Work on Glasgow street to start soon and last two years
It will include the continuation of the segregated cycle lanes, creating a link from Great Western Road at the Botanic Gardens to Dumbarton Road, which then links to the wider city cycle routes and the National Cycle Network.
Read More:
(Image: GT)
Pavements will be widened to create more space for pedestrians in street that is busy with cafes, bars, restaurants and shops.
It will also shorten crossing points to make it easier for people to get from one side to the other and step step-free crossings at the side streets.
There will be work at key corners along the street with seating put in place, similar to work done further down the street.
The project is being mostly funded though the Glasgow City Region City Deal, which also funds the city centre Avenues Project.
Glasgow City Council said the work on the southern half of [[Byres Road]] and Church Street has been a success which has led to fewer empty retail units.
(Image: Newsquest)
Work will start next month and take two years, with a completion date of August 2027.
Angus Millar, Convener for Transport and Climate at [[Glasgow City Council]], said: 'The first phase of the public realm improvement works at [[Byres Road]] has been a great success, creating a more attractive environment for residents, businesses and visitors.
'The second phase of these works will extend the transformation of this key street, upgrading pavements and improving the pedestrian experience as well as introducing safer cycle infrastructure and greater greenery to the area.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
14 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Glasgow City Council's phone system down for ten hours
The Community Alarm service is a vital lifeline that enables elderly people, individuals with disabilities, and those with health issues to summon help in an emergency. Users wear a pendant with an emergency button, allowing them to contact a 24-hour call centre from anywhere within their home. READ MORE: Council chiefs rake in this amountfrom controversial brown bin permits Call handlers can then alert family members, the police, or the fire service as needed. According to the council, although call handlers could see that calls were being received, they were unable to answer them. The council assured residents that it took immediate action by contacting family members and dispatching responders to check on the welfare of Community Alarm users. The system has since been fixed, with all of the systems working. READ MORE: Number of Glasgow City Council staff employed revealed in new FOI TELEPHONE ISSUES all incoming calls to council services affected. Our alarm receiving centre can see calls coming in but can't answer. This includes calls from service users with a Community Alarm. We will send responders out to check on their well-being. Further update to follow — Glasgow City Council (@GlasgowCC) July 28, 2025 In a statement posted on social media, the council said: "All incoming calls to council services have been affected. "Our alarm receiving centre can see calls coming in but cannot answer them. "This includes calls from service users with a Community Alarm. "We will send responders to check on their well-being."
Glasgow Times
3 days ago
- Glasgow Times
Have you spotted the 20 new Glasgow city centre trees?
The trees, funded through revenue from Low Emission Zone (LEZ) penalty charges, are part of Glasgow City Council's efforts to expand the urban canopy and improve environmental conditions in the area. Twenty large trees have been newly installed, and eight additional planters were moved from George Square to other locations while the square undergoes redevelopment. In total, 28 metal and stone planters are now in place across the city centre in locations including Trongate and outside the Gallery of Modern Art (GoMA). Cllr Angus Millar, convener for city centre recovery, said: "These new urban trees are more than just a visual enhancement to our city centre – they represent our commitment to a greener, healthier, and more sustainable Glasgow. "By reinvesting Low Emission Zone penalty income into projects like this, we're not only improving the look and feel of our public spaces but also delivering real environmental benefits for our city centre and securing a positive legacy from our action to reduce air pollution." City centre tree planter on James Watt Street (Image: Glasgow City Council) Glasgow tree planter outside the GOMA (Image: Glasgow City Council) Read more: Prominent sports club bar and bistro in 'leafy West End' brought to market Major British institution with Glasgow branch to close more than 100 locations' Glasgow tree planter outside the Mercat (Image: Glasgow City Council) The planters feature a variety of trees, including birch, cherry blossom, and rowan. These trees are intended to improve the appearance of the city centre while also helping to address climate change. They do this by absorbing carbon dioxide, lowering air and surface temperatures, and filtering airborne pollutants. Other locations include Dundasvale Road, James Watt Street, Hope Street/Bothwell Street, the Mercat, Brunswick Street, Albion Street, Goosedubbs, Blythswood Square, and Dundas Lane.
Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
Man at war with council after he is ordered to demolish extension because of 'nonsense' complaint from neighbours
A furious homeowner is at war with his local council after he was ordered to demolish his extension and wood-burning chimneys. Gerrard Caughey has branded the decision 'nonsense' after planning chiefs said he built the sunroom at his Glasgow home without permission. Mr Caughey was slapped with two enforcement notices by Glasgow City Council (GCC) but took his fight to the courts where the government ruled against him. According to the council, his neighbours were also unimpressed with the extension, built in 2018 and attached to his ground-floor flat, and in particular with smoke billowing out of his chimneys. While inspectors said the sunroom was not in 'character' with the original property, a listed building, or the wider street. Mr Caughey fumed: 'I think it's nonsense. Most folk I speak with in the area love the smell of the smoke, and I use it very occasionally.' Speaking to STV, he said the sunroom was built with high quality Spanish hardwood shipped from abroad, and stated the state of the orangery, which had previously been in place when purchased, was 'dangerous and a 'shambles'. Mr Caughey added: 'You can't even see the garden from out in the street. It's not causing anyone harm or anything.' Challenging the notion there were numerous complaints, Mr Caughey's planning agent said as part of his appeal: 'GCC enforcement allude to "various complaints" with regards to the structure. 'We are aware of one complaint from the neighbouring property, and we understand there have been long-running disputes from them. 'My clients are not aware of any further complaints from within the area and we would suggest therefore the word "various" has been used spuriously in the compiling of the GCC report.' The sunroom was built as an extension to the mid-19th century terraced building in 2018, but GCC say no planning permission was ever sought for it. Mr Caughey, however, argued that the property had a single-storey sun room attached when he purchased the property in the 1990s. The orangery was said to be in a 'dangerous condition deemed irrepairable' by Mr Caughey, a builder himself, and so he removed the glazed element and left the foundation and floor in-situ to return to at a point in the future. He says the sunroom was re-instated in 2018 based on the 'original footprint'. He also argued in the appeal that the council did not respond to queries about retrospective planning permission and that a prior notice about the flues had been dismissed - GCC refute this. While the extension was installed at the back of the property, two flues, for the wood-burning stove within a workshop in the garden, were put into place to face the lane which runs to the back of the property. The council ordered the removal of both in November last year on the terms that there was no planning permission or listed building consent. Mr Caughey's appeal also argued the sunroom had been installed six years before the enforcement notice was served. The council also ruled the smoke from the chimneys have a 'direct impact on the amenity of the neighbouring properties'. When MailOnline visited the street, neighbours expressed the same concerns. They said that 'black smoke' coming from the chimneys was concerning surrounding residents and that it was visible streets away on Dennistoun's main road of Duke street. Mr Caughey, who lives in the property with others above and below, was unavailable when the Mail attempted to contact him. A man who said he lived in the basement of the listed building shouted abuse and told our reporter to go away. However, one neighbour, who did not want to be named, admitted to complaining about his chimneys and sunroom. They said: 'I don't have anything to say other than the fact we were not happy. 'It's was not so much the summerhouse as the smoke from the fires which was a big aspect of things.' Admitting that other neighbours were concerned about the effect that it might have on younger children, they added: 'You could see the smoke from Duke Street as you walk up the hill. 'It's black and it's heavy and a few neighbours can see it but I don't think anyone wants to comment more about it. 'It was so bad that neighbours took a video of it at the time.' Another neighbour added: 'I know about the double chimney but we personally didn't complain about it. 'There is a nursery around here though so maybe it affected some of the people who use that.' Planning convener for Dennistoun Community Council, Brian Johnston, had written a letter of support for the extension, writing that the work had been 'carried out with a sympathetic regard for the original building' and praised the workmanship and design as being of a high quality. While the flues stick out onto a back lane, the council said they were not a 'sufficient distance' from neighbouring houses and stated that a retrospective planning application would also be refused. Simon Bonsall, the reporter appointed to the case by the Scottish Government, concluded that planning permission was required for both structures and that this had been breached by bypassing the process. Listed building consent was also refused for the sunroom as he ruled: 'While the effect of the orangery on the setting would not be harmful, I consider that the orangery through it's design, location and materials would not be in keeping with the character of the listed building.' A Glasgow City Council spokesman said: 'It should be noted that it was the Scottish Government - not Glasgow City Council - which dismissed the appeal on the grounds that the structure does not benefit from either planning permission or listed building consent and that the wood burning stoves were causing disamenity to the surrounding homes. 'It should also be understood that unauthorised alteration of a listed building is a criminal, not civic, offence and therefore carry a higher magnitude of scrutiny. 'The claim that we had withdrawn a notice and that there had been an attempt to submit a planning application is not true, indeed it was admitted that the resident left their application in the drafts section of the online planning process and did not submit it.' If Mr Caughey wishes to challenge the appeal decision, he would have to take the case to Scotland's highest court, the Court of Session.
