Congress misleading people by claiming BJP wants to change Constitution: Telangana BJP chief
'The words 'secular' and 'socialist' were not there in the Constitution. It was added after the 42nd Amendment. The Amendment was brought during the Emergency. Emergency was a black day in the democratic history of our country. So, the original Constitution did not have the words 'secular' and 'socialist, '' Rao told ANI.
'Who asked them to add these two words? However, after adding those words, the Janata Party came to power, Atal Bihari Vajpayee came to power, and now the BJP has come to power three times. Did we ever attempt to change these two words?' he added.
Rao stated that there were no attempts to amend the Constitution by the Centre.
'It is only the Congress party which is trying to mislead the country by saying that the BJP will change the Constitution...Congress is frustrated because it is losing elections...AICC has now become the 'All India Cheating Congress'. So, these people have no other issues except to blame the BJP and spread falsehood,' he said.
Earlier, a political controversy erupted after RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale questioned the legitimacy of including the terms 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution.
The RSS leader had remarked that the 'forceful' insertion of the words 'socialism' and 'secular' in the Preamble during the Emergency should be reconsidered today.
Reacting to the remarks, Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge on Friday dared and challenged Hosabale and top leaders of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in the centre to remove the words 'secular and socialist' from the Preamble.
'Days before, I heard that some RSS person said that we should remove Secular and Socialist words from the Constitution. I challenge them - be it him, their BJP, PM Modi, or Amit Shah - no one can remove those words. This is my challenge to them. Can you dare to remove it? This is all talk,' Kharge said while addressing the gathering at the Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee (TPCC) meeting. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Preamble like parenthood, cannot be changed 'howsoever you try': Vice President
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar on Monday (July 7, 2025) said the Preamble of the Indian Constitution is like parenthood to children, and it cannot be changed, no matter how hard one may try. "There have been a lot of issues about the preamble to the Constitution. The Preamble of the Indian Constitution is something like parenthood to children. Howsoever you may try, you can't change your parenthood. That is not possible," he said. While interacting with students and faculty at the National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS), Kochi, he also said that, historically, no country's preamble has ever been changed, but lamented that the Preamble of the Indian Constitution was altered during the Emergency era. "The Preamble of our Constitution was changed during a time when hundreds and thousands of people were behind bars, the darkest period of our democracy — emergency era," he said. His statement comes against the backdrop of the RSS calling for a review of the words 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble of the Constitution, stating that these were included during the Emergency and were never part of the Constitution drafted by B.R. Ambedkar. Addressing an event on 50 years of Emergency in New Delhi on June 26, RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabole said, "Babasaheb Ambedkar never used these words in the preamble of the Constitution. The words were added during Emergency, when fundamental rights were suspended, Parliament did not function, and the judiciary became lame."
India Today
23 minutes ago
- India Today
No one fully satisfied, says poll panel as Bihar voter roll clean-up continues
In poll-bound Bihar, the Election Commission's massive voter list overhaul has left political parties across the board dissatisfied, for reasons ranging from alleged disenfranchisement to questions over timing and Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar admitted that "for one reason or another, no one (political parties) seems fully satisfied with the current status of the voter list," even as the Election Commission goes ahead with its Special Intensive Revision (SIR) drive, covering nearly eight crore voters in the state ahead of Assembly elections due later this the past four months, the Election Commission has held nearly 5,000 meetings with representatives of several political parties. All 4,123 Electoral Registration Officers (EROs), 775 District Election Officers (DEOs) and 36 Chief Electoral Officers (CEOs) have been engaged in the drive, which aims to weed out ineligible names and ensure an updated roll ahead of the upcoming elections. However, the revision has sparked a legal and political battle. Bihar's chief opposition party, Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) has challenged the process in the Supreme Court, alleging it could strike off over two crore voters and questioning why Bihar alone is being targetted when the last nationwide revision was conducted in BJP-led NDA has defended the exercise, citing rapid urbanisation, migration, unreported deaths and the inclusion of illegal immigrants as reasons for the update. It has also accused the RJD-led Mahagathbandhan of raising 'excuses' in anticipation of the the poll panel has insisted that the process is transparent and warned voters against misleading and false claims being circulated by "some people" without reading the official orders. As per the June 24 directive, draft rolls will be published on August 1, including names for which forms are received by July 25. Voters can file claims and objections till June 25 and September 30, nearly 30 million residents will have to produce documentary proof of their date and place of birth. Those born after 1987 must also submit similar documents for each by Article 324 of the Constitution and the Representation of the People Act, 1950, the Election Commission is both authorised and duty-bound to maintain the accuracy of the electoral roll. The Commission has invoked these powers multiple times in the past — most notably during intensive revisions in 1952-56, 1957, 1961, 1965, 1966, 1983-84, 1987-89, 1992, 1993, 1995, 2002, 2003 and 2004.- EndsTrending Reel
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Not an iota of evidence': former Congress MP Sajjan Kumar claims innocence in 2 cases linked to 1984 riots
Former Congress MP Sajjan Kumar told a Delhi court on Monday that he was innocent and was being implicated falsely in two cases in which two men were allegedly killed and another person was set ablaze during the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. 'I was not present at the spot… The investigating agency did not conduct a fair Investigation. The aim was to implicate by introducing fresh and unsubstantiated allegations,' his counsel told Special Judge Dig Vinay Singh of the Rouse Avenue court. 'Initially, I wasn't even named by any of the witnesses. Decades later, I was named. The case against me is false and politically motivated.' The First Information Reports (FIRs) in this connection were filed in February 2015 by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) based on complaints of violence in Janakpuri and Vikaspuri. In Janakpuri, Sohan Singh and his son-in-law Avtar Singh were killed on November 1, 1984, while in Vikaspuri, Gurcharan Singh was allegedly set ablaze and sustained severe burns, remaining bed ridden for three decades. In August 2023, a Delhi court dropped the charges of murder and criminal conspiracy in both cases but charged Kumar with the other offences in the chargesheet, including rioting with deadly weapons, promoting enmity between different groups, and attempting to commit culpable homicide. 'I couldn't even have dreamt of committing this act. There is not even an iota of evidence against me,' he said, adding that he had organised blood donation camps and peace marches to bring harmony during the riots. Arguing through advocates Anil Kumar Sharma, Anuj Sharma and Apoorav Kumar Sharma, Kumar stated before the court: 'My lie detector test was conducted. I voluntarily participated to prove my innocence.' Sajjan Kumar is currently lodged in Tihar jail after the Delhi High Court sentenced him to life imprisonment in 2018 in a case related to the killing of five Sikhs at Raj Nagar Part I in Palam Colony on November 1-2, 1984, and the burning down of a gurdwara in Raj Nagar Part II. On August 30 last year, a Delhi court ordered framing of charges against Kumar in a case related to the killing of three Sikhs during the riots near Pul Bangash Gurdwara.
