I spent my first 24 hours with the Oakley Meta HSTN glasses — they're brilliant except for one glaring problem
Between the ultra-reflective orange lenses and angular, sport-forward frame, there's no question these glasses are an Oakley product.
But the camera cutouts on the upper corners, a pair of black holes disrupting the stark white frames, give away that there's more to these glasses than what meets the eye.
And depending on your vibe, that could be a huge selling point. For me, it's the one thing that seems to be holding these smart glasses back.
Let's backtrack a bit. When comparing the Ray-Ban Meta vs Oakley Meta smart glasses, there are several spec improvements that help justify the Oakley's $499 price tag. A better field of view for the cameras and double the battery life are the upgrades that stand out to me. But a lot is also the same, such as a quick set up process with the Meta AI (formerly Meta View) app. After a few prompts to familiarize yourself with Meta's "look and tell me" assistant, the HSTN glasses are ready to wear.
Except ready to wear doesn't mean I, personally, am ready to wear them. To put it simply, these aren't a pair of glasses I'd ever reach for on the shelves at Sunglass Hut.
The limited edition Oakley Meta HSTN smart glasses offer some spec boosts over the Ray-Ban Meta glasses, targeting the sportier crowd of wearable tech enthusiasts.
The bold, rounded frame is made to be noticed and doesn't hide the fact that these aren't normal glasses. Compared to my transition lens Ray-Ban Meta Wayfarers, which blend into almost any outfit, the Oakley smart glasses are far more overt.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
As someone who's fashion-conscious, I couldn't help but feel these glasses are bit out of sync with my closet. I'm sure these frames would look amazing out on a paddleboard or bike path, but for my everyday city wear? Not quite my default fit.
Luckily, I planned my first official outing with the Oakley Meta HSTN smart glasses to take place in an appropriately sporty setting: T-Mobile Park, home stadium of the Seattle Mariners.
Although I wished the the PRIZM 24K polarized lenses skewed blue to match the Mariners branding rather than the opposing team's yellowy-orange accents, they felt incredible against the sun shining into the park. Everything in my vision, even the players from my second deck seats looked sharp.
Most surprisingly, I could track foul and fly ball paths with ease — usually, I'm futilely circling my neck to spot them. (Side note: I can't wait to try these at the golf course to see if they improve my abysmal ball-locating abilities.)
Other use cases carry over from the Ray-Ban version of these glasses, such as capturing videos and photos of the action from my POV that I could then post on my Instagram stories or send to my family.
Image captured on the Oakley Meta HSTN Smart Glasses
Image captured on the Oakley Meta HSTN Smart Glasses
Image captured on the Oakley Meta HSTN Smart Glasses
Similarly, I could rely on Meta AI to settle in-game debates. Whether it was who else is joining Ichiro Suzuki in the 2025 Hall of Fame class or if the Mariners are actually the only active MLB team to never make the World Series, Meta AI answered accurately and with ease.
Even with the crowd noise, I could hear everything through the built-in speakers, and the mics didn't miss a beat picking up my queries.
Functionally, the Oakley Meta HSTN smart glasses are epic. But as much as I immediately love the performance, I'm having a harder time warming up to the design.
The style is just... a lot. Unlike the Ray-Bans, which come in tons of frame and lens variations, the Oakley Meta HSTNs are one bold look.
A more subtle, all-black pair has been pictured but wasn't seeded to reviewers like myself and is not yet available to purchase. I would opt for this subdued pair instead, although in a perfect world I'd be able to customize the entire look of something I planned to wear daily.
I know that there are sporty folks who are drooling over the existing edgy white-and-orange combo. If that's your vibe, I'm confident you'll love them. For me, I still need a little bit of time to come around, but I have a feeling the performance will ultimately outweigh style for me.
All I'll say is, you know a product's performance is good when I'll consider compromising my fashion sense for it.
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Arista Q2 Preview: Can AI Momentum Keep It Climbing?
Arista Networks will release second-quarter results after the market close on August 5. Consensus estimates call for $0.65 in EPS and $2.1 billion in revenue, marking a 25% year-over-year increase. Shares closed at $117.57 on August 1, up 6% year-to-date but nearly double the April low of $59.43. That rebound reflects growing confidence in Arista's exposure to AI infrastructure buildouts and expanding share in next-gen routing and switching. Despite the surge, the stock remains about 12% below its all-time high of $133.57 set on January 24. Investor focus will remain on AI-driven spending from cloud titans like Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), which have confirmed elevated CapEx in recent earnings calls. However, Arista's heavy reliance on those two customers (together accounting for over 35% of revenue) raises questions about concentration risk. Analysts will also watch whether Arista can expand routing and enterprise sales fast enough to diversify its top line. Success here could support long-term growth, though these segments tend to carry lower margins and stiffer competition. With gross margin historically above 60%, any shift in product mix or pricing pressure could raise red flags. With Arista's valuation reflecting optimism, forward guidance must support continued momentum to justify the sharp rally since April. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Big Tech's AI Spend Could Reach $400 Billion
Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) and Meta (NASDAQ:META) are pushing Big Tech's AI infrastructure spend toward an estimated $400 billion, with public filings already showing $344 billion this year. The increase is funding data centers, AI ready servers and model training as Morgan Stanley sees the surge adding up to 0.5% to U.S. GDP in 2025 and 2026 and projects $2.9 trillion in related investment from 2025 to 2028. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Sign with MSFT. Microsoft set a record with $24.2 billion in capex last quarter and plans more than $30 billion this quarter, while Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) logged $31.4 billion, and Alphabet raised its full year capex forecast to $85 billion. Meta raised the low end of 2025 guidance and is expanding its internal AI unit, signaling further planned Street has reacted unevenly: Microsoft and Meta shares climbed, with Microsoft hitting a $4 trillion value and Meta up more than 8%, while Amazon slid 8% after weak cloud results. Apple remains an outlier with $9.47 billion invested over nine months, up 45% year over year, prioritizing efficiency. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Meta, X and Snapchat Offer Discounts on Paid Subscription Packages for Summer
This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. Meta, X and Snaochat are all making a push on their premium add-on plans for the Summer, with each offering special discounts for sign-ups over the next month. Meta's offering a significant discount for initial sign-ups, with the first month available super cheap, before rising back to its normal levels. As you can see in this example, posted by Jonah Manzano, Meta's looking to entice a few more Verified sign-ups through a big discount on the initial few weeks (note: dollars here are in AUD). X Premium, meanwhile, is offering 30% off its annual subscriptions for its Premium and Premium Plus plans. While Snapchat is also offering a 50% discount off the price of the first two months of Snapchat+ as well. Will that help to boost their subscription offerings, and make them a more significant revenue stream for each company? Maybe, though I wouldn't bet on it, as most people who would sign-up for each has likely already done so, and there's not a heap of add-on content that's sweetened the deal in recent months. I mean, X is offering expanded access to its latest Grok AI tools, and that could be enticing for some people. Snap is also offering advanced access to new features to enhance the Snap experience. But none of these is going to become a major revenue driver for any of these companies, with all of these elements only contributing a minor amount, in terms of overall revenue. Though each is still a significant income stream in itself. We don't have exact data, because the platforms generally keep that to themselves, but looking at its performance reports, Meta's added an extra $358 million to its 'Other' income stream on what it was earning in this category when it launched Meta Verified back in Q2 2023. Using the average price of Meta Verified as a measuring stick ($13), that would suggest that Meta could have sold around 9 million subscriptions to Meta Verified thus far. Which is a lot, to be sure, and a lot of money to be bringing in each month from the offering. But in comparison to the $31.5 billion it generates per quarter from ads, it's clearly a subsidiary revenue element. Snapchat+ is now up to 15 million subscribers, which has brought an extra $150 million per quarter into its coffers, and made it the most successful add-on offering of the new three. Though again, it's still nowhere close to the $1.36 billion overall that Snap brought in for Q1. Which brings us to X, which has been the most scrutinized and criticized of the three new paid add-on offerings. That's because X owner Elon Musk was originally hoping to get hundreds of millions of people to pay for X access, which would then enable him to supplant advertiser dollars, and thus advertiser restrictions on content, as he mapped a way forward for the app. But it hasn't exactly worked out that way. X Premium looks to currently have around 1.5 million paying users, which equates to less than 0.5% of X's user base. So not close to the 300 million or so subscribers that X was hoping for, though it still seemingly believes that access to its Grok AI chatbot will eventually drive up subscription revenue. Though the expense of developing xAI has also forced it to increase X Premium prices. And with AI bots available from OpenAI and Meta, I'm not sure it's ever going to be the lure that Elon and Co. hope. But maybe, with this new promotional push, each platform can make their subscription add-ons a bigger factor, and get more people at least trying out their offerings. But overall, the numbers show that subscription options are never going to supplant advertising as the key funding path for social apps. Which means that Elon's stuck playing along with advertiser demands, and X is stuck looking to boost its user base to maximize advertiser interest. And while each offering does provide a valuable additional income stream, none looks set to see any huge increase in its current take-up, unless they really catch on in developing regions. Recommended Reading Social Platforms Are Running Disruptive Promotions for Their Own Products Sign in to access your portfolio
