Ferozepur Land Heist: How An IAF Airstrip Near Pakistan Border Vanished For Decades, Sold By Kin
The accused Usha Ansal and her son Naveen Chand of Dumni Wala village were named in an FIR as per an order by the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The court had asked the chief director of the Punjab Vigilance Bureau (VB) to probe the serious charges, an investigation that finally established the sale to have been fraudulent.
The case has been lodged against the accused under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), such as cheating by personation (419), cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property (420), forgery (465, 467), using a forged document as genuine (471), and criminal conspiracy (120B). Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Karan Sharma is overseeing the detailed investigation to identify everyone involved in this long-buried scam.
Strategic Land Near Pakistan Border
Situated in Fattuwala village, just perilously close to the border with Pakistan, the ownership of the airstrip was eventually re-transferred to the Ministry of Defence in May 2025, following a long and drawn-out court battle and intervention by the High Court.
The land, which the British purchased on 12 March 1945, to utilise during World War II, actually belonged to the IAF, according to the VB probe. Usha Ansal and Naveen Chand are accused of falsely claiming ownership and selling it, using forged documents in league with some revenue officials.
The issue first came to light in the form of a complaint by whistleblower Nishan Singh, who is a retired revenue officer. No serious action was taken against this complaint for years. The commandant of the Halwara Air Force Station wrote to the Ferozepur deputy commissioner in 2021 as reported, requesting an investigation into the scam. The Punjab and Haryana High Court intervened after several delays, resulting in the present FIR and ongoing investigation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
15 minutes ago
- NDTV
4 Of A Rajasthan Family Die By Suicide, Bodies Found In Water Tank
Jaipur: Four members of a family, including a woman, allegedly died by suicide by jumping into a water tank in Rajasthan's Barmer district, police said Wednesday. The incident occurred in Undu village of the district where Shivlal (35), his wife Kavita (32), and their two sons, aged 8 and 6, were found dead on Tuesday evening in a tank outside their home in Brahmano Ki Dhani in Sheo Police Station limits. According to the preliminary investigation, Shivlal allegedly jumped into the tank along with his family after locking the house. The incident came to light after his younger brother, unable to reach the couple on the phone, sent a neighbour to check, following which the police were alerted. Sheo DSP Manaram Garg said, "The bodies were found in the tank on Tuesday evening. The in-laws were informed, and the retrieval was done on Wednesday morning in their presence as they could not arrive at night." The bodies were sent to the mortuary at the Bhiyad CHC for post-mortem. Gopilal, Kavita's uncle, told reporters, "Shivlal wanted to build a separate house with funds sanctioned under PM Awas Yojana. But his brother and mother did not allow it. This constant harassment forced him to write a suicide note on June 29." According to the family, although Shivlal wrote the note two days earlier, he did not act on it immediately. But on Tuesday, after his mother left to visit his brother in Barmer and his father was away for religious work, Shivlal and Kavita turned off their phones and allegedly took the drastic step. Police recorded statements of relatives from both sides, and officials said they are investigating allegations of domestic harassment under IPC sections related to abetment of suicide. Sheo Police said further inquiries would consider the contents of the alleged suicide note and family disputes as part of the probe (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
The Hindu
39 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Mohali court extends SAD leader Majithia's remand by four days
A Mohali court on Wednesday (July 2, 2025) extended by four days the vigilance custody remand of Shiromani Akali Dal leader Bikram Singh Majithia, who was arrested in a disproportionate assets (DA) case. Mr. Majithia was produced before the court amid tight security after his seven-day vigilance remand ended on Wednesday. Speaking to the media after a three-hour hearing, public prosecutor Ferry Sofat said the court extended Majithia's remand by four more days after the Vigilance Bureau (VB) filed an application. Even the VB office witnessed beefed up security arrangements aside from the Mohali district court complex in Mohali where the politician was produced. The Punjab Vigilance Bureau arrested Mr. Majithia on June 25 in the DA case allegedly involving laundering of ₹540 crore of "drug money". Following his arrest, the court on June 26 remanded Mr. Majithia to seven days of vigilance custody. In the fresh FIR registered against Mr. Majithia, the VB claimed preliminary investigations have revealed laundering of over ₹540 crore of "drug money" through several ways and it was allegedly facilitated by Mr. Majithia. This FIR against Mr. Majithia stems from an ongoing investigation being conducted by a Punjab Police special investigation team into the 2021 drug case. In 2021, Mr. Majithia was booked under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The action was taken on the basis of a 2018 report of the anti-drug Special Task Force. Mr. Majithia spent more than five months in Patiala jail and walked out of prison in August 2022 after the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted him bail.
Scroll.in
40 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Phones cannot be tapped as part of covert operations aimed at detecting crime, says Madras HC
The Madras High Court on Wednesday held that the law does not allow for telephonic conversations or messages to be tapped for the purposes of covert operations aimed at crime detection. The law permits phone tapping only in public emergencies or in the interest of public safety, the court said. Justice N Anand Venkatesh was hearing a petition by P Kishore, the managing director of a company in Chennai named Everonn Education. The Central Bureau of Investigation had in 2011 filed a corruption case against three persons, including Kishore and an Income Tax official named Andasu Ravinder. The agency alleged that the official demanded a bribe from the company to help it evade taxes, after which Kishore paid him Rs 50 lakh. The Union home ministry had in August 2011 passed an order allowing Kishore's mobile phone to be tapped. Kishore challenged the order before the High Court. The court on Tuesday quashed the home ministry's order, holding that phone tapping would violate the right to privacy unless it was authorised under a procedure established by law. The home ministry had authorised the tapping of Kishore under Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act. However, the court noted that the provision only allows for the interception of telephones in public emergencies or in the interest of public safety. When such a situation exists, the authorities may pass an order directing interception of messages 'after recording satisfaction if it is necessary or expedient to do so in the interest of sovereignty or integrity of India, security of the state, friendly relations with foreign states, public order or for preventing incitement to the commission of an offence', the court said. The judge noted that the case at hand was one involving a covert operation for detecting a crime. 'As the law presently stands, a situation of this nature does not fall within the four corners of Section 5(2) of the Act…' the court said. The judge referred to a 1996 Supreme Court judgement on a petition filed by the People's Union for Civil Liberties, in which the court laid down guidelines for telephone tapping. It also noted that these principles had been approved by the court in its 2017 judgement in the Puttaswamy versus Union of India case, in which it held that the right to privacy was a protected fundamental right under the Constitution. The High Court on Wednesday also held that the authorities had contravened Rule 419A of the Indian Telegraph Rules by not placing the intercepted material before a review committee in time. 'As a consequence... the impugned order dated August 12, 2011, must necessarily be set aside as unconstitutional and one without jurisdiction,' Justice Venkatesh said.
