'Fortnite' Is Officially Back on the US Apple App Store
Summary
Fortniteis officially back on the USAppleApp Store.
Epic Gamesshared the news on X, confirming that the game is once again available foriPhonesandiPads. Meanwhile, in the EU, Fortnite is available via Epic Games Store and AltStore. AsIGNreports, iPhone and iPadForniteplayers can purchase V-Bucks through either the Epic Games Store or in-app.
This marksFortnite'sreturn to the US App Store after nearly five years. In August 2020, bothGoogleand Applepulled the gamefrom its stores following an ongoing legal battle between the latter and Epic. The issue began when Epic introduced a direct payment system forFortnite'sin-game currency, V-Bucks, offering them at a lower price. The developers stated their aim was to bypass the 'exorbitant 30% fee' that Google and Apple imposed on each V-Buck purchase.
In late April, a U.S. Federal District Court in California ruled that Apple deliberately violated a court order in its legal case against Epic Games. The court order required the tech giant to allow developers to offer customers different purchasing methods outside of the app. Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney then announced thatFortnitewouldreturn to the US App Store in early May, but the companyclaimedthat 'Apple has blocked ourFortnitesubmission so we cannot release to the U.S. App Store or to the Epic Games Store for iOS in the European Union.'
Fortnite is BACK on the App Store in the U.S. on iPhones and iPads… and on the Epic Games Store and AltStore in the E.U! It'll show up in Search soon!
Get Fortnite on the App Store in the U.S. ➡️https://t.co/HQu3pYCXFmpic.twitter.com/w74QPFFkOS
— Fortnite (@Fortnite)May 20, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
33 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Fornite Players Could Be Due a Refund—How to File Your Claim
Players of Epic Games, Inc.'s popular video game Fortnite could be eligible for a refund from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). "The Federal Trade Commission is sending refunds totaling more than $126 million to players of the popular video game Fortnite who were charged for unwanted purchases while playing the game," the FTC said in a statement on Wednesday. This latest round of payments come after $72 million was issued out to players in the first round of refunds, sent in December 2024. The deadline for additional claims has been extended, allowing further eligible consumers, who have not yet submitted a claim, the chance to request a refund. The FTC's action against Epic involves "two separate record-breaking settlements." In December 2022, it was announced that Epic would have to pay $245 million in refunds for "tricking users into making unwanted charges." The FTC alleged that the gaming company 'used dark patterns to trick players into making unwanted purchases and let children rack up unauthorized charges without any parental involvement.' The FTC further alleged that Fortnite's 'counterintuitive, inconsistent, and confusing button configuration' aided in these unwanted purchases. It was also announced that Epic would be required to pay a $275 million penalty for "violating" the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. Epic issued a statement regarding the settlement in December 2022. 'The video game industry is a place of fast-moving innovation, where player expectations are high and new ideas are paramount,' the statement read. 'Statutes written decades ago don't specify how gaming ecosystems should operate. The laws have not changed, but their application has evolved and long-standing industry practices are no longer enough.' The company went on to say: "Over the past few years, we've been making changes to ensure our ecosystem meets the expectations of our players and regulators, which we hope will be a helpful guide for others in our industry." Here's what you need to know about whether you're eligible to file a claim and how you can go about doing that. Who is eligible to file a claim? If you filed a claim after Feb. 14, 2025, you don't need to do anything else right now, per the FTC's instruction, as they are "still reviewing claims filed after that date and will provide more information soon." For those who haven't already filed, Fortnite players who were charged for 'unwanted purchases' may be eligible to seek a refund. The first eligible party is someone who was charged 'in-game currency' for items they did not want, between January 2017 and September 2022. The second is a parent whose child made charges in Fortnite using their credit card, without their knowledge, between January 2017 and November 2018. The third is a player who was locked out of their account when they complained to their credit card company about 'wrongful charges' between January 2017 and September 2022. Players of all ages are eligible for the refund, but the FTC stipulates that those under 18 must have a parent or guardian fill out the claimant form on their behalf. The refund is also currently only available to players in the United States. When is the deadline to make a claim and apply for a refund? The FTC has reopened the claiming process for eligible people to submit a refund request. People now have until July 9 to file a claim. How can you apply for a refund? Eligible persons can apply for a refund via the official Fortnite refund website, using either a claim number sent to their email address or their Epic Games account ID. In December 2024, the FTC said the average refund amount that an individual would receive was $114, but it now says that the amount of each refund depends on multiple factors, including how many people file a claim. When can you expect to receive payment? The next round of refunds are expected to be sent to players in 2026, after all claims are validated. Claimants can reach a representative through the email admin@ or by calling number 1-833-915-0880, if they have questions about their payment status. The refunds are due to be sent by check or via PayPal from the FTC. It's recommended that successful claimants cash checks within 90 days and redeem the PayPal payment within 30 days.
Miami Herald
38 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Microsoft makes huge change to Windows
When was Microsoft Windows great? Was it ever great? That will depend on your experience and age. The oldest version of Windows I tried was version 3.11. It wasn't great. Windows 7 was decent. I suspect most would agree Windows Vista and Windows 8 weren't. Related: How Apple may solve its Google Search problem The operating system is a huge program. It consists of many smaller programs. The graphical interface you see when you use it is just a shell or desktop environment. The main program that interacts with hardware and controls all the other processes including the graphical interface, is called the kernel. Why do I have such a low opinion of Windows? I'd probably need a couple of articles to express my opinion on just that topic. For now, let's focus on one key problem: Microsoft's approach to how applications made by other companies interact with the Windows kernel. pop_jop/GettyImages If you use Microsoft (MSFT) Windows long enough, you'll eventually witness its infamous Blue Screen of Death (BSOD). Why does the BSOD happen? It happens when the kernel enters a state where it can't recover from an error. Applications can run in two modes, user mode or kernel mode. The application running in kernel mode can do pretty much anything, and if the developer hasn't been very careful, it can break stuff easily. For example, if you have a sound card with a Realtek chip, you need drivers for it. As the kernel controls the hardware, this driver should ideally be part of the kernel. That is the default approach on Linux. Windows does it better, right? Related: Apple WWDC underwhelms fans in a crucial upgrade I'll simplify things a bit here, saying that Windows drivers are applications that run in the kernel mode. Unlike Linux drivers, which are not applications but code that has been vetted by Linux developers to be merged into the kernel, Windows drivers are applications that sometimes misuse kernel-mode "powers" and behave like they're in the Wild West. I can't remember how many times I had to remove Realtek sound drivers from someone's machine while I was still working in IT. They are my favorite cause of BSOD. More Tech Stocks: Amazon tries to make AI great again (or maybe for the first time)Veteran portfolio manager raises eyebrows with latest Meta Platforms moveGoogle plans major AI shift after Meta's surprising $14 billion move Talking about BSODs, do you remember the CrowdStrike incident? In July 2024, CrowdStrike released an update that caused hundreds of millions of computers running Windows to be stuck on a BSOD. Needless to say, the CrowdStrike application that caused the problem was running in kernel mode (It has a "kernel driver" to be technical). David Weston, vice president of Enterprise and OS Security at Microsoft, wrote after the incident: "Kernel drivers are often utilized by security vendors for potential performance benefits." It seems that the incident made Microsoft think about whether the performance benefits are worth it. Weston announced on Microsoft's blog on June 26th that the company will deliver a private preview of the Windows endpoint security platform to a set of Microsoft Virus Initiative partners in July. "The new Windows capabilities will allow them to start building their solutions to run outside the Windows kernel. This means security products like anti-virus and endpoint protection solutions can run in user mode just as apps do," wrote Weston. Related: Analyst sends Alphabet warning amid search market shakeup It will be interesting to see if Microsoft mandates in the future that all cybersecurity vendors use this new userspace system. If they do, it might cause some backlash, as Microsoft would be the only one left with a kernel-mode performance advantage for its cybersecurity software. The company is also simplifying the "unexpected restart experience" (a kind name for a BSOD). They provided the picture, and it looks like that BSOD will become a black screen of death. The company will also introduce Quick Machine Recovery (QMR), a recovery mechanism for machines that cannot restart successfully. In a widespread outage, Microsoft can use QMR to deploy fixes to affected devices via the Windows Recovery Environment. It should be generally available later this summer, together with the new BSOD experience. Related: OpenAI makes shocking move amid fierce competition, Microsoft problems The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lewis Hamilton Called Out 'BS Scenes' in F1 Movie Says Damson Idris
Lewis Hamilton Called Out 'BS Scenes' in F1 Movie Says Damson Idris originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Lewis Hamilton isn't just lending his name to the upcoming F1 movie, he's shaping it's authenticity. Actor Damson Idris, who plays the lead role in the Hamilton-co-produced Apple Original Film, opened up about Hamilton's involvement on set and how the seven-time world champion made sure the movie didn't drift into Hollywood fiction. 'He kinda called [expletive] on some of the sequences that wouldn't happen in real life,' Idris revealed in a recent interview. 'It was really just a sense of encouragement from Lewis. Anytime he came on set — everyone would be really excited.' The film, directed by top gun: Maverick's Joseph Kosinski and produced by Jerry Bruckheimer, stars Idris as a former F1 driver making a comeback. Hamilton, who has been deeply involved in ensuring the film reflects the reality of the sport, helped tweak scenes to reflect the intensity and complexity of life in the paddock. According to Idris, Hamilton's input went beyond technical accuracy — he brought motivation and mentorship. 'He'd congratulate me and encourage me to keep going, and that fuelled me throughout the whole process of filming,' the actor added. While most of the film remains under wraps ahead of its international release, these behind-the-scenes insights offer a glimpse into the level of care Hamilton is putting into the project. For a sport often misunderstood in pop culture, Hamilton's insistence on realism could be what sets this film apart. In short: when Hollywood tried to overtake F1 reality, Lewis Hamilton hit the brakes. With global fan anticipation building, and Hamilton's stamp of authenticity behind it, the movie could do for F1 what top gun: Maverick did for fighter jets — and Hamilton wouldn't have it any other story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 17, 2025, where it first appeared.
