Hague, said he expected Mr Wilders to emerge the winner and take control of parliament "so he can do like Trump is doing and other European countries where the extreme right is taking over".
Immigration a divisive issue
Mr Wilders won the last election in November 2023 with an unexpectedly high 23% of the vote.
Opinion polls put his party at around 20% now, roughly on a par with the Labour/Green combination that is currently the second-largest grouping in parliament.
Mr Wilders had last week demanded immediate support for a 10-point plan that included closing the borders to asylum seekers, sending back refugees from Syria and shutting down asylum shelters.
He also proposed expelling migrants convicted of serious crimes and boosting border controls.
Migration has been a divisive issue in Dutch politics for years. The previous government, led by current NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, also collapsed after failing to reach a deal on restricting immigration.
Mr Wilders, a provocative politician who was convicted of discrimination against Moroccans in 2016, was not part of the latest government himself.
He only managed to strike a coalition deal with three other conservative parties last year after agreeing not to become prime minister.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
'In combat mode' - Irish veteran's life after Ukraine war
Peter's first near death experience got him used to the idea that, from now on, it was going to be a regular occurrence. The Irish man had been monitoring Russian troop movements just east of Bakhmut with the Ukrainian Army when his team were called in to reinforce a platoon of Ukrainian soldiers. But Russia launched a massive assault on the area and within hours, Peter and his colleagues were surrounded. "There was no relief or help coming. We were completely isolated," he said. "As a group... how do you react to such a situation? Ok, we're done here. Ok, what are our options? Take as many of them out as we can before we die and hope for the best," said Peter. As a last stand, they fought until sunset and made one gamble to get out. "We had a small escape route that we hoped the Russians weren't aware of. "We went along that escape route and managed to get out of the position we were in... we were targeted by drones and arterially," Peter said. He added: "Then we were attacked from the flank by Russian infantry but eventually we fought our way out. "That was the first day I was over there, and I was like 'we're not getting out of this'. "After that day, to go back into combat knowing that's the reality of it… It's literally you could lose your life any day over there," he said. Peter isn't his real name. The Irish man, in his late 30s from the south of the country, said he isn't comfortable revealing his identity yet, as he continues to come to terms with this short but significant part of his life. "I went into the situation knowing the full risks involved. I didn't go over there naively. I knew when I left Ireland, I knew there was a very good chance I was not going to come back alive," he said. Peter said he decided to go to Ukraine shortly after the Russian invasion began in February 2022. He said he understood, what he called, the "seriousness" of the situation and wanted to help defend Kyiv to hold out for possible intervention from NATO or other western countries. "My understanding was if the capital fell, the whole country would capitulate to Russian rule," he said. His family knew "roughly" what he was doing, but not the details. Here are some of those details. As unusual as it may seem, Peter said he took a taxi to the nearest recruitment centre he could find so he could sign up to the Ukrainian Army. His skills as a former member of the Irish Defence Forces were welcomed. Peter's first months were spent defending Kyiv, but as Russia's failure to take the capital became more apparent, he was redeployed, initially to Kharkiv in the east. By late summer, he spent most of his time in combat in Donetsk as well as being involved in the Kharkiv counter offensive that September. As a special forces operative within the Ukrainian Army, his team were brought in to identify Russian positions and storm areas to find weak points. It could also mean helping trapped Ukrainian soldiers, recovering wounded colleagues or retrieving dead bodies. "Days were chaotic to say the least and there was very little routine over there. However, when you're in not in combat every day starts the same. "You get up, you cook breakfast for the guys and your team and usually if you're preparing not to go into combat you would spend the day training. "There was no real rest period. We were a reactive unit, so we were usually on standby, and we were sent into difficult situations or areas that needed reinforcement," he said. The Battle of Bakhmut was one of the longest and bloodiest battles of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, lasting from August 2022 to May 2023. Taking place in and around the city of Bakhmut in eastern Ukraine's Donetsk Oblast, the death toll was huge, and soldiers fought in trenches. The battle has repeatedly drawn stark comparisons with the brutal trench warfare seen in World War I. For several months, Peter said it was some of the "fiercest fighting" and the area around Bakhmut was "notorious to being lethal to troops on both sides". "You were involved in really important incidents that helped changed part of the war. We helped liberate places from Russian forces, something that I'll always remember" "Fighting was relentless and intense and some of the hardest fought battles were in that area," he said. "These are guys you fight and die for. That was an unbreakable bond... you're going into some of the most dangerous situations and risking your lives for each other and you'd literally do anything to save them so that was quite a unique bond to say the least," he added. Immense highs and the lowest of lows were always on the cards on the battlefield. "If you go into an area and you are liberating it from Russian occupation and the women and children are coming out crying and cheering… that's something that stays with me," he said. Peter added: "After how many days of fighting in Kharkiv counteroffensive…we eventually reached the Russian border and that was a huge sense of pride. We had achieved what we set out to do to get Russians off Ukrainian land." Drones have played a transformative role in the war in Ukraine and have been used extensively by both sides for surveillance, targeting, and direct attacks. The conflict has effectively become the world's first large-scale drone war, showcasing how inexpensive, unmanned systems can shape modern battlefield tactics. According to Peter, their use restricted troop movements and their sound left a lasting impact. "You had to have 360-degree awareness. You had to be aware of where you were walking, keep your eye out for enemy and obviously everything above you." "Once you hear a drone above, you are just waiting. There's nothing you can do. Where are you going to hide? You can't. You have to realise you are in situations that at any moment you could die, and you don't get any notice of it. You could be the best trained solider in the world and it doesn't matter," he said. For Peter, one of the hardest parts of war was returning to Ireland after he was sent home for a break at the end of January 2023. "[I] had to come home at some stage…preferably not in a box. One of the weirdest things when I came home was like 'I'm safe. I'm safe. I know I'm not going to be targeted today'," he said. While he escaped major physical injuries, Peter's mental health started to deteriorate when he got back to Ireland. While his GP believed he was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, he refused help. "So what did I do? I was still in combat mode. I avoided everyone. Didn't go out. Didn't socialise" he said. A friend put him in contact with Óglaigh Náisiúnta na hÉireann (ONE), which provides support and advocacy for Irish veterans. "One of the biggest disconnects you have when you come back is that everyone is a civilian," Peter said. He added: "They haven't been to war. They haven't seen what you've seen. They haven't done what you've done. Once you start talking to ex-military, you are able to connect and resonate with each other." Peter is one of seven known Defence Forces veterans who have returned from fighting in Ukraine and are now seeking help from the charity. There are calls for others to come forward. ONE support officer Audra Larkin said their services are tailored to those with military service. "The ONE is a veterans organisation and they are veterans of the Defence Forces as well as the Ukrainian Army. So, the language is very similar and we can engage with them in that language that they find difficult to be understood in the civilian world," she said. For Peter, who is home two years, he has noticed a huge difference in his health thanks to ONE. He admitted that his time in Ukraine was probably the most important period of his life. "You were involved in really important incidents that helped changed part of the war. We helped liberate places from Russian forces, something that I'll always remember," he said. And despite everything that has happened, when asked if he would go back the answer was quick and definite. "Yes," he said. "When you come back, you try and find purpose in life. You come back to Ireland, you try and work a job, you're socialising at the weekends and doing all the simple things that people take for granted. "But you're not going in, doing missions, going into combat or liberating towns, saving comrades, retrieving bodies, as grim as it might be," Peter said. He added: "At least you are doing something pretty important and making a significant difference. When you come home you realise that's lacking.


Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘Doubts' about US commitment to European security should bring EU and Ukraine closer, says Zelenskiy
Growing 'doubts' about the United States' commitment to Europe's security should push the European Union and Ukraine closer together, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy has said. The Ukrainian leader said he hoped to speak to US president Donald Trump in the next day, to raise the recent decision by the US to halt supplies of some weapons to Ukraine, including air defence missiles. The decision was driven by US concerns that its stockpiles were running low, according to senior officials. Mr Trump later reportedly pushed for a quick halt to the Ukraine war in a Thursday phone call with Vladimir Putin, while a Kremlin aide said the Russian president reiterated that Moscow would keep pushing to solve the conflict's 'root causes'. 'Root causes' has become Russian shorthand for issue of Nato enlargement and western support for Ukraine, including the rejection of any notion of Ukraine joining the Nato alliance. Russian leaders are also angling to establish greater control over political decisions made in Kyiv and other eastern European capitals, Nato leaders have said. READ MORE Mr Trump and Mr Putin did not discuss the pause in some US weapons shipments to Kyiv during the nearly hour-long call, according to a readout provided by Putin aide Yuri Ushakov. Mr Trump had promised during the US presidential election campaign to end the Ukraine war in 24 hours, but has been frustrated in his efforts to broker a US-led peace, at different times blaming Ukraine and Russia for the lack of progress. Mr Zelenskiy said talks between Ukraine and Russia needed to take place at leader level to make progress. Ukraine was confident it could count on continued US support in the war, he said. However, he said the 'doubts' about the commitment of the US to guarantee Europe's security should bring Ukraine and other European countries closer together, in the face of the threat from Russia. Mr Zelenskiy was speaking in Aarhus, where he joined a meeting of EU commissioners hosted by the Danish government. 'We are living in uncertain times ... It's so important to have something that we can count on and that is Europe,' the Ukrainian leader said. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said additional pressure had to be put on Russia to push Mr Putin to the negotiating table. Economic sanctions on Russia were 'biting' and driving Mr Putin's wartime economy to its limits, the head of the EU's executive arm said. Dr von der Leyen pointed to 'eye-opening' comments from Russian ministers about Russia being on the brink of a recession. The European arms and defence industry had to be made 'fit for purpose' and increase production, as part of plans to build-up the militaries of EU states, she said. The idea of jointly financing 'big European projects', such as an air defence shield, was still on the agenda, she said. Denmark's prime minister Mette Frederiksen said weapons and ammunition EU states provided to Ukraine should not be seen as donations. 'Right now it is the army in Ukraine that is protecting Europe,' she said. 'I see no sign that Putin wants peace and I do not trust for a second that Putin intends to stop with Ukraine,' she said. Ms Frederiksen, whose government has been one of Ukraine's staunchest allies, said the EU should fill any gaps left by the US halting the supply of some weapons to the Ukrainian army. The EU's 27 states had provided Ukraine with €24 billion in military aid this year, surpassing the €20 billion Kyiv received in support from countries in the bloc last year. Antonio Costa, the president of the European Council who chairs the summits of EU leaders, said he was 'deeply disappointed' that Russia had not engaged in talks to bring about a 'just and lasting peace' in the war. – Additional reporting: Reuters

The Journal
12 hours ago
- The Journal
Tetchy scenes between neutrality activists and politicians during Triple Lock abolition meeting
THERE WERE TETCHY scenes during the Oireachtas defence committee meeting this morning discussing legislation around the abolition of the Triple Lock mechanism. Politicians on the committee are hearing from experts on a government proposal to remove the need for formal UN approval from the existing triple-lock system for deploying Irish troops abroad. Niamh Ní Bhriain of the Transnational Institute and Chairperson of the Peace and Neutrality Alliance Stephen Kelly appeared before politicians today to advocate for the retention of the triple lock. The pair clashed with TDs and senators on many occasions, as it become abundantly clear that there were vast differences in ideology between some members of the committee and the invitees. At one point, Fianna Fáil senator Diarmuid Wilson called out Kelly for comments he made regarding politicians' ability to approve future military personnel deployments and Ní Bhriain for remarks about the deploying of Irish children. In her opening remarkers, Ní Bhriain said: 'I urge the members of this Committee to scrutinise this legislation as though it were your sons and daughters being deployed on EU battlegroup or NATO-led missions. 'For those who vote in favour of this legislation such that it is eventually passed, you should know that if Irish personnel are deployed to future wars from which they will return maimed, traumatised or in body-bags – because no one returns from war unscathed – your cards will have been marked and this will be your legacy.' Speaking later, Wilson told her: 'I speak as a father of a member of the Irish Defence Forces. And as I said to a number of people who came before us as witnesses, we take every piece of legislation seriously in this house. 'And we take it as if we're talking about the sons and daughters or gender-neutral members of any family. No matter what the piece of legislation, I want to assure you of that.' Advertisement 'I do not appreciate those comments' Kelly, in his opening remarks, questioned how effective a 'double lock', the deployment of troops following Government and Dáil approval, would be. He said the Peace and Neutrality Alliance reject it as an adequate replacement from the Triple Lock. Both invitees refused to say what would be an adequate replacement to the triple lock, arguing that the existing framework is the closest thing to ensure the neutrality of Ireland in law. Kelly accepted that neutrality and the triple lock were separate, but described them as 'close cousins'. Many politicians challenged this view, claiming that the abolition of the triple lock was to provide more control to Ireland around Defence Forces' deployments. Addressing Kelly's remarks, Wilson asked if Kelly had ever stood for election, to which the chairperson of the neutrality group said he did not. 'Well, it's important that you realise the fact that the people who put themselves forward for election – in every election there are hundreds of people who put themselves forward, be it at local level or national level – some are successful, some are not, but at least they tried. 'I would suggest to you, you should try it yourself sometime before you make those comments in relation to public representatives,' he said. Wilson continued to ask his questions to the invitees. Before answering, Kelly said: 'I don't particularly appreciate your comment.' 'I'm sure you don't,' Wilson replied. 'I don't appreciate it – at all. I'm a citizen, I've come here, I was invited to come here. I didn't have to, I was invited, I took the day off work. And I don't like the implication that you have to run for election to have an opinion on something,' Kelly said. The committee today also heard from Fianna Fáil MEP Barry Andrews and Sinn Féin MEP Lynn Boylan. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal