logo
Can freedom of movement survive Europe's migrant crisis?

Can freedom of movement survive Europe's migrant crisis?

Spectator02-07-2025
Freedom of movement in the EU received another nail in its coffin yesterday after Poland became the latest European country to introduce checks along its shared borders with fellow member states. As of next Monday, Warsaw will start enforcing border controls at crossings shared with Germany and Lithuania.
The Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said that he felt compelled to introduce border checks in particular to 'reduce the uncontrolled flows of migrants across the Polish-German border to a minimum'. The source of Tusk's angst is the tougher border regime introduced by new German Chancellor Friedrich Merz less than two months ago. Under the new measures, German border guards have been given the power to stop and turn back anyone trying to enter the country without the correct paperwork. The federal police have also been granted the power to reject asylum seekers at the border if they have grounds to.
Contrary to Tusk's accusation, the flow of migrants has been far from 'uncontrolled': according to the German authorities, just 3,488 migrants have been turned away at the country's shared border with Poland. But Tusk's barb speaks to the tension between Germany and Poland that has been growing for some time.
Merz entered Berlin's chancellery in May off the back of a violence-soaked election campaign in which the debate over migration raged thanks to the inflammatory, yet effective, rhetoric of the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party. More than 3 million asylum seekers have entered Germany in the past decade, placing a strain on crucial elements of the country's social infrastructure, piling fuel on the fire of the AfD's anti-migrant messaging and increasing the pressure on politicians in Berlin to be seen to tackle the issue.
Indeed, Merz's predecessor Olaf Scholz was the first to deal a blow to the Schengen Area system when his government introduced 'temporary' border checks in the autumn of 2023. These measures were extended most recently in February this year. They seem to be working: the number of illegal migrants entering Germany dropped from a post-pandemic peak of 127,549 in 2023 to 83,572 last year, with German authorities hopeful that that number will drop again to just over 30,000 by the end of this year.
Nevertheless, Merz made it a day one election promise to clamp down on illegal border crossings even further – not least to demonstrate to the nearly one in four Germans who voted for the AfD in February's election that their concerns over migration were being heard. Merz's legislation has not been without its controversy – his critics claim it breaches the EU constitution, while supporters say it is merely enforcing the terms of the EU's Dublin Agreement under which asylum seekers are obliged to seek refuge in whichever European country they first enter. Germany, of course, has no external EU borders.
In remarks certain to inflame tensions with Poland further, Merz hit back at Tusk yesterday: 'We currently have to implement border controls because the protection of Europe's external borders is not sufficiently guaranteed.'
But just as in Germany, the issue of migration goes back further than just the last few months in Poland, and the country now finds itself squeezed on both sides. Since late 2023, the country has also been experiencing pressure along its eastern border, specifically the 250-mile stretch it shares with Belarus. The Belarusian and Russian authorities have for several years now been waging a campaign of 'weaponised migration' against the EU, encouraging migrants mainly from the Middle East, Asia and Africa to travel through their countries and attempt to cross into the bloc along their shared borders with EU member states, including Poland. According to the Polish authorities, over 30,000 migrants crossed into the country this way last year, a rise of 16 per cent on 2023.
Migration featured heavily in Poland's presidential election last month, in which the conservative candidate Karol Nawrocki, backed by the Law and Justice (PiS) party, won. 'Order must be established on the western border,' Nawrocki said. As such, the domestic pressure is continuing to pile up on Tusk to combat the flow of migrants into Poland.
This latest blow to the sacrosanctity of the Schengen Area by Poland shows the extent to which the EU and its leadership are beginning to strain under the pressure, both literal and political, of Europe's ongoing migrant crisis. It also suggests separately that Belarus – and its overlords in the Kremlin – are succeeding with their policy of attempting to sow chaos and instability throughout the continent by weaponising migration. Poland almost certainly won't be the last to buckle under the pressure to curb freedom of movement around the bloc.
The former German chancellor Angela Merkel made it known this week that she disapproved of Merz's new border regime. 'If someone says 'asylum' at the German border,' she said pointedly while meeting with a group of refugees at the start of the week, 'then they must first be subjected to a procedure – right at the border, if you like, but a procedure.' But, as the tenth anniversary of her now-infamous open-doors asylum policy and rallying cry 'Wir schaffen das' approaches next month, the irony is not lost that, through her policies, this most Europhilic of politicians could be responsible for the bloc's weakening – if not total collapse.
Merz and Tusk's war of words gets to the nub of the problem the EU faces when it comes to dealing with the migration crisis it has now been experiencing for close to ten years. It is becoming increasingly clear that to have freedom of movement inside the bloc, the EU must protect its outer borders with a ferocity it can't – or won't – deliver. Until that moment comes, Merz has made the first move and made Germany's position clear: it is every man for himself.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Deal or no deal?: world leaders walk tightrope in tariff negotiations with Trump
Deal or no deal?: world leaders walk tightrope in tariff negotiations with Trump

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Deal or no deal?: world leaders walk tightrope in tariff negotiations with Trump

It was grip-and-grin time for Ursula von der Leyen as she sat across from Donald Trump in Scotland last week, with the two announcing a deal for 15% tariffs on European imports that would avert a transatlantic trade war – but came at a stiff price for the 27-country bloc. After committing to a unilateral US raise on tariffs that came on the heels of a Nato commitment to increase defense spending to 5% of national GDPs, von der Leyen then thanked Trump 'for his personal commitment and his leadership to achieve this breakthrough'. 'He is a tough negotiator, but he is also a dealmaker,' she said, as the US president beamed. The EU was one of just a number of parties to strike a deal with Trump before his temporary pause on new tariffs came to an end this week. And like many others, the guiding principle for the EU appeared to be: it can always get worse. 'This is clearly the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances,' Maroš Šefčovič, the EU trade chief, said. Others had a far bleaker interpretation of the dynamics, as Trump has wielded the threat of sky-high tariffs to cudgel his trading partners into submission. 'It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission,' wrote the French prime minister, François Bayrou. Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orbán put it another way: 'It was Donald Trump eating Ursula von der Leyen for breakfast,' he said on his podcast. Later, he called her a 'featherweight'. World leaders have been forced to adopt a position of appeasement and pragmatism as they've approached the Trump administration, which has swung between imposing staggering tariffs on imports and then announcing last minute pauses and exclusions that suggest there is little rhyme or reason to the White House's tariff strategy. But the key factor for Trump appears to be taking whatever he can get. Countries across Asia exporting to the US were quickest to begin negotiating new trade deals with the White House. Vietnam was desperate to cut a 46% tariff imposed on the country, and Trump early last month announced that he had negotiated a 20% rate with Vietnamese negotiators. Except, it turned out, they believed that they had negotiated an 11% rate, Politico reported. And treasury secretary Scott Bessent this week admitted that he had never seen the deal, which the Vietnamese authorities have never confirmed. Trump reportedly used the trade threats along with other incentives in order to broker a recent peace between Thailand and Cambodia after fighting broke out along the border between the two countries. He soon announced a 19% rate – a significant cut from 49% for Cambodia and 36% for Thailand – which appeared more motivated by international politics than trade considerations. But while many countries in the region will breathe a sigh of relief as they avert sky-high tariffs, some see a new danger in the arbitrary redrawing of the US's trade relationship with the world. 'What we felt during this negotiation is that the US trade environment is fundamentally changing,' South Korean trade minister Yeo Han-koo said shortly after a deal was made to tariff imports at 15%, down from a threatened 25%. The two sides had made a verbally agreement but had not made a formal draft, he said, because the deal had to be struck so quickly. 'I think we are entering a new normal era,' he said. 'So, although we have overcome this crisis, we cannot be relieved, because we do not know when we will face pressure from tariffs or non-tariff measures again.' Leaders who have stood up to Trump are having the hardest time. Among others, Trump has focused his ire on Canada, which he has blamed for the fentanyl crisis in the US, a charge that Canada's prime minister Mark Carney has rejected. Trump on Friday announced that he would raise tariffs on Canada, a top trading partner, to 35%, as tough negotiations between the two sides continued. Carney, who had coined the elections slogan 'Elbows up, Canada' as a signal of defiance against Trump's tariff and annexation threats, said he was 'disappointed'. 'While we will continue to negotiate with the United States on our trading relationship, the Canadian government is laser focused on what we can control: building Canada strong,' Carney said.

Trump ally calls for big tech 'united front' to fight UK and EU online safety laws
Trump ally calls for big tech 'united front' to fight UK and EU online safety laws

Sky News

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News

Trump ally calls for big tech 'united front' to fight UK and EU online safety laws

A "united front" of US social media giants could try to "fight off" regulation implemented in Europe, an American politician has suggested. The idea that big tech companies like Meta, Apple, Microsoft and others could work together against both the UK and EU law was made by Republican senator Scott Fitzgerald, who is chair of the judiciary subcommittee and an ally of President Donald Trump. He was part of a trip that US politicians made to this side of the Atlantic recently around the topic of online regulation. This included meetings with both the UK, EU and European member states, as well as discussions with big tech companies. Speaking to journalists, Mr Fitzgerald said he asked Facebook owner Meta whether the businesses had been working together - but said they "wouldn't confirm that". He added: "There may be some value in some type of united front in trying to fight these things off in Europe." Mr Fitzgerald went on to say that he thinks the White House "certainly is interested in finding out" what the delegation discovered. "I'm not sure if it can be elevated to a level of something that the president would talk about publicly and on the global stage, but this stuff is dangerous. "And I think it needs to be addressed, and so I certainly expect to talk to the platforms and talk to the White House as well." 5:23 As well as Mr Fitzgerald, Republicans Jim Jordan and Kevin Kiley were also on the trip - both of whom are politically close to Mr Trump. In a recent thread on social media, Mr Jordan accused the UK government of trying to censor US tech companies last summer during the riots that took place after the Southport killings. He shared emails the committee obtained from tech organisations showing the UK government asking for information and wanting to know what was being done by the companies during the rioting. A report by the UK Commons Science and Technology Committee into the events last year found that " social media business models incentivise the spread of content that is damaging and dangerous, and did so in a manner that endangered public safety in the hours and days following the Southport murders". But Mr Jordan said that the government asking for companies to tell them what was being done to tackle reports of a "two-tiered system" was concerning. He added that such an attempt by the UK government to get information from technology companies would "chill speech". Mr Jordan and the delegation met the UK Technology Secretary Peter Kyle on Wednesday. The topic of the impact of UK law on American companies came up, in what is understood to have been a polite meeting.

Trump ally calls for big tech 'united front' to fight online safety laws
Trump ally calls for big tech 'united front' to fight online safety laws

Sky News

time3 hours ago

  • Sky News

Trump ally calls for big tech 'united front' to fight online safety laws

A "united front" of US social media giants could try to "fight off" regulation implemented in Europe, an American politician has suggested. The idea that big tech companies like Meta, Apple, Microsoft and others could work together against both the UK and EU law was made by Republican senator Scott Fitzgerald, who is chair of the judiciary subcommittee and an ally of President Donald Trump. He was part of a trip that US politicians made to this side of the Atlantic recently around the topic of online regulation. This included meetings with both the UK, EU and European member states, as well as discussions with big tech companies. Speaking to journalists, Mr Fitzgerald said he asked Facebook owner Meta whether the businesses had been working together - but said they "wouldn't confirm that". He added: "There may be some value in some type of united front in trying to fight these things off in Europe." Mr Fitzgerald went on to say that he thinks the White House "certainly is interested in finding out" what the delegation discovered. "I'm not sure if it can be elevated to a level of something that the president would talk about publicly and on the global stage, but this stuff is dangerous. "And I think it needs to be addressed, and so I certainly expect to talk to the platforms and talk to the White House as well." 5:23 As well as Mr Fitzgerald, Republicans Jim Jordan and Kevin Kiley were also on the trip - both of whom are politically close to Mr Trump. In a recent thread on social media, Mr Jordan accused the UK government of trying to censor US tech companies last summer during the riots that took place after the Southport killings. He shared emails the committee obtained from tech organisations showing the UK government asking for information and wanting to know what was being done by the companies during the rioting. A report by the UK Commons Science and Technology Committee into the events last year found that " social media business models incentivise the spread of content that is damaging and dangerous, and did so in a manner that endangered public safety in the hours and days following the Southport murders". But Mr Jordan said that the government asking for companies to tell them what was being done to tackle reports of a "two-tiered system" was concerning. He added that such an attempt by the UK government to get information from technology companies would "chill speech". Mr Jordan and the delegation met the UK Technology Secretary Peter Kyle on Wednesday. The topic of the impact of UK law on American companies came up, in what is understood to have been a polite meeting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store