logo
Third of Gen Zers Polled Fret Over Return to Office for Surprising Reason

Third of Gen Zers Polled Fret Over Return to Office for Surprising Reason

Newsweek12-06-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Many companies are still in the process of issuing return-to-office mandates, but Gen Zers are worried these changes could make a significant impact on their lives—specifically their sex lives.
In a new EduBirdie survey, one in three Gen Zers believe returning to the office would harm their romantic lives. The younger generation is worried the amount of sex they'd be having could considerably drop compared to when working remotely, due to long commutes and less work/life balance.
Why It Matters
Office attendance has risen since the coronavirus pandemic, when offices largely shut down and remote work became the norm.
Recent data from Kastle System revealed the national average peak day attendance is 62.2 percent. Chicago, New York City and three Texas cities (Dallas, Houston, Austin) all saw significantly higher percentages.
But there's still pushback from workers, and with Gen Z making up most of the entry level positions, their reluctance could trigger workplace turnover and talent gaps.
A woman is pictured working from a hammock on January 12, 2010, in Varkala, near Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
A woman is pictured working from a hammock on January 12, 2010, in Varkala, near Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
EyesWideOpen/Getty Images
What To Know
Approximately 31 percent of poll respondents belonging to Gen Z, an age group defined as being born from 1997 to 2012, said they feared a return to the office would negatively affect their sex lives.
Remote work appeared to play a significant role in the younger generation having more sex, with 47 percent of Gen Zers saying they're having more sex while working remotely as a result of more flexible schedules.
The survey, based on 2,000 Gen Z responses, found that 30 percent schedule time for sex, and even more, 38 percent, wished their office had a private space for hookups.
Another recent survey from Intelligent.com discovered that companies are rapidly firing Gen Z employees just months after hiring them.
A whopping six in 10 employers had already fired recent college graduates who were hired in 2024. One in seven said they might refrain from hiring new college grads next year as well.
This, alongside workers' reluctance to return to the office, could reflect a larger gap between Gen Z and their employer's workplace expectations.
What People Are Saying
HR consultant Bryan Driscoll told Newsweek: "Gen Z isn't shy about prioritizing pleasure over capitalism. Remote work gave them autonomy, privacy, and time. RTO threatens all three. When you strip away flexibility, you're killing morale and interrupting routines that include everything from therapy to midday hookups."
Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor at the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "It's no surprise some in Gen Z are concerned about an upheaval to their personal lives by a return to the office. Much like money management, though, the transition requires maturity in discussions with your partner and family. For decades, couples were able to balance intimacy at home and work in an office; it's fair to say a belief it can no longer work isn't being realistic."
What Happens Next
Because companies have blurred the lines between work and home life for many years, Driscoll said, many Gen Zers are probably having sex on the clock, whether they're in office or remote.
"The deeper point here is that RTO is about control, not productivity," Driscoll said. "And Gen Z knows it. They're not afraid to say the quiet part out loud. Forced office time kills productivity, creativity, and it messes with your life, your body, and your relationships."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mark Cuban Says Its Not The Students At Fault But The School If Answers Can Be Generated With AI: Kids Take 'Path Of Least Resistance'
Mark Cuban Says Its Not The Students At Fault But The School If Answers Can Be Generated With AI: Kids Take 'Path Of Least Resistance'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Mark Cuban Says Its Not The Students At Fault But The School If Answers Can Be Generated With AI: Kids Take 'Path Of Least Resistance'

Billionaire entrepreneur and investor Mark Cuban says schools that still teach for model-ready answers will be 'way behind' within a decade, arguing curricula must evolve with artificial intelligence. What Happened: In an X post on Sunday, the investor wrote, 'Within 5–10 years, if a school teaches in a manner where answers by students can be generated by a model, it's a sh*tty school and way behind.' He added that 'kids will always take the path of least resistance' and said AI should be 'part of the solution.' Trending: Be part of the breakthrough that could replace plastic as we know it—Cuban's point is less about cheating than design. If assignments can be solved by a general‑purpose model, he argues, the problem is the assignment, not the student's ingenuity. He urged educators to change 'the path and how they learn,' warning that 'teaching like it's 2024' will soon be obsolete as generative systems spread. The billionaire has been on this beat for months. He told Gen Z at South by Southwest in March to "spend every waking minute" learning AI and has encouraged teens to build AI side hustles rather than wait for credentials. He's also warned there will be 'two types of companies,' those great at AI and those they put out of business, a framing he now extends to It Matters: Cuban has said AI could mint the world's first trillionaire, potentially 'one dude in a basement,' highlighting his view that mastery will drive outcomes over pedigree in the next decade. To him, classrooms that simulate that tool‑rich environment will serve students best. The former Shark Tank investor says he made it in the business world by refusing to retire in his mid‑30s and by pushing to be the best. Fresh out of Indiana University's Kelley School of Business, he founded MicroSolutions in his 20s, aimed to retire by 35, but instead sold the firm at 32 for $6 million and took home about $2 million in profit. Photo Courtesy: Kathy Hutchins on Read Next: $100k+ in investable assets? Match with a fiduciary advisor for free to learn how you can maximize your retirement and save on taxes – no cost, no obligation. These five entrepreneurs are worth $223 billion – they all believe in one platform that offers a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Mark Cuban Says Its Not The Students At Fault But The School If Answers Can Be Generated With AI: Kids Take 'Path Of Least Resistance' originally appeared on

Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' 'A Gift' for Democrats, James Carville Says
Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' 'A Gift' for Democrats, James Carville Says

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' 'A Gift' for Democrats, James Carville Says

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville on Monday said that the Donald Trump-backed "big, beautiful bill" is "a gift" for the Democratic Party. Why It Matters The One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed Congress earlier this month and aims to deliver on Trump's biggest legislative priorities: cementing the sweeping tax cuts, which disproportionately benefit wealthy Americans, enacted during his first term, and substantially increasing funds for border security and immigration enforcement. The Republican-passed bill pays for the tax cuts and increased border security with deep spending reductions in critical social safety net programs like Medicaid and food assistance. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the bill could result in 11.8 million more uninsured Americans by 2034 and add nearly $3.4 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade. James Carville is pictured at Politicon in Pasadena, California, on June 25, 2016. James Carville is pictured at Politicon in Pasadena, California, on June 25, 2016. Colin Young-Wolff/Invision/AP What To Know Carville made his remarks during an appearance on Fox News, telling host Martha MacCallum that the massive spending package should be the Democratic Party's main messaging focus. "James, you've talked about, you know, them wasting time on some of these issues around trans sports and all this stuff," MacCallum said. "What substantive thing would you like to see them focus on? Because perhaps immigration is the one, and in what way?" "The 'big, beautiful bill,'" Carville responded. "Cutting veterans' benefits, closing rural hospitals, raising $3.4 trillion on our national debt. I mean, when you have something simple in a gift like this to contrast yourself, you would be stupid to talk about immigration, or talk about bathrooms, or track meets or anything else." He added: "Just define yourself that we don't think this is going in the right direction for the United States and the numbers overwhelmingly would support that! But if we keep talking about this other nonsense, we're going to lose our focus." House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries gave a marathon speech railing against the bill, which lasted eight hours and 44 minutes. "Republicans are trying to jam this one, big, ugly bill down the throats of the American people," Jeffries said during his "magic minute" speech. "Leadership requires courage, conviction, compassion—and yet what we have seen from this administration and co-conspirators on the Republican side of the aisle is cruelty, chaos and corruption," he said, adding that the bill was "an extraordinary assault on the health care of the American people." Other Democratic lawmakers also made headlines for their stinging rebukes of the megabill. "This bill will kill good, blue-collar manufacturing jobs that we need to rebuild the economy in this country," Democratic Representative Josh Riley of New York said during a floor debate. "It closes rural hospitals. It defunds health care. All to give trillions of dollars in tax cuts to your cronies." "Don't tell me you give a s*** about the middle class when all you are doing is s******* on the middle class," Riley added. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, another Democrat from New York and one of the most progressive members of Congress, described the bill as a "deal with the devil" in an impassioned speech on the House floor. Democratic Massachusetts Representative Jim McGovern mocked Republicans for behaving like they were in a "cult" because of their support for the Trump-backed bill, despite recent polling data showing that it's broadly opposed by Americans. Several Republican senators have also faced scrutiny over comments they delivered regarding the cuts to Medicaid. Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa made headlines in May when she responded to people protesting Medicaid cuts by saying, "Well, we are all going to die." Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell, former Senate majority leader, also told Republicans during a closed-door lunch in June: "I know a lot of us are hearing from people back home about Medicaid. But they'll get over it." What Happens Next Trump administration officials have continued touting the law since Trump signed it earlier this month as part of an effort to sell it to voters. "It is time for you to have a government that works for you instead of against you for the next 3 1/2 years," Vice President JD Vance told voters in his home state of Ohio on Monday. "The Trump administration promises that is exactly what we're going to do."

Jim Cramer explains what's driving the stock of Tapestry
Jim Cramer explains what's driving the stock of Tapestry

CNBC

time4 hours ago

  • CNBC

Jim Cramer explains what's driving the stock of Tapestry

CNBC's Jim Cramer on Monday explained what he thinks is driving the stock of Tapestry, a company known for brands like Coach, Kate Spade and Stuart Weitzman. To Cramer, Tapestry has made some savvy business choices after it decided to walk away from an acquisition deal. "In the end, giving up on the Capri Holdings acquisition turned out to be a brilliant move for Tapestry," he said. "Rather than buying a bunch of struggling brands, they made a much better investment in their own stock, sold off the unexciting Stuart Weitzman business, and have turned their core Coach brand into a powerhouse." After the Federal Trade Commission blocked the deal late last year, Tapestry called off plans to acquire apparel peer Capri, which owns brands including Jimmy Choo, Versace and Michael Kors. But shares have climbed since then, and the stock hit a new 52-week high on Monday, up just over 69% year-to-date. Wall Street did not like Tapestry's proposed purchase of Capri, in part because some of Capri's brands are not doing well, Cramer said. Investors were concerned that adding Capri's brands would derail Tapestry's business, especially as its own core brands struggled, he continued. They were also worried Tapestry would overstretch its budget by borrowing billions for the deal, Cramer added. After Tapestry abandoned the deal, it made a few moves Cramer said he liked — it announced it would redeem the deal debt and add to its buyback. The company also said it wouldn't make any more acquisitions until it turned around Kate Spade, which he said is something Wall Street wanted to hear. Tapestry's decision to sell Stuart Weitzman further emphasized the company's plan to focus on Coach and Kate Spade, he continued. Tapestry beat the estimates during its last quarter and raised its guidance, bolstered by growing sales from its Coach handbag arm, which makes up a large part of business. Cramer suggested that Coach is popular because consumers believe the products are high quality and reasonably priced compared to luxury peers. He was also positive on Tapestry's future because management said Coach is popular with Gen Z. Cramer said Tapestry is still managing to beat the estimates even as Kate Spade continues to struggle, so a turnaround for that brand would be "pure upside." There might be an opportunity to buy Tapestry at lower levels after it reports earnings in August, Cramer said, as expectations for the upcoming quarter are high. "Ideally, I want Tapestry to report a good quarter that doesn't quite satisfy the shareholder base, causing a sell-off that allows you to buy this stock at a lower price," Cramer said. "But if you like the story, you've got my blessing to put on a small position before the quarter, because from my perspective, Tapestry's management knows exactly what they're doing, and they're doing it well." Tapestry did not immediately respond to request for comment. Click here to download Jim Cramer's Guide to Investing at no cost to help you build long-term wealth and invest

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store