Anthony Albanese denies he's prioritising Beijing over Washington, says Donald Trump meeting will come
Anthony Albanese has dismissed suggestions he's prioritising Australia's relationship with China over the United States, as he denied being 'embarrassed' about not yet meeting Donald Trump.
In a morning media blitz, the Prime Minister said he would meet the United States President in the 'coming months', suggesting the two leaders would likely meet multiple times during the second half of the year on the sidelines of summits like the Quad, G20, and APEC.
With Foreign Minister Penny Wong currently in Washington to meet with her Quad counterparts, the Prime Minister shrugged off suggestions it was 'embarrassing' he was the only Quad leader to have not yet met with Mr Trump.
'We'll have a meeting. We've had a few constructive discussions. I'm sure when we meet, it will be constructive as well,' he said, going on to describe their relationship as 'respectful'.
With the deadline for negotiating on Mr Trump's so-called 'liberation day' tariffs approaching next week, Mr Albanese was keen to stress on Tuesday morning that Australia has one of the best deals on the US President's 'reciprocal' imports.
'There's no country in the world that has a lower tariff than Australia. So, that's the starting point,' he said.
In a later interview with Sky News, Mr Albanese rebuffed claims he was prioritising China above the US. The Prime Minister is slated to travel to China later this month if a meeting with Xi Jinping can be locked in.
Challenged on why he had met the Chinese President more times than he had met the American, Mr Albanese took umbrage.
'Well, Xi Jinping has been in office for some time and the person who had Xi Jinping address our national parliament here was Tony Abbott, just for the record,' Mr Albanese said.
'I've met with the US President more than I have met with the President of China since I've been the Prime Minister and I've travelled five times to the United States and one time to China.'
Over on Channel 7, Mr Albanese said his Government was using all of its 'assets' in the US to give Australia a leg up with the Trump Administration.
Asked if that included Gina Rinehart or Greg Norman, who the Prime Minister has confirmed spoke to before the ill-fated G7 bilateral meeting, Mr Albanese said he was working in Australia's interests.
'Well, we talk to all of our assets, if you like, the great Australians who make a difference around the world,' he told Sunrise.
The Prime Minister was also asked about reports in the Australian Financial Review covering an auditor-general's report that revealed military chiefs failed for almost 2.5 years to provide formal updates to Defence Minister Richard Marles on the readiness of the army, air force, and navy to be deployed on missions.
The report released on Friday reportedly showed Defence stopped giving Mr Marles half-yearly 'preparedness' reports.
Mr Albanese dismissed the AFR's reporting as 'absurd'.
'We meet regularly. I certainly have met with heads of all of the armed forces regularly. And, you know, that is just completely incorrect,' he said.
'The idea, this $57 billion that we've added to our defence investment of our capability, has come directly after discussions and engagement, obviously, with defence … Don't believe everything you read in the papers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
18 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Annastacia Palaszczuk concedes green hydrogen production 'too hard' after Central Queensland Hydrogen Project collapses
The key Labor Premier behind Chris Bowen's green hydrogen push has conceded developing the renewable fuel "doesn't stack up" after the nation's biggest green hydrogen project collapsed. Annastacia Palaszczuk, whose Queensland government backed the now-failed Central Queensland Hydrogen Project, now doubts the vision of the government she led after a litany of projects failed. 'Hydrogen is proving to be in the 'too hard' basket,' Ms Palaszczuk told Sky News on Tuesday. 'The price is not right. People are looking around (at) solar, batteries, (there are) conversations around making more gas supply available domestically. 'Hydrogen is just too hard at the moment and until those prices come down, I don't think we'll see those projects taking off the ground.' The nation's largest hydrogen project, CQ-H2, was axed on Monday after it failed to attract sufficient investment. Ms Palaszczuk conceded the announcement was 'a little bit disappointing' given her loud support for green hydrogen during her tenure as Premier. 'It was high in the national agenda, but it just doesn't stack up,' she said. 'I can understand why this has happened at this particular point in time.' She pushed back against the suggestion Queensland Labor was given inaccurate forecasts about improvements in green hydrogen technology, remaining adamant there was a future in the renewable fuel. 'You've got to be in it to win it,' Ms Palaszczuk said. 'Whoever's going to crack green hydrogen is going to make a lot of money so you've gotta be in it to win. 'Good partnerships were happening with the state enterprises, but also too with other countries, but it was just found to be too difficult in these circumstances. 'That's not to say it's not going to happen down the track, but the seed funding was necessary at the time.' Several green hydrogen projects have fallen around the country in recent months, raising concerns about the feasibility of the energy source. Despite this, Energy Minister Chris Bowen recently flagged efforts to provide $8 billion over 10 years into the hydrogen industry. Addressing the collapse on Monday, Mr Bowen conceded there would be challenges facing green hydrogen projects and said the Crisafulli government's decision to withdraw financial support meant the collapse came as "no surprise". "Does it face headwinds? Of course it does. Of course it does. It faces investment headwinds," Mr Bowen told reporters. "And as I've said, including in a speech just a couple of weeks ago, these things don't follow a linear line; you have progress, you have setbacks." Meanwhile, Shadow Energy Minister Dan Tehan has blamed the Albanese government for driving up power prices due to an 'ideologically driven renewables-only agenda'. 'Minister Bowen's ideological renewables only approach is disrupting the energy system and leading to higher electricity prices,' Mr Tehan said on Tuesday. 'There is no transparency about the true costs to consumers of Labor's renewables only approach and underwriting renewable energy projects using taxpayer money.' According to the government's own Australian Energy Market Commission, 'new generating plants do not earn enough money… to compensate for the investment'.
Sydney Morning Herald
32 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump's ‘magic' act: The US Senate has just made $5.8 trillion disappear
That's why the Republicans have resorted to accounting gimmickry. Conventional congressional policy measures outcomes by what's known as 'current law baseline,' which takes into account the legislated expiry of fiscal measures. That's why the Trump tax cuts were scheduled to expire this year, to reduce the cost that would otherwise have been factored into the Congressional Budget Office's 10-year deficit and debt projections. Extending policies with legislated extensions requires a new law, which is why the usual accounting convention is to treat the extension as a new cost. The Republicans, however, have decided to use a 'current policy baseline' approach, which assesses the impact on deficits and debt against current fiscal policies. On that basis, the Trump tax cuts never expire and therefore have no impact on the cost of the One Big Beautiful Bill. That simple change in accounting transforms the cost of the One Big Beautiful Bill from a $US3.3 trillion addition to US deficits over the next decade into a $US508 billion decrease in them. The accounting trickery is deceitful, creating the pretence that the Republicans are cutting spending while actually adding trillions of dollars to future deficits and debt while creating time bombs that future administrations will have to defuse, presumably by resorting to accounting trickery of their own. An indication of how the Republicans are manipulating the accounting rules to obscure the actual impact of the Trump budget on debt and deficits is provided by their treatment of Trump's new tax breaks for tips, overtime, senior citizens, car loans and deductions for local and state taxes. The 'temporary' spending measures in the bill are scheduled to expire at the end of the current Trump presidency. If they were extended indefinitely, they would add about $US1 trillion to deficits over the decade, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Normally, the question of whether the One Big Beautiful Bill complied with the Senate rules would be referred to the non-partisan Senate parliamentarian, who has already ruled against the inclusion of a number of items if the bill is to comply with the reconciliation process. Loading The Republicans, however, have avoided that scrutiny by giving the authority to decide the policy used for calculating the impact of the bill to the Senate Budget Committee chairman, Lindsey Graham, who said last week that he was 'the king of the numbers'. 'I'm Zeus, the budget king,' he said. At the weekend, he said that, as budget chairman, he had decided to use current policy as the reference point for the tax cuts. 'If you use current policy, they never expire, so the policies that were created in 2017 would not end in December. They would continue. And that's a good thing for the American people, that's a good thing for the economy, because it gives you certainty,' he said. Unsurprisingly, the Republican majority then voted to endorse Graham's decision. The Democrats were quick to point out that using current policy as the baseline sets a precedent, one they could use to implement their own agendas – and undo Republicans' – if they regained control of Congress. Effectively, they – or a future Republican majority – could create massive new programs, legislate their expiry in a few years to minimise their apparent impact on debt and deficits and then claim that their extension was costless, even though they could blow out deficits and debt over the longer term. While the change in accounting policy might help protect the use of the reconciliation process, it doesn't disguise the reality that the One Big Beautiful Bill will significantly increase US deficits and debt, pushing the current federal government debt level up from $US36.2 trillion to around $US40 trillion by 2034. That's caused some dissension among Republicans. In the Senate, two senators have already declared they'll vote against the bill and as many as eight have expressed some opposition to it. Loading With the Senate version of the bill significantly more expensive that the one the House passed narrowly, even if it scrapes through the Senate there is no certainty that it will remain intact once it returns to the House, where the House Freedom Caucus of fiscal conservatives are saying that the Senate version needs major changes if it is to gain their support. Trump has set a July 4 – Independence Day – deadline for passage of the bill, which is why the Republicans have been scrambling to try to lock in enough votes to ensure it clears the Senate and why Elon Musk, who went silent after his criticisms of the bill (and some verbal attacks on Trump) triggered an aggressive and threatening response from Trump, has re-emerged. In posts on his social media platform, X, Musk described the spending levels of the bill as 'insane' and said the bill would increase the US debt ceiling by a record $US5 trillion. It was obvious, he said, that Americans were living in a one-party country, the 'porky pig party'. He has a point. The accounting trickery is deceitful, creating the pretence that the Republicans are cutting spending while actually adding trillions of dollars to future deficits and debt while creating time bombs – the 'expiring' tax measures in the bill – that future administrations will have to defuse, presumably by resorting to accounting trickery of their own. In the meantime, the debt, its cost (already running at about $US1 trillion in interest) and the volume of bonds US Treasury will have to issue into a market that's been showing signs of shallow liquidity will continue to mount, relentlessly.
Perth Now
33 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Trump suggests DOGE look at Musk's firms to save money
US President Donald Trump has suggested his efficiency department should take a look at the subsidies that Tesla CEO Elon Musk's companies have received in order to save the federal government "BIG" money. Trump's comments come after billionaire Elon Musk renewed his criticism on Monday of Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, vowing to unseat lawmakers who backed it after campaigning on limiting government spending. "Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa. No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. In response to Trump's post, Musk, in his own social media platform X, said: "I am literally saying CUT IT ALL. Now." After weeks of relative silence following a feud with Trump over the legislation, Musk rejoined the debate on Saturday as the Senate took up the package, calling it "utterly insane and destructive" in a post on social media platform X. On Monday, he ramped up his criticism, saying lawmakers who had campaigned on cutting spending but backed the bill "should hang their heads in shame!" "And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," Musk said. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO called again for a new political party, saying the bill's massive spending indicated "that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!" "Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people," he wrote. Musk's criticism of the bill has caused a rift in his relationship with Trump, marking a dramatic shift after the tech billionaire spent nearly $US300 million ($A457 million) on Trump's re-election campaign and led the administration's controversial Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a federal cost-cutting initiative. Musk, the world's richest man, has argued that the legislation would greatly increase the national debt and erase the savings he says he has achieved through DOGE. It remains unclear how much sway Musk has over Congress or what effect his opinions might have on the bill's passage. But Republicans have expressed concern that his on-again, off-again feud with Trump could hurt their chances to protect their majority in the 2026 midterm congressional elections. The rift has also led to volatility for Tesla, with shares of the company seeing wild price swings that erased about $US150 billion of its market value, though it has since recovered.
