Trump: Tariff letters to 12 countries signed, going out Monday
Trump had earlier on Thursday told reporters that he expected a first batch of letters to go out on Friday, a national holiday in the United States, though the date has now shifted.
In a global trade war that has upended financial markets and set off a scramble among policymakers to guard their economies, Trump in April announced a 10 percent base tariff rate and additional amounts for most countries, some ranging as high as 50 percent. However, all but the 10 percent base rate were subsequently suspended for 90 days to allow more time for negotiations to secure deals.
That period ends on July 9, although Trump early on Friday said the tariffs could be even higher - ranging up to 70 percent - with most set to go into effect August 1.
'I signed some letters and they'll go out on Monday, probably twelve,' Trump said, when asked about his plans on the tariff front. 'Different amounts of money, different amounts of tariffs.'
Trump and his top aides initially said they would launch negotiations with scores of countries on tariff rates, but the US president has soured on that process after repeated setbacks with major trading partners, including Japan and the European Union. He touched on that briefly late on Friday, telling reporters: 'The letters are better ... much easier to send a letter.'
He did not address his prediction that some broader trade agreements could be reached before the July 9 deadline. The shift in the White House's strategy reflects the challenges of completing trade agreements on everything from tariffs to non-tariff barriers such as bans on agricultural imports, and especially on an accelerated timeline.
Most past trade agreements have taken years of negotiations to complete. The only trade agreements reached to date are with Britain, which reached a deal in May to keep a 10 percent rate and won preferential treatment for some sectors including autos and aircraft engines, and with Vietnam, cutting tariffs on many Vietnamese goods to 20 percent from his previously threatened 46 percent. Many US products would be allowed to enter Vietnam duty free.
A deal expected with India has failed to materialize, and EU diplomats on Friday said they have failed to achieve a breakthrough in trade negotiations with the Trump administration, and may now seek to extend the status quo to avoid tariff hikes. —Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
7 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Gold prices surge amid economic, political tensions
KUWAIT: Women visit a stand during the 23rd international gold and jewelry exhibition at the Kuwait International Fairgrounds in this file photo. - Photo by Yasser Al-Zayyat KUWAIT: Global gold prices witnessed a sharp increase at the close of the first week of July, reaching $3,337 per ounce, as investors turned to the precious metal as a safe haven amid mounting economic and geopolitical uncertainties. In a report issued Sunday, Kuwait's Dar Al-Sabayek Company attributed the surge to a range of interrelated factors, foremost among them growing concerns over the widening fiscal deficit in the United States. The company noted that fears escalated after the US House of Representatives approved a tax cut and spending expansion package proposed by former President Donald Trump's administration. According to the report, projections by the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation estimate that the package will increase US public debt by more than $3.4 trillion over the next decade. The resulting pressure on the US dollar prompted many investors to boost their gold holdings to hedge against market instability and the weakening purchasing power of the currency. The report also highlighted the intensification of trade tensions following the US President's announcement of new tariffs on several countries, potentially reaching up to 70 percent. These tariffs, expected to take effect in early August, have sparked fears of retaliatory measures by nearly 100 countries should trade agreements fail to materialize by July 9, as warned by the US Treasury Secretary. These developments have contributed to a retreat in the US dollar index, which fell to 97 points against major currencies, further strengthening gold's appeal. The report pointed out that the holiday-induced liquidity decline in US markets, particularly around the Independence Day holiday, helped reduce selling pressure in the final trading sessions of the week. Despite the upward momentum, gold's gains were partially curbed by positive US labor market data. Official figures showed that 147,000 jobs were added in June and the unemployment rate dipped to 4.1 percent. This data has dampened expectations of an imminent interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve. Moreover, the rise in yields on 10-year US Treasury bonds to 4.338 percent exerted additional pressure on gold prices. Dar Al-Sabayek stated that gold continues to respond to shifts in both economic indicators and political developments, even with US markets closed. Investor sentiment remains cautious as markets await key monetary policy signals from global central banks, including the release of the US Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting minutes and weekly unemployment claims data. Locally, the report noted that gold prices mirrored global trends in the Kuwaiti market. The price of 24-karat gold reached KD 32.89 per gram (approximately $107), while 22-karat gold was priced at KD 30.15 per gram (about $98). The price of silver remained stable at KD 407 per kilogram (roughly $1,329). Gold is traditionally measured in troy ounces, with one troy ounce equivalent to approximately 31.103 grams, the standard unit for weighing precious metals. — KUNA
Kuwait Times
7 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
EU GDPR should merely be a guiding framework for Kuwaiti legal system
By Noura Almutairi Since May 25, 2018, the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has been applied across all EU member states, establishing a global benchmark. Several countries, including South Korea, Brazil, Japan, Kenya, Egypt, Indonesia and the US State of California, have enacted data privacy laws aligned with the GDPR. Unlike the EU Data Protection Directive (DPD), the GDPR aims to enhance control over personal information to safeguard fundamental rights, especially the individual's right to data protection. The right to protect personal information is distinct from the right to privacy under the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR). The values underlying the regulation and protection of the former right are transparency, autonomy, fairness, dignity and non-discrimination. These are different from the values of reputation and honor, which underpin the individual's right to privacy in Kuwaiti society. Nonetheless, this article urges Kuwaiti lawmakers to be guided by the GDPR, as the individual's right to privacy is one of the values underpinning the protection of their personal information under the GDPR. Some of an individual's personal information, as defined under Article 4 of the GDPR, is linked to their right to privacy, for example, their photo. In addition, most of the individual's sensitive or private information, as outlined in Article 9 of the GDPR, is linked to the individual's right to privacy or a private life under the Kuwaiti legal system. Examples of such information include genetic data and health data. Even the process of collecting an individual's non-sensitive or private information can be used to reveal hidden private data about them. To illustrate how this point is relevant to the GDPR, it applies to private companies (as data controllers) that monitor individuals' online behavior and activities through their online identifiers or observed data, such as IP addresses, cookies and location data. A massive amount of 'dynamic personal information' is collected through such observed data and can then be analyzed predictively or using AI, which may infer private information about the Internet. As such, the GDPR protects the individual's right to privacy. However, this article suggests that Kuwaiti decision-makers should be guided by the GDPR, rather than merely copying it, when drafting a comprehensive Data Privacy Law. The GDPR has legal loopholes and vague provisions, and it does not entirely suit Kuwait for the following reasons, as explained. Firstly, the meaning of 'personal information', which determines the material scope of the Data Privacy Law, should be interpreted broadly to cover an exponentially growing range of situations. This article finds that identifiability is the core element required to consider data or information as personal information under the definition of personal information under Article 4 of the GDPR. Therefore, the GDPR does not cover anonymous information within its scope; however, the re-identification of an individual's data may still occur. Re-identification of an individual's data can be easily achieved, for example, through the Internet of Things (IoT), such as wearable devices like a Fitbit or an Apple Watch; the combined data, including location information, can distinguish one person from millions of others. Therefore, this article recommends that when Kuwaiti decision-makers draft an information Data Privacy Law, they should broaden the definition of personal data to include not only identifiability but also the ability to single out an individual from a crowd, regardless of whether their identity can be confirmed. Although Recital 26 of the GDPR explicitly mentions 'single out,' there is no clear indication of whether singling out an individual without identifying them is covered under the GDPR's scope. The GDPR also does not clarify whether inferred data falls within the scope of personal information, and the European Court of Justice's approach is inconsistent. To emphasize this point, the judgment in the case YS, M and S v Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel clearly excludes inference data from the safeguards of Data Protection Law, while a later judgement of the case Peter Nowak v Data Protection Commissioner in 2017 attributes the status of 'personal data' to inferences. However, in the former case, the Court was clear that GDPR does not grant all rights for inference data. As such, this article recommends including inferred data within the protection or material scope, since these types of data contain hidden private information. Secondly, Article 8 (1) of the GDPR states that the processing of minors' data (those under the age of 16, or if the law of the Union Member State sets a lower age, but not younger than 13) must be authorized by the holder of parental responsibility. This article argues that the decision maker in Kuwait, instead of ignoring this requirement, should consider the following questions before implementing the parental consent requirement under Article 8 (1): Whether the age setting under Article 8(1) accurately reflects the concept of childhood, culture, social heritage, and the Kuwaiti legal system; Should the requirement for parental consent apply to all online service providers, or should online services that are offered directly to children be excluded? If so, what are the indicators that an online service is offered directly to children? How can it be ensured that parents give verification in cases where a parent is no longer responsible for their child, or when parents are deceased? Thirdly, the digital privacy rights are the legal mechanisms that put an individual in a position of control over their personal information, thereby safeguarding the individual's right to privacy. However, not all the rights that regulate users under the GDPR are necessary to put Internet users in control of their data, to safeguard their right to privacy from the challenges posed in the digital age. To illustrate this point, the right to data portability, as outlined in Article 20 of the GDPR, empowers individuals to take control of their data by allowing them to retrieve it from one service and transfer it to another. Although it offers individual control, it is not rooted in the right to privacy; rather, it stems from competition laws. The right to data portability aims to foster competition among private companies, serving a primarily economic purpose to enhance the market, which is one of the main objectives of the GDPR. Therefore, this article does not recommend that Kuwaiti lawmakers recognize data portability as a new right within a Data Privacy Law, as it is not directly related to the right to privacy. Also, some rights under the GDPR are redundant, as they can be exercised through other rights. For instance, the right to restriction of processing under Article 18 of the GDPR is an alternative or optional right that an individual can exercise in place of other rights in some legal cases. As an alternative right, whether this right is regulated or guaranteed is less critical, since another right takes its place. To emphasize this point, if an individual's consent is not valid, instead of requesting erasure, they may request a restriction on processing. As such, this article emphasizes that there is no need to set the right to restriction of processing, except in cases where the individual requires that right for the establishment, exercise or defense of legal claims against a company for breach of their right to privacy by misuse of their private data, in which case the plaintiff can request restriction of processing through an immediate injunction under the KCC. NOTE: Noura Almutairi is an Assistant Professor at Kuwait University School of Law, Private Law Department, with research interests in the right to privacy, AI, the tort liability of tech companies and IP law.
Kuwait Times
7 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Illegal loggers profit from Brazil's carbon credit projects
PORTO VELHO: Companies around the world have poured hundreds of millions of dollars into conservation projects in Brazil designed to protect the Amazon rainforest in return for carbon credits offsetting their emissions. Reuters found that many of those projects are profiting people and businesses fined by Brazilian authorities for destroying the rainforest. Reporters analyzed 36 conservation projects in the Brazilian Amazon offering voluntary carbon offsets on the global market's biggest registries. At least 24 of those involved landowners, developers or forestry firms that have been punished by Brazil's environmental agency Ibama for their roles in illegal deforestation, Reuters found. The offenses ranged from clear-cutting the rainforest without authorization to transporting felled trees without valid permits and entering false information in a government timber tracking system. Government officials and experts said these infractions reflected the range of roles in the illicit timber trade devouring the rainforest. In 20 of the conservation projects, Reuters found, Ibama had fined key players for deforestation before they were listed with a carbon credit registry. In seven of those cases, the fines for illegal deforestation by the projects' backers continued after registration. 'It's a failure of the whole idea,' said Raoni Rajao, who ran the Brazilian Environment Ministry's program combating deforestation until December. By paying people with a track record of violating environmental law, he said, the carbon market may be funding groups engaged in illegal deforestation. 'They might be reducing deforestation in one place, but increasing emissions somewhere else with those same resources,' said Rajao, now an environmental policy professor at the Federal University of Minas Gerais. Brazil levies fines to enforce laws putting strict limits on deforestation since 2008 in the Amazon, the world's largest rainforest, which has lost about a fifth of its original tree cover over the past half century. Scientists warn further deforestation could release catastrophic quantities of planet-warming carbon dioxide, accelerating climate change. — Reuters That has made the Amazon an important part of the voluntary carbon market, which was worth $7.6 billion globally over the last five years, according to market watcher AlliedOffsets. In this market, projects that show they are reducing greenhouse emissions – for example, by avoiding deforestation in parts of the rainforest – can generate carbon credits, each one equivalent to a metric ton of carbon dioxide saved. Polluters can then voluntarily buy the carbon credits to compensate for their own emissions. The referees setting the standards in that global market are accrediting firms such as non-profit Verra, the world's largest carbon credit registry, and its Colombian rival Cercarbono. They run systems certifying whether a project is reducing emissions as promised. Reuters examined thousands of pages of documents related to the 36 conservation projects in the Brazilian Amazon that had been certified by Verra or Cercarbono at the start of this year. Both provide public records of projects' designs, boundaries and credits issued. Reporters identified key players and cross-checked them against Ibama's database of fines. -- Reuters
