logo
Elon Musk Launches 'America Party' "To Give You Back Your Freedom"

Elon Musk Launches 'America Party' "To Give You Back Your Freedom"

NDTV10 hours ago
Elon Musk, an ex-ally of US President Donald Trump, said Saturday he had launched a new political party in the United States to challenge what the tech billionaire described as the country's "one-party system."
The world's richest person -- and Trump's biggest political donor in the 2024 election -- had a bitter falling out with the president after leading the Republican's effort to slash spending and cut federal jobs as head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Musk has clashed with Trump over the president's massive domestic spending plan, saying it would explode the US debt, and vowed to do everything in his power to defeat lawmakers who voted for it.
Now he has created the so-called America Party, his own political framework, through which to try and achieve that.
"When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy," the Space X and Tesla boss posted on X, the social media platform that he owns.
"Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom."
Musk cited a poll -- uploaded on Friday, US Independence Day -- in which he asked whether respondents "want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system" that has dominated US politics for some two centuries.
The yes-or-no survey earned more than 1.2 million responses.
"By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!" he posted on Saturday.
Musk also shared a meme depicting a two-headed snake and the caption "End the Uniparty."
'Laser-focus' on vulnerable lawmakers
It is not clear how much impact the new party would have on the 2026 mid-term elections, or on the presidential vote two years after that.
The Trump-Musk feud reignited in dramatic fashion late last month as Trump pushed Republicans in Congress to ram through his massive domestic agenda in the form of the One Big Beautiful Bill.
Musk expressed fierce opposition to the legislation, and ruthlessly attacked its Republican backers for supporting "debt slavery."
He vowed to launch a new political party to challenge lawmakers who campaigned on reduced federal spending only to vote for the bill, which experts say will pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the US deficit.
"They will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," Musk said earlier this week.
After Musk heavily criticized the flagship spending bill -- which eventually passed Congress and was signed into law -- Trump threatened to deport the tech tycoon and strip federal funds from his businesses.
"We'll have to take a look," the president told reporters when asked if he would consider deporting Musk, who was born in South Africa and has held US citizenship since 2002.
On Friday after posting the poll, Musk laid out a possible political battle plan to pick off vulnerable House and Senate seats and become "the deciding vote" on key legislation.
"One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts," Musk posted on X.
All 435 US House seats are up for grabs every two years, while about one third of the Senate's 100 members, who serve six-year terms, are elected every two years.
Some observers were quick to point out how third-party campaigns have historically split the vote -- as businessman Ross Perot's independent presidential run in 1992 did when it helped doom George H.W. Bush's re-election bid resulting in Democrat Bill Clinton's victory.
"You are pulling a Ross Perot, and I don't like it," one X user wrote to Musk.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump admin building own chatbot to boost govt tech with AI tools: Report
Donald Trump admin building own chatbot to boost govt tech with AI tools: Report

Hindustan Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Donald Trump admin building own chatbot to boost govt tech with AI tools: Report

The Trump administration is developing a new website called ' and an API meant to 'accelerate government innovation with AI,' according to 404 Media, which found a draft version of the site with code posted to GitHub. Even though Musk is no longer involved in the government and is publicly feuding with the President, the plan shows that some of DOGE's ideas are still being used.(Pexels) The project seems to be led by the General Services Administration's Technology Transformation Services, which is run by Thomas Shedd, a former engineer at Tesla, according to As per New York Times, Shedd is connected to Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and has publicly supported using AI to spot fraud, review government contracts, and build 'AI coding agents' to write software for federal agencies. The draft version of uncovered by 404 Media (the live link currently redirects to the White House website), outlines three tools as part of the platform and says they are 'powered by the best in American AI.' These include an AI chat assistant, an API that connects to models from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic, and a dashboard for reviewing how AI is used across agencies. According to 404, the full site was supposed to go live on July 4th. Also Read: Trump rips apart Musk in brutal attack, calls DOGE 'a monster' that may 'go back and eat Elon' Elon Musk no longer involved in the government Even though Musk is no longer involved in the government and is publicly feuding with the President, the plan shows that some of DOGE's ideas are still being used. Shedd, described as a close Musk associate, who has pushed for the GSA to 'operate like a software startup' and has promoted the use of AI tools that other agencies would be required to adopt. The draft site also mentioned plans to work with Amazon Bedrock, Meta's LLaMA, and other FedRAMP-approved vendors, though some of the AI models mentioned do not currently have official government clearance. Federal workers raised concerns Some federal workers have raised concerns about the AI project. Internal reaction has been 'pretty unanimously negative,' with employees worried about possible security issues, the risk of bugs affecting key systems, and the chance that AI could suggest canceling important contracts.

BJP demands apology from Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah over remarks linking vaccines to heart attacks
BJP demands apology from Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah over remarks linking vaccines to heart attacks

Hindustan Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

BJP demands apology from Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah over remarks linking vaccines to heart attacks

The BJP on Sunday mounted a sharp attack on Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, demanding an unconditional apology over his recent comments linking a rise in cardiac arrests, particularly in Hassan district, to COVID-19 vaccination. The demand comes after an expert committee, appointed by the state government itself, found no scientific evidence to support such a link. Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah Also Read - Ganesh idol desecrated in Karnataka's Shivamogga: BJP alleges rising anti-Hindu acts under Congress rule Union Minister Pralhad Joshi led the charge, calling Siddaramaiah's remarks 'irresponsible and politically motivated.' Addressing the media in Hubballi, Joshi said, 'Premier institutions like ICMR, NCDC, and AIIMS-Delhi have already clarified that COVID-19 vaccines do not cause heart attacks. Now, the Karnataka government's own expert panel, led by Dr Ravindranath of the Jayadeva Institute of Cardiology, has confirmed the same. Will the Chief Minister apologise now?' Joshi alleged that Siddaramaiah's statements were part of a broader attempt to discredit vaccines developed during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's tenure. 'They thought the pandemic would work against the Prime Minister, but he managed the crisis with care and compassion. The vaccine rollout saved millions, and now the opposition is resorting to misinformation,' he said. Why did the controversy begin? The controversy stems from Siddaramaiah's recent remarks suggesting a connection between the sudden spike in heart attacks in Hassan and the COVID-19 vaccination drive. He had also questioned the speed at which the vaccines were approved, comments that drew criticism from scientists, political opponents, and industry leaders, including Biocon chairperson Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw. Also Read - Indie dog goes missing in Bengaluru, army doctor who rescued him flies home for search: Report To investigate the matter, the Karnataka government had constituted a panel led by Dr Ravindranath. In its findings, the committee stated that there was no causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and sudden cardiac deaths. Instead, it described the issue as multifactorial, pointing to behavioural, genetic, and environmental risk factors. The Jayadeva Institute's report echoed findings from global studies, reaffirming that vaccination offers long-term protection against cardiac events, rather than causing them. BJP spokesperson and former minister Dr CN Ashwath Narayan also slammed Siddaramaiah, accusing him of spreading unverified claims that could erode public trust in vaccines. 'The Chief Minister made a reckless statement without citing any scientific evidence. His comments undermine the credibility of Indian-made vaccines. He owes an apology to the people of Karnataka,' Narayan said.

Harvard students push back as over 200 sign open letter against demands from Trump administration
Harvard students push back as over 200 sign open letter against demands from Trump administration

Time of India

time16 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Harvard students push back as over 200 sign open letter against demands from Trump administration

Over 200 Harvard students have signed an open letter urging the University not to bow to political pressure, as former President Donald Trump claims a 'historic' deal with Harvard is imminent. The letter, circulated by Harvard Students for Freedom —an unrecognized student group—was released on July 4 to emphasize concerns around institutional independence and academic freedom. According to a report by The Harvard Crimson , the letter attracted 197 public signatures and 29 anonymous ones from undergraduate and graduate students alike. It was addressed 'To Harvard from its Students' and expressed unease about potential compromises in ongoing negotiations between the University and the Trump administration. Concerns over academic freedom, student rights The letter outlines several red lines that students believe the University must not cross. These include refraining from altering its curriculum under political pressure, refusing to dismiss faculty members over ideological disagreements, and not disciplining students for exercising peaceful free speech. One of the more pressing concerns involves the possible sharing of disciplinary records of international students, which students believe could open the door to politically motivated deportations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 새로 나온 '실비보험' 최적가 비교가입! "月 보험료 낮추고, 보장은 든든하게"... 굿리치 [등록번호:제2006038313호] 가입하기 Undo The group stressed that any deal with the federal government should not come at the expense of Harvard's core academic principles, nor should it set a precedent that undermines university autonomy nationwide. Independence Day release marks symbolic resistance The timing of the letter's release, on July 4, was a deliberate choice. The group positioned the move as a show of unity and a reaffirmation of values such as freedom of expression and institutional integrity. By publishing the letter on a national holiday, the students aimed to frame their message as a defense of foundational American principles, according to The Harvard Crimson . University response remains guarded While Trump has publicly claimed that Harvard is close to reaching a deal with his administration, the University has not confirmed those claims. It has only stated that its communications with the White House have focused on efforts to combat antisemitism and support viewpoint diversity. This ambiguity has sparked concern among students, faculty, and alumni about the nature of the negotiations and their potential implications. The student letter argues that Harvard must maintain its stance, guided by legal principles and a commitment to truth. The signatories contend that conceding to political pressure would erode the University's credibility and autonomy, not just for Harvard, but across higher education institutions in the U.S. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store