Elon Musk says he has created a new US political party
Image: X
Elon Musk, an ex-ally of US President Donald Trump, said on Saturday that he had launched a new political party in the US to challenge what the tech billionaire described as the country's "one-party system."
The world's richest person - and Trump's biggest political donor in the 2024 election - had a bitter falling out with the president after leading the Republican's effort to slash spending and cut federal jobs as head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Musk has clashed with Trump over the president's massive domestic spending plan, saying it would explode the US debt, and vowed to do everything in his power to defeat lawmakers who voted for it.
Now he has created the so-called America Party, his own political framework, through which to try and achieve that.
"When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy," the Space X and Tesla boss posted on X, the social media platform that he owns.
"Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom."
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
Musk cited a poll -- uploaded on Friday, US Independence Day -- in which he asked whether respondents "want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system" that has dominated US politics for some two centuries.
The yes-or-no survey earned more than 1.2 million responses.
"By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!" he posted on Saturday.
Musk also shared a meme depicting a two-headed snake and the caption "End the Uniparty."
It is not clear how much impact the new party would have on the 2026 mid-term elections, or on the presidential vote two years after that.
The Trump-Musk feud reignited in dramatic fashion late last month as Trump pushed Republicans in Congress to ram through his massive domestic agenda in the form of the One Big Beautiful Bill.
Musk expressed fierce opposition to the legislation, and ruthlessly attacked its Republican backers for supporting "debt slavery."
He vowed to launch a new political party to challenge lawmakers who campaigned on reduced federal spending only to vote for the bill, which experts say will pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the US deficit.
"They will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," Musk said earlier this week.
After Musk heavily criticised the flagship spending bill -- which eventually passed Congress and was signed into law -- Trump threatened to deport the tech tycoon and strip federal funds from his businesses.
"We'll have to take a look," the president told reporters when asked if he would consider deporting Musk, who was born in South Africa and has held US citizenship since 2002.
On Friday after posting the poll, Musk laid out a possible political battle plan to pick off vulnerable House and Senate seats and become "the deciding vote" on key legislation.
"One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts," Musk posted on X.
All 435 US House seats are up for grabs every two years, while about one third of the Senate's 100 members, who serve six-year terms, are elected every two years.
Some observers were quick to point out how third-party campaigns have historically split the vote -- as businessman Ross Perot's independent presidential run in 1992 did when it helped doom George H.W. Bush's re-election bid resulting in Democrat Bill Clinton's victory.
"You are pulling a Ross Perot, and I don't like it," one X user wrote to Musk.
THE MERCURY
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
6 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Eight migrants deported from Djibouti to South Sudan: US Homeland Security
The fate of the migrants had become a flashpoint in the fight over the legality of the Trump administration's campaign to deter immigration through high-profile deportations to so-called "third countries" where migrants say they face safety concerns, which has already gone from lower courts to the Supreme Court twice. South Sudan has long been dangerous even for local residents. The US state department advises citizens not to travel there due to violent crime and armed conflict. The UN has said the African country's political crisis could reignite a brutal civil war that ended in 2018. The eight men — who according to their lawyers are from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Sudan and Vietnam — had argued their deportations to South Sudan would violate the US constitution, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. They had been held in US custody in Djibouti since a federal judge in Boston in May blocked the Trump administration from immediately moving them to South Sudan over due process concerns. Following additional litigation, the Supreme Court on Thursday sided with the administration, lifting those limits. Two courts considered requests from the migrants' lawyers on an emergency basis on Friday, when courts are otherwise closed for the holiday, but ultimately US district judge Brian Murphy in Boston said the Supreme Court order required him to deny their bid, clearing the way for their deportation. The location of the men in South Sudan after their arrival was not immediately known.
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
The great Bitcoin power shift has large holders dumping 500 000 coins
A silent transfer of control is reshaping the $2.1 trillion (R37 trillion) Bitcoin market. Image: File A silent transfer of control is reshaping the $2.1 trillion (R37 trillion) Bitcoin market. A steady stream of sales by long-time whales - miners, offshore funds and anonymous wallets - is being matched almost one-for-one by institutional players like ETFs, corporates and asset managers. The result: Bitcoin is struggling to break out of its record high around $110 000, volatility is evaporating, and its place in the investment landscape is being reshaped. Despite a flurry of bullish headlines - from corporate treasuries embracing Bitcoin to the Trump administration's full-throated crypto endorsement - the largest digital currency has remained stuck in its trading range for months. Underneath the surface, long-dormant whales have been trimming positions just as institutions ramp up their buying. And this switchover is gradually recasting Bitcoin's identity from a high-octane trade to a slow-burn allocation. Over the past year, large holders, or Bitcoin whales, have offloaded more than 500 000 Bitcoin - worth over $50 billion at current prices - according to data compiled by 10x Research. That's roughly equal to the net inflows into the wildly successful US exchange-traded funds since their approval. And it's not far off from the $65bn amassed over the past five years by crypto treasury pioneer Michael Saylor and his firm, now known as Strategy. Many of these whales trace back to Bitcoin's earliest cycles, when it traded far below current levels. In some cases, whales aren't simply selling, they're swapping tokens for deals tied to the stock market, bypassing the open market. 'What we're seeing is a churning in the base,' said Edward Chin, co-founder of Parataxis Capital. 'A less covered driver and potential reason for the churn and increasing network activity seems to be driven by whales converting their BTC into equity exposure through in-kind contributions of BTC into financing transactions tied to the public markets.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Institutions - from ETFs and Saylor's Strategy to dozens of corporate imitators - now control about a quarter of all Bitcoin in circulation. Back in 2020, researcher Flipside Crypto estimated that about 2% of the anonymous ownership accounts that can be tracked on the cryptocurrency's blockchain controlled 95% of the digital asset. The power dynamic is shifting fast. 'Crypto is becoming less of an outlier and more established as a legitimate asset class,' said Rob Strebel, head of relationship management at the trading firm DRW, which includes crypto-focused arm Cumberland. Alongside that shift, 'we expect to see a compression in volatility.' That appears to be already taking place, dampening one of the most alluring aspects of Bitcoin to many traders. A closely watched measure of price swings has declined to the lowest level in about two years, according to Deribit's BTC Volatility Index. The gauge monitors the 30-day forward-looking annualized expectations of volatility. While the whales cut exposure, ETFs, treasury companies and other institutions combined have absorbed nearly 900 000 coins in the past year, according to 10x Research. These players now hold about 4.8 million coins, out of about 20 million Bitcoin in circulation. But even as institutions bring stability and legitimacy to the asset class, some observers warn they're also providing the long-awaited exit ramp for whales, raising the risk that it's retail and retirement investors left holding the bag if crypto sentiment falters. 'The goal for a long time has always been to make Bitcoin a palatable asset for institutional investors to provide exit liquidity in volume so the whales could cash out,' said Hilary Allen, a law professor at American University's Washington College of Law, a long-time crypto skeptic. After two straight years in which the price more than doubled, Bitcoin is still hovering around levels reached at the start of the year, despite President Donald Trump's pro-crypto agenda. Some analysts now expect Bitcoin's appreciation to be capped at 10% to 20% a year. That's a far cry from 2017's almost 1 400% surge that pushed the token into the mainstream. 'Bitcoin is probably more like boring dividend stock over time,' said Jeff Dorman, chief investment officer at Arca. 'On average it goes higher every year, but by less and less amount. It becomes more of an attractive retirement asset.' Still, the picture is incomplete. Not all whale activity is visible, and Bitcoin could prove ever-volatile soon enough, especially if a new market catalyst emerges. Regardless, one big risk right now is imbalance: If Bitcoin whales resume selling at scale while institutional flows plateau, the market could tip into steep declines. Outflows of just 2% in 2018 and 9% in 2022 triggered Bitcoin price drops of 74% and 64%, respectively, according to 10x Research. 'We are nearing a point where the market is hitting its peak,' said Fred Thiel, chief executive officer of Bitcoin miner MARA Holdings Inc., which has yet to sell any of its Bitcoin holdings. 'My personal belief, however, is we are in a very different market dynamic today.'
Daily Maverick
10 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Africa must help steer the world away from deep-sea mining
Unilateral deep-sea mining, such as that planned by the Trump administration, could have grave impacts on Africa. The continent has a vital role in global ocean stewardship and safeguarding humanity's shared future. Under President Donald Trump, the US' rush for critical minerals spans Ukraine, Greenland, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and now the last untouched frontier – the deep sea. A recent White House executive order aims to position the US as a 'global leader in seabed mineral exploration and development both within and beyond national jurisdiction'. It involves extracting critical minerals such as cobalt, copper, manganese, nickel and rare earth elements from the ocean floor through dredging, hydraulic systems and subsea drilling. Seabed or deep-sea mining (DSM) risks irreversible harm to ocean ecosystems. It involves extracting critical minerals such as cobalt, copper, manganese, nickel and rare earth elements from the ocean floor through dredging, hydraulic systems and subsea drilling. These ventures do not align with Africa's long-term economic and environmental priorities. As the global debate intensifies – led by the United Nations' International Seabed Authority (ISA) – ocean governance is being reshaped. African countries must engage collectively or risk being sidelined. The short-term economic benefits for miners are apparent, but several countries and stakeholders are concerned with the industry's long-term financial viability and environmental impact. This has stalled the finalisation of the ISA Mining Code to govern DSM activities, which has been in development since 2014. During the March 2025 ISA Council meeting, Sierra Leone, on behalf of the African Group, highlighted key concerns about DSM commencing before the code is finalised. These include potential impacts on land-based mining economies and the need to bolster the economic assistance fund. There is also a need for environmental thresholds, effective compliance and enforcement mechanisms, robust anti-corruption and transparency measures, and a fair financial model for benefit sharing. The US's planned exploration outside its waters goes against the 'common heritage of humankind' principle in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The principle requires collective global governance of seabed resources. Although the US is neither an ISA member nor a party to UNCLOS, the country has generally observed the treaty as customary international law. However, Trump's executive order enables unilateral exploitation of the global seabed. Trump's global seabed 'exploitation' It was issued barely a month after Canadian firm The Metals Company (TMC) announced it would circumvent the ISA by applying for mining licences under a US mining code. In April, TMC USA filed for licences under the 1980 US Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act to mine in the Pacific Ocean's Clarion-Clipperton Zone. Trump's executive order risks undermining decades of multilateral efforts to protect the ocean. According to ISA Secretary-General Leticia Carvalho, 'Any unilateral action threatens not only this carefully negotiated treaty (UNCLOS) and decades of successful implementation and international cooperation, but also sets a dangerous precedent that could destabilise the entire system of global ocean governance.'' The executive order has also drawn criticism from China (which shares DSM interests), France and the European Commission for its apparent violation of international law. Even before the order was issued, 33 developed and developing countries called for a precautionary pause on DSM until scientific certainty ensured its safety. June's UN Ocean Conference (UNOC3) in France saw global opposition to DSM grow, with 37 countries supporting a moratorium or precautionary pause. UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned that the deep sea couldn't become the 'Wild West'. Although Trump's executive order faces strong global pushback, African countries have been less vocal than other regions. 'African states should advocate for science-based decision-making and address environmental knowledge gaps to protect shared marine resources,' says Dr Kirsty McQuaid, a researcher at the Nelson Mandela University Institute for Coastal and Marine Research and African Network of Deep-water Researchers coordinator. Altered seafloor topography Addressing knowledge gaps is vital. A recent study in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone revealed that more than 44 years since DSM experiments in 1979, mining equipment tracks, sediment plumes and altered seafloor topography remain. Biodiversity was also impacted, particularly among slow-growing and endemic species. Scientists continue to sound the alarm on the irreversible harm posed to marine ecosystems. Forecasts suggest that DSM could damage African economies, particularly in land-based mineral-exporting countries. Seabed minerals could undercut the value of land-based exports like cobalt, nickel and manganese, which are major sources of revenue for several African countries. The industry could also depress terrestrial mineral prices by flooding markets with seabed-derived alternatives. The DRC, Eritrea, Gabon, Madagascar, Mauritania, Namibia, Zambia and Zimbabwe are especially vulnerable. Zambia and the DRC derive over half their export earnings and a substantial share of gross domestic product from these metals. African manganese producers such as South Africa, Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire may also be affected. Ocean governance and maritime security expert Dr Ifesinachi Okafor-Yarwood told ISS Today that the US executive order 'will likely increase competition for seabed exploitation and risk further ocean degradation'. This would undermine social equity and ecological conservation, 'which is concerning given the vital role of marine fisheries in the livelihoods of millions of Africans. Africa must establish a clear stance on DSM'. Professor Edwin Egede, an expert on international law of the sea and member of the ISA Legal and Technical Commission, agrees. 'Any unilateral appropriation of the deep seabed area and the resources therein contravenes both UNCLOS and customary international law.' He says 'Africa should raise its voice and uphold its legacy in global ocean governance, protect the common heritage of humankind developed by a rules-based international order, and ensure international cooperation and equity guide decisions shaping humanity's shared future.' African protective options African states have two possible options. First, they could ask the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea to clarify states' obligations under the 'common heritage of mankind' principle. In 2011, the tribunal affirmed that sponsoring states must comply with UNCLOS environmental standards and due diligence obligations – a decision that discourages unilateral or domestic licensing. Second, ahead of the mid-July ISA General Assembly meeting, African countries could advocate for a DSM pause to ensure environmental safeguards and address regulatory gaps. The momentum achieved at UNOC3 for the High Seas Treaty – with 50 of 60 required ratifications reached – faces serious threats from the rise of unilateral DSM activities, which weaken ocean governance. Africa has a vital role in global ocean stewardship and safeguarding humanity's shared future. By advocating for stringent environmental safeguards and equitable benefit-sharing in ISA policy discussions, African countries can prevent DSM from compromising the health of our oceans and the rights of future generations. DM
