
Gen Z Student Gets $10K 'Inheritance' From Dad, Fury Over Unexpected Twist
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A Gen Z student has revealed that the "inheritance" his father gifted them was, in fact, their own child support, prompting fury online over the betrayal.
In a post on Reddit, user u/flexgj8 said that their dad presented them with just under $10,000 on their 18th birthday, calling it money he had been saving for them "for years."
"He made a whole production of it," the original poster (OP) wrote. "Gave me a check, shook my hand, told me to spend it wisely... it meant a lot to me."
The student used the money to pay for college deposits, rent and a much-needed car repair—never questioning where it had come from.
A stock image of an upset woman sitting alone at home.
A stock image of an upset woman sitting alone at home.
Siarhei Khaletski
It wasn't until years later, during a chance conversation with their mother's old friend at a wedding, that they learned the truth: their father had been paying court-ordered child support for 12 years—but their mother never received it.
"Turns out, my dad... opened a bank account in my name, funneled the money there, and gave it to me at 18 like it was some gift from him," the OP revealed. "He basically gift-wrapped my own fking child support and called it generosity."
Newsweek reached out to u/flexgj8 via direct message on Reddit. We could not verify the details of the case.
John Nachlinger, a New Jersey-based family law attorney with over 20 years' experience, told Newsweek that this scenario is more common than people might think.
"A paying parent can't unilaterally decide to reroute payments," Nachlinger said. "A controlling parent, often one who is not subject to wage execution like a self-employed individual, will often try to dictate the terms of child support and dare the other parent to bring them back to court."
Direct payments to the child don't fulfill a court order unless specifically permitted by the order. Even if a child turns 18 or receives the money later, the law does not consider that compliance, Nachlinger said.
"The intent here is irrelevant, it doesn't excuse noncompliance," he added. "Therefore, whether the father calls it a 'gift' or not, the fact that it was not paid to the other parent constitutes a violation of a court order, and she can pursue him for all the child support arrears, which she is likely to win."
The OP said that when they confronted their father, he shrugged and said, "I knew you'd need it more than your mom."
The truth hit hard—not only because of the financial deception, but because of what their mother had endured.
"My mom worked two jobs. Skipped meals. Wore threadbare shoes so I could have new ones," the student said. "And he let her suffer while hoarding the money and pretending to be the good guy."
At the time of writing, the post had received 6,700 upvotes and over 240 comments. Many Reddit users were furious at the father's actions, calling him a "manipulator" and an "a******."
"He's a jerk. Child support was meant to help your mom provide for you. But this isn't on you, you had nothing to do with it...," one Redditor wrote.
"Your dad is an emotional manipulator and uses money as his weapon," a second user said.
"Your Dad is and was cruel to both you and your Mom. He knew exactly what he was doing and he didn't even come clean about it until you confronted him," wrote a third.
Another Redditor offered a different perspective, saying: "Your dad's a p****. But coming from someone who was raised by a narcissist who also never received a penny in child support despite a court order...I wish my dad had done for me what yours did. But that's my selfish and traumatised side speaking."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Christian Leaders Bodies Found in Mass Grave
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The bodies of eight Christian leaders who disappeared in April were discovered in a mass grave in Colombia. The victims—James Caicedo, Óscar García, Máryuri Hernández, Maribel Silva, Isaid Gómez, Carlos Valero, Nixon Peñaloza, and Jesús Valero—were conducting humanitarian and spiritual outreach in the region, according to the office of the attorney general, cited by Christian Daily International. Why It Matters The region is marked by power struggles between dissident factions of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the National Liberation Army (ELN). This massacre represents the largest recorded in Colombia in 2025, according to the Institute for Development and Peace Studies (Indepaz). Christians are often targeted in Columbia because they oppose the country's drug cartels and guerrilla groups, according to Open Doors' 2025 World Watch Report of the 50 countries where it is most difficult to be a Christian What To Know The Christian leaders were summoned by members of the FARC's Armando Ríos Front, led by Iván Mordisco, prior to their disappearance, according to initial reports from the attorney general's office. The FARC was trying to block the influence of a rival ELN cell in the area, but authorities have not found any evidence of any links between the Christians and the guerrilla group. The victims' identities and backgrounds were confirmed by Christian Solidarity Worldwide and Open Doors, which highlighted that Colombian Christian leaders, particularly those working with youth, are frequent targets of cartel or guerrilla violence. The mass grave was identified after authorities detained a guerrilla in May whose cellphone contained photos of the victims and the crime, making it possible to locate the grave. Colombian President Gustavo Petro called this massacre a grave human rights violation and called for a stronger security presence in regions affected by conflict. Stock photo of a cross atop a church, taken in Hyderabad, India, Monday, Dec. 19, 2011. Stock photo of a cross atop a church, taken in Hyderabad, India, Monday, Dec. 19, 2011. AP What People Are Saying The Evangelical Confederation of Colombia (CEDECOL) said in a statement: "We ask for prayers for peace and consolation for these families. We raise a firm voice of cry and demand that the authorities ensure that these crimes do not go unpunished, that the investigations move forward swiftly, and that real guarantees are provided for the protection of the lives and integrity of those who exercise spiritual leadership in the most vulnerable regions of the country." The daughter of one of the victims told SEMANA newspaper that the Petro administration should be "present and to avoid these types of situations, because currently two armed groups are fighting over territory, and the peasantry is caught in the middle, and there is no response from the state, no protection from the state. In other words, we are truly alone in a war between two armed groups." What Happens Next Investigations are ongoing by the Colombian attorney general's office, and the Evangelical Confederation has called for urgent protection measures. International organizations are monitoring further developments and urging the Colombian government to address violence against religious and social leaders in rural regions


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Green Card Holder Wrongfully Detained by ICE For Nearly 50 Days
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A green card holder who has been in the United States for 20 years spent over a month in federal custody, according to KSL News. Junior Dioses, a lawful permanent resident, was returning from a trip to Peru on April 28 when federal agents stopped him at a Texas airport. Dioses spent two days in custody at the airport, followed by 48 days detained at an ICE facility in Conover, Texas. "When I was there, I kept thinking every day, 'Why am I here?'" Dioses told KSL News. Newsweek has contacted the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP, as well as the man's attorney, for comment. A man holds a United States Permanent Resident card, otherwise known as a Green Card. Image for illustration purposes only. A man holds a United States Permanent Resident card, otherwise known as a Green Card. Image for illustration purposes only. Getty Images Why It Matters The case comes amid a crackdown on immigration by President Donald Trump's administration. The Republican leader pledged to remove millions of immigrants without legal status as part of a hard-line mass deportation policy. However, concerns have been raised as dozens of cases have emerged of green card holders getting caught in the immigration raids. The White House has said that anyone living in the country illegally is a "criminal." What To Know Federal immigration authorities pointed to two prior convictions, one for failing to stop for a police officer in 2006 and another for disorderly conduct in 2019, as grounds for deportation, according to KSL News. The man's attorney argued that his client's record does not justify deportation under immigration law. Adam Crayk, managing partner at Stowell Crayk, said that while permanent residents can be deported for offenses that meet certain legal criteria, Dioses' past charges fall short of that standard. Crayk pointed out that existing case law makes it clear these offenses are not considered crimes involving moral turpitude. He also criticized immigration authorities for pursuing deportation without fully understanding the law, saying they wrongly detained Dioses and started removal proceedings that should never have been initiated. "Most people when they think of '(deporting) criminals' they don't think of Junior. They think of the guy selling drugs to our kids, that guy (who) murdered someone, that guy (who) engaged in horrific violent behavior," Crayk told KSL News. "Permanent residents can be deported ... if you do things that under our law qualify for deportable offenses." "There's already case law that says these are not crimes involving moral turpitude," Crayk added. "Had anyone on the government side done the research, they would have known they had inappropriately incarcerated and inappropriately begun deportation proceedings against someone who should have never been in that type of position." Under U.S. immigration law, any noncitizen convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude — if it was committed within five to ten years of admission and resulted in a sentence of at least one year in jail — can be deported. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services confirms that this standard is well established, with "extensive" case law describing moral turpitude as conduct so offensive that it "shocks the public conscience" and is "inherently base, vile, or depraved, contrary to the rules of morality and the duties owed between man and man, either one's fellow man or society in general." Crayk said that Dioses' prior offenses do not meet this definition under the law. Although he filed a motion to end the deportation proceedings — which the government did not challenge — Dioses was still held for another week. Crayk says this extra time in custody was likely caused by bureaucratic uncertainty about a possible appeal that ultimately never happened. What People Are Saying Crayk told KSL News: "He didn't have his green card taken away. He's still a permanent resident and on track to become a citizen. For Junior to spend 48 days in an immigration custody on charges that were never legitimate." Dioses told the outlet: "I just want to spend time with my kids, go to the lake and have fun."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Global Aerospace's SM4 Aviation Safety Program on the Shifting Security Landscape Within the Business Aviation Industry
Emerging Security Threats in Business Aviation: Activism and Down-Route Risks Morris Plains, NJ, July 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The security landscape for business aviation is shifting, and operators must remain vigilant. In recent years, operators have encountered increasing ground-based threats unrelated to traditional geopolitical instability. Instead, organized non-state actors (activists, opportunists and localized disruptors) who perceive business aviation as a symbolic or tactical target have begun taking aim at aviation. Threats have evolved. They can range from climate activists breaching airport fences to high-profile vandalism of parked jets and targeting of the C-suite. These are not isolated incidents but part of a growing trend in which operators must prepare for deliberate, targeted interference at or near operational touchpoints—hotels, FBOs, hangars and roadways. A New Type of Risk Historically, corporate and private aviation has managed a well-defined set of risks, including geopolitical volatility, threats to the executive team in unstable regions and opportunistic petty crime. Today's threat profile includes ideologically driven groups that use disruption—especially public, visual disruption—as a means of protest and advocacy. This operational risk is now a part of the overall risk spectrum. Several recent incidents across Europe and North America have involved protesters gaining access to business aviation terminals or apron areas. Their objectives may not be to harm individuals but to capture attention and cause operational disruption and reputational damage. These events often unfold rapidly and without prior notice, challenging traditional notions of a secure, low-risk destination. 'We're seeing a growing convergence between social and political activism and the high-profile events our clients attend, like annual meetings, conferences and summits where their executives are increasingly visible,' says John Cauthen, Vice President of Aviation Security at MedAire. 'In light of recent tragedies targeting corporate leadership, operators must factor reputational risk and personal safety into even the most routine down-route planning.' In addition, the movement of high-net-worth individuals and corporate leadership can intersect with civil unrest, large-scale protests or targeted campaigns aimed at broader social or political causes. Even a well-secured FBO may be adjacent to vulnerable public access points or infrastructure susceptible to demonstration-related blockages. A location's threat landscape can shift, particularly in countries where lawful protests can still create unpredictable effects on crew, passengers or assets. Importantly, it also reflects the need for collaboration among flight operations teams, airport authorities and local intelligence sources to preserve business continuity without compromising safety. Unlike commercial aviation, business aviation operations may rely on a leaner in-house infrastructure. Flight departments often collaborate with third-party handlers, local agents or concierge services for trip support. While efficient, this model can sometimes lead to underestimating ground-based risk exposure, particularly in otherwise 'safe' regions. Some vulnerabilities include: Unsecured or low-visibility airport perimeters, where access points may be inadequately monitored Crew accommodation in city centres during periods of political tension or mass gatherings Publicly visible tail numbers or branding that identify aircraft to activists or opportunists Security planning that overlooks last-mile transport between the airport and the hotel Security incidents affecting business aviation do not need to involve violence to have an operational impact. A protest delaying crew movements, blocking access to a hangar or resulting in an unauthorized photograph of a sensitive client can all trigger reputational, financial or compliance concerns for operators. Preparing for the Next Security Disruption While the nature of threats continues to evolve, the principles of risk mitigation remain consistent: vigilance, adaptability and pre-emptive planning. Flight departments and operators should consider the following: Conducting proactive threat and risk assessments before each trip, especially when major political, economic or environmental events occur Developing alternate routing and secure transport options in high-density urban or politically active areas Training crew members to recognize early signs of escalating protest activity or suspicious behavior Strengthening coordination with local airport security teams and requesting additional support when warranted Establishing contingency communications plans if local disruptions affect mobile networks or access to primary support channels Briefing crew and passengers on conduct in public spaces This final point is essential when traveling to locations with elevated protest activity or press presence. Even inadvertent engagement with demonstrators or journalists can escalate tensions or lead to reputational fallout. Operators should brief crew and passengers on how to politely disengage from protestors or media without making political statements and clearly instruct them to refer any questions to the appropriate company spokesperson. Providing straightforward, rehearsed responses can help everyone stay calm and professional if approached. Final Thoughts Security is no longer a background consideration but an operational imperative that must be monitored and managed, like weather or aircraft maintenance. Activism and civil disruption are unlikely to diminish in the current global climate, and business aviation's visibility makes it a potential flashpoint for targeted actions. By recognizing that ground risks can emerge even in politically stable environments, operators are better positioned to implement practical, layered strategies that protect their people and preserve operational continuity. The stakes may vary, but the expectation is always the same: every journey ends safely, no matter what happens on the ground. About Global Aerospace SM4 Aviation Safety ProgramThe Global Aerospace SM4 Safety Program has revolutionized the way insurance specialists help their clients achieve higher levels of operational safety. SM4 was built on the concept of integrating four critical safety components: planning, prevention, response and recovery. Its mission is to help organizations manage risk, enrich training efforts, strengthen safety culture and improve safety management systems. Global Aerospace SM4 Aviation Safety Program Media Contact Suzanne Keneally Vice President, Group Head of Communications +1 973-490-8588Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data