logo
Prince Philip's mother reveals the 'rapid transformation' he went through days before his engagement to the Queen

Prince Philip's mother reveals the 'rapid transformation' he went through days before his engagement to the Queen

Daily Mail​16 hours ago
Prince Philip 's mother claimed that her son underwent a rapid transformation days before his engagement to Elizabeth was announced as he prepared for his new life in the Royal Family.
It's 78 years today since the then-Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten announced their engagement.
According to Philip's mother, Princess Alice, Philip was not the same man before and after the announcement.
Writing in her book 'Elizabeth and Philip', Tessa Dunlop claims that Alice witnessed a 'rapid transformation in her son'.
Dunlop wrote: 'Alice witnessed a rapid transformation in her son. Two days earlier she'd help him pack, and then his levels of excitement had been reminiscent of Philip's "eager tail-wagging days" as a schoolboy, when he moved from pillar to post.
'Overnight her son made the transition and it was with a note of satisfaction that Alice wrote to her brother Dickie [Lord Mountbatten] in India: "It amused me very much to be waiting with the rest of the family, for Philip to come down grandly with Bertie, Elizabeth and Lillibet".'
However, Philip's sudden transformation had been a year in the making after the couple secretly got engaged in 1946 but waited until Elizabeth was 21 to make a formal announcement.
So when the happy couple emerged from Buckingham Palace to wave at cheering well-wishers on the Mall, Elizabeth and Phillip - unsurprisingly - looked every bit like the dutiful public servants they would become in the decades after their marriage.
Royal aides spun the fairytale story of the beautiful 21-year-old heir to the throne and the ruggedly handsome war hero who - as a member of the Greek royal family - had renounced his own princely titles to serve with distinction as a British officer in the Royal Navy.
And following a period of crisis for the Royals - with the abdication crisis that saw Elizabeth's father become king - Elizabeth and Philip proved that the future of the crown was in safe hands.
But while 'Lilibet' and Philip - now the most 'in-demand' couple in London - embarked on a round of celebratory balls and parties, not everyone at the Palace was quite so delighted.
Sir Alan Lascelles, her father George VI's private secretary, spoke for many courtiers and some in the Royal Family when he wrote of Philip: 'They felt he was rough, uneducated and would probably not be faithful.'
Elizabeth's father King George VI was so concerned that the couple's burgeoning romance may be a short-lived teenage infatuation that when Philip asked for her hand in marriage in 1946, he insisted they wait a year until after Elizabeth's 21st birthday before making any public announcement.
By modern standards, the couple's engagement was short. After a courtship that spanned eight years and a global conflict, they were married on November 20, 1947 at Westminster Abbey, just four months after the Princess first showed off her engagement ring.
The ring had special symbolic value that speaks volumes about their respective backgrounds.
It was specially made from a platinum band set with diamonds taken from a tiara Alice had worn on her wedding day.
Princess Alice's life is one of the most remarkable in the history of the Royal Family.
She was born Victoria Alice Elizabeth Julia Mary on 25 February 1885 at Windsor Castle in the presence of her great-grandmother, Queen Victoria.
Shortly after her birth it was discovered that Alice was congenitally deaf but could speak clearly and lip read in several languages.
While at the Coronation of King Edward VII in 1902, she met and fell in love with Prince Andrew, a younger son of the King of Greece - a year later the couple were wed.
Alice married into the Greek Royal Family at a tumultuous time with the family exiled from the country in 1921, the same year Prince Philip was born.
By 1930 she was hearing voices and believed she was having intimate relationships with Jesus and other religious figures. She was diagnosed as schizophrenic before being treated by Sigmund Freud at a clinic in Berlin.
When Charles' grandmother was released from the the sanatorium in 1932, she drifted between modest German B&Bs before she eventually returned to Athens following the restoration of the Greek monarchy.
Alice then found herself stranded in Nazi-occupied Greece throughout WW2.
Due to her links to Germany, with her cousin serving as German ambassador to Greece until the start of the occupation, the Nazi soldiers wrongly assumed Alice was sympathetic to their cause.
Instead when a general asked Alice if there was anything he could do for her, she bravely responded: 'You can take your troops out of my country.'
During the war, she was instrumental in aiding the escape from Greece of several Jews. Alice even hid the Cohen's, Jewish family, on the top floor of her home, just yards away from Gestapo headquarters.
When the Gestapo became suspicious and questioned the Princess, she used her deafness as an excuse not to answer their questions and prevented them from entering her property.
Following the war, diamonds were used from Alice's tiara so Philip could present a ring to Princess Elizabeth, the future Queen.
Alice sold the rest of her jewels to create her own religious order, the Christian Sisterhood of Martha and Mary, in 1949, becoming a nun.
When the future King Charles III was born in 1948, Alice was living on the remote Greek island of TInos.
According to Ingrid Seward, a royal biographer, she heard the news of the birth of her grandson via a telegram.
In response she wrote: 'I think of you so much with a sweet baby of your own, of your joy and the interest you will take in all his little doings.
'How fascinating nature is, but how one has to pay for it in the anxious trying hours of confinement.'
She went on to build a convent and orphanage in a poor suburb of Athens.
The royal remained in Greece until 1967, when there was a Greek military coup. Alice refused to leave the country until Prince Philip sent a plane and a special request from the Queen to bring her home.
She spent the final years of her life living at Buckingham Palace with her son and daughter-in-law before she died in December 1969, aged 84.
The last few months of her life were fictionalised in the third season of Netflix's The Crown, played by Jane Lapotaire. The series incorrectly suggested she gave a tell-all interview with the Guardian, covering topics about her mental health condition.
Shortly before her death, she wrote a heartbreaking letter to her only son, that read: 'Dearest Philip, Be brave, and remember I will never leave you, and you will always find me when you need me most. All my devoted love, your old Mama.'
In 1994, 25 years after Alice's death, her son attended a ceremony in Jerusalem to honour his mother, who is buried in a crypt at Gethsemane on the Mount of Olives.
In honour of her courage during the war, when she saved her friends, the Cohen family, from certain death, she was given the title of Righteous Among The Nations.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

My nosy neighbour showed me pictures of my husband cheating with his colleague – but has she done me a favour?
My nosy neighbour showed me pictures of my husband cheating with his colleague – but has she done me a favour?

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

My nosy neighbour showed me pictures of my husband cheating with his colleague – but has she done me a favour?

DEAR DEIDRE: THE nosiest neighbour in town told me something no woman wants to hear – my husband is cheating. She was almost gleeful as she knocked on my door last week. My husband was at a physio session. This woman is elderly and a real curtain-twitcher. She couldn't wait to inform me that my husband's colleague had been staying over whenever I was away. She showed me photos she'd taken of her leaving our house. Now my head is spinning. We've had a few incidents with this neighbour before. She knocks on the door with a parcel she has taken in, but always seems to know what the contents are. Once I caught her reading a letter she had fished out of our bin. She said she was looking for space because her 'bin was full'. But has she actually done me a favour? My husband went back to work a year after a car accident. His employer allowed him to make a phased return. He hasn't been up to driving yet, so after a week of getting the bus into town, a new colleague offered to pick him up. He's 45 and he told me she was 25. I had no objections. I thought it was kind of her to volunteer to give him a lift. I'm 42 and my job takes me all over the country so I'm often away overnight. Cheating and can you get over it Because of his injuries, we've not had sex for months — and now I find out he's giving it to someone else. I don't know how to even tackle the conversation with him. DEIDRE SAYS: I'm afraid you don't have a choice – you have to talk to him. Find a quiet moment to tell him what the neighbour showed you and listen carefully to his response. If this woman has been staying over, he has a lot of explaining to do. If he is remorseful, only you can decide if you are prepared to work on your relationship and forgive him. He has hurt you so he will have to prove himself for any trust to return. Please don't allow him to pull the wool over your eyes with some ridiculous explanation. There really isn't any genuine innocent reason why this woman should have stayed overnight in your home, with your husband, without your prior knowledge. Talking to a counsellor in a safe space can be beneficial. My support pack, How Counselling Can Help, explains more. SHOULD I END IT WITH LAZY OVERSEAS ONLINE GUY? DEAR DEIDRE: ALL my energy is being sapped by my long-distance relationship. My boyfriend is rubbish. I'm a woman of 27 and I met him online five years ago. I am American and I came to the UK to do a masters degree. Before I left the States, I met a man of 30 online from a different state. We never actually met before I came away to study. The relationship started out as chat and then it became sexual. He would ask me to send explicit photographs, which I did. We had video sex once too. Since then the relationship hasn't progressed. He shows no sign of wanting to meet me. He doesn't support me financially or emotionally. He doesn't even answer or return my calls. It's all on his terms. Should I walk away? DEIDRE SAYS: Yes. He is bringing nothing to the table and while you can't expect financial support from him, it would be good to know if he sees a future with you. You could ask him, but don't hold your breath. It sounds as if you're an online booty call for him. It is always better if you can find somebody local where there is a mutual interest but it's not always easy. If you find someone new, really get to know them so you can be certain they want the same things as you do, and as a rule of thumb – don't send any photograph that you wouldn't be happy for your parents to see. MY WIFE'S STOPPED ENJOYING SEX NOW DEAR DEIDRE: I STILL have regular sex with my wife but it's a long time since she's had an orgasm. In our younger years we used to be sex-mad. We are both 61 now and my wife often seems to want physical intimacy when I do – she doesn't turn me down when I initiate it anyway. But she doesn't seem to enjoy it as she used to. It's a case of her enduring it rather than liking it. We still enjoy doing things together, going on nice holidays and watching films with each other. We cuddle and hold hands. I've asked her about sex and whether she enjoys it but she says: 'It's OK.' I want to make her feel like she did when we were in our twenties. DEIDRE SAYS: It is good for you physically and mentally to have sex for as long as you can. You're both in your early 60s and there's no reason why this should stop. Your wife may not feel physically the same and it may take her a little longer to get aroused because of her age and the menopause. Kissing, caressing, and massage can all help her to feel good and it's important to not have sex until she's ready. Use lubrication if that helps. My support pack Love And The Mature Woman will offer advice, along with one called Helping Your Partner To Orgasm. I'M ADDICTED TO BUYING THINGS DEAR DEIDRE: MY online shopping habit is completely out of control even though I live off my pension. I'm a man of 56 and I live alone. I've never had a relationship with anyone – ever. When I went to my nephew's wedding, I wore a three-piece suit I'd had for years. I guess it would be considered 'vintage'. I was getting lots of compliments from men and women, saying I looked 'sharp' or 'cool'. It gave me such a buzz. The attention felt so good. I'd never thought about my appearance or been interested in clothes so much, so I started shopping on my tablet. It seemed so easy. I bought a few items and then I went to a barbers and had a haircut. They suggested I grow my facial hair into a 'trendy beard with a spaghetti moustache' – so I did it! I went to my local social club and had such a nice time talking to people and feel I've reinvented myself. The attention just keeps on coming and I'm having the time of my life. It all comes at a cost though and my credit card bill is now massive. I know that I have got to stop but I feel that I'm addicted to improving my image. DEIDRE SAYS: You'll need to try to pay off some of your credit card but without an income, it might prove difficult. To make a dent in your debts, make a con­cer­ted effort to sell some things you no longer need. There are lots of different auction sites. Ask a friend or relative to help you if you're not sure how to go about it. My support pack Solving Debt Problems will show you where to find free assistance to help you get this sorted out. You can find further support through Action On Addiction, who can advise you about shopping problems too and assist you in getting the right help (

Special needs children deserve a better start
Special needs children deserve a better start

Times

time2 hours ago

  • Times

Special needs children deserve a better start

Alfie is 11 and looks angelic in the rare moments he is asleep, but the minute he wakes up he begins to rock and grind his teeth. At school he was friendless, getting into fights, smashing his fist through windows. He no longer speaks, can barely write his own name and has been diagnosed as being on the autistic spectrum, with ADHD and low self-esteem. His single mother has spent four years trying to get a formal assessment, while Alfie languishes on the waiting list. Flick through Mumsnet, switch on Woman's Hour, listen at the school gates and you will hear horrific stories of distraught parents fighting to get provision for their challenged children so they can receive specialist help. Yet now the government is threatening to reform the special educational needs and disabilities (Send) system. Ministers are considering scaling back the use of education, health and care plans (EHCPs) which legally require councils to provide these vulnerable children with a set amount of support, from a dedicated teaching assistant to special schools or paid transport. • Keir Starmer faces fresh Labour revolt over special needs support reforms 'First, they went for the pensioners over winter fuel allowance, then they picked on adults with disabilities [over personal independence payments] and when they couldn't stuff them, they came for our children. This is not why I voted Labour,' says Alfie's mother, who has given up her work in Tesco to care for him at home and is desperate. But what can the government do? I feel sorry for the education secretary Bridget Phillipson as she attempts to get to grips with this inherited crisis. Help for children with learning difficulties and disabilities costs £12 billion a year, up from £8 billion in 2021-22. Government figures show that 638,745 children in England now have EHCPs, 11 per cent more than last year and three times more than in 2017. The number of children at specialist schools has grown to 157,000, up from 105,000 ten years ago. Councils must pick up the bill. No wonder nearly half of English local authorities say they could be driven to bankruptcy next year as they struggle to cope. They now collectively spend £1.7 billion a year on transporting Send pupils, a cost that almost equals the budget for fostering. It's easy to see why desperate councils are delaying assessments to save money and blocking families who beg for Send provision, but they won just 1.3 per cent of appeals last year, according to HM Courts and Tribunals Service data. Private specialist schools can charge exorbitant rates to educate children who have been given a programme. Meanwhile those with the most complex needs who already have EHCPs have seen their funding fall by a third in real terms over the past decade. And less troublesome children with what are considered milder learning disabilities such as dyslexia, who still require professional help, are often being shunted to the bottom of the pile, unable to excel in unruly, packed classes. My mother was the head of a special needs school; I know how desperate parents and pupils feel when they can't get the assistance they urgently require. Labour backbenchers might kick up a fuss but the government has to act and for once, ministers appear to have a plausible plan. They want to pivot funding to early intervention, hence the announcement this week that they are resurrecting the Sure Start scheme under the banner Best Start. Much of the recent growth in demand for tailored support has come from a vast increase in children who have speech, language and communication difficulties, alongside social, emotional and mental health conditions. Many, particularly since the pandemic, enter the system without having learnt how to be school-ready and socialised; they and their parents would benefit hugely from expert advice at Best Start centres. The number of children with physical disabilities has remained static. But the other surge in demand has come from a greater diagnosis of ADHD and autism spectrum disorder. Here, the government is hoping to keep most pupils within local mainstream schools and improve support on-site so that more children can be accommodated more cheaply within state education, and they can cut the expense of lengthy journeys to specialised centres. The borough of Barking and Dagenham in east London has shown a way forward. A decade ago, it realised that well-equipped inclusion units within mainstream primary and secondary schools that allowed siblings to stay together and be educated locally would be both cost effective and beneficial for all pupils. Children spend time in their age-group classrooms, which have higher staff to pupil ratios, while benefiting from breakout support from a multi-disciplinary team of educators, educational psychologists and speech and language therapists for the neurodiverse. The council was one of only a few in England not to overspend on its high needs block allocation in 2022-23. But to match this, our currently under-resourced schools, with their inadequate classroom help and often antiquated facilities, will need more financial aid and tailored teaching, rather than handing the cash to specialist schools and taxi drivers. For the past 11 years, since EHCPs were introduced, we have incentivised heads to offload and exclude their most challenging children rather than finding the means to embrace their differences where possible and help them to interact with their peers. This has created an unsustainably expensive system that diverts money from mainstream schools, threatens to bankrupt councils and thwarts stressed parents and children with learning difficulties. Let's hope that in contrast to their recent intervention on welfare reform, Labour backbenchers have the courage and intelligence to support necessary change.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store