
Centre pegs FY35 peak power demand at 446 GW; calls for prepaid meters, transmission upgrades
Union Minister of Power and Housing & Urban Affairs Manohar Lal, chairing the Regional Conference for Northern Region States and Union Territories in Chandigarh, said India successfully met a peak demand of 250 GW in May 2024 and the peak demand shortage is currently zero. He said India's power system has evolved into a unified national grid, fulfilling the vision of 'One Nation-One Grid', and stressed on coordinated action between the Centre and States to achieve the goal of Viksit Bharat by 2047.
The meeting was attended by Anil Vij (Energy Minister, Haryana), Harbhajan Singh (Power Minister, Punjab), Subodh Uniyal (Forest Minister, Uttarakhand), A K Sharma (Energy Minister, Uttar Pradesh), Ashish Sood (Power Minister, Delhi), Javed Ahmad Rana (Minister of Jal Shakti, Environment & Forest & Tribal Affairs, Jammu & Kashmir), and Heeralal Nagar (Minister of State for Energy, Rajasthan), along with the Union Power Secretary, state energy secretaries, CMDs of Central and State utilities, and senior officials from the Ministry of Power.
The Union Minister emphasised the need to ensure resource adequacy and long-term
power generation capacity tie-ups
, including addition of nuclear power. He said States should work towards resolving issues in intra-state transmission projects, including Right of Way (RoW) constraints, and explore financing options such as multilateral institutions. He informed that ₹1.5 lakh crore has been allocated in the Union Budget 2025–26 as 50-year interest-free loans to support capital expenditure by States, which can be utilised to strengthen transmission infrastructure.
He advised States to promote renewable energy with storage to ensure reliable power supply and implement Renewable Purchase Obligation (RPO) Guidelines. He said the share of renewable energy in India's total installed capacity has increased from 32 per cent in 2014 to 49 per cent in April 2025 and recommended formation of dedicated teams in States for critical renewable planning.
He also highlighted the importance of cyber-security protocols and islanding schemes as preventive measures to ensure grid resilience and mitigate cyber threats.
On the distribution sector, the Minister said it remains the most critical link in the power value chain but faces challenges due to poor tariff structures, inefficient billing and collection, and delays in payment of government dues and subsidies. He said reducing AT&C losses and the gap between Average Cost of Supply and Average Revenue is essential, and asked States to engage with Electricity Regulatory Commissions (ERCs) for cost-reflective tariffs and timely issuance of tariff and true-up orders.
He said that losses incurred by utilities raise the cost of power for consumers and weaken service delivery, with cascading financial impact. He asked distribution utilities to expedite infrastructure and smart metering works under the Revamped Distribution Sector Scheme. He added that several States have pending dues from FY24 and gaps are more apparent in FY25, calling for timely settlement of dues to support the financial health of utilities.
The minister said pre-paid smart meters are key to timely realisation of government department dues and asked States to saturate installation of prepaid smart meters in all government establishments, including government colonies, by August 2025. He also directed States to complete installation of smart meters for commercial, industrial, and high-load consumers by November 2025. He said smart meters can transform consumer-utility interactions using data analytics based on AI and ML tools and enable consumers to benefit from inbuilt features in the smart meter application.
He assured States of continued support from the Central Government and said that all stakeholders must work together to ensure 'Power for All, at All Times'.
Secretary (Power), Government of India, said States must ensure necessary generation capacity tie-ups aligned with resource adequacy plans till FY2035. He said arrangements must also be made to develop intra-state and inter-state transmission capacity through financing models such as Tariff-Based Competitive Bidding (TBCB), Regulated Tariff Mechanism (RTM), infrastructure support under Budget 2026, or monetisation of assets.
He said power sector infrastructure, including transmission and distribution systems, must be secured against cyber threats and that States should implement cyber-security protocols and islanding schemes. He also advised States to work towards ensuring the financial viability of distribution utilities.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Mint
31 minutes ago
- Mint
How new rules may change your app-cab rides
The Centre's new Motor Vehicles Aggregator Guidelines, released last week, redraws the playbook for ride hailing apps. While dynamic pricing gets a nod, states still have the final word. Mint explains what it means for aggregators, drivers and riders alike. Any changes in how the fare is calculated? The new guidelines allow aggregators to implement dynamic pricing based on demand, within limits. Simply put, dynamic pricing, or surge pricing, is when fares fluctuate in real time based on demand and supply—like during airport rush hours. States can set a base fare for the first three kilometres—say ₹100. Depending on demand, the fare can range from ₹50 (50% below) to ₹200 (twice the base). If a state hasn't set a fare, the aggregator can notify one temporarily. Dynamic pricing has long angered driver unions and customers, so the new limits aim to ensure fare predictability. What happens to bike taxis? The guidelines give state governments the legal framework to permit bike taxis using non-transport (private) motorcycles through aggregators. This move ends years of regulatory ambiguity and puts the ball in the state's court. States can now authorize operations, impose fees, and ensure compliance mechanisms. Legal experts call it a crucial shift that could legitimize bike taxis and boost investor confidence. But policy is uneven—Karnataka has imposed a ban, while Maharashtra allows only e-bikes. The sector's future now hinges entirely on how individual states respond to this enabling legal framework. Who pays for cancelled rides now on? If a driver cancels a ride without a valid reason, they are fined 10% of the fare, up to ₹100. Ditto, if a passenger cancels without a valid reason. 'Valid reasons' must be clearly listed on the aggregator's app. While the passenger pays directly, it's unclear who bears the cost when drivers cancel—the driver or aggregator—leaving it to platform policy. Will costs increase for aggregators? Yes, the guidelines add tighter compliance standards on aggregators: States can mandate annual targets for EV adoption. Aggregators can face licence suspension for up to three months, followed by cancellation for repeat offence. Fines ranging from ₹1 lakh to ₹1 crore may be levied for violations like overcharging, safety lapses and breach of contract. A centralized portal will handle licence applications, deposits, and renewals. It also imposes an age cap—vehicles over eight years old can no longer be onboarded. What's in it for drivers of app-based cabs? Drivers can operate across multiple aggregators without restriction. Firms must provide a minimum of ₹5 lakh in health insurance and ₹10 lakh in term insurance per driver, with yearly increases as notified by the Centre. Earnings are protected: drivers get at least 80% of the fare if using their own vehicles, and 60% if driving aggregator-owned ones. Fare settlements must be processed daily, weekly, or at most, every fortnight. Mandatory structured onboarding covers app training, and legal awareness.


Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Karnataka must win over Tamil Nadu to unlock Mekedatu dam project, say experts
Bengaluru: Experts believe the impasse over the Mekedatu balancing reservoir project would not be permanent if Karnataka changes its approach from confrontation to collaboration. Planned at the confluence of Cauvery and Arkavathi rivers in Bengaluru South district, the Rs 9,000-crore project aims to store 48tmcft of water, supply 4.7tmcft for Bengaluru's drinking needs, and generate 400Mw of hydropower. Karnataka claims the project will help regulate water flow, prevent droughts and floods, and recharge groundwater. Despite political unity within Karnataka, the project has failed to move forward due to Tamil Nadu's opposition and pending approvals from central agencies. Tamil Nadu fears the dam will reduce its share of Cauvery water. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru A 2018 Supreme Court verdict on the Cauvery water-sharing issue did not prohibit Karnataka from building a dam at Mekedatu, but it said any such project must be cleared by Cauvery Water Management Authority (CWMA), which is bound to consider Tamil Nadu's objections. Although both states are now partners of the INDIA bloc, the dispute remains. For Karnataka, which is battling erratic rainfall and mounting demand in Bengaluru, shelving the project is not an option. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo The state assembly has repeatedly passed unanimous resolutions demanding early clearance, escalating tensions with Tamil Nadu. Deputy chief minister DK Shivakumar, who led a 168-km padyatra in 2023 ahead of the assembly polls in support of the project, has been less vocal in recent months. He continues to express commitment but blames the Centre for not facilitating inter-state talks or granting approvals. Experts say Karnataka must reposition the project as a cooperative effort. "This is a project that can move forward but only if Karnataka stops presenting it as a unilateral exercise," said Dr Roopesh Kumar, a retired professor and water policy expert. "It should bring Tamil Nadu into the process. There is room for negotiation under the Cauvery tribunal framework if Karnataka can prove that the project won't affect flows to Tamil Nadu. " Political analyst Vishwas Shetty believes Karnataka's unity on the project offers leverage. "This is a rare issue where all Karnataka parties agree. The state can use that consensus to build pressure on the Centre," he said. "But Karnataka must first assure Tamil Nadu through diplomatic and technical channels that its water share won't be compromised." JD(S) state chief and Union minister HD Kumaraswamy also urged a direct dialogue between states. "The Congress govt in Karnataka should convince the DMK govt in Tamil Nadu to clear the project. I will then get clearance from Prime Minister Narendra Modi in five minutes," he said. Tamil Nadu had passed resolutions opposing the project, citing the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956, and moved the Supreme Court. "Any construction across the Cauvery by Karnataka will violate both tribunal and court orders," a senior Tamil Nadu official said. Karnataka maintains Mekedatu is a non-irrigation project and does not threaten Tamil Nadu's allocation of 404tmcft under the tribunal's final award and the apex court's revised 2018 order. Karnataka's allocation is 284tmcft. A Central Water Commission official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Karnataka must back its case with data. "Karnataka needs to submit a fresh, detailed project report with real-time data on flow, storage, and release mechanisms. If the DPR is watertight and shows that regulated releases will ensure Tamil Nadu's share, the Centre and CWMA may find it difficult to reject." A senior Jal Shakti ministry official said CWMA could mediate too. "CWMA's role isn't only to monitor releases; it can facilitate coordinated efforts to manage water resources. If both states are willing to discuss safeguards, a resolution is not impossible."


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Bawana Waste-To-Energy Plant Given Green Nod Amid Protests
New Delhi: A 30MW waste-to-energy plant near a village in Bawana Industrial Area has received clearance from the Union environment ministry, confirmed Delhi Pollution Control Committee. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The environment clearance (EC) has come despite residents of neighbouring villages protesting against the plant since last year. The 15-acre facility in northwest Delhi, which includes six acres as a green belt, aims to burn 3,000 tonnes of municipal solid waste as boiler fuel per day. Located in DSIIDC Industrial Area, it will be managed by Jindal Urban Waste Management (Bawana) Limited. Municipal Corporation of Delhi has provided the land. "The capital cost of the proposed project is Rs 660 crore and the capital cost for environmental protection measures is proposed as Rs 91.605 crore. The annual recurring cost towards the environmental protection measures is proposed as Rs 14.155 crore. The employment generation from the proposed project is 242 (during the operational phase)," stated the June 18 document granting EC. According to it, a JJ colony is within 1km of the plant while within 5km, there are several villages, including Naya Bans, Holambi Khurd and Sanoth. The waste will be brought via road from approximately 12km away and the plant will use approximately 6,25,000 litres per day of treated water from sewage treatment plants and approximately 7,000 litre fresh water daily. The document, however, claims that the project will not use groundwater. "A natural nullah is passing through the project site and Western Yamuna Canal is located approximately 32 metres from the site," stated the document, outlining protection measures, including storing waste in a closed pit, to prevent cross-contamination and similar provisions for fly ash and fuel oil. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now An analysis of PM2.5 between March and May 2023 showed readings ranging from 46 to 228 micrograms per cubic metre while the average standards are 40 units annually and 60 daily. "The residents, especially those living near the industrial area, are already exhausted due to pollution," stated one of the key concerns raised during a public consultation, as highlighted in the grant letter. The response stated, "Ambient air quality monitoring systems will be installed in the plant for tracking pollution levels." While 61 flora and 56 fauna species are found in the area, Wildlife Protection Act mentions three schedule-I species, Indian peacock, small Asian mongoose and Shikra bird, here. A wildlife conservation plan has been submitted to the divisional forest officer for approval and Rs 54 lakh has been allocated for it, the document stated. The letter also recommends strengthening primary healthcare services and disease surveillance in Bawana, focusing on prevention and early diagnosis of communicable and non-communicable diseases. At least Rs 55 lakh will be spent from 2025-26 to 2029-30 to provide medical camps in Bawana and nearby villages. During the public consultation last Dec, in the presence of DPCC and district administration officials, many village residents cited their current health issues, specifically kidney and lung problems, which, they claimed, were caused by a neighbouring waste disposal facility. Incinerating waste would worsen the situation, they said, drawing parallels with the Okhla plant. According to a DPCC document issued later, over 680 responses were received. A plea was filed in Supreme Court by many residents, predominantly from Sanoth located within 4km, who were affected by the current landfill. The court sought a report on the probable impact on environment and health from Central Pollution Control Board. The report is still awaited.