Political parties put their full weight behind armed forces
In a fiery parliamentary session following deadly skirmishes along the Line of Control (LoC), political and religious leaders praised the armed forces for their 'strategic response' to Indian aggression – but it wasn't long before opposition lawmakers torched the government over diplomacy, defence, and democracy.
Leading the charge was Maulana Fazlur Rehman, chief of Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (F), who vowed his party's volunteer force, Ansar-ul-Islam, would join the military in defending Pakistan – with seminary students also ready to 'stand shoulder to shoulder' with the army.
'We've handed responsibilities to our men,' Fazl thundered. 'In these trying times, our seminaries are not detached – every citizen must be ready to take part in civil defence.'
In the same breath, Maulana also announced 'Million March' rallies in Peshawar and Quetta this month to show solidarity with the military, while delivering a blistering critique of Pakistan's diplomatic 'inertia.'
'I'm not satisfied with this government,' he said bluntly. 'They've contacted Iran, the UAE, Saudi Arabia – but that's not enough. Phone calls don't cut it. We needed special envoys, face-to-face visits with China, Saudi Arabia, and Iran.'
He also accused India and Israel of forming an anti-Islamic alliance and urged Pakistan to expose attacks on mosques and Madrassas on the world stage. 'There is no room for ambiguity,' Rehman said. 'The government must lead with clarity, strength, and unity.'
Defence Minister Khawaja Asif hit back, assuring lawmakers that the Foreign Affairs Ministry headed by Ishaq Dar was in daily contact with key allies and that Islamabad's UN mission was 'effectively presenting Pakistan's position.'
'We're not sitting idle,' Asif said. 'China, Iran, UAE – they're all with us. Türkiye and Azerbaijan have openly backed us.'
Asif also confirmed the military had shot down five Indian jets – including three French-made Rafales – and multiple drones, claiming 'India's designs were thwarted,' sending shockwaves through its media and political ranks.
'Our forces are fighting valiantly,' he added. 'The morale of our people, our forces, and even political parties is sky high.'
National Food Security Minister Rana Tanveer Hussain joined the chorus of praise, declaring the military 'the best in the world,' while Railway Minister Hanif Abbasi didn't hold back: 'India is the biggest terrorist in the world,' he fumed, adding that Pakistan had already provided proof of Indian-backed terrorism.
Lawmakers across the aisle echoed support for the troops, but not all were in a flag-waving mood.
Members of the opposition Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) turned the debate into a full-frontal assault on Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N).
PTI's Shandana Gulzar Khan lobbed a stinging rebuke at the Sharif family's 'cozy ties' with Indian PM Narendra Modi. 'He [Modi] openly says that he came to Pakistan without a visa and had biryani in Lahore,' she sneered, referencing Modi's infamous visit to the niece's wedding of Nawaz Sharif in Lahore.
Another PTI lawmaker, Sanaullah Mastikhel, referred to the current government as the 'Form 47 regime' – a dig at the disputed 2024 election results. His mic was abruptly cut during his fiery remarks.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Trump says US nears trade deals as tariff effective date delayed
MORRISTOWN: The United States is close to finalizing several trade agreements in the coming days and will notify other countries of higher tariff rates by July 9, U.S. President Donald Trump said on Sunday, with the higher rates scheduled to take effect on August 1. Trump and other top officials had flagged the August 1 date earlier, but it was unclear if all tariffs would increase then. Asked to clarify, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters the higher tariffs would take effect on August 1, but Trump was 'setting the rates and the deals right now.' Trump in April announced a 10% base tariff rate on most countries and additional duties ranging up to 50%, although he later delayed the effective date for all but 10% until July 9. The new date offers countries a three-week reprieve. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNN's 'State of the Union' earlier on Sunday that several big announcements of trade agreements could come in the next days, noting the European Union had made good progress in its talks. He said Trump would also send out letters to 100 smaller countries with whom the U.S. doesn't have much trade, notifying them that they would face higher tariff rates first set on April 2 and then suspended until July 9. 'President Trump's going to be sending letters to some of our trading partners saying that if you don't move things along, then on August 1 you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level. So I think we're going to see a lot of deals very quickly,' Bessent told CNN. Since taking office, Trump has set off a global trade war that has roiled financial markets and sent policymakers scrambling to guard their economies, including through deals with the U.S. and other countries. Kevin Hassett, who heads the White House National Economic Council, told CBS's 'Face the Nation' program there might be wiggle room for countries engaged in earnest negotiations. 'There are deadlines, and there are things that are close, and so maybe things will push back past the deadline,' Hassett said, adding that Trump would decide if that could happen. 'I hear good things' Stephen Miran, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, told ABC News' 'This Week' program that countries needed to make concessions to get lower tariff rates. 'I hear good things about the talks with Europe. I hear good things about the talks with India,' Miran said. 'And so I would expect that a number of countries that are in the process of making those concessions… might see their date rolled.' Bessent told CNN the Trump administration was focused on 18 important trading partners that account for 95% of the U.S. trade deficit. But he said there had been 'a lot of foot-dragging' among countries in finalizing trade deals. Trump says alignment with BRICS' 'anti-American policies' to invite additional 10% tariffs Trump has repeatedly said India is close to signing a deal and expressed hope that an agreement could be reached with the European Union, while casting doubt on a deal with Japan. Thailand, keen to avert a 36% tariff, is now offering greater market access for U.S. farm and industrial goods and more purchases of U.S. energy and Boeing jets, Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira told Bloomberg News on Sunday. India and the United States are likely to make a final decision on a mini trade deal in the next 24 to 48 hours, local Indian news channel CNBC-TV18 reported on Sunday, with average tariffs on Indian goods shipped to the U.S. to be 10%, it said. Hassett told CBS News that framework agreements already reached with Britain and Vietnam offered guidelines for other countries seeking trade deals. He said Trump's pressure was prompting countries to move production to the United States. Miran called the Vietnam deal 'fantastic.' 'It's extremely one-sided. We get to apply a significant tariff to Vietnamese exports. They're opening their markets to ours, applying zero tariff to our exports.'
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Trump says alignment with BRICS' ‘anti-American policies' to invite additional 10% tariffs
US President Donald Trump on Sunday said that countries aligning themselves with the 'Anti-American policies' of BRICS, will be charged an additional 10% tariff. 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. Trump did not clarify or expand on the 'Anti-American policies' reference in his post. BRICS finance ministers make unified proposal for IMF reforms The original BRICS group gathered leaders from Brazil, Russia, India and China at its first summit in 2009. The bloc later added South Africa and last year included Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia as members.
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
X suspends Reuters account in India after ‘legal demand', government denies making request
NEW DELHI:The Reuters News account on X has been inaccessible to users in India since Saturday, when the social media platform suspended it in response to what it described as a 'legal demand'. A spokesperson for the Indian government's Press Information Bureau, however, told Reuters there was no requirement from any agency in the government of India to 'withhold the Reuters handle. We are continuously working with X to resolve the problem'. Reuters could not immediately determine what specific content the demand referred to, why its removal was sought or the entity that had lodged the complaint. Representatives for X did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A Reuters spokesperson said in a statement, 'We are working with X to resolve this matter and get Reuters account reinstated in India as soon as possible.' Musk announces forming of 'America Party' in further break from Trump Reuters World, another X account operated by the news agency, has also been blocked in India. The main Reuters account, followed by more than 25 million users globally, has been blocked in India since Saturday night. A note tells X users that '@Reuters has been withheld in IN (India) in response to a legal demand'. In an email to the Reuters social media team on May 16, X said: 'It is our policy to notify account holders if we receive a legal request from an authorized entity (such as law enforcement or a government agency) to remove content from their account.' 'In order to comply with X obligations under India's local laws, we have withheld your X account in India under the country's Information Technology Act, 2000; the content remains available elsewhere'. Reuters could not ascertain if the May 16 email was linked to Saturday's account suspension. While the email did not specify which entity had made the request or what content they sought to remove, it said X had been advised that in a case of this sort, a user could contact the secretary of India's Information and Broadcasting Ministry. The secretary, Sanjay Jaju, did not immediately respond to requests seeking comment. The 2000 law allows designated government officials to demand takedown of content from social media platforms they deem to violate local laws, including on the grounds of national security or if a post threatens public order. X has long been at odds with India's government over content-removal requests. The company sued the federal government in March over a new government website the company says expands takedown powers to 'countless' government officials. The case is continuing. India has said X wrongly labelled an official website a 'censorship portal', as the website only allows tech companies to be notified about harmful online content.
