Saying 'I Love You' not proof of sexual intent: Bombay High Court acquits man in POCSO case
According to the judgment, the man had been sentenced to three years' imprisonment by a Nagpur sessions court under sections 354-A (sexual harassment) and 354D (stalking) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POSCO) Act.
The lower court had viewed his words as stemming from sexual intent. However, the High Court overturned the verdict, observing that merely expressing love verbally does not, in itself, constitute sexual harassment.
Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke, who delivered the judgment, clarified that actions such as inappropriate touching, forcible disrobing, or indecent gestures accompanied by intent to violate a woman's modesty are essential elements to establish a case of sexual offence. Simply saying 'I love you' without any corroborating evidence of such intent does not fulfil the legal criteria.
The case dates back to 2015, when the accused allegedly approached a 17-year-old girl on her way home from school. According to the complaint, he held her hand, asked her name, and told her, 'I love you.' The girl informed her father, leading to the filing of a police complaint.
In its ruling, the High Court noted that there was no proof indicating that the man's actions were driven by a desire for sexual contact.
'The phrase 'I love you' alone does not automatically imply sexual intent as defined under the law,' the court stated, adding, 'There must be additional factors that point toward a motive beyond mere expression of affection.'
'Thus, the state of mind, must be to establish some sort of physical contact or must be related to or associated with sex or indicative of involvement of sex in the relationship, if it is to be considered as sexual. Words uttered should be with 'sexual intent' associated with indicative of involvement of sex or physical contact or expressing sexual overtures. Words expressed 'I Love You' would not by itself amount to 'sexual intent' as contemplated by the legislature. There should be something more which must suggest that the real intention is to drag in the angle of sex, if the words uttered are to be taken as conveying sexual intent. it should reflect by the act,' the judgment read.
The judgment is being seen as a precedent that distinguishes between emotional expression and sexual misconduct, emphasising the need for clear evidence of intent before drawing legal conclusions in such sensitive cases. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Being part of crime ring must to invoke MCOCA, rules court
1 2 Nagpur: A designated special court in Chandrapur in a detailed judgment recently ruled that mere involvement in criminal activity does not fall under the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) unless the accused is proven to be a member of an organised crime syndicate. Special Judge AD Deo acquitted all 17 accused in a liquor smuggling and murder case, citing insufficient evidence to establish their membership or nexus with any crime syndicate. They were instructed to furnish bonds of Rs 50,000 each in the event the prosecution approached the Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court. The case pertains to an incident involving alleged liquor smuggling by a group operating in Chandrapur and Gadchiroli districts on November 6, 2018 when strict prohibition was in force in both the districts. During an attempted police interception, a white SUV carrying the contraband reportedly ran over and killed a police sub inspector, leading to the filing of charges of murder and provisions under MCOCA were invoked against all the accused. They challenged their arrest in the MCOCA court through counsels Amol Jaltare and others. The accused had been undertrial for nearly five years, with some granted bail during the proceedings. The court noted that the "lynchpin of the offence of organised crime is the nexus with organised crime syndicate." Judge Deo added, "It is membership of such a syndicate that makes a person liable under MCOCA." The court emphasised that in the present case, there was no evidence from past criminal records of the petitioners or from the FIR and charge sheet to support the prosecution's claim of organised crime. While reiterating established legal principles, the court stated, "The prosecution must establish accused's involvement in past offences while invoking MCOCA but also prove that such offences were committed using coercion or other unlawful means with the objective to gain pecuniary benefits, obtain undue economic or other advantages, or promote insurgency. " Despite the trial involving over 50 witnesses and hundreds of exhibits, the prosecution failed to establish that the accused were part of an organised crime syndicate or continuing unlawful activity with the required intent under MCOCA.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘Videos of Pitbull dogs hunting porcupines uploaded on social media': Punjab Police arrest ‘poacher' after Maneka Gandhi intervenes
The Patiala Police has arrested a Rajpura-based poacher for allegedly using his Pitbull and other dogs to illegally hunt porcupines, filming the incidents, and uploading the videos on his Instagram account, officers said on Thursday. The arrest followed the intervention of BJP MP and animal rights activist Maneka Gandhi, who was informed about the matter by a local animal lover and environmentalist Sahil Sharma. In the heart-rending videos, allegedly uploaded by the accused — identified as Ajay, a native of Jansua area of Rajpura — on his Instagram account, a pack of dogs — at least one of them prima facie identified as Pitbull — could be seen hunting and mauling a porcupine mercilessly in the presence of two men whose faces are not visible. Sharma said he had allegedly received an anonymous complaint regarding the videos, following which he contacted the office of the former Union minister, Maneka. 'Following her intervention, police immediately took action against Ajay and raided the Jansua area to nab him. Subsequently, an FIR was registered.' Based on a complaint filed by Patiala district's Wildlife Range Forest Officer Charanjit Singh, the FIR was registered against Ajay under sections 9 (prohibition of hunting), 39 (wild animals, etc, to be government property), and 51 (penalties) of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, at the Sadar Rajpura police station. In the FIR, it is mentioned that 'several residents of Rajpura hunt porcupines using Pitbull dogs, and videos of such incidents are being uploaded on social media'. Listed as endangered species, 'porcupines are protected under Schedule 1 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, and illegal hunting or poaching of them is banned'. A complaint was received through the office of Maneka Gandhi, with videos enclosed in a pen drive, the FIR read. Speaking to The Indian Express, wildlife range officer Charanjit said: 'Prima facie, the dogs in the videos are Pitbull breed, but further investigation is underway. The accused — Ajay, from whose Instagram ID the videos were allegedly uploaded — has been arrested. It is being probed whether the dogs belong to him… The duo seen in the videos are being identified. Prima facie, they engage in the activity for fun or to consume porcupine's meat.. Porcupines are protected species (under the Act), but are often seen in the jungles of Punjab.' Divya Goyal is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, based in Punjab. Her interest lies in exploring both news and feature stories, with an effort to reflect human interest at the heart of each piece. She writes on gender issues, education, politics, Sikh diaspora, heritage, the Partition among other subjects. She has also extensively covered issues of minority communities in Pakistan and Afghanistan. She also explores the legacy of India's partition and distinct stories from both West and East Punjab. She is a gold medalist from the Indian Institute of Mass Communication (IIMC), Delhi, the most revered government institute for media studies in India, from where she pursued English Journalism (Print). Her research work on 'Role of micro-blogging platform Twitter in content generation in newspapers' had won accolades at IIMC. She had started her career in print journalism with Hindustan Times before switching to The Indian Express in 2012. Her investigative report in 2019 on gender disparity while treating women drug addicts in Punjab won her the Laadli Media Award for Gender Sensitivity in 2020. She won another Laadli for her ground report on the struggle of two girls who ride a boat to reach their school in the border village of Punjab. ... Read More
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Bangladesh seeks extradition of ex-PM Sheikh Hasina from India: Report
Bangladesh's interim government has formally begun efforts to extradite former prime minister Sheikh Hasina from India, nearly a year after her ousting following a student-led uprising, news agency ANI Affairs Advisor to the interim administration, Md Towhid Hossain, confirmed on Thursday that a formal request had been sent to Indian authorities. "We have sent a letter. We will follow up if necessary," Hossain said, responding to questions about delays in the push for extradition follows a fresh legal setback for Hasina. On Wednesday, the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) sentenced her to six months in prison in a contempt of court case. A three-member panel led by Justice Md Golam Mortuza Majumder passed the ruling after Hasina failed to respond to court notices or submit an to ANI, the contempt case stems from comments made by Hasina and Awami League leader Shakil Alam Bulbul about an ongoing trial linked to the July 2024 uprising. Prosecutors said an alleged viral audio clip of Hasina, in which she is heard saying, 'There are 227 cases against me, so I have a licence to kill 227 people', was found authentic through forensic analysis by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID). The clip prompted legal action earlier this tribunal also appointed senior lawyer AY Moshiuzzaman as amicus curiae for the proceedings. Despite public notices, Hasina reportedly failed to respond, prompting the court to proceed in ICT has also accused Hasina of orchestrating violence during the anti-government movement, including crimes against humanity and targeted killings. Formal charges state that these acts were ordered directly by a statement, the Awami League denounced the tribunal's decision, calling it a 'mock trial' orchestrated by 'anti-national and anti-independence forces' to serve political has been living in self-imposed exile in India since August 5, 2024, after being deposed amid mass protests. Following her departure, a transitional government led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus was formed.- EndsWith inputs from ANI
