Kneecap, Bob Vylan Glastonbury Sets Spark Police Probe And Global Criticism
UK police on Monday launched a criminal investigation into remarks made by rap groups Kneecap and Bob Vylan during the Glastonbury festival, as the US revoked visas for the latter after its frontman led an anti-Israel chant.
Bob Vylan, a London-based duo which often tackles racism in its tracks, was slammed by international and British politicians after the group led the crowds in chants of "Death to the IDF" -- the Israeli military.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer said after the show there was "no excuse for this kind of appalling hate speech".
Avon and Somerset Police in southwest England said a "criminal investigation is now being undertaken" after reviewing "video footage and audio" of both Kneecap and Bob Vylan.
"The investigation will be evidence-led and will closely consider all appropriate legislation, including relating to hate crimes," police said in a statement.
The BBC apologised for not pulling the live stream of Bob Vylan's performance at the festival over the weekend.
"With hindsight we should have pulled the stream during the performance. We regret this did not happen," the broadcaster said.
It added that the "antisemitic sentiments expressed by Bob Vylan were utterly unacceptable and have no place on our airwaves".
Media watchdog Ofcom said it was "very concerned" and the BBC had questions to answer.
"We have been speaking to the BBC over the weekend and we are obtaining further information as a matter of urgency," it added.
Israel's deputy foreign minister Sharren Haskel called for the public broadcaster to be investigated over the time it took for the video to be removed from the BBC's online streaming platform.
"I think that the latest (BBC) statement is absolutely pathetic," Haskel told Times Radio.
Controversy descended on this year's festival before it even began over the inclusion of Kneecap, one of whose members was recently charged under terror legislation.
During their show on Saturday, one Kneecap member also wore a T-shirt dedicated to the Palestine Action Group, which is about to be banned under UK terror laws.
The chants about Israel's military were led by Bob Vylan's frontman who goes by the stage name Bobby Vylan, and were broadcast live on the BBC.
Bob Vylan also chanted "free, free Palestine" and "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" -- an expression which some see as a call for Israel's destruction, but others say demands an end to Israeli occupation in Gaza and the West Bank.
The United States on Monday said it would revoke visas for Bob Vylan's members, ahead of its American tour dates scheduled later this year.
"Foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors to our country," Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau posted on X.
Causing a possible political headache for the UK, the Israel embassy issued a statement saying "it was "deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury Festival".
US ambassador to the UK Warren Stephens slammed the chants as "anti-Semitic" and a "disgrace".
Glastonbury's organisers said the the comments had "very much crossed a line".
"We are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence," the festival said in a statement.
Kneecap, which has made headlines in recent months with its pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel stance, also led crowds in chanting abuse against Prime Minister Starmer.
Starmer and other politicians had said the band should not perform after its member Liam O'Hanna, known by his stage name Mo Chara, was charged with a terror offence.
He appeared in court this month accused of having displayed a Hezbollah flag while saying "Up Hamas, Up Hezbollah" at a London concert last year.
The Iran-backed Lebanese group Hezbollah and the Palestinian militants Hamas are banned in the UK, where it is an offence to express support for them. Police are studying videos of comments by Bobby Vylan of British duo Bob Vylan AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Canada axes digital tax to ease Trump trade tensions – DW – 06/30/2025
Canada has withdrawn a tax that could have reaped billions in revenue to bring Donald Trump back to the table. It raises the possibility that other taxes targeting big tech could be in the US president's sights next. Canada has canceled its digital services tax (DST) to entice the United States to return to the negotiating table for a long-awaited trade and defense deal. The tax, which was due to take effect on Monday, would have applied a 3% levy on revenues earned within Canada by companies — from any country — whose services are digitally based and earn more than 20 million Canadian dollars ($14.7 million, €12.4 million) per year. But the DST was the target on Friday of a now familiar missive from US President Donald Trump on his Truth Social platform. There, he labeled the tax as a "direct and blatant attack" on the US and set the clock ticking on new tariffs for his northern neighbor as he put trade negotiations on ice. While DSTs from Canada and other nations avoid naming specific companies among their targets, there is an inescapable reality that such instruments catch a swathe of American companies in their nets — among them digital behemoths like Meta, Google, Amazon, Airbnb and Uber. The tax's impact was compounded by its retroactive nature, capturing all revenues back to 2022, a boon that would have yielded more than $2 billion to Canada's finances. Binning the tax on the day it came into effect has potentially prevented Canada from feeling the brunt of harsher Trump tariffs and the loss of a trade deal with a significant trading partner. At the very least, it's brought the US president back to the negotiating table. Last year, Canada bought nearly $350 billion in US products and exported more than $412 billion to the US. "Obviously, the revenue from digital services taxes will be much lower than any costs from potential trade conflicts," said Bertin Martens, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based economic think tank Bruegel. "This is the right road to take at this moment for Canada, at least." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Big tech companies make billions in revenue globally and there are few places that haven't been touched by the presence of the dominant US players in e-commerce, digital advertising and social media. But taxation of these businesses largely falls to the country where they are headquartered. For the majors, it's usually in the US, or even low-taxing countries like Ireland or Luxembourg. It's why other countries are turning to DSTs to recoup revenue for operating within their borders. While Canada's DST has been shelved, other countries across the Atlantic have been reaping revenues for years. France, Italy, Spain and the UK have revenue taxes for digital services providers, with criteria requiring a company to meet a minimum level of global revenue, a fraction of which is made within their borders. France, Italy and Spain apply a tax of 3% on those revenues, the UK 2%. France is even looking to increase its rate to 5%. "Big US tech companies that operate in Europe and elsewhere in the world pay very little, if any, taxes in the countries where they operate and collect substantial revenue and profits," Martens told DW. "But nothing of that can be taxed in the country itself, and so, in the absence of an OECD agreement on how to do this, countries have taken this in their own hands." The US has historically taken a dim view towards foreign digital services taxes under the last three administrations, Democrat and Republican, with a view that they amount to import tariffs on services. "It's not just Preisdent Trump, it was President Biden too, it is members of the US Congress in both parties, Republican and Democrat, that agree that DSTs are not appropriate for other countries to adopt," said James Hines, a professor of law and economics at the University of Michigan, US. "A tax that really is designed just to hit hard the American tech companies, which is what DSTs are," Hines said. "I'm sure the Trump administration is very serious about being upset about DSTs, and being willing to retaliate." That leaves open the question of whether other countries will be pressured to drop theirs. "I think the EU could also be persuaded to withdraw these taxes, but the problem is that the EU Commission, as a trade negotiator, has no leverage on member states' taxation policies," said Martens. "It can try to pass the message to member states, but whether they will accept it or not is a different matter." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Biden administration opposed DSTs but worked to broker a global trade deal via the OECD. That agreement was scuttled by Trump upon his return to the White House, leaving the prospect of unilateral DSTs back on the table. Despite American opposition to these agreements, Allison Christians, a tax law professor at McGill University in Canada, said the idea that major tech corporations should only be taxed in their home country is "antiquated." "They're headquartered in the US, yes, but they're capitalized all over the world, and they're collecting data all over the world, and they're making profit all over the world," Christians said. That, she said, makes it harder for local companies to compete with their "highly digitalized" US rivals. Martens agrees that DSTs are a response to the desire for other nations to have a level playing field. "There is this distorted playing field between local companies and foreign — in this case US — companies, in online markets," Martens said. "Local companies obviously pay local taxes in the country where they are established, and US companies can avoid that or circumvent that through preferential tax deals with tax havens like Ireland or Luxembourg, or even through repatriation of lots of their profits to the US. Martens said a global agreement like those brokered by the OECD would be a better way to proceed. But without US support, national-level taxes are likely to remain, at least until they appear again as a trade negotiation tool. "[DSTs] have become tangled up in this Trump administration trade policy debates, and that makes a debate even more complicated," Martens said.
Int'l Business Times
7 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Hong Kong Rights Record Under Fire As It Marks China Handover Anniversary
Hong Kong leader John Lee said on Tuesday the city has become safer and more competitive as it marks its 28th year under Chinese rule, although critics including the EU decried the use of a "repressive" security law. The former British colony was handed over to China in 1997 under a "One Country, Two Systems" governance model, which guaranteed key freedoms and a high degree of autonomy not enjoyed on the mainland. July 1 in Hong Kong had been marked in previous years by demonstrations but authorities have cracked down on dissent after huge and sometimes violent pro-democracy protests in 2019. Lee said "high-level security to safeguard high-quality development" was a top priority for his administration, noting the need to integrate into China's economic blueprint. The city this week also marked the fifth anniversary of Beijing's imposition of a sweeping national security law, under which 76 people have been convicted so far, imposed after the 2019 protests. Lee's government enacted a separate security law of its own in 2024 that authorities say is needed to restore order. "We have rebuilt a safe Hong Kong," Lee said in a speech. However, the European Union said on Monday "the repressive use of the National Security Law has undermined confidence in the rule of law and Hong Kong's international reputation". "The European Union regrets that additional national security legislation... introduced new offences, increased penalties and further empowered security authorities," it said in a statement. The League of Social Democrats, one of Hong Kong's last remaining opposition parties, disbanded on Sunday citing "immense political pressure" and concern for the safety of its members. It was the second pro-democracy party to announce plans to wind down this year, following the Democratic Party in February. Outgoing US consul general in Hong Kong Gregory May also criticised the Hong Kong government last week for using the security law to target overseas activists. Authorities say that Hong Kong residents continue to enjoy rights and freedoms guaranteed under its Basic Law constitution, although such rights are not absolute. Lee also said Hong Kong will speed up an ambitious plan to urbanise land near its border with China, a development known as the Northern Metropolis that will take up a third of Hong Kong's total area. The project has raised concerns over its environmental impact as well as its long-term burden on Hong Kong's public finances. AHong Kong marked its 28th year of Chinese rule but critics say the use of a "repressive" security law has undermined confidence in the rule of law AFP
DW
12 hours ago
- DW
Turkey detains cartoonist over Muhammad caricature – DW – 06/30/2025
A cartoonist working for a satirical magazine drew outrage in Turkey for a cartoon depicting the Islamic prophet. The magazine said the cartoon did not aim to mock religious values. A cartoonist working for the satirical magazine was detained by police for questioning on Monday amid controversy over a cartoon depicting the Prophet Muhammad. In a statement, the chief public prosecutor's office said it "launched an investigation" into a cartoon published by the magazine on June 26 that "openly disparages religious values." "Arrest warrants have been issued for those involved," the prosecutor's office said. The arrest warrants also include editors-in-chief and managing editor. Turkish Justice Minister Yilmaz Tunc earlier said cartoons depicting Muhammad were an affront to religious sensitivities and social harmony. Images of the cartoon in question posted on social media, appeared to show Prophet Muhammad and Prophet Moses shaking hands in mid-air while missiles fell onto a city. "No freedom grants the right to make the sacred values, of a belief a subject of humor in an ugly way," Justice Minister Tunc wrote. Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya confirmed that the cartoonist had been taken into custody, and shared a video showing him being put into handcuffs in a stairwell. "The person named D.P. who made this vile drawing has been caught and taken into custody," he wrote, using the cartoonist's initials. "These shameless individuals will be held accountable before the law," he added. Although Turkey has a secular legal system, having abolished Islamic law in the 1920s, the law does allow for a prison sentence of up to one year for anyone "who openly insults the religious values of a section of the public." Turkish media reported several dozen protesters gathered outside of office in Istanbul after the image spread on social media. However, the magazine issued an apology on social media for any offense caused and said the cartoon had been misunderstood. The statement said the cartoonist had intended to highlight "the suffering of a Muslim man killed in Israeli attacks," rather than to insult Islam. "The name Muhammad is among the most widely used in the world by Muslims honoring the Prophet. The cartoon does not depict the Prophet and was not drawn to mock religious values," the magazine said, calling some interpretations "deliberately malicious."
